Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy Or Not?


BrandySimms

Recommended Posts

BrandySimms Newbie

Hi :)

I'm new and am not even sure whether or not my daughter has a gluten intolerance, but all signs point that way...so here I am.

My 13 month old has been having digestive issues (constipation) for about 6 months, pretty much right after she started table foods. The only thing that gets things moving is miralax. Her pediatrician (Dr. K) referred us to a gastroenterologist (Dr. A), who sent us for blood work (fun!). The results show (I haven't personally seen them, we've spoke over the phone) that the allergy panel is relatively normal, with very, very mild allergies to gluten and milk. However, she is IgA deficient, so I know that can show false negatives.

Dr.A wants to do an upper endoscopy to test for celiac, because he thinks that there is a good chance of her having it. We are not comfortable with this for our 13 month old. I suggested that we try a 100% gluten free diet and see if it makes a difference. I'm already eating a 70/30 gluten free diet as it is, for my own digestive concerns. I'm well aware of the commitment that it takes for a gluten-free diet and am willing to do that to help my baby. He told me not to go gluten-free if we are not doing the endoscopy. Also, if/when we decide to do the endoscopy we will have to reintroduce gluten to get accurate results, so we should just do it now. I understand his reasoning, but I don't agree with it.

Has anyone dealt with something similar? What was the ultimate outcome? Did a diet change alone prove that your child has a gluten intolerance?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

If you were talking about an adult then I likely would say just go gluten free. However your child will need to be safe in school or daycare and in most instances a diagnosis is needed to accomplish that. If either your ped or your GI doctor is willing to give a diagnosis based on her improvement on the diet then IMHO you could skip the endoscopy. If not then it is better to do it now while your child is still eating gluten. Many have nasty reactions to a gluten challenge after they have been gluten free for a while so a challenge may be difficult later on. While any procedure has risks most endos go smoothly and only require a short time under anesthesia. 

africanqueen99 Contributor

I think the difference is if your doctor will give a clear diagnosis.  If you can get it written that your daughter has celiac then that's all you need for school - with or without an endoscopy.  If the doctor won't DX without scoping first then I'd go with that.

 

FWIW, I have three kids.  The youngest (18 months at the time) had the highest bloodwork and since she was so young we got a DX based on blood.  My older two had that weird mid-range bloodwork so they both had biopsies - one was DX, one wasn't, even though they both had negative biopsies.

 

I have a 504 plan for both my DX girls.  One in elementary and the other in our Early Childhood Center (both in our public school district).  I wouldn't have been given the gravity of accommodations without clear diagnoses for them.  Based on my situation, I wouldn't stop until you're sure of what's going on with her.

 

And, please, don't stop gluten until you're sure you're finished all her testing.  I know it's hurting her body, but getting to the bottom of this will help in the long run.

StephanieL Enthusiast

And, please, don't stop gluten until you're sure you're finished all her testing.  I know it's hurting her body, but getting to the bottom of this will help in the long run.

 

 

THIS!!!  

 

Please keep her on gluten until you 100% figure out what you are going to do (scope or not).  We are in an area now where there are questions by some Dr's (while others there is no question- go figure!) and I would not wish it on anyone!  I completely understand not wanting to do the scope and if you are that much against it or prefer more information perhaps getting the genetic test (which is NOT diagnostic in any way- PLEASE understand that!  Just says there is the genetic potential for Celiac) perhaps if that is + you may be more willing to do the scope.

RMJ Mentor

Can you get a copy of the results? You wrote "allergy panel", but celiac is not an allergy. If the full celiac panel, including IgA and IgG antibodies, has not been run, that would be a less invasive next step than an endoscopy for your little one.

BrandySimms Newbie

Can you get a copy of the results? You wrote "allergy panel", but celiac is not an allergy. If the full celiac panel, including IgA and IgG antibodies, has not been run, that would be a less invasive next step than an endoscopy for your little one.

These are the IgA and IgG tears they ran. What exactly does this show? High probability of celiac or not?

