Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Colonoscopy Question


jjc

Recommended Posts

jjc Contributor

My daughter was diagnosed by some stool testing, but she is finally going to have her first colonoscopy to see what's up officially down there.....however, she hasn't had gluten in a whole year. She's HAS been accidentally glutened several times in the past couple of months, but she is currently on a gluten free diet.

In a year she's probably healed up pretty well, but I wondered if her colonoscopy would show any damage from those few times she's been glutened?

We want to make sure she doesn't have IBS or Crohn's or any other problem.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

A colonoscopy will not show celiac disease damage caused by gluten. Damage from celiac disease occurs in the small intestine, not in the colon.

The procedure to detect celiac disease is an enteroscopy, commonly also called an endoscopy. It is common for both procedures to be done at the same time.

Dr-LaTino Newbie

I wouldn't recommend doing a colonoscopy. Take it from me, I've done it, and I remembered it put my body under even more stress than it was in the first place and usually results in nothing (especially in the younger). Plus, they're sticking a tube through your... you get the point.

It's not pleasant and usually results in worser symptoms. Same thing goes for fiber. It's a horror on the body.

It's all up to you though. ;) If you want proof of fiber damage just ask me. I've got plenty of resources.

psawyer Proficient
I wouldn't recommend doing a colonoscopy. Take it from me, I've done it, and I remembered it put my body under even more stress than it was in the first place and usually results in nothing (especially in the younger). Plus, they're sticking a tube through your... you get the point.

It's not pleasant and usually results in worser symptoms. Same thing goes for fiber. It's a horror on the body.

It's all up to you though. ;) If you want proof of fiber damage just ask me. I've got plenty of resources.

Okay I'll take the bait. Please provide your proof of how fiber does damage, and while you are at it, I'd be interested in your evidence that a colonoscopy is harmful (not just unpleasant--harmful).

toni m Newbie
My daughter was diagnosed by some stool testing, but she is finally going to have her first colonoscopy to see what's up officially down there.....however, she hasn't had gluten in a whole year. She's HAS been accidentally glutened several times in the past couple of months, but she is currently on a gluten free diet.

In a year she's probably healed up pretty well, but I wondered if her colonoscopy would show any damage from those few times she's been glutened?

We want to make sure she doesn't have IBS or Crohn's or any other problem.

definately have the colonoscopy. my daughter was also diagnosed with celliac disease, was gluten free for months with no improvement. she was diagnosed celiac by positive blood and endoscopy. after months of still being in severe pain she went for a colonoscopy only to find out she had crohns as well as celiac. by time of the diagnosis she had a case of severe crohns. definately have it done

ravenwoodglass Mentor
I wouldn't recommend doing a colonoscopy. Take it from me, I've done it, and I remembered it put my body under even more stress than it was in the first place and usually results in nothing (especially in the younger). Plus, they're sticking a tube through your... you get the point.

It's not pleasant and usually results in worser symptoms. Same thing goes for fiber. It's a horror on the body.

It's all up to you though. ;) If you want proof of fiber damage just ask me. I've got plenty of resources.

While a colonscopy prep is unpleasent the test itself is not bad. For one thing most are under some form of sedation when it is done. I did have a bad reaction once to a prep that I turned out to be allergic to and was reluctant to do one again. However with celiac the chances of a cancer of the intestines is higher than for the regular population. I had another one done a few months ago with a different prep and suffered no ill effects and they found a polyp that was fairly good sized. In the long run I am glad I had it done as polyps can turn cancerous.

As for it worsening symptoms the first one I had done prediagnosis left me feeling great for about three days, until the gluten built up again. My GI looked at me like I was nuts when I asked if I could do the prep once a month or so. :lol: That should have clued him in but it would still be another 5 years before I was finally diagnosed.

IF your experience made you worse you may have had a bad reaction to the prep and when it is time to do it again let the GI know so they can give you something different.

As for fiber being bad for you- when most think of fiber they think 'wheat'. For those of us with celiac yes that type of fiber is not good of course. However the fiber found in fruits, veggies and nongluten foods is not bad for us and is an important part of our diets.

To the original poster- do ask that they do an endo at the same time. It requires no additional prep and only adds a few minutes to the test time. The endo will show if she is healing well, the colonoscopy will not.

Gemini Experienced
While a colonscopy prep is unpleasent the test itself is not bad. For one thing most are under some form of sedation when it is done. I did have a bad reaction once to a prep that I turned out to be allergic to and was reluctant to do one again. However with celiac the chances of a cancer of the intestines is higher than for the regular population.

I have read numerous publications and books on Celiac and most agree that if someone follows a strict gluten-free diet and doesn't cheat, the risk of any intestinal cancer

is no more than for the general population. I also believe that it's just intestinal lymphoma and adenoma of the small intestine that can occur in undiagnosed or non-complaint Celiacs. Both are rare cancers and occur in a very small percentage of the population so I don't think people need to walk around fearing intestinal cancer if they do a good job with the diet.

You also need to look at family history. There are many undiagnosed Celiacs in my family and just about no cancer at all. We all have autoimmune diseases yet pretty much have a non-cancer family tree, going back many generations. It's not much of a worry for me. I think if people choose to have one done if they are having additional problems that cannot be explained easily, it might be a good thing to do but all this screening because you turn a certain age is part of the reason health care costs have soared.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ang1e0251 Contributor

The other posters are correct, your daughter needs an endoscopy to reveal celiac disease but it will not show any damage if she has been gluten-free for a year. She will need at least 8 weeks of a gluten challenge before she can have an accurate endoscopy.

Not that you shouldn't do the colonoscopy, that's up to you but if it were me, I'd like them to do both at one time after the challenge. That way she only has to undergo the anesthesia once.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,202
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PatBurnham
    Newest Member
    PatBurnham
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.