Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

The Little Stickers They Put On Fruit


Wandering Hermit

Recommended Posts

Wandering Hermit Contributor

I love apples, but I'm worried about those little stickers they put on them. If there is gluten on stamps, I figure there might be gluten on these stickers. Peel them off and they leave a residue. I have been wiping my apples with a paper towel before I eat them, but I worry that there may still be some residue.

Plus, the shiny apples I buy clearly have some kind of waxy substance applied to the outside - is this safe?

Am I getting paranoid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

I don't think that is too paranoid. Alot of stickers have gluten in the adhesive. You could take a knife and peel that part of the skin off ...that would work

I do think by washing it off after taking the sticker off would probably do the job though so if your doing that I wouldn't worry too much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
watkinson Apprentice

Never paranoid...always careful :D

WOW! I never thought of that. I do eat a fair amount of apples. I wash them carefully and polish them up but I wonder about that resiude you were talking about. <_<

HMMMMM, Wendy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
celiac3270 Collaborator

While I think it's very good that you're being so careful, I have to disagree with the responses to this one. I don't want to discourage you from asking questions, though. While the amount of damage needed to cause gluten is small, the sticker on fruit, even if the adhesive contained wheat, would be of absolutely no risk. If we start worrying about the sticker's on foods, then we should also be avoiding all foods made in facilities that make wheat products. Then we shouldn't even be eating anything that isn't 100% natural at all--and that we can't confirm are made in 100% gluten-free fields with gluten-free fertilizer, etc. If it makes you feel better, you can rinse the piece of fruit, but seriously, it's nowhere NEAR the amount of gluten you'd need to get contaminated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wandering Hermit Contributor

celiac3270:

I hope you are right. It begs the question: how much gluten is too much? I read somewhere that it is 100 ppm. Is this pretty well accepted? It would be worth doing a simple estimate of what a bread-crumb in a normal sized, otherwise gluten-free dinner would work out to in terms of ppm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
celiac3270 Collaborator

100 ppm is the CODEX standard...200 ppm is about what it would take to cause damage. Anne Lee compared this to about 1/8 of a tablespoon of flour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lovegrov Collaborator

I've seen at least three people who have checked this out and the answer has been the same -- the stickers do NOT have gluten.

richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wandering Hermit Contributor
100 ppm is the CODEX standard...200 ppm is about what it would take to cause damage. Anne Lee compared this to about 1/8 of a tablespoon of flour.

1/8th TBSP? Seems like a lot! That is a lot bigger than a breadcrumb. Does this mean mixed in with a nominal-sized dinner? If one crumb can do you in, it must be because you had it on a relatively empty stomach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wandering Hermit Contributor

Sorry to harp on this, but something here just does not add up.

It has been stated that even if it was gluten, the sticker residue on an apple is of no risk.

Yet I am also told that:

- I should not use a wooden utensil or iron skillet that once touched flour, even if they have been scrubbed.

- I should not eat fries out of a frier that even saw one onion ring.

etc.

Surely the amount of gluten from the wooden spoon is not significantly more than the sticker residue? We are talking trace amounts in either case.

Here is a "back of the envelope" calculation of ppm. Suppose a bread crumb is 100% pure gluten (worst case). Suppose it is 1 cubic mm - thats about the size of a crumb.

Now suppose your dinner is about 500 cc's of food. I think this is a fair estimate.

In that case, at least in therms of volume, if not mass (because I am not taking the density of different food items into account) - the volume ratio is

10^-3/5x10^2 = 5.0X10-5, or 0.00005, or 50 ppm. This is an order of magnitude ESTIMATE. This is what you get if you get one crumb in your dinner. (Of course the one crumb on an empty stomach would be a different issue entirely.)

If this really is the case, I'm having a hard time seeing how a scrubbed wooden spoon used to stir a large pot of otherwise gluten-free stew is going to cause a problem.

