Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Caramel Coloring


positivenrgfairy

Recommended Posts

positivenrgfairy Apprentice

I've read a few different things - I had a a reaction earlier and have definitely eaten something with caramel coloring in it. is caramel coloring gluten-free or not?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



positivenrgfairy Apprentice

I'm also reading mixed reviews about vinegar, if anyone can help with that.

seashele2 Newbie

In the U.S., caramel coloring is almost always made from corn. If it were to be made from wheat, wheat would have to be listed on the ingredient label since it is a "top 8". So, unless the ingredients say wheat, caramel coloring is gluten-free.

Vinegars vary. White vinegar is corn-derived so should be gluten-free. Cider vinegar is apple-derived so should be gluten-free. Malt vinegar has malted barley so it is NOT gluten-free. Some say the distillation process kills off the proteins, but my gastro doc, who is also celiac, said an absolute "NO!" to malt vinegar in the celiac diet.

Some of the discrepancy and confusion as to the gluten-free status of many foods arises from the fact that in the U.S., gluten-free foods don't have to be free-of-gluten. A food only has to be less than 10ppm (parts per million) of gluten content to be considered gluten-free.

Michelle

Western Washington State

lovegrov Collaborator

In the U.S. you will not find caramel coloring with gluten. In 8 years, I've never seen it.

Distilled vinegar is gluten-free. "Vinegar" is distilled vinegar and is gluten-free. Cider vinegar is gluten-free.

"Some say the distillation process kills off the proteins, but my gastro doc, who is also celiac, said an absolute "NO!" to malt vinegar in the celiac diet."

You are confused. I don't know of a single person with celiac disease or any celiac disease expert who says malt vinegar is gluten-free. Malt vinegar is NOT distilled and is most definitely not gluten-free.

richard

ravenwoodglass Mentor

The following is from the FDA website. Caramel coloring can be made from malt (barley). That would not have to be declared on the label. How often it is I don't know. The gluten would likely be in extremely small amounts but someone who is supersensitive might have issues.

Open Original Shared Link

(a)Identity. (1) The color additive caramel is the dark-brown liquid or solid material resulting from the carefully controlled heat treatment of the following food-grade carbohydrates:

Dextrose.

Invert sugar.

Lactose.

Malt sirup.

Molasses.

Starch hydrolysates and fractions thereof.

Sucrose.

lovegrov Collaborator

In 8 years I have yet to hear of anybody who has found caramel coloring with gluten. Most celiac disease experts and organizations now consider caramel coloring safe, at least in the U.S. I guess it's a personal decision, but it's just not an ingredient I worry about any more.

richard

ChemistMama Contributor

Article on caramel color and celiacs, a good read:

Open Original Shared Link

She agrees with you, lovgrov. :) Nothing to worry about from caramel color.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.