Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New Clue On Babies' Wheat Allergy


Claire

Recommended Posts

Claire Collaborator

NEW CLUE ON BABIES' WHEAT ALLERGY

Study: Adding Grains to Babies’ Diet After Age 6 Months May Up Allergy Risk

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Interesting. I note that in passing, the article mentions that, "None of the babies had celiac disease, in which the body cannot digest a protein called gluten, which is found in various grains including wheat, rye, and barley."

Is the mechanism of celiac disease really that the body cannot digest gluten? That is not my understanding of the basis of the disease. My understanding is that gluten triggers an autoimmune response, not that it isn't being digested. Is this an accurate statement in the article?

jerseyangel Proficient

Trents, you are right. At least as far as I know--gluten causes an autoimmune reaction in Celiacs--it's not a problem with digestion of the gluten that is the problem (strictly speaking of Celiac, and not other sensitivites or allergies).

trents Grand Master

Thanks for your input, Jersey angel. Sounds like the statement made in the article would better fit a food intolerance condition like say, lactose intolerance where an enzyme is actually lacking that is needed to break down the substance.

jerseyangel Proficient

Yes, that's what I was thinking, too.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

The MD's and PhD's still don't get it, do they? I mean, this is our whole problem, isn't it? They look at a normal-to- overweight celieac and say, "No, you couldn't possibly have celiac, you're not wasting away," or they look at someone like me, with a sky-high IgG and, mild tummy symptoms, thyroid disease, and horrible rashes, and they don't care that the rashes and the tummy symptoms disappeared without the gluten, or that I lost 10 pounds (need to lose more) and felt SO much better--they say, "you couldn't possibly have celiac, it could be anything, and the positive dietary response is ALL IN YOUR HEAD!"

Grrrr.

Now, because they've come out with a flawed study (how can they say ANYTHING about celiac when they don't even know what it is?!?!?!), doctors are going to tell moms to introduce wheat EARLIER--and we'll see celiac problems with infants skyrocket even more.

Maybe they are being paid to do so by the pharmaceutical industry to take the heat off vaccines....

eKatherine Apprentice

Of course it didn't have anything to do with celiac, but in the past 6 months or so I read about a study where they found that it doesn't make any difference whether you delay feeding the allergen to the child, the same percentage will end up with the allergy. I think it was peanuts and maybe soy in that study.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



shai76 Explorer
:angry: This goes against what they told me to do when my son was very young. They said to hold off giving him any allergenic foods, now they are saying that causes the allergies, not prevents them. I wish they would make up their minds already.
trents Grand Master

I went back and looked at the referenced article again. The author was not a medical doctor but someone with a BS in health studies or some such thing. It was reviewed by an MD, however. I intended to contact the author to explain that her explanation of Celiac disease was incorrect but there was no email address given for her. Her name was hyperlinked but it only gave a bio. No contact info.

Steve

gfp Enthusiast

Open Original Shared Link

Results: Of the 1560 children, 51 developed celiac disease autoimmunity. Infants exposed to gluten in the first 3 months of life had a 5-fold increased risk of autoimmunity compared with infants first exposed at 4–6 months (hazard ratio
5.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44–18.57). Infants introduced to gluten at 7 months or later also had an increased risk of celiac disease autoimmunity compared with those exposed between 4 and 6 months (HR 1.87, 95% CI 0.97–3.60). The risk of autoimmunity was independent of the age of first exposure to rice and oats. Breastfeeding duration was similar for children who developed autoimmunity and those who did not.
...

