Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Retarded Blue Shield


holdthegluten

Recommended Posts

holdthegluten Rising Star

I applied for an individual PPO because i got laid off of work and they denied me. I got a letter today stating that I wouldnt be covered by Blue Shield until I was symptom and treatment free for 5 years.........What is the point of the insurance then? How can I prove I am Symptom free, even though I am not. These insurance companies are getting ridiculous with choosing who they cover. Why dont they at least cover me and chrge a premium that is equal to the risk. Unbelievable. It isnt even an illnes that requires daily medication.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

I can't think of enough horrible things to say about the health insurance industry! I'm so sorry you are going through this.

Please keep asking to speak to whoever actually makes the decision--appeal left and right, and hire an attorney if you can (Edgar Snyder comes to mind, as this is a kind of malpractice).

Folks, this is a good reason NOT to get the endoscopy/biopsy/firm diagnosis--if a gluten-free diet works, you have your answer--and the insurance companies have no excuse to deny you coverage. (If the gluten-free diet doesn't work, you are back to square one, but then you have it on record that the gluten-free diet didn't work, so they will hopefully look further for answers for you, and you won't have the celiac label.)

kbtoyssni Contributor

Gosh I'm sorry. Health insurance scares me for this very reason. I'm so scared I'll lose my job some day and be in this position. Can you get the continuing/COBRA coverage that's usually offered after losing a job? For some reason I thought there was a way to continue coverage without having to apply and deal with all the pre-existing condition stuff. But I might be making that up.

labbott Newbie
I applied for an individual PPO because i got laid off of work and they denied me. I got a letter today stating that I wouldnt be covered by Blue Shield until I was symptom and treatment free for 5 years.........What is the point of the insurance then? How can I prove I am Symptom free, even though I am not. These insurance companies are getting ridiculous with choosing who they cover. Why dont they at least cover me and chrge a premium that is equal to the risk. Unbelievable. It isnt even an illnes that requires daily medication.

I had major health issues and was finally dxd with celiacs. After I was laid off I had to find my own insurance and was also denied coverage because of my history. (of course if the stupid Drs had listened to me we could have avoided my whole history but whatever) Anyhoo, it is standard to deny coverage with anyone who looks like they are high risk. But if you have had continuous coverage they have to offer you a high risk policy. They don't volunteer that info though. You have to ask for it. Even though they are required by law to offer it they won't tell you about it unless you ask. Contact your state's insurance regluation group and they can tell you what you need to know so you can talk inteligently with the insurance company. Then when they tell you to fill out apps and they will review you have to follow up with them. Every day. There is a time limit of I think 45 days. So if you go more than 45 days without coverage then they don't have to offer you a policy. The insurance industry is criminal.

Jenny (AZ via TX) Enthusiast
Gosh I'm sorry. Health insurance scares me for this very reason. I'm so scared I'll lose my job some day and be in this position. Can you get the continuing/COBRA coverage that's usually offered after losing a job? For some reason I thought there was a way to continue coverage without having to apply and deal with all the pre-existing condition stuff. But I might be making that up.

I had also heard that as long as you didn't let the coverage lapse in between coverages, you were fine. When I had switched coverage (before celiac) from my work to my husband's, I had several tests at an ENT. I had to send proof that my coverage had never lapsed. After that I had no problems.

ShayFL Enthusiast

All insurances suck from what I can tell...I have had Aetna and Blue Cross/Blue Shield (current). Sometimes they pay for things and other times they dont. FOR THE SAME THING!!!! Like lab work.....

Phyllis28 Apprentice

You may qualify for insurance through a high risk pool available through your state. I know California has one and I believe many other state also have them.

Also check the availablity of insurance through your former employer using COBRA if you have not already done so.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



blueeyedmanda Community Regular

I too hate the insurance industry. Thankfully I do have full coverage through my job but its crazy. Our ER copay is 75 bucks..crazy!

Nancym Enthusiast

Yes, isn't US health care wonderful?

You should be eligible for COBRA for 1.5-3 years, why not sign up for that?

Silly Yak Pete Rookie

That is why we need socialized medicine in this country..

Lockheed Apprentice

yeah saying I'm a celiac did horrible things to my life insurance premium.

darlindeb25 Collaborator
That is why we need socialized medicine in this country

This most definitely is not the answer for the US. Socialized medicine is much worse. You can't get into a doctor for months at a time, they tell you where you can go, just the same...good doctors do not want socialized medicine, they would never beable to get tests done for you.

I have heard many Canadians complain about it. Hospitals are not equipped to care for very sick patients, etc.

Open Original Shared Link

What we need is some kind of a cap put on the insurance compaines, and we need doctors to not run needless tests, which also brings up the cost of health care.

