Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Grrrr Gene Testing-Results Not What I Expected


powerofpositivethinking

Recommended Posts

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

so i already felt in the grey area with testing, please see my signature, and was hoping for some validation with genetic testing.  That didn't come through since it showed I don't possess DQ2 or DQ8, but instead have gluten sensitive genes which I know aren't medically backed anyway  :(

 

Here were my results:

 

Gluten Sensitivity Gene Test

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1      0303   

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2      0501   

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ   3,1  (Subtype 9,5)


 

TEST INTERPRETATION(S):

Interpretation of HLA-DQ Testing:  Although you do not possess the HLA-DQB1 genes predisposing to celiac disease (HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8), HLA gene analysis reveals that you have two copies of a gene that predisposes to non-celiac gluten sensitivity, in your case HLA-DQB1*0303 and HLA-DQB1*0501. Having two copies of a gluten sensitive gene means that each of your parents and all of your children (if you have them) will possess at least one copy of the gene. Two copies also means there is an even stronger predisposition to gluten sensitivity than having one gene, and the resultant immunologic gluten sensitivity may be more severe. This test was developed and its performance characteristics determined by the American Red Cross - Northeast Division. It has not been cleared or approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



IrishHeart Veteran

Hon, I am sorry, I have looked and looked, but I cannot  find any Pub Med, scientific or informational research that corroborates any 

 

 

" gene that predisposes to non-celiac gluten sensitivity"

 

 

But this does not exclude a NCGS diagnosis.!..if gluten makes you sick, you have a gluten intolerance

and should stay gluten-free.

IMHO  ( I am not a doctor) 

 

"Currently, there are no recommended methods to test for non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Some doctors offer saliva, blood or stool testing. However, these tests have not been validated and are therefore not accepted.  

In NFCA’s webcast, Dr. Guandalini states:

“As a matter of fact, right now, they are to say that there is absolutely no biological readout that is no way can this diagnosis can be supported by any laboratory investigation. No antibodies in the blood are specific enough, or sensitive enough, for this condition. No antibodies in the stools can be utilized to diagnose or screen for this condition.”

Dr. Fasano also touched on this topic and stated that his team is currently conducting research to identify biomarkers that may help to test for and diagnose non-celiac gluten sensitivity:

“…as Dr. Guandalini explained when the only way to make a diagnosis of gluten sensitivity is by exclusionary criteria since we do not have tests that will point in that direction. And that’s where our current efforts are all about. Now that we understand that it is a different entity we want to make sure that we can eventually identify the biomarkers for this condition, and we’re doing a double blind study to identify the biomarkers that will eventually fill the gap that Dr. Guandalini was alluding to.”

Open Original Shared Link

cyclinglady Grand Master

I agree with Irish.  You have seen that I have harped about the fact that although I have been formally diagnosed, my husband has not.  He's been gluten-free for 13 years.  He went off gluten at the advice of my allergist and his GP.  It would be nice to have a formal diagnosis, but he has stated that he will not do a gluten challenge.  For what? He already knows that gluten makes him sick.

nvsmom Community Regular

Oh gee, I know you were hoping for a more definite result.  :(  I've never heard anything about gluten sensitivity genes either.

 

You could be in that minority of celiacs who do not have the DQ2 or DQ8 genes. I read (in Dangerous Grains I believe) that 90 and 94% of celiacs have the DQ2 and DQ8 genes respectively. There are a couple of people around here who are in the same boat - I just can't remember who...

 

The gold standard biopsy after a positive blood test seems like a bit of a crap shoot to me; I'm exaggerating a bit but I don't understand why doctors love it so much. They already had a positive test showing that your body is attempting to do damage when gliadin is in your system, just because they did't find damage doen't mean your body is trying to attack itself. They can miss finding the damage or perhaps your body is withstanding the autoimmune attack better than others do. Who knows... That was part of the reason I did not have the biopsy, I didn't want an ambiguous test to affect my resolve to live gluten-free.

 

You've had positive blood tests, you feel better gluten-free, and your health has improved. It's celiac disease. I've never found anything else that causes a high DGP. The grey area you are in is almost black. KWIM? You are making yourself better, just stick with it and let doctors call it whatever they want.

