Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Many Ppm Make Something 'gluten Free'?


tsomo

Recommended Posts

tsomo Rookie

My understanding is that if something has under 200ppm it can be labeled as gluten free. At least this is the law in Canada and I believe its true for the U.S. also. I can't begin to describe how retarded that logic is, however, there have been numerous times I have gotten contamination from a product claiming to be gluten free. Only to discover after investigating that the product may contain up to 200 ppm of gluten.

I dont believe anyone anymore who says their product is gluten free. With the exception of those who use testing for less than 20 ppm which is I think the most sensitive test there is.

Does anyone else here react to this amount?

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills :)

Tsomo


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

As far as I know, in the states it hasn't been defined yet.

I consider something that has no gluten to be gluten-free ... but maybe I'm just not as smart as those making the laws. <_<

penguin Community Regular

There are no laws regarding gluten-free in the US, there's not even a definition. There will be laws on the books by 2008. The european definition is the Codex standard of 200ppm.

Jestgar Rising Star
There are no laws regarding gluten-free in the US, there's not even a definition. There will be laws on the books by 2008. The european definition is the Codex standard of 200ppm.

Does this thought worry anyone else? Do you think that current "gluten free" products from companies that have gluten products will be less safe?

Guest dreams25

Hi In answer to your question about gluten in the gluten free products here in Australia we have very strict guidelines, for a product to be named gluten free has to contain no detectable gluten.

The level of detection for the test to measure gluten is 0.0005% (ie. 5 parts per million)

The food standards code in this country is pretty strict so i'm finding most of the products gluten free here carry the 0% of gluten in them.

The food standards code also makes provision for foods to be lablelled as low gluten. If the gluten content is less than 0.02% (ie. 200 parts per million)

psawyer Proficient

As mentioned by others, there is no definition of "gluten free" in the US. Codex has a couple of different standards, depending on whether the item in question is naturally free of gluten, or has been processed in a manner that removes most of the gluten.

Canada's rule is not based on ppm. Actually, there are two regulations:

Food and Drug Regulation B.24.018

No person shall label, package, sell or advertise a food in a manner likely to create an impression that it is gluten-free unless the food does not contain wheat, including spelt and kamut, or oats, barley, rye or triticale or any part thereof.

Food and Drug Regulation B.24.019

The label of a food that is labelled, packaged, sold or advertised as "gluten-free" shall carry the following information, per serving of stated size of the food:

( a ) the energy value of the food, expressed in Calories (Calories or Cal) and kilojoules (kilojoules or kJ) and;

( b ) the protein, fat and carbohydrate content of the food, expressed in grams.

For enforcement purposes, when a test is needed, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) uses an ELISA test which can detect 20 ppm, but this is a limitation of the test itself, not an approved level of gluten. The words "any part thereof" in the first regulation prohibit even those parts of the grains in question which are not proteins.

[in my opinion, rule B.24.019 is completely irrelevant to the matter, and serves only to prevent things like apples and milk being sold as "gluten-free." Who cares?]

In Canada, gluten free really means gluten free. :)

jaten Enthusiast
I can't begin to describe how retarded that logic is, however, there have been numerous times I have gotten contamination from a product claiming to be gluten free. Only to discover after investigating that the product may contain up to 200 ppm of gluten.

Tsomo

Yes, I know exactly what you're talking about. The only "gluten-free" foods that I've found to consistently keep me well, are those that are from dedicated facilities...Kinnikinnick...Enjoy Life....whoever makes those EnviroKidz products, etc. I've researched and those stick to the less than 20 ppm. I agree, 200 ppm is TOO MUCH GLUTEN for me. The proof is in the pudding if you experience the symptoms (or not) and THEN research and uncover the reason behind the undeniable pattern...less than 20 ppm, never sick; 200 ppm allowed, often sick.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gfp Enthusiast
As mentioned by others, there is no definition of "gluten free" in the US. Codex has a couple of different standards, depending on whether the item in question is naturally free of gluten, or has been processed in a manner that removes most of the gluten.

Canada's rule is not based on ppm. Actually, there are two regulations:

Food and Drug Regulation B.24.018

No person shall label, package, sell or advertise a food in a manner likely to create an impression that it is gluten-free unless the food does not contain wheat, including spelt and kamut, or oats, barley, rye or triticale or any part thereof.

Food and Drug Regulation B.24.019

The label of a food that is labelled, packaged, sold or advertised as "gluten-free" shall carry the following information, per serving of stated size of the food:

( a ) the energy value of the food, expressed in Calories (Calories or Cal) and kilojoules (kilojoules or kJ) and;

( b ) the protein, fat and carbohydrate content of the food, expressed in grams.

For enforcement purposes, when a test is needed, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) uses an ELISA test which can detect 20 ppm, but this is a limitation of the test itself, not an approved level of gluten. The words "any part thereof" in the first regulation prohibit even those parts of the grains in question which are not proteins.

