Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Would You Report A Doctor Who Misdiagnosed You?

veryami1

Recommended Posts

veryami1 Apprentice
veryami1
Posted

Hi! I finally have my positive diagnosis of Celiac and while I know it's a tough road ahead, i'm so happy to have it!  I'm ready to start feeling better.

 

The first doctor who tested me for Celiac misread the blood paperwork, told me I did not have Celiac, and ordered more tests for me. She wanted to check my gallbladder next, and even prescribed me drugs for calming my bowels.  I took the celiac results paperwork to another doctor and within minutes was told that it was a very strong possibility I had it. He didn't order the endoscopy because I've been gluten free for about a month now, and feeling better. I also didn't need to have that info for my own piece of mind - the bloodwork was enough for me.

 

I want to report the first doctor who misread the paperwork. I am not a vengeful person - I don't want to get her in trouble, but I don't want others to suffer like I did with the wrong information.

 

Would you consider reporting someone who was so clearly wrong? Anyone have any advice so I can help other people who might be seeing her?

 

Thanks!

 

Ami

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

Have you looked into who you would "report" her to & how that process works?  Have you gotten copies of all your records from that doc?

 

You might have better luck filing a malpractice suit if you have had side effects of the mis-diagnosis or  prescribed treatment.

 

Perhaps a more helpful thing to do would be to send the doctor some info about Celiac and how your tests were mis-read?  Educate the doctor so it can't happen again?

IrishHeart Veteran
IrishHeart
Posted

If I reported or sued every doctor who misdiagnosed me, I'd be in court for years. Not sure it would hold up in court anyway.

 

A "very strong possibility" means what exactly--what were the results?

This possibility without an endo and positive biopsy and lack of positive celiac-related genes does not necessarily make a definite celiac diagnosis, hon. (I guess that is what you mean by negative DNA in your sig line?)

 

At least, not according to the diagnostic protocol.  

 

Your symptom-resolution so quickly could be NCGS. In any case, I am glad you feel better.

 

You may want to be sure you have celiac disease before you make any reports against this doctor.

 

Welcome to the forum!

 

I took the celiac results paperwork to another doctor and within minutes was told that it was a very strong possibility I had it. He didn't order the endoscopy because I've been gluten free for about a month now, 

veryami1 Apprentice
veryami1
Posted
  • Author

Thanks for the replies. Not looking to sue the doctor or anything, I'd just love to give some cautionary advice to others seeing them. I posted on Yelp, that should be enough. I  might write the doctor a letter as well and be done with it.

 

To answer your question, I tested positive for EMA and had high levels of DGP antibodies. (I think that's the correct terminology), that's what lead to the doctor confirming Celiac.

 

~Ami

IrishHeart Veteran
IrishHeart
Posted

I am confused by something. What do you mean by "negative DNA"?  you have DNA...do you mean negative Celiac gene test? If so, you do not have celiac. That's the exclusionary test. I just heard all this diagnostic protocol this past weekend from Dr. Fasano at a conference here in Orlando.

 

from Univ. of Chicago Celiac Center

"To help diagnose celiac disease, physicians first test blood to measure levels of certain antibodies. These antibodies are:

• The anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG)
• The anti-endomysium (EMA); and
• The anti-deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP)..
A positive antibody test suggests that a person might be celiac, but it is not a conclusive test; a biopsy will be needed to confirm the diagnosis."
veryami1 Apprentice
veryami1
Posted
  • Author

Sorry, I wrote in such a hurry I didnt realize my grammar was so awful. Of course I have DNA. At least, I sure hope I do!

 

I meant, negative for Celiac DNA. However, I'm wrong. The paperwork says I'm positive for one allele but not another. Paperwork explicitly states "Extremely low likelihood" - but given my positive other tests, the doctor today was pretty assured. High DGP IGG and IGA, plus positive EMA, and high anti human transglutaminase. All this terminology is still new to me!