Tim-n-VA Contributor

Since members of this forum probably read more medical stuff than any group not employed by the health care industry, I have a slightly off topic question. Has anyone seen any studies that evaluate medical innovation by medical system - i.e. government funded versus for profite, etc? The potential concern would be that with profits capped, companies would not think it worth the risk to to conduct research.

The extra tests, etc. that drive health care costs are partially influenced in the US by our general tendency to sue for any less than optimum outcome. I suspect that has a lot to do with doctors not wanting to diagnose celiac without a positive blood and a positive biopsy.

rpf1007 Rookie

What we need is some kind of a cap put on the insurance compaines, and we need doctors to not run needless tests, which also brings up the cost of health care.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

What about the fact that most health insurance companies USED to pay for just about every drug under the sun--then, when most people in this country actually believed that they NEEDED all those drugs, the HIC's said that they would only pay if said drug was on their formulary--and then the copays went up and up and up...

Synthroid used to be $4 for 30 pills. Now it's 5 times that much. Does it cost them 5 times to produce it? NO!

And what about all the elderly patients who are on 27 different medicines--how many of those medicines are necessary? Or how many of them are to mask side effects of other meds?

Insurance pays for vaccines--but not for titres to see if the patient is already immune, including the MMR, which gives lifetime immunity with one dose--but two doses are "required." And they don't pay a penny if you or your child has a terrible reaction to the vaccine.

They pay for antacids, H-2 blockers, thryoid meds, anxiety meds, insulin, anti-inflammatories, sleep meds, and all kinds of cortisone treatments (skin and pill form) to combat what we here all recognize as symptoms of gltuen toxicity, but then when you actually find out that you can't eat gluten (and can save them a bundle on prescriptions you no longer need), they deny you coverage. :ph34r:

debmidge Rising Star
You may qualify for insurance through a high risk pool available through your state. I know California has one and I believe many other state also have them.

Also check the availablity of insurance through your former employer using COBRA if you have not already done so.

Call your past employer immediately about COBRA availability

debmidge Rising Star

Open Original Shared Link

Info site about each state's health insurance rules and regs.

My E.R. Co pay is $100 per visit -

I am in the insurance business - keep in mind that the lower the co pays and deductibles the higher the annual premium.

debmidge Rising Star
I can't think of enough horrible things to say about the health insurance industry! I'm so sorry you are going through this.

Please keep asking to speak to whoever actually makes the decision--appeal left and right, and hire an attorney if you can (Edgar Snyder comes to mind, as this is a kind of malpractice).

Folks, this is a good reason NOT to get the endoscopy/biopsy/firm diagnosis--if a gluten-free diet works, you have your answer--and the insurance companies have no excuse to deny you coverage. (If the gluten-free diet doesn't work, you are back to square one, but then you have it on record that the gluten-free diet didn't work, so they will hopefully look further for answers for you, and you won't have the celiac label.)

Well......I am in insurance -- at the risk being unpopular I have to say that there's a lot of acturarial reasons

why an insurance company declines a "risk." Sometimes they'd like to write it at the higher premium but the State Dept. of Insurance is prohibiting them as the rate would be excessive and against public policy. All rates and rules are always approved by your State Dept of Insurance - so it's not necessarily the insurance company giving you the hard time.

Insurance is probably one of the only industries to allow "fair discrimination." This being said, an attorney will not take on a case such as this unless you are being denied coverage for your sex, marital status or religion. Health Insurance companies can deny based on health condition, maybe age too if you are eligible for Medicare - that's a grey area, and type of occupation/hazardous activities like skydiving

If an insurance company can prove actuarially to the State Dept of Insurance that they cannot make a profit in a "line" of insurance, they get permission from the state to decline or limit the coverage or just not write it at all.

You are absolutely correct about not pushing for a firm diagnosis - nothing on paper or in writing...however you can get snagged when you answer the question: Have you seen a doctor in the last 5 years? If you are still messing around with doctors because you have not been feeling well and you are going from Dr. to Dr. for an answer, the response to that question is probably going to be "yes."

My best advices are these:

1a) Always, always take COBRA if offered to you. If your employer is too small for COBRA law then you have a problem....always find out before you take a new job if the employer is subject to COBRA law or not.

1b) Try to get coverage off of your spouse's policy at work, if your spouse works. If your spouse works part-time and only full-timers get health insurance, then perhaps your spouse should increase his/her hours in order to secure health insurance for your family. However, a Pre-existing condition may apply there too.

1c) Never let a lapse happen (see your state guide at site: http://www.healthinsuranceinfo.net)

1d) Group policies have more flexible rules than personal policies do. So always stay with the group or get COBRA from the group.

