Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Which French Fries Can We Have?


Kelly&Mom

Recommended Posts

Kelly&Mom Rookie

My daughter was diagnosed in Sept. and me in February. She's 14 and of course loves fast food but we're still figuring out what we can have and can't have. We knew we could have In n' Out fries because they don't fry anything else and used to eat Del Tacos but now they are serving chicken fingers..... Rats! I've seen some debate on whether McDonald's fries are OK. Any answers?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

Burger King should be using a dedicated fryer. Double-check at the particular restaurant you visit.

McDonald's does declare a wheat ingredient in the seasoning used in a processing step to make their fries. The finished fries have been independently tested and do not contain enough residual gluten to show up on an ELISA assay. That means they shouldn't cause damage, but not everyone can tolerate them without any GI symptoms. (They're probably safer than Amy's pizza! :P)

kareng Grand Master

Five Guys is supposed to be good. They only fry fries. They keep the buns away from the grill according to my son.

Chick fill a says their waffle fries are.

I like to get Ore-Ida frozen fries. The plain crinkle ones come out good if you cook them a little longer. They probably have less fat by baking them then a fast food place.

Mizzo Enthusiast

We actually had a Mcdonalds employee tell us not to get the fries as the oil is absolutely cross contaminated . If asked The manager is required to say the FF are gluten free and they take great care in cleanliness, but cannot guarantee with 100% certainty the CC will not occur.

I have heard Red Robin is very clean, considerate and have a designated gluten-free cooking area. We stick with Ore-Ida to be safe. But we indulge in the Outback for meals (never ever had a problem there).

psawyer Proficient

... but cannot guarantee with 100% certainty the CC will not occur.

Nobody can honestly guarantee that, and anyone who claims to is at best mistaken and at worst lying.

luvs2eat Collaborator

LOVE me some Chik-fil-A fries!! There are none where we live, so when I see one in our travels... I always have to stop!!

I don't eat them anywhere else tho. I've heard that McD's are gluten-free and have enjoyed them twice w/o problems in the past, but I don't trust 'em at all!

Mizzo Enthusiast

Nobody can honestly guarantee that, and anyone who claims to is at best mistaken and at worst lying.

I believe YOU misread the statement .


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

My point is that, no matter how hard an establishment tries, they can never guarantee 100% against cross-contamination. Nobody can, because there are too many possible sources. Anyone who makes such a claim is either misinformed or lying outright.

buffettbride Enthusiast

We'll do ChicFilet fries from time to time and In N Out when we travel to states w/ an In N Out. We avoid BK, Wendy's, and McD's fries. Even with dedicated fryers, I've seen chicken nuggets and onion rings sneak into the friers an I don't trust McD's as far as I can throw them.

For sit down meals, we go to Red Robin for fries (ask for no seasoning).

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

I've just about given up on fast food fries being safe. I've gotten sick from Chick-fil-a and McDonalds. The best I have found is Cheeseburger in Paradise, but I got sick once out of the two times I ate there. No way to tell if it was the fries or not. SO it's a 50-50 gamble to me. I like to make oven fries at home. It's really simple to do, just time consuming.

ryebaby0 Enthusiast

The McD's controversy is pretty well documented. My son eats them regularly with no problem (and his tTg is tested once a year). Red Robin's are independantly owned so you'd need to ask. (We were once asked to leave a Red Robin in Harrisburg PA; the manager didn't want us to "risk illness" by even being inside). BK is notorious for their poorly run deep fryers (how many people get a "free" onion ring or chicken nugget in their fries?) Some Wendy's are dedicated fryers, but most are not. Outback fries are not gluten-free, neither are Ruby Tuesday's or EatNPark.

No restaurant will guarantee food is free of CC. They are opening themselves to a lawsuit if they do --- you just have to ask, and fries are high on the list of hard-to-find

scarlett77 Apprentice

My son can't eat McD's fries. We only eat In& Out fries. Otherwise we make them at home. Like someone else said...fries are difficult to find without CC issues. I can say that we recently went to Disneyland and there are quite a few of the places in the park that have a specially dedicated fries fryer specifically for gluten-free guests.

RiceGuy Collaborator

Just check the McD's website if you really want to know the officially published ingredients.

French Fry ingredients currently listed on the McDonald's website:

Ingredients (Allergen statement in ALL CAPS.)

Potatoes, vegetable oil (canola oil, hydrogenated soybean oil, natural beef flavor [wheat and milk derivatives]*, citric acid [preservative]), dextrose, sodium acid pyrophosphate (maintain color), salt. Prepared in vegetable oil (Canola oil, corn oil, soybean oil, hydrogenated soybean oil with TBHQ and citric acid added to preserve freshness). Dimethylpolysiloxane added as an antifoaming agent.