[in my opinion, rule B.24.019 is completely irrelevant to the matter, and serves only to prevent things like apples and milk being sold as "gluten-free." Who cares?]

In Canada, gluten free really means gluten free. :)

Agree completely....... I even wish that they would label apples and stuff gluten-free just to help confused noobies.

The codex standard itself is VERY bizarre.

First off its NOT a European standard its a WHO standard and its completely optional. As it happens the board has representatives from Canada and the US but the EU only has a single one so its not European .....I just say this because its important how its viewed. The US and Canada have far more influence than any EU nation and together twice that of the EU as a whole.

The second thing is it is done with and funded by food manufacturers, it is not a independent organisation.

The most bizarre aspect is similar to rule B.24.019 .. but it goes further.

A literal intepretation (and I can't see any other way to interpret this kind of document) is a real corn tortilla cannot be labelled gluten free BUT if you add some wheat starch to the corn flour or even some pure gluten it can be so long as the total isn't more than 200ppm (actually expressed as mg/l dry matter total nitrogen)

Someone tell me this isn't crazy!

You can only call a product which is naturally gluten free "gluten free" by adding gluten or an item that normally contains gluten.

Lastly, 20ppm is the detection limit for the ELISA test which is cheap... GC-MS or LC-MS would be able to detect it down to ppb levels.

CarlaB Enthusiast
You can only call a product which is naturally gluten free "gluten free" by adding gluten or an item that normally contains gluten.

Maybe someone who's more knowledgeable about history can tell me, at what point in time did lawmakers decide logic was irrelevant?

gfp Enthusiast
Maybe someone who's more knowledgeable about history can tell me, at what point in time did lawmakers decide logic was irrelevant?

I used to work for a company who had a policy on eMail which states "rough translation"

In order to get a company eMail account the employee must send an email from their company email to xxx@yyy.com giving there employee number and email address of their direct superior.

I actually thought whomever wrote this must be a complete idiot till I met them.

They tried 5 times to tell the person telling them to write this it was illogical BUT on the 5th time they were told that they would receive a written warning letter if they refused to write what they had been told and put thier name on it.

Actually an old college (different company) had a sign on his wall... "A camel is a horse designed by comitee"

Guest nini

since we've been told that a single molecule of gluten is enough to cause damage then anything that has more than ONE MOLECULE can not be considered gluten free

2Boys4Me Enthusiast

Nini, I've always heard that it was 1/49th of a slice of bread needed to cause an auto-immune reaction that affects villi.

I know that some people are very sensitive, and I'm wondering where I can read about the one molecule info. Ty has no outward symptoms, and I'm a lot more concerned about cc than his dad is. Dad is very careful preparing food, but thinks nothing of having a common chip bowl where people eating gluten buns are sharing the chip bowl with Ty. I always give him a separate bowl and depending on his mood, I sometimes get an eye-rolling do-you-really-think-that's-necessary speech. Well, obviously I think it's necessary or I wouldn't be doing it.

If you have easy access to that info, will you please pass it along so I can have my husband read it?

Thanks.

penguin Community Regular
Maybe someone who's more knowledgeable about history can tell me, at what point in time did lawmakers decide logic was irrelevant?

Around the same time humans started walking upright. :rolleyes:

gfp Enthusiast
Nini, I've always heard that it was 1/49th of a slice of bread needed to cause an auto-immune reaction that affects villi.

I know that some people are very sensitive, and I'm wondering where I can read about the one molecule info. Ty has no outward symptoms, and I'm a lot more concerned about cc than his dad is. Dad is very careful preparing food, but thinks nothing of having a common chip bowl where people eating gluten buns are sharing the chip bowl with Ty. I always give him a separate bowl and depending on his mood, I sometimes get an eye-rolling do-you-really-think-that's-necessary speech. Well, obviously I think it's necessary or I wouldn't be doing it.

If you have easy access to that info, will you please pass it along so I can have my husband read it?

Thanks.

Well if a T-cell detects it then it starts the whole process. Chance is it won't but 1 molecule is ... minicule/a lot .. really really small.... a single crumb contains millions so its best to just think the tiniest amount you can imagine then divide that by 100.

the 1/49th thing is really old. Its just the how much to eat to get a biopsy if I remember.

CarlaB Enthusiast
the 1/49th thing is really old. Its just the how much to eat to get a biopsy if I remember.

I think the 1/49th came from a test they did of celiacs and this is the amount they gave them and they saw damage from it. The point of the test, I believe, was to show even a little causes visible damage, I don't think it was the purpose of the test to show how much or how little.

  • 4 weeks later...
jaza33 Newbie
Agree completely....... I even wish that they would label apples and stuff gluten-free just to help confused noobies.

The codex standard itself is VERY bizarre.

First off its NOT a European standard its a WHO standard and its completely optional. As it happens the board has representatives from Canada and the US but the EU only has a single one so its not European .....I just say this because its important how its viewed. The US and Canada have far more influence than any EU nation and together twice that of the EU as a whole.