Practice implications: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends exclusive breastfeeding until 6 months of age to protect children from gastrointestinal infections, to prolong lactational amenorrhea and to increase postpartum maternal weight loss. The results of this study did not show that breastfeeding protected against celiac disease autoimmunity. However, at least for children predisposed to celiac disease or type 1 diabetes, avoiding cereal with wheat, rye or barley until a child is 4–6 months of age appears to reduce the risk of autoimmunity. Starting cereal before 3 months or after 7 months appears to increase the risk. Thus, although current recommendations in Canada and from the WHO are to breastfeed exclusively until at least 6 months of age, the results of this study suggest that it may be wise to consider introducing cereals at around the sixth month.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - daniellelawson2011 replied to daniellelawson2011's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Lab results

    2. - trents replied to daniellelawson2011's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Lab results

    3. - daniellelawson2011 posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Lab results

    4. - Joe R replied to Joe R's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      2

      Immunologist Referral if IgA Deficient

    5. - nanny marley replied to nanny marley's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Help needed


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Pat Gamble
    Newest Member
    Pat Gamble
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • daniellelawson2011
      Thank you for the welcome and reply. The first test was tissue transglutaminase IGA and it was normal. The second test just simply says IGA and it was 638. You definitely answered my question, it sounds like im negative for celiac since the 1st test was normal, and that another condition has caused the abnormal result of the IGA. That's exactly what I was wondering. Im almost positive I have MS and I've read results are higher like that with early onset. Or it could be IBS. Hopefully the visit with the neurologist will give me even more answers and point to a final diagnosis. I really appreciate you taking the time to reply and for helping. Thank you so much!
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @daniellelawson2011! First, we need to deal with terminology here. When you refer to the "ttg" test I take that to mean the ttg-iga. And when you refer to the "iga" test I take that to mean total iga since the magnitude of the score would suggest that. Total iga is not a test for celiac disease per se. It is run in order to check for iga deficiency. If you are iga deficient, then the ttg-iga and other iga tests that are specific for celiac disease will be abnormally low and this would potentially produce false negatives. You are not iga deficient but, rather, your total iga is abnormally high. This can suggest underlying health conditions, some of them can be serious in nature.  https://labs.selfdecode.com/blog/high-iga/ "High IgA usually points to chronic infections or inflammation, though many disorders can raise its levels. High IgA does not cause symptoms. People show symptoms from their underlying health problem." One thing I might add and that is you must have been eating normal amounts of gluten for weeks/months prior to the blood draw for antibody testing. Testing while on a gluten free or gluten reduced diet will not yield valid results. Also, here is a primer outlining the various antibody tests that can be ordered to check for celiac disease:  
    • daniellelawson2011
      After struggling with many different symptoms for years with no diagnosis, I decided to do my own research and I stumbled upon an article about celiac disease. I asked my PCP to order a ttg and iga. The results: the iga was high at 638. The ttg was negative. Of course I will discuss with my doctor, but i would like to hear from people that have went through the process of diagnosis to maybe give me some insight on what this means and where to go from here. Also of note, i had a brain mri which showed white lesions which arent typical at 44 years old. I have many MS symptoms. I go to the neurologist on Tuesday, but just curious if anyone knows if there is a correlation between iga and MS. I appreciate any help! Thanks!
    • Joe R
      Thank you for your advice. I appreciate the help. 
    • nanny marley
      Thankyou so much for your reply I decided to skip the senna has I've already had very loose stools last few days I've cut my portions down on the low fiber diet too and drinking lots of liquid has I just thought it would be wise to listen to myself too I've probably already done wat the senna would of done myself naturally by drinking clear apple juice which if not on the diet I would have to avoid anyways has I don't tolerate many fruit juices so I'm sure I've done the right thing I did try to contact the department on my letter but weirdly enough it was ringing but then after a while saying wrong number 🤷 but again I'm positive I've done the right thing I'm going to take today very lightly too with low portions and more liquids so yes thankyou for that advise I am very nervous but I have had time to think and read other peoples experiences and not all are bad there is some good advise and reassuring information from people who do these all the time so I'm trying my best to be positive so I can at least settle my mind knowing im doing this to help my own health has this year has been a rollercoaster for me cutting out gluten and lactose was a good idea but I still get flare ups and other symptoms so it definitely is worth a check like you said it was the calprotein that prompted the doctor to refer me again thankyou for your reply it's means a lot for someone to take the time to listen and respond and give uplifting advise  especially to me just now has I'm a bundle of nerves inside getting closer to tomorrow prep so thankyou for that 🙏
×
×
  • Create New...