CONTAINS: WHEAT AND MILK *(Natural beef flavor contains hydrolyzed wheat and hydrolyzed milk as starting ingredients).

Skylark Collaborator

I must be lucky. Fries at the BK near work have not made me sick. It's actually one of the "safer" foods when I don't bring lunch.

NE Mom Apprentice

BK fries make me sick within hours of eating them every time. However, I seem to do just fine with the McD's fries.

celiac-mommy Collaborator

There's only Red Robin here that I trust. I know it's a gamble every time you eat out, but-knock on wood-the kids have never gotten sick there from anything. Also, wherever we go, we ALWAYS make sure it is NOT peak meal times. Definitely more dangerous!

gfreegirlie Rookie

My daughter was diagnosed in Sept. and me in February. She's 14 and of course loves fast food but we're still figuring out what we can have and can't have. We knew we could have In n' Out fries because they don't fry anything else and used to eat Del Tacos but now they are serving chicken fingers..... Rats! I've seen some debate on whether McDonald's fries are OK. Any answers?

McDonald's french fries are not only cross-contaminted but they also contain wheat in the basic ingredients list.

psawyer Proficient

McDonald's french fries are not only cross-contaminted but they also contain wheat in the basic ingredients list.

Much discussion has taken place over the last four years. McDonalds fries have been independently tested and found to contain no detectable gluten using the most sensitive ELISA test available. Cross-contamination is on a case-by-case basis and cannot accurately be generalized.

RiceGuy Collaborator

Much discussion has taken place over the last four years. McDonalds fries have been independently tested and found to contain no detectable gluten using the most sensitive ELISA test available. Cross-contamination is on a case-by-case basis and cannot accurately be generalized.

Given the declared ingredients, and the statements on their website regarding allergies and even the link to a Celiac organization's website, I don't care what any tests might suggest. Is the ELISA test so reliable that it can be depended upon so much?

I have reacted to numerous products which state gluten-free right on the label, and aren't supposed to contain any gluten, wheat, etc, etc. So I could care less what any test says. My immune system knows better.

And for those who don't get sick, I just hope that there isn't any reaction going on undetected. After all, not feeling or noticing the effects is common enough to be a concern.

I just did a quick search for documentation about the ELISA test, and it turns out that it DOES NOT TEST FOR THE PRESENCE OF GLUTEN. It is apparently supposed to detect immune response of a blood sample to a given allergen. That means if you test with blood from someone who isn't sensitive to a given substance, the result will be negative! According to Open Original Shared Link, ELISA testing is plagued with various problems.

As far as I can tell, trusting such a test is like trusting a room full of people eating the fries, saying they don't feel sick. It has nothing to do with actually measuring the presence or absence of a substance within the food, but rather the reaction of a blood sample to a food sample. Read the article and decide for yourself.

i-geek Rookie

Given the declared ingredients, and the statements on their website regarding allergies and even the link to a Celiac organization's website, I don't care what any tests might suggest. Is the ELISA test so reliable that it can be depended upon so much?

I have reacted to numerous products which state gluten-free right on the label, and aren't supposed to contain any gluten, wheat, etc, etc. So I could care less what any test says. My immune system knows better.

And for those who don't get sick, I just hope that there isn't any reaction going on undetected. After all, not feeling or noticing the effects is common enough to be a concern.

I just did a quick search for documentation about the ELISA test, and it turns out that it DOES NOT TEST FOR THE PRESENCE OF GLUTEN. It is apparently supposed to detect immune response of a blood sample to a given allergen. That means if you test with blood from someone who isn't sensitive to a given substance, the result will be negative! According to Open Original Shared Link, ELISA testing is plagued with various problems.

As far as I can tell, trusting such a test is like trusting a room full of people eating the fries, saying they don't feel sick. It has nothing to do with actually measuring the presence or absence of a substance within the food, but rather the reaction of a blood sample to a food sample. Read the article and decide for yourself.

There are two types of ELISA tests. The one you have mentioned is the clinical test for antibodies against ingested or environmental proteins. That is not the test used by food manufacturers to determine gluten levels in foods. There are indeed tests that directly measure gluten levels in foods and these are the ones that people refer to when they are discussing foods that have been determined to be gluten-free by ELISA.

i-geek Rookie

Topic: Five Guys only fries potatoes in their fryer. I ate there (bunless cheeseburger and fries) and had no problems other than a temporary bout of indigestion from the grease and soda.