LauraTX Rising Star
LauraTX
Posted

If you feel, in good faith, that this doctor is dangerous and should not be practicing medicine or needs remediation, you can report them to your state medical board, and they will investigate and determine if something should be corrected.  I don't think that is the case here.  Either way, given the prevalence of uninformed medical professionals about celiac disease and NCGI, you should always give someone a chance to correct themselves before doing anything else.  I think it would be a good idea to contact them, or if they are not responsive to your requests to talk to someone at the office, send a letter with information from the University of Chicago Celiac center or one of the other prominent Celiac organizations.  Outline what mistake the doctor made and give them the information they need to not do that again in the future.  

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


IrishHeart Veteran
IrishHeart
Posted

Sorry, I wrote in such a hurry I didnt realize my grammar was so awful. Of course I have DNA. At least, I sure hope I do!

 

I meant, negative for Celiac DNA. However, I'm wrong. The paperwork says I'm positive for one allele but not another. Paperwork explicitly states "Extremely low likelihood" - but given my positive other tests, the doctor today was pretty assured. High DGP IGG and IGA, plus positive EMA, and high anti human transglutaminase. All this terminology is still new to me!

 

 

is this new doctor a GI? Does he want to do a biopsy?

 

what does the genetic test say? positive for which gene?

 

just trying to sort out what your tests say exactly.

Fenrir Community Regular
Fenrir
Posted

Drs.  are hunan, can make a mistake. 

 

I work in labs, been doing it for 12 years. In spite of what people think, many Drs. are not well versed in interpreting lab reports and that is complicated by the fact that no lab format reports the same, use the same units of measure, and they all use different equipment so ranges vary a lot. 

 

Some labs, like ours, have started to put written explainations of the results in the reports to make it easier for the provider to put them to use. Still, a simple mistake of looking at the wrong colmn or number will still happen, it is human. 

 

People seem to think physicans are never wrong and if they happen to be then they should be strung up for it. IMO, there is a reason why most Drs. do not mind patients getting a second opinion, because they realize they could make a mistake. I think that unless they make a grossly negligant error because they didn't follow accepted practices they should be held accountable. However, for something like this where it sounds like a simple mistake in interpreting a lab result that didn't result in major injury or illness it seems a little spiteful to want to "report" her. 

 

This would go nowhere, there would be no malpractice case that went against her in something like this. Sure, she made a mistake but these sorts of mistakes don't amount to malpractice.

veryami1 Apprentice
veryami1
Posted
  • Author

Since you asked, here are my exact test results:

 

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide Antibody - IgG - 43.0 EU  (<4.9 EU)

Deamidated Giagin Peptide Antibody IgA - 9.3 EU  (<6.1 EU)

Anti-hunman tissue transglutaminase igA - 75.0 EU (<10.3)

Anti-endomysial igA IFA - positive  (range, negative)

total serum iGA by Nephelometry, total igA - 129   (<3 years, 8-220, 3-13 years 41-395, >13, 44-441)

One Allele - HLA DQA1*of DQ2.5 detected, HLA DQB1*02 not detected.

 

In regards to the rest - I completely agree. I don't have a malpractice suit and I wouldn't do that anyways! My only thought was that I could somehow help other people in the same predicament as me but without the thought to keep trying anyways. I like the suggestions of contacting the doctor to have a conversation with her about it and trying to find out why she might have misread it and giving her info so it might not happen again.  Again, I'm not litigious. I was curious if there were any ideas about who might be willing to hear a  "report" but by no means was I looking for backup for a malpractice suit. This hardly qualifies!

LauraTX Rising Star
LauraTX
Posted

Some doctor somewhere told me... "There is a reason it is called 'practicing medicine'- it is not an exact science."  Just think of what house does in every episode!  I bet a lot of us (myself especially included) are those weird mystery patients with all our many conditions... LOL

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

I asked if you had looked into what it took to "report" a doctor because, this isn't really "reportable".  You weren't harmed in any serious way.  Having dealt with how these processes work - hospital and AMA/State Board censoring of Doctors over the years, it doesn't seem bad enough to get into the process.  The process can take a couple of years, etc.  