2) Never apply directly to the insurance company, if you can help it. Go through an expert agent who can

assist you in answering the tricky questions and/or the agent can assist when they know what

health insurance companies are more "with it" than other companies when it comes to celiac.

3a) And the ever unpopular: Keep in mind that insurance companies are not charitable organizations and are only in business for profit, like any other business. Unfortunately, there is a "blur" because the "Blues" used to be non-profit in many states. If insurance companies don't understand a "risk", like celiac, they'll put up

obstacles to coverage or decline outright. If you are not symptomatic, then take their coverage

with the waiting period if you feel that nothing "celiac" will happen in those 5 years. You can't come down with celiac again if you are on a gluten-free diet, etc. So what then exactly is "Blue" excluding in coverage? Any other new health condition shouldn't be attributed to celiac....that would be unlikely....I don't feel that any doctor would

connect a dot between A and B and write that down as an official diagnosis, especially when many doctors

don't know celiac when it's staring them in the face. Let's take advantage of their ignorance.

3b) Also unpopular is the fact that health insurance is not required by law, so therefore, insurance companies do not have a legal obligation to provide it to everyone - like assigned risk auto or workers' compensation, no matter what your health condition is.

I have had the unfortunate experience to know people who neglected to take COBRA and developed cancer while uninsured. These people have no insurance and no way to get it. They have had to sell their home to pay for the cancer treatments (and move in with their son). The sad fact is that they had the opportunity to take COBRA, and had the money for COBRA premiums, but still refused it. I can't stress enough to people that the consequences for not taking health coverage are high. It is the most expensive financial gamble you'll make. I'd like to say the situation can be fixed, but just like many things in life, it can't be fixed once you make a bad decision. A lot of times in life we "pay" for bad decisions. When you don't take COBRA, it's not the insurance industry's fault. COBRA was put into effect to alleviate the "pre existing" condition consequences.

4) Apply to several health insurance companies at once and "shop" it.

5) On applications, do not volunteer information or lengthy explanations

6) If you have insurance issues and would like to complain:

1) Make a written appeal to the insurance company - if they don't satisfy you then,

2) Make a written complaint to your State Dept. of Insurance

7) Please read the info found in: Open Original Shared Link before doing anything rash (#6 above)

8) Some states have more insurance consumer protection laws than others - again, the state has a lot to do with it too.

9) Contact your state legislators (not federal because the federal govt. does not regulate insurance....yet). Tell your state legislators about how you feel that you get denied coverage.

darlindeb25 Collaborator

I work for a doctor, I am on the inside looking out. It's the health industry in general, not the doctors causing the problem. It's like others have said, doctors order tests to cover themselves, just to protect themselves. Like with Medicare, the doctor is told what he must charge, it's not up to the doctor, Medicare sets the amount. With HMO's, the doctor, hospitals, etc, must accept whatever the insurance pays them.

I was prescribed physical therapy, I just received the EOB for the first visit from my insurance. The theripist charged them $290, he received $60, including my copay.

I work for an optometrist, we have one insurance company that pays him $15 for the visit, most of those patients do not have copays, and this insurance is taking over. There is a lot of overhead in a doctor's office, plus staff...with 2 paitents an hour, that's $30....this is what is raising the cost of health prices. It's not the doctors causing the problems.

They pay for antacids, H-2 blockers, thryoid meds, anxiety meds, insulin, anti-inflammatories, sleep meds, and all kinds of cortisone treatments (skin and pill form) to combat what we here all recognize as symptoms of gltuen toxicity, but then when you actually find out that you can't eat gluten (and can save them a bundle on prescriptions you no longer need), they deny you coverage.
This is so true, but the pharmacutical industry doesn't want celiac's to be diagnosed, they want us to think we need all these meds! That's why there isn't more research in celiac/gluten intolerance...it doesn't pad the pockets of the pharmacutical industry. Most research is backed by this industry. Celiac disease does not make them wealthy.

