Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help understanding results


maverickuk

Recommended Posts

maverickuk Newbie

Just been to my consultation with my GP and have been referred. 

My results are as follows:

Tissu transglutaminase lGA level: 130 u/ml. Range 0.00 - 2.9u/ml

Endomysial antibody lGA level. Weak positive. No figures for that? Is that a visual test perhaps? 

Any assistance in understanding the figures would be great.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Just as the nurse hinted.....you have celiac disease!  Normally, biopsies (obtained from through an endoscopy) would officially confirm it, but you will have to decide if you want to go that route.  Easy for me as it was covered by insurance and I did not have to wait long.  Not so easy in countries where there often is a long wait.  I also just had anemia so I was not suffering at all even though I had moderate to severe intestinal damage.  I needed a firm diagnosis for that reason.  Also my husband (not officially diagnosed) had been gluten free for 12 years and I could not believe that I would have it too!   I encourage you to research further and decide what is best for you.  

nvsmom Community Regular

The tTG IgA typically indicaes and autoimmune attack is happening in the mucosal lining of the intestines.  You are over 40X the upper limit.  That's about as positive as it gets.

The EMA IgA is similar to the ttG IgA but it tends to show more advanced disease.  It is not uncommon to have a positive tTG IgA and a negative EMA IgA, but it is very unusual to have a positive EMA IgA without a positive tTG IgA.  The EMA IgA often starts in response to the tTG IgA damaging the intestines. It attacks and tries to wipe out the upper layer of the intestines.

The EMA IgA is done as a titre.  They keep diluting the sample until it is undetectable.  A positive is often 1:80 or 1:160 (1:320 is very positive). 1:40, 1:20, 1:10 are considered negative usually (1:40 could be a positive in some places).  So yes, it is a visual test.

Those are the positives I had too.

maverickuk Newbie

Cyclinglady, thanks. My GP suggested getting the gastro privately as it will speed things up a lot, then the biopsy on the NHS. 

NVSMOM, yet again you're a fountain of knowledge, helping alleviate my concerns. Now I've had the positive blood, I'm worried I'll have a negative biopsy, but your post has helped me believe that maybe I will get a positive diagnosis, thanks. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Ha!  I was just going to tell you to google the content of your question, but NVSMOM actually keeps this information in her head!  Amazing!  ?

nvsmom Community Regular

LOL  I'm at a good level of geekiness in those tests because they were relevant to my situation. Self serving interest. ;) :)

There is a chance you'll have a negative biopsy.  Damage can be patchy, although a positive EMA IgA is usually a positive biopsy.

The false negative rate for biopsies can be as high as 1 in 5, or 20%.  That seems to happen most early in the disease, if the damage is patchy, and if fewer than 6 samples were taken.  If you do get it done, make sure they start at 6 samples - more is better.

 

maverickuk Newbie

I am going to push hard for 6+ samples. As I cannot imagine how bad I'll feel getting a negative result. I need some answers and a chance of a life without exhaustion. 

Since my last post, I've had a few upsetting realisations. My mum has had a life of symptoms much the same as mine, but hers have progressed to osteoporosis, carpal tunnel, etc. 

We were chatting about it all and my mum talked about her IBS, I told her she doesn't have IBS, she has Celiacs and that the IBS was a misdiagnosis. She said "well your nan had IBS too", at which point suddenly dots connected in my mind and a cold shiver went through my body. My nan died of intestinal cancer. 

So it looks highly likely my nan lives with Celiac, undiagnosed, as did my mum and as have I. My mums health has declined rapidly but she's agreed to go completely gluten free for the rest of her life. Realising my nan probably died of it, plus her symptoms and my recent bloods, she's 99% convinced that she has it. 

She isn't going to have the tests, as she will not have an endoscopy. Long story short, my grandad had one, which punctured his oesophagus, leading to him being given morphine, which lead to pneumonia and he died. So I understand why she's terrified. 

Plus, it will be several more months of declining health. So nothing to lose by going gluten free. I am hoping this changes things for her.

i have a gastro appointment on November 3rd and hoping a biopsy not long after! Fingers crossed. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran

No reason for your rmum to go through an endoscopy then. She could still get the blood work but if she's content to go strict gluten-free then good for her. Make sure she reads or you teach her everything in the Newbie 101 so she knows how to protect herself from cross contamination. And tell her she might go through gluten withdrawal but it will only last 1 month max. if that (for most people). All your first degree relatives should get tested every 2 years or sooner if symptoms present as celiac can present at any age.

Fingers crossed for you to get an endoscopy very soon! Please let us know what happens at the gastro. 

nvsmom Community Regular

I agree. Let your mom (and siblings) know that they can just have the blood test. An endoscopy is not an absolute need for a diagnosis - I've never had one done either.

Good luck.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,207
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    WAB19
    Newest Member
    WAB19
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.