Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Disease - Only 1 In 5000 In N. America...


StacyA

Recommended Posts

StacyA Enthusiast

I have a 1992 Merck Manual (yes, I need to get a newer one) - and I was curious so I looked up Celiac Sprue, and in there it said the incidence in N. America is only 1 out of every 5000 persons. 1992 is not all that long ago, so we can definately understand why there is such ignorance in the medical community (I mean that in an 'unaware' kind of way, not 'stupid' kind of way - although some stories I hear almost suggest the latter in individual cases...)

I'll have to look in some newer versions of Merck to see how much their numbers change.

But anyway - mentioning to any of your unaware doctors the discrepencies between the thoughts in the 90's and better research now may help lift some of the ignorance.

Doctors may pay attention to the difference between 1 out of 5000 and 1 out of 133 - and hopefully say to her/himself - 'Wow, I guess I better read up on this disease.'

Just an idea.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



bittykitty Rookie

I have a 1992 Merck Manual (yes, I need to get a newer one) - and I was curious so I looked up Celiac Sprue, and in there it said the incidence in N. America is only 1 out of every 5000 persons. 1992 is not all that long ago, so we can definately understand why there is such ignorance in the medical community (I mean that in an 'unaware' kind of way, not 'stupid' kind of way - although some stories I hear almost suggest the latter in individual cases...)

I'll have to look in some newer versions of Merck to see how much their numbers change.

But anyway - mentioning to any of your unaware doctors the discrepencies between the thoughts in the 90's and better research now may help lift some of the ignorance.

Doctors may pay attention to the difference between 1 out of 5000 and 1 out of 133 - and hopefully say to her/himself - 'Wow, I guess I better read up on this disease.'

Just an idea.

Sadly, the ignorance hasn't gotten any better.I had to pull strings and drive 8 hours round trip to get the blood tests done, and have to do it again for a biopsy.My ER doctor in January didn't even know what celiac was..I had to explain it to him.Seems to me like if there isn't a pill that can treat it, it's not worth understanding.

jackay Enthusiast

Sadly, the ignorance hasn't gotten any better.I had to pull strings and drive 8 hours round trip to get the blood tests done, and have to do it again for a biopsy.My ER doctor in January didn't even know what celiac was..I had to explain it to him.Seems to me like if there isn't a pill that can treat it, it's not worth understanding.

I'm guessing the numbers are a lot higher than 1 in 133.

It really upsets me that most doctors treat the symptoms and not the causes. I think there are so many people that would be so much healthier if they would just give up gluten.

I never thought I could and here I am gluten free and surviving much better than gluten me.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,867
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Frankblole
    Newest Member
    Frankblole
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Multivitamins are generally not potent enough to effective address significant deficiencies.
    • xxnonamexx
      Try a multivitamin maybe it will cover what you are deficient in.
    • cristiana
      Agreed, and I can't remember exactly and haven't got time to check, but I think my blood didn't normalise for eight years! For years I read this forum thinking why can't I get my numbers down - everyone else manages to.   But my gastroenterologist didn't seem to worry about it, which makes me think he either thought I wasn't complying to the diet, or he'd seen similar cases.
    • trents
      Yes, being off gluten for 3 months would likely yield negative results. To get accurate testing redone you would need to restart gluten consumption for several weeks (the "gluten challenge") to the tune of at least 10g of gluten daily (about the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread).
    • trents
      That is one of the tests covered in the article I linked you above.
×
×
  • Create New...