Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Your Takes On Diagnosis


heather Goble

Recommended Posts

heather Goble Rookie

Hi,

I have just recently had blood tests and biopsy, both came back negative. When I went to the doctor today for the biopsy results I actually met with the phsyicians assistant (who didn't do the biopsy, but read me the results). After hearing my symptoms he said he was very surprised the tests came back negative. I told him that I was off of gluten for a month and a half before testing and only went back on for a couple of weeks for the test (the dr said I only needed to eat gluten for 3 days prior to testing). The physicians assistant that I saw today said he wasn't sure if that would skew the results or not, but told me to just assume I have celiac due to my symptoms. Not really a diagnosis and a long story to explain to everyone that inquires. I guess I'm a little frustrated. Any advice ( I have been gluten free since the day is the biopsy, I just can't eat it) I'm just uneasy of the somewhat diagnosis.

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Dr. B Newbie

Signs of a gluten intolerance are not always found in the intestines via a biopsy. Other organs can be affected.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Proteins from other foods, which leak through the intestines, might be causing your discomfort.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Many people in situations such as yours eat the paleolithic diet (no grain diet) for awhile (several months) and then might re-introduce proteins, one at a time, to see if the proteins from that particular food causes them discomfort. Also, once the candida is gone, and the holes in the intestines are healed up/closed up, one can tolerate other proteins better because they don't leak through the intestines anymore.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Go ahead and stick with the diet being aware it can take a bit of time to heal. Not all of us have candida issues and even if you do that doesn't mean you would be able to add gluten back in if you are gluten intolerant or celiac. Going with a whole food diet is the quickest way to heal as there is less risk of cross contamination that way.

JonnyD Rookie

I had very positive bloodwork as well as family history so I went Gluten-Free right away. I had a biopsy done a month later but never had any gluten before. My GI said it could take 6 months to a year to fully recover so he wasn't too concerned. My biopsy show some moderate signs but not slam dunk atrophy. It's been almost three months Gluten-Free and I'd never go back on gluten. If Gluten-Free agrees with you, stick with it.

heather Goble Rookie

Just wondering how seriously to take the "your results are negative, but assume you have celiac" the doctor said he couldn't believe they came back negative due to the symptoms I have. I guess I was just looking for a yes or no answer and am afraid family and others won't take the "assume that you have it" as a real diagnosis. I'm tired of explaining it already....

Dr. B Newbie

I think the best test is "go gluten free and see if you feel better". If you do, then you tested positive for gluten intolerance. Just tell "family" that you tested positive. Are they going to want to see the actual test results?

Chemical tests are not always accurate. You know how you feel better than anyone else. I would never put my health in the hands of a medical doctor, or believe 100% in their tests.

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

I had a similar situation. After my son tested positive, I had the blood test done and it came back very positive. I went gluten-free (but only for about 2 weeks) before seeing the GI. He did more blood tests and endoscopy (said the short time gluten-free shouldn't make a difference). Everything came back negative. Went on gluten challenge (3 months) but only did it 1/2 way. At 6 weeks he tested me again (blood only) and it was still negative. By this time my son has been diagnosed with a biopsy and since I have all the symptoms I saw no reason to continue.

My doctor is certain I don't have celiac disease but diagnosed me with gluten intolernace. Whatever. Treatment is the same so I don't really care. I'm pretty sure I have celiac disease. Why else would the original blood test be so positive?

Cara


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ked85 Newbie

I also tested negative with a very deep family history of celiac and intolerance. The doctor wanted to put me on IBS pills and I said NO. I immediately went on a gluten free diet after the nurse told me that it did not test for intolerance and I already feel a difference after a week and a half. Also, people claim there's a false negative rate of about 20% (not sure how accurate that is), but it just goes to show - do what makes you feel good. If removing gluten works for you, maybe try the diet and then reintroduce it to your system at a later date and see how your body reacts. That's what I plan to do.

Dr. B Newbie

I think the high gluten content in grains now-a-days makes grains an undesirable food for human consumption. I have read that tens of thousands of years ago that wheat berries were plump and juicy, and contained very little gluten. Today

ked85 Newbie

So, reintroducing gluten to your diet in the future may not be the healthiest way to go.

