Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Glutened By Caramel Colour In Coke?


kristionii

Recommended Posts

kristionii Rookie

Hi

I've been on a gluten free diet for 2 months now. I've had both a positive and negative blood test, and an inconclusive endoscopy over the course of 1.5 years, and decided upon myself to go gluten-free to see if it made a difference. So far, I've only been sick once, during my 1st week doing gluten-free after I ate McDonalds fries : :o

I got incredibly sick right after dinner tonight, and I'm scratching my head. I had rice pasta with a slice of cheese, salad with ranch dressing, and a glass of coke (which I very very rarely drink). I looked at the Coke bottle and it said "caramel colour" on it. I know theres alot of debate surrounding caramel colour, and most people say its safe if made in teh USA or Canada (I live in Canada). And I've read others that say its NOT safe.

Has anyone else had any experience with this? I honestly can't figure out what made me so sick.

Maybe it's all the Halloween chocolate :D !

Thanks,

K.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Caramel color should not be a gluten issue.

Some people have issues with dairy, while they heal.

I can't crawl in your shoes, but it took me about six months before I got a grasp on the diet. As well as learning the difference between a "glutenening" and the healing process, when every other thing I ate bothered me.

You will have lots of trials. And sometimes, answers are hard to figure out.

Chocolate, huh? Yum (my downfall), but too much of anything is hard on a compromised system.

psawyer Proficient

Coca-cola products in Canada and the USA are gluten-free. The caramel colour (color) is made from corn. The same is true of the beverages made by Pepsi.

tarnalberry Community Regular

any chance you're using the same colander to strain the rice pasta that you used to use for wheat pasta? that would definitely be a risk factor.

RideAllWays Enthusiast

Maybe it's a corn issue? I know I can't havce corn...

lovegrov Collaborator

There really is no debate about caramel color. It's safe. And Coke is most definitely gluten-free.

richard

Ahorsesoul Enthusiast

I can't handle McDs fries. I don't even drive in for a drink there. Too many kids working there that do not realise the importance of keeping clean a uncontaminated fryer.

I worked in fast foods and so did my ds. Know too much about what goes on when the managers are not looking (or not interested).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Eric-C Enthusiast

As I found out last year, Coke made in Mexico is not gluten-free.

Coke sold in glass bottles and made with 'real sugar', or Mexican Coke which they have been selling here in the US as a speciality item has malt in it and is not gluten-free.

Lisa Mentor
As I found out last year, Coke made in Mexico is not gluten-free.

Coke sold in glass bottles and made with 'real sugar', or Mexican Coke which they have been selling here in the US as a speciality item has malt in it and is not gluten-free.

I would assume that the Coca Cola formula is consistent world wide. Would you please show your source for this.

Maybe you are referring to something other than the trademark Coca Cola.

Ahorsesoul Enthusiast
I would assume that the Coca Cola formula is consistent world wide.

Never assume that a product that is gluten free in one country is gluten free in another. Many items items are not made with the exact same ingredients in another country. Just something else to give us all a headache or worse.

Lisa Mentor

I understand that, but we are (or I am) taking about a patented formula for Coca Cola, not a generic coke. I would find it difficult to believe that their formula differs from country to country

If there is contrary information, I would be glad to see that.

Open Original Shared Link

Ahorsesoul Enthusiast

There is plenty of information on the Internet showing the ingredients of how the Brand Name Coca Cola differs from country to country. I guess I just knew it differs since I've lived in other countries. Even between foods made in Canada and the USA differ.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
There is plenty of information on the Internet showing the ingredients of how the Brand Name Coca Cola differs from country to country. I guess I just knew it differs since I've lived in other countries. Even between foods made in Canada and the USA differ.

I agree. Even here in the states for example a beverage that comes out of a fountain or a speed bar can have different ingredients than one you buy bottled in a store even if the same company makes it and markets it under the same name. Companies change their formulas all the time I can't even count how many times a new Coke has come out. I do however agree that if it is one of the ones made here in the US it should be safe.

Eric-C Enthusiast

Lisa,

Here is a start:

Open Original Shared Link

That right there is a differnece in the main ingredient, sugar. That article you quoted most likely only concerned products produced and bottled in the US.

Coke and other products are bottled regionally and no, its not all the same. If you travel around the country you will find it tastes different everywhere. The 'formula' that Coke ships them might be the same, but there is a difference in the level of sweetening, the water used, etc.