It's a never ending battle!!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,393
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    HeckelCrazy
    Newest Member
    HeckelCrazy
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I had the same thing happen to me at around your age, and to this day it's the most painful experience I've ever had. For me it was the right side of my head, above my ear, running from my nerves in my neck. For years before my outbreak I felt a tingling sensation shooting along the exact nerves that ended up exactly where the shingles blisters appeared. I highly recommend the two shot shingles vaccine as soon as your turn 50--I did this because I started to get the same tingling sensations in the same area, and after the vaccines I've never felt that again.  As you likely know, shingles is caused by chicken pox, which was once though of as one of those harmless childhood viruses that everyone should catch in the wild--little did they know that it can stay in your nervous system for your entire life, and cause major issues as you age.
    • trents
    • Clear2me
      Thanks for the info. I recently moved to CA from Wyoming and in that western region the Costco and Sam's /Walmart Brands have many nuts and more products that are labeled gluten free. I was told it's because those products are packaged and processed  in different  plants. Some plants can be labeled  gluten free because the plant does not also package gluten products and they know that for example the trucks, containers equipment are not used to handle wheat, barely or Rye. The Walmart butter in the western region says gluten free but not here. Most of The Kirkland and Members Mark brands in CA say they are from Vietnam. That's not the case in Wyoming and Colorado. I've spoken to customer service at the stores here in California. They were not helpful. I check labels every time I go to the store. The stores where I am are a Sh*tshow. The Magalopoly grocery chain Vons/Safeway/Albertsons, etc. are the same. Fishers and Planters brands no longer say gluten free. It could be regional. There are nuts with sugar coatings and fruit and nut mixes at the big chains that are labeled gluten free but I don't want the fruit or sugar.  It's so difficult I am considering moving again. I thought it would be easier to find safe food in a more populated area. It's actually worse.  I was undiagnosed for most of my life but not because I didn't try to figure it out. So I have had all the complications possible. I don't have any spare organs left.  No a little gluten will hurt you. The autoimmune process continues to destroy your organs though you may not feel it. If you are getting a little all the time and as much as we try we probably all are and so the damage is happening. Now the FDA has pretty much abandoned celiacs. There are no requirements for labeling for common allergens on medications. All the generic drugs made outside the US are not regulated for common allergens and the FDA is taking the last gluten free porcine Thyroid med, NP Thyroid, off the market in 2026. I was being glutened by a generic levothyroxin. The insurance wouldn't pay for the gluten free brand any longer because the FDA took them all off their approved formulary. So now I am paying $147 out of pocket for NP Thyroid but shortly I will have no safe choice. Other people with allergies should be aware that these foreign generic pharmaceutical producers are using ground shellfish shell as pill coatings and anti-desicants. The FDA knows this but  now just waits for consumers to complain or die. The take over of Wholefoods by Amazon destroyed a very reliable source of good high quality food for people with allergies and for people who wanted good reliably organic food. Bezos thought  he could make a fortune off people who were paying alot for organic and allergen free food by substituting cheap brands from Thailand. He didn't understand who the customers were who were willing to pay more for that food and why. I went from spending hundreds to nothing because Bezo removed every single trusted brand that I was buying. Now they are closing Whole foods stores across the country. In CA, Mill Valley store (closed July 2025) and the National Blvd. store in West Los Angeles (closed October 2025). The Cupertino store will close.  In recent years I have learned to be careful and trust no one. I have been deleberately glutened in a restaurant that was my favorite (a new employee). The Chef owner was not in the kitchen that night. I've had  a metal scouring pad cut up over my food.The chain offered gluten free dishes but it only takes one crazy who thinks you're a problem as a food fadist. Good thing I always look. Good thing they didn't do that to food going to a child with a busy mom.  I give big tips and apologize for having to ask in restaurants but mental illness seem to be rampant. I've learn the hard way.          I don't buy any processed food that doesn't say gluten free.  I am a life long Catholic. I worked for the Church while at college. I don't go to Church anymore because the men at the top decided Jesus is gluten. The special hosts are gluten less not gluten free. No I can't drink wine after people with gluten in their mouth and a variety of deadly germs. I have been abandoned and excluded by my Church/Family.  Having nearly died several times, safe food is paramount. If your immune system collapses as mine did, you get sepsis. It can kill you very quickly. I spent 5 days unconscious and had to have my appendix and gall bladder removed because they were necrotic. I was 25. They didn't figure out I had celiac till I was 53. No one will take the time to tell you what can happen when your immune system gets overwhelmed from its constant fighting the gluten and just stops. It is miserable that our food is processed so carelessly. Our food in many aspects is not safe. And the merging of all the grocery chains has made it far worse. Its a disaster. Krogers also recently purchased Vitacost where I was getting the products I could no longer get at Whole Foods. Kroger is eliminating those products from Vitacost just a Bezos did from WF. I am looking for reliable and certified sources for nuts. I have lived the worst consequences of the disease and being exposed unknowingly and maliciously. Once I was diagnosed I learned way more than anyone should have to about the food industry.  I don't do gray areas. And now I dont eat out except very rarely.  I have not eaten fast food for 30 years before the celiac diagnosis. Gluten aside..... It's not food and it's not safe.  No one has got our backs. Sharing safe food sources is one thing we can do to try to be safe.        
    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.