 

(((HUGS))

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Not all celiacs have DQ1 or DQ2.  I myself am a firmly diagnosed celiac who is a double DQ9 and was close to death by the time I was diagnosed.  I have a family member who was diagnosed by both blood test and biopsy who recovered on the diet but then was gene tested a few years later and told they were not celiac because they also didn't  have DQ2 or DQ8. There is still much to learn about genes and if you have had some positive blood work that has gone into normal ranges and you have seen relief on the diet IMHO you are celiac. Continue healing and don't worry about what label under which you fall.

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

all your replies definitely made me feel better :)

 

I was upset when I wrote the first post, there's no denying that, but despite those results it doesn't change that gluten makes me feel terrible.  It brings my digestion to a halt and the brain fog makes me feel like I'm having an out of body experience.  I'm there physically, but mentally I'm so out of it, I'm not fit to be around.  I even thought about the way I would have reacted pre-gluten-free to the test results.  I would have been upset for days at the outcome.  I'm still a bit disappointed, but it's nothing that compares to the fantastic way I've been feeling...minus the post I made the other week about finally trying oats again and reacting to them. 

 

This whole process has been so frustrating, but in the end I realize I should count myself lucky that LabCorp even runs DGP tests as part of their panel, or I would still be wondering what is wrong with me.  The only thing that makes this process less frustrating is coming here to vent and having others truly understand :)

 

Things I've decided:

-I'll stop chasing the celiac diagnosis because without DQ2 or DQ8, this country won't recognize it anyway.  Maybe in the future those genes will change, but right now it is what it is.

-When people ask me why I can't eat something with gluten, I'm still going to say that I tested positive for celiac disease.  They don't need to know which test.

-I really liked Melinda Dennis' idea of saying to a server at a restaurant that I follow a medically necessary gluten free diet. 

-Maybe in the future if they develop a test where they put your DNA/intestine into a petrie dish to see if it reacts, I'll entertain that idea.  A full blown gluten challenge would alienate me from my friends and family because of my terrible mood.

 

I've always been a curious person who wants to know why, and sometimes there isn't always an answer and that drives me nuts.  Before last year, I didn't even know what PubMed was, and now I realize what an awesome resource it is for celiac research and otherwise! 

 

At this point I've exhausted all my options, and so it's time to find my inner peace and let it go.  I'm simply going to say, "No gluten for this girl!" :)

IrishHeart Veteran

I am also a "I want to know why! " kind of person and research satisfies my curiosity most times. ^_^

 

They are always working on ways to better diagnose this thing, so perhaps in the future, there will be less hassle, less confusion, less people who fall through the cracks and less people left wondering WHY.

 

(and my very cool GI doctor told me he biopsied a man who was seronegative, neither a DQ2 or DQ8 and his villi were totally flat. He said symptoms were his guide in determining the medical necessity. We need more like him.) .

 

And for what it is worth, I think you have a most positive outlook and attitude and I think your username fits you to a T.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

Thanks, Irish  :) My username at this time last year didn't fit me at all, but I've grown into it  :P  I remember thinking that I needed to focus in general more on the positives in life, so that's why I chose it.  This last year has really taught me a lot about myself and that rough times will always ebb and flow, but life is a lot easier when you focus on the positives!  It also greatly helps when you realize your problems all along were caused by a tiny, little protein called gluten  :lol:

 

 

 

And for what it is worth, I think you have a most positive outlook and attitude and I think your username fits you to a T.

nvsmom Community Regular

PoPT is a good name.  :) I think your drive to understand "why" will help you get better faster than most others. Actively researching and not just trusting in others can only help.... Okay, it can frustrate the researcher, but overall it's a good thing.  LOL

IrishHeart Veteran

  It also greatly helps when you realize your problems all along were caused by a tiny, little protein called gluten  :lol:

 

My hubs and I have discussed this often. Really...think about how bizarre it is that one food protein makes your own body attack itself

and can kill you if left unchecked. When I think about how really, really bad it got for me and how I actually looked and felt 20 years older

than I was...how I was wasting away and my brain deteriorated...(shudder!)

 

Seems more  like a plot for a cheesy sci-fi novel rather than a "real thing". 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,671
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Paul1567
    Newest Member
    Paul1567
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.