Mountain Dew in Canada is caffeine free.

Coke in Europe has FAR less sugar than Coke here in the US. Do some reading on GI index tests of different products and you'll find nothing is the same.

Kraft Thousand Island in Canada has a more tomatoe taste and look to it. Arby Sauce in Canada is totally different than here. Having travelled a lot, name brand foods differ from region to region.

I posted what I posted as a courtesy to others who may buy this product.

Pepsi has a product made with real cane sugar and it is bottled here in the US and is gluten free.

The issue with Coke from Mexico and malt has been discussed here before since it became available in the US. I know first hand what it does and believe it is better to error on the side of caution.

Ahorsesoul Enthusiast

Yep, we have to be on our guard all the time.

Of course Coca Cola was also the brilliant company that thought they'd change the formula for coke, the world's number one selling soft drink.

Open Original Shared Link

Eric-C Enthusiast

Just another example.

Worcestershire sauce made in Canada by Lea and Perrin's is malt based and is not gluten-free, but L&P made in the US is made without malt, and is gluten-free.

Lisa Mentor

This is an interesting article. This does not make reference to malt, but to the difference in sweetner used in processing Coke. I learn something every day here! ;)

By ROB WALKER

The New York Times

October 11, 2009

Spend a few years writing about consumer culture, and you might get a

little jaded about products or brands with cult followings. The

extreme-loyalist customer always insists that there are perfectly

rational reasons for his or her devotion; to the disinterested

observer, the reasons seem dubious. This is good news for me, because

it assures that I have plenty to write about. But this week, for

once, I'm casting myself in the role not of the reasonable observer

but of the dubious product-cultist.

The product is Coca-Cola that is made and bottled in Mexico. I'm not

the only person who believes that it's better: there's a Mexican Coke

Facebook page with more than 10,000 fans. "I am a (Mexican) Coke

fiend," wrote Richard Metzger on the Web site Dangerous Minds this

past August. "It is SO FREAKING DELICIOUS." Mexican Coke is "a lot

more natural tasting," another fan recently told a news program in

Idaho. "A little less harsh, I would say."

Mexican Coke cultists of course have a rational explanation:

Coca-Cola bottled in Mexico is sweetened with sugar, while the U.S.

version is (almost) always made with high-fructose corn syrup. That

is so. And it's surprising, given the degree to which uniformity

defines the Coke idea. Who knew the "secret formula" could

accommodate ingredient variation? Andy Warhol once suggested that

Coke's sameness united us all: "A Coke is a Coke and no amount of

money can get you a better Coke than the one the bum on the corner is

drinking. All the Cokes are the same and all the Cokes are good. Liz

Taylor knows it, the president knows it, the bum knows it and you

know it."

My own induction into this product cult was inadvertent and based on

aesthetics. Some years ago I noticed a glass bottle of Coke for sale,

and that was something I hadn't seen in a while. It looked great; I

enjoyed drinking it immensely. I didn't notice the "No Retornable"

and "Refresco" phrases on the 12-ounce bottle, or the ingredients. My

rational explanation was that Coke tastes better from a glass bottle

than from a plastic one or from a can. It happens that Popular

Science examined this very contention on its Web site not long ago

and allowed that as the "most inert" material in which the cola is

packaged, it's possible that glass results in a subtly more "pure,

unaltered" product than plastic or aluminum. Of course a commenter on

that site promptly chimed in that glass-bottle Coke often comes from

Mexico: "In the United States, Coke is made with CORN SYRUP. . . .

It's disgusting."

I've now heard this contention many times, but never more so than

lately, as high-fructose corn syrup has become one of the most

demonized ingredients in contemporary food culture. There's a

political angle (corn subsidies), an authenticity angle (it's

processed, very pervasive and just sounds industrial) and a paranoid

angle (the entertaining conspiracy theory that the 1985 New Coke

fiasco was an intentional failure, orchestrated to distract consumers

from an ingredient switch in Coke Classic). The upshot is the curious

celebration of sugar as natural and desirable. Pure-sugar soda fans

motivate other product cults, including Passover Coke (using sugar

instead of not-kosher-for-Passover corn syrup) available only around

the Jewish holiday, and Dr Pepper from a particular bottler in

Dublin, Tex.; Coke's biggest rival has put out a product called Pepsi

Throwback, "sweetened with natural sugar." Somehow all the reverence

for sugar manages to make high-calorie carbonated drinks sound like

health food.

