Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need Some Advice And Input


jem4152

Recommended Posts

jem4152 Newbie

Hi everyone, I am new member. I am writing because my 2 year old has had chronic diarrhea off and on since he was 10 months old. He has been tested for celiac, but the results were negative. His IgA Serum was 24 with a reference range of 24-121 and his TTG was less than 3 with a range of less than 5 to more than 8. Prior to the test I had been restricting his diet of the obvious foods that would have gluten in them such as bread and pasta, but did not have him on a completely gluten free diet. The doctor said that was okay. He also had a scope done to see if he had celiac after being on a gluten diet for 2 weeks and that came out fine, but they found he has reflux. The doctor did say that he might be sensitive to gluten. What I am wondering is if it was ok that he had been on a gluten restricted diet at the time of the blood testing? I just do not know what to do anymore. When he was on the gluten restricted diet it seemed to help somewhat, but then his diarrhea started up again. We just had allergy testing done just over a week ago and have kept him off of all the foods he is allergic to and he has now been having issues again for the past two days. He currently is having gluten in his diet since they said the results were negative. What do you all think? I have no idea where to go from here or if his issues have anything at all to do with gluten. Any input would be greatly appreciated!

Michelle


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Hi Michelle, and welcome.

Unfortunately, you are discovering that there is not a lot of knowledge about celiac disease and gluten intolerance in the medical community, including how to diagnose it.

Let's start with his serum IGA, which was on the lowest point of normal. That means that he does not naturally produce a lot of IgA antibodies. If he were one point lower it would totally invalidate any IGA testing. As it is, it makes the IGA testing suspect and the IgG testing is normally used instead. His tTG was normal (did they do the IgG as well as the IgA version?), but you had been restricting his gluten intake, I am not sure for how long. Most doctors will tell you that this does not make any difference, but for a truly valid test it is recommended that a normal full gluten diet be consumed for at least 8 weeks before and up until the date of testing. Same holds true for the scope and biopsies, because with restricted gluten the body stops making so many antibodies and healing starts to take place in the small intestine. Two weeks is not long enough to redamage the small intestine.

If he showed improvement of his symptoms on the restricted gluten diet and then they recurrred with the full gluten diet, that is telling you something significant. The reflux finding is significant too, and is a symptom often experienced in the gluten intolerant.

I would not consider his testing to be adequate to diagnose him one way or other. First of all, he needs to have a full celiac panel, which consists of

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgA and IgG

Total Serum IgA

Of these you would not need to repeat the Total Serum IgA or the tTG IGA. The important tests to run would be the AGA IgG; the EMA IgG, and the DGP (IgA and IgG)., but these would only be valid if he had been consuming gluten for the eight weeks. This is if you want a definitive diagnosis for him. Bear in mind that the testing is considered quite unreliable in infants, and even in adults there are false negative tests, so at the end of eight weeks there is a possibility that he could still test negative on all tests, and be classified as gluten intolerant rather than celiac. This does not mean that his condition is less severe than that of a celiac, just that he does not meet the criteria for a celiac diagnosis, celiac being the only form of gluten intolerance that there is currently testing devised for..

Now, you are probably feeling quite confused at this point, and I don't blame you. You can read some more about testing here: Open Original Shared Link The IgG tests are run when people are low producers of IgA antibodies, and the DGP is a new test that is showing a lot of specificity for celiac disease. Many doctors are not familiar with it or where to get it done.

When you have thought about it and asked all the questions which will no doubt arise, and once you have completed all testing that you wish to have done, be sure to try him on a strict three-month period of the gluten free diet; you will then be able to asses for yourselves whether or not he needs to be gluten free.

jem4152 Newbie

Thank you so much for all the information and validating what I suspected about his diet and his blood test results. I had no idea that there were so many tests that could be run since the doctor only did the two and had no idea that there was a correlation between gluten intolerance and reflux. The doctor had told me that it was just a bonus to the procedure. This has been so hard and I just want to get some answers.

Michelle

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,898
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MLucia
    Newest Member
    MLucia
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.