Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Tried out my new Nima sensor


tessa25

Recommended Posts

icelandgirl Proficient
3 hours ago, cristiana said:

Just name the date girls!

That would be so fun!??


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ennis-TX Grand Master

Just tried out the Nima on some non gluten-free certified hemp protein I got on a good deal. Came back gluten positive, well figured that was to good to be true. Saved me finding  out the hard way.

kareng Grand Master

You might want to read this

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

Ennis-TX Grand Master

Yeah...sorta had a part in that, jeez feel like a ass. Anyway at least it is not giving false negatives. Rather have it go off on trace amounts then miss a contamination. Though it has caused some unnecessary whistle blowing, really am questioning it a bit more now. 

Gemini Experienced

I think the NIMA would be best suited for use in restaurants and not so much for pre-packaged foods.  It is also very important to read all directions before using as there are limitations, which are clearly stated, to it's use. 

I never worry about pre-packaged foods because I choose my processed foods wisely. If a company is labeling their food as gluten free, then they must test so they are already doing the testing for you.  The only time I was ever sick from a processed food was in the very beginning and it was a brand that became known for some issues with people getting sick.  After 12 years, knowing what is safe becomes second nature. 

Restaurant food, when traveling, is my only concern.  Again, I choose my places wisely from folks who have vetted these places and reported them on reputable Celiac websites.  I also take into consideration how I am treated when there and answers to questions asked on food prep. You cannot rely on a single source for safety when deciding on whether food is safe to eat.

The NIMA team clearly states that their tester will not work on soy sauce or fermented foods so testing Asian foods will not be reliable.  But with most other types of cuisine, as long as they don't contain some of the ingredients listed as a problem, testing should be straight forward.  No one should have the expectation it will test as well as an ELISA lab test but used as a tool in the total decision making process, it can be a great resource.  I am keeping track of every restaurant meal I test when traveling and whether or not I think it may have been wrong, depending on how I feel the next day. I always know if I have been glutened, which is not very scientific but if the NIMA says safe and I get sick, that will give me some useful information.  I think this device is pretty damn good for a first try and I really think down the road, we will have VERY accurate testing means available to help us dine out more easily.  I think that far more likely to happen than anyone coming up with the cure that they keep touting about. Funny enough...I am not remotely interested in a cure but would like accurate testing for dining out when traveling. That's the only time I worry about a hit.

kareng Grand Master

People miss- using it, testing foods it can't test, cross- contaminating the sample themself, etc.  these are all reasons I don't go by what some random person says tested positive.  Seen it with other testing methods.  

Ennis-TX Grand Master

Yeah I been testing it more, always use a disposable plastic sample fork for loading it. Seems it is very sensitive, will give false positives on certain products, will also clog and error out if there is not enough liquid present in the sample. Has issues with foods high in tannin, acids, bright in colors, or containing vinegar. On the bright side, at least it does not give false negatives, so better safe then sorry with it, just do not use it to go throwing flags around and calling people out. I made this mistake at first trusting it like I did EZ strips. It is less expensive for a reason I guess, still a nice convenient gadget, hoping for a updated version with better accuracy and reliability.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master
5 minutes ago, Ennis_TX said:

Yeah I been testing it more, always use a disposable plastic sample fork for loading it. Seems it is very sensitive, will give false positives on certain products, will also clog and error out if there is not enough liquid present in the sample. Has issues with foods high in tannin, acids, bright in colors, or containing vinegar. On the bright side, at least it does not give false negatives, so better safe then sorry with it, just do not use it to go throwing flags around and calling people out. I made this mistake at first trusting it like I did EZ strips. It is less expensive for a reason I guess, still a nice convenient gadget, hoping for a updated version with better accuracy and reliability.

I hope, if you posted in various places that a product has gluten,  but it does not, that you have gone back and corrected that.  Making claims like that can cause you legal issues.

Gemini Experienced
2 hours ago, kareng said:

People miss- using it, testing foods it can't test, cross- contaminating the sample themself, etc.  these are all reasons I don't go by what some random person says tested positive.  Seen it with other testing methods.  

As with the gluten free diet, there is a learning curve to using one of these and you have to read all instructions on its use. 

Ennis-TX Grand Master
17 minutes ago, kareng said:

I hope, if you posted in various places that a product has gluten,  but it does not, that you have gone back and corrected that.  Making claims like that can cause you legal issues.

It was  a bit more of a questioning statement I had where I  mentioned sending it off to get official test done on the forums. I have posted a update on here where I did so. I thankfully held off til the test came back before emailing the company about food poisoning. I only inquired to their production line, where they mentioned they did not certify anything gluten free, as they did process wheat in the facility. -_- I feel like a  ass for assuming that a device like that would be 100% accurate.

Rob S. Contributor

I would like to point out one thing to everyone on this board: If you purchase the NIMA, the app is NOT required to use it. If you download the app, please know that you are turning over detailed information about your self and your eating habits not only to NIMA  but also to Google and/or Apple.

While NIMA claims to currently anonymize the information, nothing prevents it from changing its position in the future.

Nothing prevents either Google or Apple from using the information as it pleases.

Many people may scoff at my position, but no one can say whether insurance companies or even employers may obtain the information in the future and how they may use it.

  • 4 weeks later...
kareng Grand Master

Bottom Line: Based on testing done to date by Gluten Free Watchdog, products testing “low gluten” using Nima tested from below the limit of detection of 1 ppm gluten up to 18,963 ppm gluten using the R5 ELISA. Barley flour also tested low gluten. Based on these results it is difficult to assess the meaning or understand the usefulness of a “low gluten” Nima reading.

Open Original Shared Link

tessa25 Rising Star

To me, any gluten is unsafe. I use the device to tell me something is bad. A smiley face does not mean to me that something is good. Just a tool in the box.

 

  • 4 weeks later...
kareng Grand Master

Open Original Shared Link

 

"t Gluten Free Watchdog we have been testing a wide variety of products with the Nima Sensor. It is very difficult to put the results of testing completed to date into proper context due to the lack of a published validation report on this device. One goal of our testing is to provide recommendations for consumer use of the Nima Sensor. This is proving to be impossible at this time. In the opinion of Gluten Free Watchdog the Nima Sensor was released into the marketplace prematurely. Given the current state of development of this sensor, Gluten Free Watchdog cannot support its use by the gluten-free community at this time."

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,202
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PatBurnham
    Newest Member
    PatBurnham
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.