 

I really think the best thing would be to send a letter with some info from a medical site like Univ of Chicago Celiac Center.

 

 

Open Original Shared Link

1desperateladysaved Proficient
1desperateladysaved
Posted

When I met up with a doctor that wouldn't test my daughter's rash, I printed out information about celiac and mailed it with a letter to the doctor.  I all the while remembered a friend that treated her doctor respectively and taught her some lessons. 

 

Dee

NoGlutenCooties Contributor
NoGlutenCooties
Posted

I want to report the first doctor who misread the paperwork. I am not a vengeful person - I don't want to get her in trouble, but I don't want others to suffer like I did with the wrong information.

 

If your main concern is that this doctor may be giving other patients bad information, I would write to her and educate her on her mistake.

I had to do this once when a doctor prescribed me a certain drug (I forget now which one) for a UTI and told me to also start taking larger doses of Vitamin C.  I looked up the drug in the med book and it explicitely states NOT to take it with Vitamin C because it can cause kidney damage!  I copied the page from the manual and sent it to the doctor who appologized profusely.  Doctors are human.  They don't know everything.  Purposefully causing harm is one thing... making an honest mistake is something entirely different.

GottaSki Mentor
GottaSki
Posted

Nope.

 

I wrote letters to all of my former doctors...um there were many over the years.  I didn't doctor shop...just turnover of primary docs within UCSD over a thirty year period. 

 

Anyway, my current primary didn't "find" celiac for over three years and many, many tests -- since I tested positive her knowledge of celiac symptoms grew from short skinny children with D to include all possible symptoms -- yes, she now tests all her "fibro" and "rhuemy" patients at my request.

 

I prefer to educate where ever possible and keep my whining amongst my lucky pals on c.com ;)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Russ H
      - Russ H posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      0

      Anti-endomysial Antibody (EMA) Testing

      I thought this might be of interest regarding anti-EMA testing. Some labs use donated umbilical cord instead of monkey oesophagus. Some labs just provide a +ve/-ve test result but others provide a grade by testing progressively diluted blood sample. https://www.aesku.com/index.php/ifu-download/1367-ema-instruction-manual-en-1/file Fluorescence-labelled...
    2. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to JoJo0611's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Just diagnosed today

      First, please know that receiving two diagnoses at once, especially one you've never heard of, is undoubtedly overwhelming. You are not alone in this. Your understanding is correct: both celiac disease and Mesenteric Panniculitis (MP) are considered to have autoimmune components. While having both is not extremely common, they can co-occur, as chronic inflammation...
    3. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to GlorietaKaro's topic in Super Sensitive People
      1

      Am I nuts?

      Your experience is absolutely valid, and you are not "nuts" or a "complete weirdo." What you are describing aligns with severe neurological manifestations of gluten sensitivity, which is a recognized, though less common, presentation. Conditions like gluten ataxia and peripheral neuropathy are documented in medical literature, where gluten triggers an autoimmune...
    4. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      28

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

      Some members here take GliadinX (a sponsor here) if they eat out in restaurants or outside their homes. It has been shown in numerous studies to break down small amounts of gluten in the stomach, before it reaches your intestines. This would be for small amounts of cross-contamination, and it would not allow any celiac to eat gluten again.
    5. Russ H
      - Russ H replied to Samanthaeileen1's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      6

      Thoughts? Non-endoscopic Celiac diagnosis in two year old

      The anti-endomysial antibody test is an old test that is generally reported as positive or negative - a lab technician looks down a microscope to check for fluorescence of the sample. It is less sensitive but more specific for coeliac disease than IgA tTG2. Hence, it is not "barely positive" - it is positive. People diagnosed in childhood recover much...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,805
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    lalan45
    Newest Member
    lalan45
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Russ H
      Anti-endomysial Antibody (EMA) Testing