Skylark Collaborator

The McDonald's fry issue has been hashed and rehashed. Foods that are below the 3 ppm ELISA detection limit have been shown to be safe for celiacs in terms of not causing serum markers or villous damage by multiple studies. This includes things like <20 ppm wheat starch (NOT 200 ppm codex stuff), "gluten-free" products like Amy's pizza, and McDonald's fries. Not all celiacs will be able to TOLERATE them though, as the threshold for uncomfortable symptoms in some folks seems to be lower than the threshold for damage. If you only tolerate naturally gluten-free foods, you would avoid the McDonald's fries. Remember that some people are so sensitive they even react to distilled vinegars or whisky, even though most celiacs eat them fine.

This does NOT address CC in the fryers. All bets are off if breaded foods are put into the french fry fryer. Back when I worked at McDonalds doing that was grounds for disciplinary action, as the fryers were at different temperatures and it would have ruined the food. I never saw anything other than hash browns and fries at the french fry station.

@RiceGuy ELISA stands for "Enzyme Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay". There are a number of different ELISA formats (direct, sandwich, competitive) and the assay is used widely to measure all sorts of proteins, small molecules and antibodies. That article you linked is trying to address the current consumer scam of mail order IgG4 "food allergy" ELISAs. People send off hundreds of dollars and a blood sample and get back a bunch of difficult-to-interpret information that is often misrepresented as an absolute result. (People reading that article would do well to keep the Enterolab fecal antibody tests in mind...)

This wikipedia article explains ELISA assays pretty well and might help you understand the difference between serum antibody assays and gluten ELISAs. Gluten is usually measured with a sandwich ELISA or competitive ELISA.

Open Original Shared Link

RiceGuy Collaborator

There are two types of ELISA tests. The one you have mentioned is the clinical test for antibodies against ingested or environmental proteins. That is not the test used by food manufacturers to determine gluten levels in foods. There are indeed tests that directly measure gluten levels in foods and these are the ones that people refer to when they are discussing foods that have been determined to be gluten-free by ELISA.

I've searched, and every single ELISA test I found, including both the industrial and home test kits for food testing, rely upon antibodies. Please post a link to an ELISA test which doesn't use antibodies.

Skylark Collaborator

I've searched, and every single ELISA test I found, including both the industrial and home test kits for food testing, rely upon antibodies. Please post a link to an ELISA test which doesn't use antibodies.

Perhaps I misunderstood your post. When you wrote:

I just did a quick search for documentation about the ELISA test, and it turns out that it DOES NOT TEST FOR THE PRESENCE OF GLUTEN. It is apparently supposed to detect immune response of a blood sample to a given allergen. That means if you test with blood from someone who isn't sensitive to a given substance, the result will be negative!

I though you were confused as to how an ELISA could test for a protein like gluten, rather than testing for the presence or absence of antibodies in someone's blood. The Wikipedia I article I linked above explains how the various ELISAs work in great detail. Antibodies used in an ELISA where you are testing for a hapten like gliadin are laboratory-produced monoclonal antibodies. They are very different from serum polyclonal antibodies and are extremely sensitive and specfic.

i-geek Rookie

I've searched, and every single ELISA test I found, including both the industrial and home test kits for food testing, rely upon antibodies. Please post a link to an ELISA test which doesn't use antibodies.

Yes, they do all use antibodies. They don't all measure antibodies. ELISAs use specific antibodies to measure levels of any protein, including gluten or other antibodies. Here's a brief explanation:

Gluten in food is probably measured using a standard quantitative sandwich ELISA (I say probably because I don't know for sure). In this assay, an antibody specific for gluten (or whatever is the protein of interest) is coated on test plates in a known quantity. Then the test food dissolved in buffer is applied to the plates in a known amount. After an incubation (in my lab, we let our ELISAs incubate from three hours to overnight), the excess sample is washed off and a second antibody that binds to a different part of the gluten molecule is applied. This second antibody has a reporter molecule attached to it. After that binds, the excess is washed off and a chemical that will react with the reporter molecule is added. In our lab, we use a colorimetric reagent- the more color change we see, the more second antibody is bound and thus the more target protein was in our original sample. We read these using plate readers that measure light absorbance at specific wavelengths. These assays are nice because you can set up extra plate wells and add known quantities of your target protein, so then you can compare your sample wells to your known wells and extrapolate how much target protein is in the sample wells. These assays are highly sensitive and are limited only by the lower detection limit of the plate reader (and user error, but that's why there is value in repeating the same sample several times).

