Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac's--a Disease Or A Syndrome?


darlindeb25

Recommended Posts

darlindeb25 Collaborator

There is much discussion in another forum I attend about celiacs being a disease or a syndrome. This doctor believes it makes more sense to call it a syndrome. In my opinion, it doesn't matter what you call it--there is no cure--it is with us for life--this was my response to the forum:

Sometimes these people make it sound too easy. Celiacs is a disease and it doesn't have a cure. Gluten is the enemy. Celiac disease goes into remission when you go gluten free, but the disease is still there. Gluten free is not a cure, it's our medicine, so to speak. We can live normal lives according to us, but not normal. We don't have the freedom to eat what we want, we still have to worry about kisses from our gluten eating spouses, bf/gluten-free, kids, grandkids, and friends--we can't truly enjoy a family dinner unless we make it ourselves--we don't have freedom of choice in that respect. Yes, we do choose to be gluten free--but our choices are very slim---gluten free or sick--hmmmmmmmm, pretty easy choice for me. I don't really miss much of the gluten containing foods. I have pretty much made peace with myself about this disease. I do still have moments when I ask, "Why me?" I can go out with friends or family and enjoy their company without eating with them. I was sick for so many years (at least 25 that I can remember) before going gluten-free, so now I have peripheral neuropathy to deal with too. Celiacs takes a backseat to the neuropathy now. It is a disease--whateverwe call it, it needs more awareness out there. Deb


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



plantime Contributor
It is a disease--whateverwe call it, it needs more awareness out there. Deb

AMEN!!

jerseyangel Proficient

I would say disease, also. Even though the symptoms may go away, the disease never does.

nikki-uk Enthusiast

I think they both mean pretty much the same thing.

In the dictionary definition of syndrome is as follows;

'A set of symptoms or conditions that occur together and suggest the presence of a certain disease or an increased chance of developing the disease'.

Either way you look at it celiac disease can be frustrating,inconvenient and sometimes a royal pain,but on the flip side,following a gluten-free diet does give alot of you guys the opportunity to go back to living full and healthy lives (hopefully!-I realise that a dx of celiac disease and gluten-free diet has not been the end of their medical problems :) )

CeliaCruz Rookie

This is one of those debates where it's like, "who cares?" Whether I call it a "disease" or a "syndrome" doesn't make any tangible difference in my life. I still can't eat in most restaurants and I can't go grocery shopping without sitting down at my computer and doing a buttload of research. My family and friends still ask me stupid questions and act insensitively. I still can't eat the pizza at work luncheons. Whatever it is -- disease, syndrome, condition, underground political alliance, etc. -- it still sucks. It's lifelong and -- at times -- socially crippling. And it's not like I can go to Krispy Kreme if I refer to myself as having a "syndrome" instead of a "disease."

If someone wants to make a difference in my life, either introduce better-tasting gluten-free products and make them available in convenient locations or develop a reasonably-priced over-the-counter drug that will make me impervious to cross contamination. Otherwise, don't waste my time with the semantics. I've got a pot of rice pasta boiling on the stove and if I get distracted for even a minute, that s&*t's gonna turn to mush.

penguin Community Regular

I don't think the symantics matter too much, either way the treatment is the same.

I think there is more of a social stigma with the term "disease" because it sounds tainted and contagious. Using words like "syndrome" or "condition" are a politically correct way to trivialize the problem.

Actually, when you think about it, Celiac is more of a disorder.

Or it's a good excuse to use a thesaurus :rolleyes:

Gotta keep those linguists employed

jerseyangel Proficient
Actually, when you think about it, Celiac is more of a disorder.

That, and a big, gigantic pain in the butt :ph34r:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rusla Enthusiast

I don't care what they call it, we have it, we can't get rid of it so it is a disease.

watkinson Apprentice

Well...I never thought about it before. I mean it's called celiac disease so I just think of it as a disease. I guess the meaning of disease is that the body is at dis-ease. Therefore when we are suffering from celiacs or an untreated celiac, and are sick, I guese we would be at dis-ease. But when we are gluten-free and feeling fine maybe we could call it a syndrome. I agree with you when you said that it really doesn't matter. It's incurable whatever it is so we are at dis-ease with it to some degree all the time.

However...all the other autoimmune dieases are also called just that....diseases,... not syndromes.

Wendy

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I prefer to think of it as a difference. If we had not been consuming great amounts of this stuff since birth I doubt we would see this genetic difference as a problem. I know I am in the minority but the disease is not with me, it is with a culture that overprocesses everything and then adds an addictive and toxic (I believe for everyone) compound into our foods instead of alternatives, for what reason again?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,746
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Hughesy
    Newest Member
    Hughesy
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.