      By Russ H · Posted

      I thought this might be of interest regarding anti-EMA testing. Some labs use donated umbilical cord instead of monkey oesophagus. Some labs just provide a +ve/-ve test result but others provide a grade by testing progressively diluted blood sample. https://www.aesku.com/index.php/ifu-download/1367-ema-instruction-manual-en-1/file Fluorescence-labelled anti-tTG2 autoantibodies bind to endomysium (the thin layer around muscle fibres) forming a characteristic honeycomb pattern under the microscope - this is highly specific to coeliac disease. The binding site is extracellular tTG2 bound to fibronectin and collagen. Human or monkey derived endomysium is necessary because tTG2 from other mammals does not provide the right binding epitope. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/3/1012
    • Scott Adams
      Just diagnosed today

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      First, please know that receiving two diagnoses at once, especially one you've never heard of, is undoubtedly overwhelming. You are not alone in this. Your understanding is correct: both celiac disease and Mesenteric Panniculitis (MP) are considered to have autoimmune components. While having both is not extremely common, they can co-occur, as chronic inflammation from one autoimmune condition can sometimes be linked to or trigger other inflammatory responses in the body. MP, which involves inflammation of the fat tissue in the mesentery (the membrane that holds your intestines in place), is often discovered incidentally on scans, exactly as in your case. The fact that your medical team is already planning follow-up with a DEXA scan (to check bone density, common after a celiac diagnosis) and a repeat CT is a very proactive and prudent approach to monitoring your health. Many find that adhering strictly to the gluten-free diet for celiac disease helps manage overall inflammation, which may positively impact MP over time. It's completely normal to feel uncertain right now. Your next steps are to take this one day at a time, focus on the gluten-free diet as your primary treatment for celiac, and use your upcoming appointments to ask all your questions about MP and what the monitoring plan entails. This dual diagnosis is a lot to process, but it is also the starting point for a managed path forward to better health. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      Am I nuts?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Your experience is absolutely valid, and you are not "nuts" or a "complete weirdo." What you are describing aligns with severe neurological manifestations of gluten sensitivity, which is a recognized, though less common, presentation. Conditions like gluten ataxia and peripheral neuropathy are documented in medical literature, where gluten triggers an autoimmune response that attacks the nervous system, leading to symptoms precisely like yours—loss of coordination, muscle weakness, fasciculations, and even numbness. The reaction you had from inhaling flour is a powerful testament to your extreme sensitivity. While celiac disease is commonly tested, non-celiac gluten sensitivity with neurological involvement is harder to diagnose, especially since many standard tests require ongoing gluten consumption, which you rightly fear could be dangerous. Seeking out a neurologist or gastroenterologist familiar with gluten-related disorders, or consulting a specialist at a major celiac research center, could provide more validation and possibly explore diagnostic options like specific antibody tests (e.g., anti-gliadin or transglutaminase 6 antibodies) that don't always require a gluten challenge. You are not alone; many individuals with severe reactivity navigate a world of invisible illness where their strict avoidance is a medical necessity, not a choice. Trust your body's signals—it has given you the most important diagnosis already.
    • Scott Adams
      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Some members here take GliadinX (a sponsor here) if they eat out in restaurants or outside their homes. It has been shown in numerous studies to break down small amounts of gluten in the stomach, before it reaches your intestines. This would be for small amounts of cross-contamination, and it would not allow any celiac to eat gluten again.
    • Russ H
      Thoughts? Non-endoscopic Celiac diagnosis in two year old

      By Russ H · Posted

      The anti-endomysial antibody test is an old test that is generally reported as positive or negative - a lab technician looks down a microscope to check for fluorescence of the sample. It is less sensitive but more specific for coeliac disease than IgA tTG2. Hence, it is not "barely positive" - it is positive. People diagnosed in childhood recover much more quickly than adults.  I would look at testing all 1st degree relatives - parents, siblings.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.