The Coca-Cola Company is by now quite familiar with the Mexican Coke

cult. It is true, acknowledges a Coke spokesman, Scott Williamson,

that different sweeteners are used by the company's bottling partners

in different parts of the world, for reasons having to do with price

and availability. But, he says, "all of our consumer research

indicates that from a taste standpoint, the difference is

imperceptible."

The company principally imports the Mexican version to appeal to

immigrants who grew up with it and draw nostalgia from the packaging

they remember. Online you'll find Mexican Coke cultists offering tips

about tracking down grocers who serve a primarily Latino clientele.

Surely this is part of the fun - nobody wants to be a snob on behalf

of a product that's easy to obtain. But Coke is in the business of

supply and demand and has seen to it that Mexican Coke has found its

way into places like Kroger, Costco and a certain sandwich shop in my

not-very-Hispanic neighborhood in Georgia. I have lunch there every

week or two, and while it would be cheaper to have a can of American

Coke, I always pay extra for the 12-ounce bottle that says it's

"Hecho en Mexico." I do this because I believe it tastes better, and

I really don't care why. Spend a few years writing a column about

consumer culture, and what you learn is that we all think everyone

else's shopping quirks are weird and irrational - but that our own

make perfect sense.

Copyright 2009 The New York Times Company

Another on the change of ingredients:

Open Original Shared Link

Here is link with the ingredients for Mexican Coke and malt could hide in the Natural Flavor, but I have not found any reference to malt.

Open Original Shared Link

lovegrov Collaborator
Just another example.

Worcestershire sauce made in Canada by Lea and Perrin's is malt based and is not gluten-free, but L&P made in the US is made without malt, and is gluten-free.

And malt is petty much always clearly listed, even though not required in he U.S.

richard

positivenrgfairy Apprentice
I would assume that the Coca Cola formula is consistent world wide. Would you please show your source for this.

Maybe you are referring to something other than the trademark Coca Cola.

I live in Texas and Mexican coke is everywhere. I don't drink sodas, but my friends say the mexican cokes taste way better so there is something different about the formula for sure.

psawyer Proficient
I live in Texas and Mexican coke is everywhere. I don't drink sodas, but my friends say the mexican cokes taste way better so there is something different about the formula for sure.

It is the sweetener that is different.

sunnybabi1986 Contributor

I got sick to my stomach the other day...after drinking Gatorade!! The only thing I can figure that made me sick is the high fructose corn syrup. I stay as far away from it as possible usually, but I was trying to keep myself hydrated (I've had a sinus infection all week). I have definitely noticed that when I drink things with high fructose corn syrup, I get a stomach ache and don't feel well for several hours. Maybe that could be what set you off?

Eric-C Enthusiast

Well after posting my L&P comparison I have my doubts about the US product being gluten free.

We ate at home all week and night before last my wife made a new chilli recipe. Same tomatoe sauce we've used for years in our spaghetti sauce, same chilli powder we use in our spaghetti sauce(Penzi's, all gluten-free), Beef Stock clearly labled as gluten-free.

Basically it was all gluten-free stuff we've used for a long time. The only new item, L&P's Worcestershire Sauce.

Something was not gluten-free...and it had to be the sauce. I've stayed far away from gluten so my reactions these days are more in line with how they were years ago. There was not a lot of gluten in it, but for sure something was not gluten-free. I'm wondering since we're so close to the Canadian border if it doesn't get shipped over here, have to call them today.

psawyer Proficient

The Lea & Perrins labels are quite different in the two countries.

