Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Many Times Did Your Kid Test Neg Before Pos?


Fourmonkeysjumping

Recommended Posts

Fourmonkeysjumping Rookie

My oldest had his first test at 18 months and then had three additional negative tests (yearly) before testing positive at 5 1/2.  My daughter tested negative three times before testing positive last week at 4 1/2.  My two littlest have so far tested negative three times, so I guess we are just waiting to see now!

 

Did/does anyone else test yearly?  My oldest had unusual symptoms, so we didn't figure out what was going on quickly.  My daughter, though, had the same symptoms her big brother had, so we just knew and expected her test to be positive.  So far, the younger two have no symptoms, but we keep wondering and waiting.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I haven't tested my daughter yet.  Have you read any of the "The Patent Celiac" blogs on this forum?  They are written by Jebby who's a Pediatrician and has four small children.   Here's one about testing:

 

https://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/blog/1038/entry-1849-should-your-kids-be-screened-for-celiac-disease/

 

Read them all!  

Fourmonkeysjumping Rookie

I haven't.  I've never heard of her before.  I read the testing one just now.  My kids had none of those symptoms (they presented rather unusually and with my first, we didn't even realize they were symptoms for months.  My second had the same, so we knew).  My husband is, though, so that's why we do it yearly.

come dance with me Enthusiast

None.  She tested positive straight up but was 7 before I realised what was wrong.  Before that I had people telling me that it was my fault she was sick all the time.  My mum was not very nice about it, telling me that even though I thought the house was clean, it can't be cleaned good enough (I hired a professional cleaner for a $400 bond clean a number of times thinking I sucked at cleaning but she still got sick) so because the focus was always on what I must be doing wrong, it took a while to see that it was something else.

nvsmom Community Regular

My three boys tested negative last year (doctors would only do the tTG IgA) but because I have celiac disease, and two of my boys have some pretty obvious symptoms, we made our house gluten-free anyway. I'm glad I did because they are doing MUCH better now even though they never tested positive.

 

I'm of the opinion that if celiac disease is in the family, and someone has symptoms, then why wait to go gluten-free? The gluten-free diet can't hurt a child and often forces us parents to feed our children better because of the high cost (and sugar content) of gluten-free substitute foods.

 

Just my opinion though.  :)

  • 2 weeks later...
Mayasmum Rookie

My two youngest tested negative, as did I. We had only been eating one slice of bread a day though for 2 weeks, so not sure if that was why, but my 6 year old came back very positive on that. With my youngest two, they also have low IgA, so we were told that a negative Celiacs test could be false because their low IgA could mess the test up. Stool tests have shown that they both have very bad guts, and some of the results with my youngest at 18 months, were indicative of Celiacs. The whole house is gluten-free, it just seems the responsible thing to do.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.