Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Conflicting Information On Labels


brb

Recommended Posts

brb Newbie

I have seen a fair number of products that are prominently labeled gluten-free, but which also say they are processed in a plant that also processes wheat. In one instance, when I contacted the company, I got a convoluted answer that failed to clarify whether the product was actually safe. How does one make sense of the apparent inconsistency?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



domesticactivist Collaborator

I always play it safe.

kareng Grand Master

in the US, there is no legal definition for gluten-free. There is no law that they have to tell you that other things are made in the same facility or on the same machines.

As an example: Below is an explanation of how Rudis keeps the gluten & gluten-free bread separate. Some places have separate lines, some just clean between batches. The only way to know if it's an issue is to ask.

Lisa Mentor

I have seen a fair number of products that are prominently labeled gluten-free, but which also say they are processed in a plant that also processes wheat. In one instance, when I contacted the company, I got a convoluted answer that failed to clarify whether the product was actually safe. How does one make sense of the apparent inconsistency?

It's not really inconsistent. It's covering their bottoms.

In the US there is no legal standing for declaring a product gluten free. It is strictly voluntary.

What they are saying is that there is no gluten in the ingredients, but they manufacture other gluten containing products at that facility, thus a minimal change for cross contamination. Manufacturing lines are thoroughly cleaned between product changes. Some, super sensitives may react.

It's generally not something I'm concerned about.

mbrookes Community Regular

I agree. The danger lies in the level of sensitivity of the individual, and this is something you only learn by experience.

I am fairly sensitive, but generally do not have problems with stuff manufactured in the same facility as gluten. I do steer clear if it is on the same macines.

Trial and error seems to be the only way to clarify this.

ElseB Contributor

If in Canada, I would suggest alerting the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. My understanding is that such labelling would be considered inconsistent with the spirit of the new labelling requirements.

psawyer Proficient

ElseB, you are misinformed about the new regulations. Like the current regulations, they do not address contamination issues:

"These amendments will not apply to food allergens or gluten that may be present in the prepackaged product as a result of cross-contamination. The cross-contamination of prepackaged foods with food allergens or gluten are unique issues which are beyond the scope of this regulatory initiative." Open Original Shared Link

That said, the OP is in the US.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • 3 weeks later...
Coolclimates Collaborator

I hate all the games these companies play when they use their labels. It seems misleading and unfair. So I echo your frustration.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,351
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    giuseppe gamerra
    Newest Member
    giuseppe gamerra
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Thanks for the reply. 
    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.