Antigliadin Abs, IgA. 1

Antigliadin Abs, IgG. 2

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA <2

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG <2

Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 5

RMJ Mentor

Can you get the report that includes her results and the normal ranges? Those numbers look low, but normal ranges differ from lab to lab so it's hard to evaluate without them.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



BrandySimms Newbie

Antigliadin Abs, IgA 1 (0-19)

Antigliadin Abs, IgG 2 (0-19)

tTG IgA < 2 (0-3)

tTG IgG < 2 (0-5)

Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 5 (20-101)

psawyer Proficient

AImmunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 5 (20-101)

RED FLAG! The total serum iGa is way below normal. The other tests may be false negatives due to this. She is not producing antibodies in the normal range overall, so the "low" gliadin numbers may not be meaningful. This could be age-related. Blood testing in very young children is notoriously unreliable.

As RavenWoodGlass said, having a confirmed diagnosis will be very important in enforcing her ADA 504 rights at day care, school, and in similar situations. I would do the endo if it was my child.

BrandySimms Newbie

Yes, that is what the dr is concerned about mainly. He sees low IgA levels a lot, but was more concerned because hers is VERY LOW. I'm still not sure what we are going to do. I'm on the fence and can understand the benefits of getting it done, but I'm also scared. My husband is 100% against it, though, and it's difficult to sway his decision. I think we will stick to a gluten diet (as much as it kills me to see her in pain) until we both can agree on something.

Thank you all for your input.

StephanieL Enthusiast

I can understand having different thoughts on the procedure.  Perhaps asking DH why he's so against it when it may be the ONLY way to tell if there is an issue because of the IgA issues may help you get to the heart of it and help work through it (if you are thinking you want to do it).  My DH HATES hospitals.  Really hates them. Not fond of Dr's either.  Most times when it is a major decision we have to make walking away for a day or two then coming back together with thoughts and questions he has has been helpful for us.  

 

It's important to remember- This isn't a "diet" that you can go off of.  This is a LIFE LONG requirement.  Would he rather her not have the information to make that life long decision?  Seems easy enough now but what about high school, college and beyond.  Do you want to say "oh we thought we were right" or would you prefer to have "proof" to show her?  Just some things to think about.

 

Is a procedure for a kid fun for a parent? Nope.  Not even a little.  Does it help us make the best decisions we can for our kids at this point in time? It can.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

Also, this diet is not easy to enforce when your child is in the care of others, such as grandparents or other caregivers. Having the gravity of a celiac diagnosis can really help, when it comes to taking all necessary precautions to keep your child healthy.

beth01 Enthusiast

Luckily I was diagnosed through a scope and blood work so when my daughter came up positive on her blood work, she didn't have to have the endoscopy. If the doctor would have suggested it, I would have. It is invasive and there are risks, though they are very small, but it really is a necessity in your situation. If it was my child I wouldn't hesitate. Children are young and resilient and she won't even remember the whole situation. I wish you luck in what ever you decide and your daughter gets back to feeling well.

GottaSki Mentor

Yes, that is what the dr is concerned about mainly. He sees low IgA levels a lot, but was more concerned because hers is VERY LOW. I'm still not sure what we are going to do. I'm on the fence and can understand the benefits of getting it done, but I'm also scared. My husband is 100% against it, though, and it's difficult to sway his decision. I think we will stick to a gluten diet (as much as it kills me to see her in pain) until we both can agree on something.

Thank you all for your input.

I understand not wanting to undergo an invasive procedure, but this one is necessary. We opted to forgo endoscopy with our seronegative teens as they were willing to go gluten-free on their own due to frustrations with symptoms. We cannot go back, but each of them along with their father and I would say....hell, yes! To endoscopy if we knew then what we know now. You can't replicate this moment in time.
BlessedMommy Rising Star

^Yes.

 

I'm putting my kids through a gluten challenge to finally end limbo land and if I had it to do over, I would've never tried to take them gluten free without a diagnosis.

 

I find it hard enough as an adult without a diagnosis, though I've been able to adapt over time, but for kids it's even more difficult and realistically it's very hard to enforce a 100% celiac diet for a kid, without medical directives. Thus, for many kids, lack of diagnosis could harm their harm in the long run. Even if the diet is helping your kid, there will always be that doubt of "do they have celiac or not?" and when there are doubts, there's the temptation to cut corners or be a little less careful about cross contamination, which will harm their health in the long run if celiac is the issue. (just speaking from personal experience here with my own kids)

 

I'm fortunate that my kids are able to tolerate the gluten challenge, so that I can end this and bring us to a permanent dietary decision for them.

 

However I wasn't able to tolerate the gluten challenge and so now I'm facing the fact that a diagnosis is forever closed to me...unless of course science comes up wtih a way to get one without taking the risk of brain damaging myself.