In the US, the label has brown letters on a tan background, and it specifically says gluten-free right on the label. The Canadian version has an orange label with black letters, and lists malt vinegar as the first ingredient.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,957
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dogdad21
    Newest Member
    Dogdad21
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      If black seed oil is working for his Afib, stick to it, but if not, I can say that ablation therapy is no big deal--my mother was out of the procedure in about 1 hour and went home that evening, and had zero negative effects from the treatment. PS - I would recommend that your husband get an Apple watch to monitor his Afib--there is an app and it will take readings 24/7 and give reports on how much of the time he's in it. Actual data like this should be what should guide his treatment.
    • Jacki Espo
      This happened to me as well. What’s weirder is that within a couple hours of taking paxlovid it subsided. I thought maybe I got glutened but after reading your post not so sure. 
    • Mari
      Hi Tiffany. Thank you for writing your dituation and  circumstancesin such detail and so well writte, too. I particularly noticed what you wrote about brain for and feeling like your brain is swelling and I know from my own experiences that's how it feel and your brain really does swell and you get migraines.    Way back when I was in my 20s I read a book by 2 MD allergist and they described their patient who came in complaining that her brain, inside her cranium, was swelling  and it happened when she smelled a certain chemical she used in her home. She kept coming back and insisting her brain actually swelled in her head. The Drs couldn't explain this problem so they, with her permission, performed an operation where they made a small opening through her cranium, exposed her to the chemical then watched as she brain did swell into the opening. The DRs were amazed but then were able to advise her to avoid chemicals that made her brain swell. I remember that because I occasionally had brain fog then but it was not a serious problem. I also realized that I was becoming more sensitive to chemicals I used in my work in medical laboratories. By my mid forties the brain fog and chemicals forced me to leave my  profession and move to a rural area with little pollution. I did not have migraines. I was told a little later that I had a more porous blood brain barrier than other people. Chemicals in the air would go up into my sinused and leak through the blood brain barrier into my brain. We have 2 arteries  in our neck that carry blood with the nutrients and oxygen into the brain. To remove the fluids and used blood from the brain there are only capillaries and no large veins to carry it away so all those fluids ooze out much more slowly than they came in and since the small capillaries can't take care of extra fluid it results in swelling in the face, especially around the eyes. My blood flow into my brain is different from most other people as I have an arterial ischema, adefectiveartery on one side.   I have to go forward about 20 or more years when I learned that I had glaucoma, an eye problem that causes blindness and more years until I learned I had celiac disease.  The eye Dr described my glaucoma as a very slow loss of vision that I wouldn't  notice until had noticeable loss of sight.  I could have my eye pressure checked regularly or it would be best to have the cataracts removed from both eyes. I kept putting off the surgery then just overnight lost most of the vision in my left eye. I thought at the I had been exposed to some chemical and found out a little later the person who livedbehind me was using some chemicals to build kayaks in a shed behind my house. I did not realize the signifance  of this until I started having appointments with a Dr. in a new building. New buildings give me brain fog, loss of balance and other problems I know about this time I experienced visual disturbances very similar to those experienced by people with migraines. I looked further online and read that people with glaucoma can suffer rapid loss of sight if they have silent migraines (no headache). The remedy for migraines is to identify and avoid the triggers. I already know most of my triggers - aromatic chemicals, some cleaning materials, gasoline and exhaust and mold toxins. I am very careful about using cleaning agents using mostly borax and baking powder. Anything that has any fragrance or smell I avoid. There is one brand of dishwashing detergent that I can use and several brands of  scouring powder. I hope you find some of this helpful and useful. I have not seen any evidence that Celiac Disease is involved with migraines or glaucoma. Please come back if you have questions or if what I wrote doesn't make senseto you. We sometimes haveto learn by experience and finding out why we have some problems. Take care.       The report did not mention migraines. 
    • Mari
      Hi Jmartes71 That is so much like my story! You probably know where Laytonville is and that's where I was living just before my 60th birthday when the new Dr. suggested I could have Celiacs. I didn't go on a gluten challange diet before having the Celiac panel blood test drawn. The results came back as equivical as one antibody level was very high but another, tissue transaminasewas normal. Itdid show I was  allergic to cows milk and I think hot peppers. I immediately went gluten free but did not go in for an endoscopy. I found an online lab online that would do the test to show if I had a main celiac gene (enterolab.com). The report came back that I had inherited a main celiac gene, DQ8, from one parent and a D!6 from the other parent. That combination is knows to sym[tons of celiac worse than just inheriting one main celiac gene. With my version of celiac disease I was mostly constipated but after going gluten-free I would have diarrhea the few times I was glutened either by cross contamination or eating some food containing gluten. I have stayed gluten-free for almost 20 years now and knew within a few days that it was right for me although my recovery has been slow.   When I go to see a  medical provide and tell them I have celiacs they don't believe me. The same when I tell them that I carry a main celiac gene, the DQ8. It is only when I tell them that I get diarrhea after eating gluten that they realize that I might have celiac disease. Then they will order th Vitamin B12 and D3 that I need to monitor as my B12 levels can go down very fast if I'm not taking enough of it. Medical providers haven't been much help in my recovery. They are not well trained in this problem. I really hope this helps ypu. Take care.      
    • knitty kitty
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.