Of course, I will still continue to use a non-gluten-free spoon, just because I am a bit paranoid and anal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
astyanax Rookie

yeah i was surprised by the response to this thread too. i brought up awhile ago that i eat american food that's gluten free according to the euro standard (since usa doesn't have one) and i thought the response was predominantly: any gluten is too much (which i totally understand, i personally find it too difficult to avoid even 'gluten free' food and feel if it's ok for europe, it's ok for me !)

i'm personally confused on this issue, although i continue eating food that's "gluten free" even if it falls in that euro standard. especially since something could look gluten free ingredient wise and end up having more gluten from cc than something labeled 'gluten free' in accordance with the european standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gabrielle Contributor

I agree with celiac3270.

It's good to be careful, but don't drive yourself crazy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
celiac3270 Collaborator

I had also thought it was a lot when Anne Lee said that. I had heard 1/48th of a slice of bread, which is a very small amount.

Yes, wooden spoons are very dangerous in terms of contamination, so any wooden spoons used for gluten should be replaced. Same with teflon. I also agree with the thing about the fryer. In reality, is it probably going to damage your villi if the spoon is scrubbed well and then stirs this gluten-free stew you speak of? No...but regardless, you're best off not doing that because if you get lenient on the wooden spoon with the stew and you occasionally use the gluten-free pan to make non-gluten-free food and you use that same plastic measuring cup for gluten-free and regular flour, it's going to add up to a substantial amount that can contaminate you.

It's a difficult topic. We don't really know exactly how much is too much, we don't really know about certain ingredients: the Europeans accept wheat starch in their gluten-free products, yet Americans and Canadians do not. We don't really know if wheat starch is okay--in some ways it's difficult to imagine that it would be, but yet, you don't hear all the European celiacs grumbling about symptoms from products which contain it.

But my point is that the adhesive from the sticker:

1) is gluten-free

2) if it did contain gluten, the adhesive wouldn't come close to enough wheat to contaminate you

3) how much of the adhesive actually sticks to the apple

4) this can be avoided simply by taking the skin off the part with the sticker or washing the apple

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SabrinaLuvsGluten Apprentice

I think if it were me, I would just do what someone else had said and cut the part with the sticker on it off with a knife and be done with it! Then I would rinse it after that...

Sabrina

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest nini

I recently read that the stickers used on fruit are made by only ONE company, AND they DO NOT use any gluten in their adhesive, so to answer the question, those particular stickers DO NOT pose any gluten risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stef-the-kicking-cuty Enthusiast

I just asked myself the same question a few days ago. And frankly said, I don't care, if anybody tells me, there's no gluten in it. I always cut it of, so I don't have problems for sure. And it's easy to do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lotusgem Rookie

I'm so glad that this topic was brought up, as it gave me pause the last time I washed an apple and pulled off that little sticker, wondering if its adhesive contained gluten. It is certainly logical, given all that we have to consider, to be concerned. I never lick envelopes or stamps, so why would a fruit sticker be any less suspect? Because it is on food? How about ESPECIALLY because it is on food, we should question it? Well thanks guys for letting us know that the stickers pose no risk. We've cleared yet another great hurdle. :lol:

Paula

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PreOptMegs Explorer

I am EXTREMELY sensitive to gluten, so I know for a fact that I would have symptoms even if it was just a small crumb, so to say that everyone can have up to x amount of ppm of gluten and be fine is an overstatement. I have experimented with my body and I know my limitations. I have learned the hard way.... you can never be too careful!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
calico jo Rookie

with me I seem to be a tiny bit tolerant, but it seems to be cumulative also. I'm not sure within how much time, or how much is my limit, but if I had several "one little bits" that on their own wouldn't cause me a problem, they could add up to make me sick.

I accidently ingested a crumb from a piece of cereal one day and within 1/2 hour I was vomitting and had diarrhea that lasted all day. It was horrible, just from that one little crumb. Or so I thought. Could be I'd had gluten elsewhere and it all just finally added up to enough to make me sick.

So when I think of ANY gluten as being too much, this is why.

As far as stickers on fruit, I peel them off, then use a scrubby sponge with a little soap and rinse well. We ought to be washing our fruit anyway. Could be all of the environmental contaminants are what led to our bodies behaving this way with NORMAL foods to begin with!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Anmol
      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
×
×
  • Create New...