 

The best time to get a diagnosis is right now, while gluten is still in the diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,692
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda M Rush
    Newest Member
    Linda M Rush
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Gigi2025
      Since 2015 we've spent extensive time in Italy and I've been able to eat their wheat products without incident. Initially, I was practically starving thinking foods in Sicily were not gluten-free.  An Italian friend who had lived in the US for over 20 years said she had celiac/gluten-free friends from the US who could eat Italian wheat products without problems. Hesitantly, I tried little by little without issues.  A few years later at a market, I asked a bread vendor if they had gluten-free loaves. Turns out she had lived in LA, said groups believe it's not the gluten that's causing our bodies harm, but potassium bromate; these groups have been trying to ban it.  Bromines and other halogens wreaks havoc to our endocrine system and, more specifically, our thyroids and immune systems. When bromines are ingested/absorbed into the body, it displaces iodine causing other health issues. Potassium bromate is a powerful oxidizing agent (dough 'conditioner') that chemically changes flour to enhance elasticity, bleaches the dough, and ages the flour much faster than open air.   Shortly thereafter while visiting friends in California, one family said they had gone gluten-free and the difference was incredible. The reason they choose this path was due them (a biologist/chemist/agriculturist scientist) having to write a portion of a paper about a certain product for the company he worked. Another company's scientist was directed to write the other portion. All was confidential, they weren't allowed to know the other company/employee.  After the research, they learned gluten was being removed from wheat, sent elsewhere, returned in large congealed blocks resembling tofu, and then added to wheat products. Potassium bromate has been banned for use in Europe, China, and other countries, but not in the US. Then we have the issues of shelf preservatives and stabilizers. What are we eating?  Why? We spend long periods of time in Italy and all has been good.  We just returned from an extended time in Greece;  no issues there either.  There is a man there we learned about on a travel show about Greece who walks the hills, picking herbs, pods, etc.  He is a very learned scholar, taught at the university level in Melbourne. It took a few days to locate him, but were finally successful. He too, is concerned about the additives and preservatives in American food (many of his customers are Americans, haven't been in the best of health, and have become healthier after visiting him). He suggested taking a food product from the US and the same product in Europe, and compare the different ingredients. Then ask why these things are being allowed in the US by the 'watch dog' of our foods and drugs. It would be amuzing if it weren't tragic. I'm presently looking for flour from Europe that I can make my own bread and pasta as the gluten-free bread is now $7.99 a (small) loaf.  BTW, studies are showing that many gluten-free individuals are becoming diabetic. My guess is because the gluten-free products are high in carbs. This is only my experience and opinion garnished by my personal research.  I hope it helps.  
    • knitty kitty
      Symptoms that get worse if you don't supplement is a sign of malabsorption, possibly due to Celiac disease. Blood tests for nutritional deficiencies are not very accurate, and should be done when you have been off of supplements for eight to twelve weeks, otherwise the vitamin supplements you've taken will be measured.  The blood circulation system is a transportation system.  It transports the vitamins you've absorbed around the body, but blood tests don't give an accurate picture of the vitamin and mineral stores inside organs and tissues where they are actually used.  You can have "normal" blood levels but still have deficiencies.  This is because the brain demands stored nutrients be put into the blood stream to supply important organs, like the brain and heart, while other organs do without.   If you are taking Thiamine Mononitrate in your supplements, you are probably low in thiamine.  Thiamine Mononitrate is used in many supplements because it won't break down sitting on a shelf.  This also means Thiamine Mononitrate is difficult for the body to utilize.  Only thirty percent of Thiamine Mononitrate on the label is absorbed and even less is able to be utilized by the body.  A different form of Thiamine called Benfotiamine has been shown to promote intestinal healing.   Talk to your doctor about doing a genetic test to look for Celiac markers.   I'm concerned that if you do a gluten challenge (10 grams of gluten per day for a minimum off two weeks) in your weakened state, the nutritional deficiencies will become worse and possibly life threatening.  
    • ElisaAllergiesgluten
      Hello, good afternoon!   I apologize, I didn’t see a notification and I’m just reading this. Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and the link. Yes you are absolutely right, even so trying to get a response from them has been extremely difficult. They don’t answer but I will your practice of “guilty until proven innocent.”   I like and have a sense of trust here in this website, everyone is honest and thoughts are raw. The mutual understanding is amazing!   thank you Scott!
    • Scott Adams
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.