Those are very good (and educational) points. Thank you for that information! Definitely want to do some more research out of curiosity now.

heather Goble Rookie

Thanks everyone for the helpful info. I have pretty bad reactions when I eat even a small amount. Usually get a really itchy rash which lasts for about a day, headache, fatigue, and terrible joint pain (which lasts for several days). All of which I have had before going gluten free, but now much worse. I know I can't eat it, so I don't.

sb2178 Enthusiast

That rash could be biopsied for a definitive diagnosis. Check out the DH board for details on the testing as it's finicky.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

    2. - Scott Adams replied to lizzie42's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Low iron and vitamin d

    3. - Scott Adams replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Healthy Gluten Free Foods low sugar that you found?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to lizzie42's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      1

      Trip to Anaheim/Disney

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,242
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Maya Baum
    Newest Member
    Maya Baum
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing this — it’s really important. The FDA is actively seeking public input on improving gluten and ingredient labeling, which could directly impact how people with celiac disease and gluten sensitivity shop and stay safe. Clearer labeling would help reduce accidental gluten exposure and make it easier to identify hidden sources of gluten in foods. I encourage everyone here who is affected by celiac or gluten sensitivity to read the announcement and submit their own suggestions — real lived experience matters and can influence policy changes that benefit the whole community.
    • Scott Adams
      A low tTG is great news, but it doesn’t always mean the small intestine has fully healed yet—iron and vitamin D absorption can lag behind for months or even years, especially in young children. Many kids need supplements for a period of time while the gut repairs itself, and that doesn’t necessarily mean it will be lifelong. Morning stomach pain is also commonly reported in celiac kids and can be related to slow healing, reflux, motility, or even low iron itself. It sounds like the supplements are clearly helping, which is reassuring, and ongoing monitoring with her doctor can help determine when (or if) doses can be reduced as absorption improves. The most common nutrient deficiencies associated with celiac disease that may lead to testing for the condition include iron, vitamin D, folate (vitamin B9), vitamin B12, calcium, zinc, and magnesium.  Unfortunately many doctors, including my own doctor at the time, don't do extensive follow up testing for a broad range of nutrient deficiencies, nor recommend that those just diagnosed with celiac disease take a broad spectrum vitamin/mineral supplement, which would greatly benefit most, if not all, newly diagnosed celiacs. This article has more info:    
    • Scott Adams
      A lot of gluten-free packaged foods do rely on extra sugar, starches, or sodium to replace texture and flavor, so focusing on simpler options makes sense. Many people do better with naturally gluten-free proteins like eggs, plain yogurt, nuts, seeds, hummus, beans, and minimally processed protein bars with lower added sugar and higher fiber. Pairing those with whole foods can help you feel more “normal” without triggering symptoms. Subscription boxes can be hit or miss, so checking labels carefully and using them as an occasional supplement—rather than a staple—often works best.
    • Scott Adams
      This article is a few of years old, but my still be helpful.  
    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @McKinleyWY, For a genetic test, you don't have to eat gluten, but this will only show if you have the genes necessary for the development of Celiac disease.  It will not show if you have active Celiac disease.   Eating gluten stimulates the production of antibodies against gluten which mistakenly attack our own bodies.  The antibodies are produced in the small intestines.  Three grams of gluten are enough to make you feel sick and ramp up anti-gluten antibody production and inflammation for two years afterwards.  However, TEN grams of gluten or more per day for two weeks is required to stimulate anti-gluten antibodies' production enough so that the anti-gluten antibodies move out of the intestines and into the bloodstream where they can be measured in blood tests.  This level of anti-gluten antibodies also causes measurable damage to the lining of the intestines as seen on biopsy samples taken during an endoscopy (the "gold standard" of Celiac diagnosis).   Since you have been experimenting with whole wheat bread in the past year or so, possibly getting cross contaminated in a mixed household, and your immune system is still so sensitized to gluten consumption, you may want to go ahead with the gluten challenge.   It can take two years absolutely gluten free for the immune system to quit reacting to gluten exposure.   Avoiding gluten most if the time, but then experimenting with whole wheat bread is a great way to keep your body in a state of inflammation and illness.  A diagnosis would help you stop playing Russian roulette with your and your children's health.      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.