Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing Baby Gluten


KHumphrey

Recommended Posts

KHumphrey Newbie

Hello,

I am 31 weeks pregnant and do not have celiac disease. However, my husband does and was diagnosed when he was little. I'm not clear on how we can test the baby to see if the baby has celiac when born. Anybody have any idea. The advice we got previously was to keep the child off gluten for 2 years and then do a blood test after 2 years. That seems like a long time to wait.

I'm also wondering whether I need to eat gluten-free when breastfeeding? I haven't been while I am pregnant and the baby seems to be doing well so far.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



buffettbride Enthusiast

In order for the blood tests to be indicative of Celiac disease, your child would need to eat gluten. Your child will get some gluten if you are eating gluten and breastfeeding. Celiac needs a trigger, so it's possible your child will have at least one of the Celiac genes, but never develop the disease.

I don't know what I would do in that situation, but I would probably breastfeed (not being gluten free), and delay the introduction of wheat/oatmeal (stick with rice cereal, when you decide to introduce). Then, watch for symptoms, knowing that Celiac could be a possibility. You could have your child tested for the Celiac genes after birth and then you'd know that you might have to look for symptoms as well.

Ursa Major Collaborator

To be on the safe side, you may consider going gluten-free while pregnant. That is what my daughter did, because the baby has two grandmothers with celiac disease.

She fed her older child (who is now 16 months old) gluten foods for way too long, though. That child NEVER had a solid bowel movement after being weaned and eating solids, until she took her off gluten last week. She'd have total blowouts several times a day, after every meal (I didn't know, as they don't live close, and she was in denial). She also started having terrible temper tantrums not long after being introduced to bread, crackers and pasta.

When my daughter finally smartened up and started feeding her gluten-free foods, she had a solid bm by the next day, and her temper tantrums stopped!

Anyway, just to show you that it is relatively easy to figure out if a baby has celiac disease or not. If you eat gluteny foods when the baby is being breastfed, you'll know if there is a problem with food as well. If you have a colicky baby (really, there is no such thing as colick, it is ALWAYS caused by food intolerances), you need to find out what is making the baby sick, and stop eating the offending foods.

My daughter now had to stop dairy, gluten and corn, as her new baby has tested sensitive to those as well (testing done by a naturopath).

And, surprise, she herself is suddenly feeling so much better, no more bloating and gas! It appears that she is gluten intolerant herself, which she refused to consider and would get mad at me for mentioning several times.

And the advice from the doctor to keep the baby gluten-free for two years and then do the blood test is ridiculous. If the child has never had gluten, it would obviously test negative, celiac disease or not. Then you'd be told the kid is fine to eat gluten, possibly making him/her sick.

I agree that a gene test would be a good idea, to give you a clue as to whether the child has the celiac disease genes.

vanillazeis Rookie

i have a 3 year old that is diagnosed with celiac. I also have a 9 month old. Bayleigh's gi dr told us to wait until 12 months to introduce the baby to gluten, and blood test him at 18 months. Hope that helps! good luck!

kbtoyssni Contributor

The other thing to be aware of is they baby might not have celiac at birth and might either develop it later in life or never get it. So it might be something that shows up at age 5 or 10 or 15. You never know when, so if he/she tests negative initially, it's still something to be aware of and watch for.

KHumphrey Newbie

Thanks for all the replies. It has been difficult to find information on this topic. My next step is to also advice our new pediatrician of the condition so we can monitor him.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,194
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bottsy
    Newest Member
    Bottsy
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.