Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Aga And Dgp Differences?


dhiltonlittle

Recommended Posts

dhiltonlittle Contributor

what is the difference between the AGA (IGA) anti gliadin antibody and the DGP deamidated gliadin pedtide antibody?

what exactly are they?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gemini Experienced

what is the difference between the AGA (IGA) anti gliadin antibody and the DGP deamidated gliadin pedtide antibody?

what exactly are they?

This is covered in Dr. Peter Green's new book. The DGP is a newer version of the AGA test and, supposedly, a more sensitive test. I don't have the book with me so cannot provide a direct quote but that's essentially it. The AGA is still a good test but the DGP is better and may replace the AGA.

The AGA test looks for the gliadin protein in your blood, which happens if you are eating gluten and have Celiac Disease.

It is used to help diagnose and then used in re-testing to see if you are compliant to the diet.

sa1937 Community Regular

I just received Dr. Green's new (revised) book today. This is what he says:

Deamidated Gliadin Peptides (DGP)

Patients with celiac disease create antibodies to gliadin, but these antibodies can also be found in other conditions and in normal people. It is known that tTG deamidates, that is , it acts on and enhances the gliadin peptide in patients with celiac disease which causes the inflammatory reaction in the gut. The new ELISA test looks for these specific antibodies to deamidated gliadin.

sa1937 Community Regular

(cont'd) had an oops...

The new ELISA test looks for these specific antibodies to deamidated gliadin.

The DGP test is a significant and valuable new addition to the celiac panel. Many labs have changed over to it. It is also being studied to replace AGA antibody testing in young children who may not yet have developed tTG antibodies.

nora-n Rookie

Interesting they admit that the ttg test is not good in small children...

Also, Dr. Ford writes about the deamidated gliadin antibody test on his website, google ford gluten.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,205
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Butch68
    Newest Member
    Butch68
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.