The ELISAs used in the clinic to measure, say, TTG are a little different. I'm guessing (again, I don't know for sure as I'm a research immunologist and not a clinician) that in these assays, a known quantity of TTG is bound to the test plate. Then patient serum is added. Any TTG-specific antibodies in that patient's serum will bind to the TTG on the plate. The excess serum is washed off, and then a reporter antibody (like the one described above) can be added. The reporter antibody can be specific for the Fc or tail region of human antibody and will depend on what the clinic wishes to test- there are antibodies against human IgG, IgA, and IgE. The rest of it proceeds as described above. I don't know how the labs quantitate this, or what control samples are used, as I don't run these in my lab.

Hope this helped.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Ginger38 replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

    3. - Scott Adams replied to emzie's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      2

      Stomach hurts with movement

    4. - knitty kitty replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      17

      My only proof

    5. - Xravith posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,463
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    The Yellow Rose
    Newest Member
    The Yellow Rose
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Ginger38
      I refused to do the gluten challenge for a long time because I knew how sick I would be: I have always had and still have positive antibodies and have so many symptoms my  GI was 💯 sure I would have a positive biopsy. I didn’t want to make myself sick to get a negative biopsy and be more confused by all this.  He couldn’t guarantee me a negative biopsy meant no celiac bc there may not be damage yet or it’s possible to miss biopsies where there’s damage but he was so sure and convinced me I needed that biopsy I went back on gluten. It was a terrible experience! I took pictures of the bloating and swelling and weight gain during the challenge. I gained 9 pounds, looked pregnant, was in pain , couldn’t work or function without long naps and the brain fog was debilitating. And in the end he didn’t get a positive biopsy… so I wish I had never wasted my time or health going through it. I haven’t been truly straightened  out since and I am currently battling a shingles infection at 43 and I can’t help but wonder if the stress I put my body under to try and get an official diagnosis has caused all this. Best of luck to you - whatever you decide. It’s not a fun thing to go through and I still don’t have the answers I was looking for 
    • Scott Adams
      It's completely understandable to struggle with the gluten challenge, especially when it impacts your health and studies so significantly. Your experience of feeling dramatically better without gluten is a powerful clue, whether it points to celiac disease or non-celiac gluten sensitivity. It's very wise of you and your doctor to pause the challenge until your holidays, prioritizing your immediate well-being and exams. To answer your questions, yes, it is possible for blood tests to be negative initially and become positive later as the disease progresses, which is why the biopsy remains the gold standard. Many, many people find the gluten challenge incredibly difficult due to the return of debilitating symptoms, so you are certainly not alone in that struggle. Wishing you the best for your exams and for obtaining clearer answers when you're able to proceed.
    • Scott Adams
      It's smart that you're seeing the gastroenterologist tomorrow. While it's possible this is a severe and persistent inflammatory reaction to gluten, the fact that the pain is movement-dependent and localized with tenderness is important for your specialist to hear. It could indeed be significant inflammation, but it's also worth ruling out other overlapping issues that can affect those with celiac disease. Is it possible you got some gluten in your diet somehow? This could be a possible trigger. Hopefully, tomorrow's appointment will provide clearer answers and a path to relief so you can get back to your lectures and enjoy your weekend. Wishing you all the best for the consultation.
    • knitty kitty
      What exactly are you taking from doterra? 
    • Xravith
      Hello, I'm back with a second post. The first time I wrote, I mentioned the possibility that my symptoms were related to gluten. I did a genetic test in which I resulted to have the predisposition, but the results of my blood test were all negative without IgA deficiency. My doctor suggested that it was necessary to do a biopsy to rule out Celiac Disease. However, he said, because of my family history and my symptoms were strongly related to gluten, it was very possible that my Celiac Disease is developing and my antibodies may become positive in the future.  I tried to continue the gluten challenge for the biopsy, around 2-3 g of gluten per day, but it was enough to make me feel worse each passing day. I started developing anemia and other mild nutritional deficiencies, and it was really affecting my daily life. I'm a student and exams are coming up, so my doctor suggests me to strictly remove gluten until I feel better so I could study without problems until I could do the gluten challenge when I come back home for holidays. Since going gluten free, I feel like a completely different person. My mind is clearer, I have no stomach pain during the day, and even my nails improved within just two weeks. It could also be Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, but of course I’ll need the biopsy to know for sure. I was wondering, has anyone else had negative blood tests at first and later tested positive? And has anyone struggled with the gluten challenge because of symptoms?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.