The second thing is it is done with and funded by food manufacturers, it is not a independent organisation.

The most bizarre aspect is similar to rule B.24.019 .. but it goes further.

A literal intepretation (and I can't see any other way to interpret this kind of document) is a real corn tortilla cannot be labelled gluten free BUT if you add some wheat starch to the corn flour or even some pure gluten it can be so long as the total isn't more than 200ppm (actually expressed as mg/l dry matter total nitrogen)

Someone tell me this isn't crazy!

You can only call a product which is naturally gluten free "gluten free" by adding gluten or an item that normally contains gluten.

Lastly, 20ppm is the detection limit for the ELISA test which is cheap... GC-MS or LC-MS would be able to detect it down to ppb levels.

I'm not sure I understand this correctly....

I buy corn tortilla chips with the only ingredients being corn, lime and oil. However, they are lableled gluten free. Does this mean, in order to put gluten free on the package they have to add a little gluten to the mix?

So I am better off buying corn tortilla chips with corn, lime and oil, but doesn't say gluten free on the label.

LKelly8 Rookie
. . . Does this mean, in order to put gluten free on the package they have to add a little gluten to the mix?. .

So I am better off buying corn tortilla chips with corn, lime and oil, but doesn't say gluten free on the label.

I think the idea was to stop marketers from putting a gluten-free label on everything - even those foods which never contained gluten, apples etc. - but "ideas" and "laws" have never played well together.

The codex(s) only apply outside the US. So it depends on where you live.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,468
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muna
    Newest Member
    Muna
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Thanks for sharing this info! Frustrating to see companies who haven't used wheat as an ingredient start to do so! https://blistex.com/product/five-star-lip-protection/
    • Emily P.
      As of July 2025, Blistex is no longer gluten free for their five star protection lip balm The last ingredient is WHEAT! From Blistex' website, ingredient list for 5 Star Protection;: "Inactive Ingredients: bis-diglyceryl polyacyladipate-2, bis-stearyl dimethicone, butyloctyl salicylate, C12-15 alkyl benzoate, calendula officinalis extract, caprylic/capric triglyceride, carthamus tinctorius (safflower) seed oil, cetyl dimethicone, citric acid, euphorbia cerifera (candelilla) wax, flavor, microcrystalline wax, myristyl myristate, octyldodecanol, oryzanol, ozokerite, panthenol, phenoxyethanol, sorbic acid, stearyl behenate, sucralose, tetrahexyldecyl ascorbate, tocopheryl acetate, triticum vulgare (wheat) germ oil"
    • knitty kitty
      I followed the Autoimmune Protocol Diet to get my symptoms calmed down and my nutrients up.   I know what a struggle it is.  You're why I'm here. Smoothing out some rough parts of your journey makes my journey worthwhile. Here's the tests you can get for Celiac antibodies...  
    • knitty kitty
      @Ginger38, I'm with you!   I could not take Metformin.  I got so sick, constant diarrhea, abdominal cramps, extreme highs and lows, no energy, weight loss, muscle wasting.  Just horrible.   Metformin is known to block thiamine absorption.  Talk to your doctor about thiamine deficiency.  It's called Gastrointestinal Beriberi.  My doctor didn't recognize thiamine deficiency outside of alcoholism.  So I took over the counter Thiamine in the form Tetrahydrofurfuryl Disulfide and felt health improvement within an hour.  Magical!   I followed the Autoimmune Protocol diet to get my stomach calmed down and control my blood glucose levels without medication. Being diabetic, we lose more thiamine through our kidneys, and the Metformin on top of it and malabsorption from Celiac.  Talk to your doctor soon!
    • Jmartes71
      Thankyou I will be seeing my new primary this coming Monday and will ask.I did ask about some other blood test to look for that I saw on this website.I pushed the second ANA panel two months ago thinking it would show but found out it doesn't.I don't have lupus which seems what the ANA panel seems to only look for.I have come to the conclusion that doctors are like hair people meaning all hair places know how to cut hair and style but not all know how to grow hair.I was given tramadel for nearly 20 years to push through. I literally can't no more and stopped taking tramadel since I was swelling slowly in the belly.I will diffently show new primary this website and hopefully he will help.Its so hard because im falling apart with my eye, skin and read every label and stay away from what Im not supposed to.I had SIBO test done and it died on me and didn't complete all 8 breathes just the 5.I spoke to np and was finally validated by word of mouth.Cone to find out I have to repeat again.I went to a reputable hospital to be let down.I have to redo breath test but want to do at hospital instead of at home so no issues.Its not pleasant drinking that glucose stuff and not getting a direct answer. I live in Northern Cali.What recommended gi would know about celiac  disease, really know because I thought I found one but didn't. I don't want to digest any wheat, dairy, peanuts, rye, barely, eggs,garlic, walnuts because I get sick.When i showed the reputable hospital my past food allergies i was told that test is old.My thoughts were i was made in 1971 and its still avtive with diagestive issues. 
×
×
  • Create New...