Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is Gluten Intolerance Stage One Of Celiac Disease?


CCM

Recommended Posts

CCM Rookie

I called the Celiac Hotline at the Univ of Chicago to ask about a study I saw described on Celiac Disease Research Center that is examining whether gluten intolerance should be considered a precursor to celiac disease rather than an independent condition.

What do folks on this forum know of this? I am guessing I am gluten intolerant (and dairy) because my blood test, and biopsy were negative, as were food allergy tests. Yet a gluten filled diet has been doing horrible things for me for years. So I am transitioning to a gluten-free diet.

I am wondering whether confirmed celiacs here went through a separate distinct phase of gluten intolerance that just got worse over time? Worse enough to be diagnosed as celiac?

Should I be concerned about the potential for long term health effects from untreated (or undiagnosed gluten intolerance) as someone with a confirmed case of celiac disease may be concerned about increased cancer risks, etc.?

Does anyone know how many people are gluten intolerant as opposed to celiac? I would think that more public education on the issue would lead to more cases of gluten intolerance.

Univ of Chicago seemed to have more celiac research posted on its website than other centers. Any good referrals to the latest research, especially on gluten intolerance vs. celiac disease?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jodie2DQ2 Apprentice

I have been wanting to ask the same question...as I was only tested for celiac after I was already gluten free and was negative. However my allergist did genetic testing and I have double DQ2 which is about the worst genetics for celiac from what I have learned. It is amazing to me that I can't say I have celiac disease....but I can't even eat one bite without my stomach feeling like a bomb went off inside. It seems to me that you are gluten intolerant until you have done enough damage to your intestines for the test to be positive. It does not matter anymore as I would not go back on gluten for any testing..I get too sick from the accidental glutenings as it is. Great post though. I will be interested to see the responses. Jodie

dbmamaz Explorer

Thats an interesting question . . i know people here have talked about a genetic test that shows which of 2 celiac genes you carry, and i guess if you have an intolerance and carry one of those genes, you could be likely to develop celiac. I havent seen any numbers for how many people who are negative for celiac but positive for food trials have the gene, that would be interesting.

HAK1031 Enthusiast

I know that both my brother and I have violent reactions to gluten, yet our bloodwork and his biopsy were clear. I didn't have a biopsy, however. I had the genetics test and I have the DQ2 allele, so my GI feels I am likely celiac or at least "pre-celiac" as he called it. I was only seriously ill for a few months before diagnosis, though I have had scattered symptoms all my life.

CCM Rookie

I noticed you are from CT. I grew up there and will be heading back this summer to visit family, the first time visiting on a gluten-free diet. Are there any active local groups there (preferably in the New Haven area) that I could get in touch with regarding places to shop for food, restaurants, etc.? I am trying to get as much info on gluten intolerance/celiac as I can before I head out because it would not surprise me if some other members of the family have this problem.

HAK1031 Enthusiast

I'm not from near New Haven, but I think I do remember hearing about support groups around there. I'm in the Greater Hartford area, and as of yet there's no support group near me. But I found this website: Open Original Shared Link

good luck!

HAK1031 Enthusiast

ok i guess this site won't let you post other sites...but google it. PS- I totally lied about there not being a group in my area. after 5 seconds of googling i found one right in my TOWN!! on this website no less!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master

Your question points not only to the fact that the state of the research and understanding of gluten-related disease is in flux but so is the terminology. It's getting more complicated all the time. The one thing that is becoming clearer to me is that gluten-containing grains (or at least their modern hybrids) may not be good for anybody and they are very bad for a certain percentage of the population.

Steve

Tim-n-VA Contributor

Is there a standard medical definition of "gluten intolerance"?

I've seen the term used here to cover a variety of situations some of which are probably pre- or early celiac.

hathor Contributor

I don't think there is a standard medical definition of gluten intolerance because the condition isn't even generally accepted. I think once there is an accepted test, the definition and the good statistics will follow.

I've heard 30% of the population. I've heard 10%. I've heard four to five times the number of people with celiac. Hard to tell. I believe Dr. Fine found that roughly 30% of the population gets a positive score on his tests. I don't know where these other folks' figures come from -- perhaps their own practices.

I think quite a bit of gluten intolerance is preceliac. But then there are people who react to gluten, not in their villi, but elsewhere in their bodies.

My position is that you shouldn't eat anything that makes you feel bad, whether the doctors have a name or test for your condition or not. Remember the doctors, with the then available testing and their accepted medical definition, used to think that celiac was very rare and presented nearly always in infants who had certain symptoms. Now that view is accepted as wrong. But the disease hasn't changed any.

CCM Rookie
I think quite a bit of gluten intolerance is preceliac. But then there are people who react to gluten, not in their villi, but elsewhere in their bodies.

Thanks for the feedback. I am guessing I could fall into that category of folks whose gluten intolerance reactions occur elsewhere than their villi. I deal with excessive gas intestinally, but that's it. The rest is my joints, bones, muscles, mood, reproductive tract, as well as fatigue and brain fog (so bad that I now finally understand why I was unable to complete graduate school).

I feel like my brain is finally starting to wake up now that I am going gluten-free.

Rosebud710 Apprentice

This is an interesting topic . . . when I tell people I can't eat gluten, some will ask if I'm celiac. This is where I'm sure I confuse them. Since I don't have immediate, digestive disturbances when I eat gluten, I never consider myself celiac. But I've learned (from this forum) that that's not the case. From what I've learned, based on the condition of my villi is how you determine celiac disease. Well, the only test I've had to determine my gluten intolerance is an antibodies test my doctor requested from my blood work. My antibodies were high, therefore, my body was fighting something and my doctor recommended I stop eating gluten. Well, since I've stopped eating gluten, I'm more healthier, my panic attacks have dramatically lessened (that could also be from me cutting caffeine out of my diet), and the bloating and gas has ended. I'm still at a loss as to whether I have an intolerance or if I have celiac.

In the meantime, I'm avoiding the confusion in the explanation of my dietary limitations. Whenever someone asks me if I'm celiac, I now say "yes, I am". It's just easier.

Nancym Enthusiast

Don't bother getting technical with people who ask, they're usually not really interested in a detailed answer and they're likely to think you're a hypochondriac if you explain that you're not a celiac but... Just leave it at "yes, I'm a celiac" or for the people that really are clueless tell them you're allergic to wheat, barley, rye and oats.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,678
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    GGGrandpa
    Newest Member
    GGGrandpa
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.