Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Indicates Beginning Stages... Doc Says No


PossiblyCeliac?

Recommended Posts

PossiblyCeliac? Newbie

Hi there,

Just received the results of my biopsies.

The doctor says the biopsies show potential beginning stages of celiac. He says because the celiac blood tests were negative, he's ruling out celiac.

Has anyone else heard of these "beginning stages" of villi deterioration? Any idea what it might mean?

Thanks for your insight!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

Get a copy of the blood tests and the pathology report and procedure report. Looks like you will need to see what was actually done and found.

pain*in*my*gut Apprentice

Hi there,

Just received the results of my biopsies.

The doctor says the biopsies show potential beginning stages of celiac. He says because the celiac blood tests were negative, he's ruling out celiac.

Has anyone else heard of these "beginning stages" of villi deterioration? Any idea what it might mean?

Thanks for your insight!

What blood tests did you have done? All too often docs don't order the full panel.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Did he also tell you to keep eating gluten and come back in a year to retest to see if your villi are totally destroyed yet? What did he say was the reason why he found the results he did find?

I agree you need to get full copies of your blood work and biopsy report. Make sure all celiac related testing, including total IGA is done and then give the diet a good try for a few months to see if it helps your symptoms. Some doctors don't want to diagnose until the villi are totally destroyed and bloodwork is a strong positive.

Skylark Collaborator

If you have symptoms that resolve off gluten and villous damage, you are probably celiac. Blood tests are false negative 20% of the time.

beachbirdie Contributor

If your doctor acknowledges you might have damage that looks like the "beginning stages" of celiac, he is wrong to send you on your way thinking everything is hunky dory. If you have celiac, the damage will not "go away", it will continue to get worse.

Lucky is the person who knows they are celiac, before they suffer the terrible damage and discomfort caused by the nutritional deficiencies and cancers that occur with greater frequency in celiacs.

I don't think I'd stay with that MD.

MitziG Enthusiast

Sounds like your dr is not the brightest. Unfortunately, some want to wait until you have a serious problem before they diagnose you! Get all of your labs and pathology reports and let the folks here tell you if you have celiac. The majority of them know more about celiac than the average GI.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



PossiblyCeliac? Newbie

Thanks for your insight!

I did request my blood and biopsy reports. Here are the results:

Transglutaminase: <3.0

IgA: Negative

Duodendum biopsy: Duodenal mucosa with normal villous architecture and slight prominence of intrapithelial lymphocytosis.

Lisa Mentor

Thanks for your insight!

I did request my blood and biopsy reports. Here are the results:

Transglutaminase: <3.0

IgA: Negative

Duodendum biopsy: Duodenal mucosa with normal villous architecture and slight prominence of intrapithelial lymphocytosis.

Silly Doctor!

The following are the celiac specific blood tests:

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgA and IgG

Total Serum IgA

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Thanks for your insight!

I did request my blood and biopsy reports. Here are the results:

Transglutaminase: <3.0

IgA: Negative

Duodendum biopsy: Duodenal mucosa with normal villous architecture and slight prominence of intrapithelial lymphocytosis.

I found this. I doubt its the lab used for your report (you may try finding their interpretation)... but it does give you some insight into the meaning.

Open Original Shared Link

beebs Enthusiast

Yeah, my son had that - I think if we are talking about Mash scores, 1 & 2 is beginning stages (borderline) and 3&4 are diagnosable as coeliac, so annoying - it means there is damage there - but not enough to be conclusive - so he shouldn't send you on your way as there is obviously something going on.

PossiblyCeliac? Newbie

Pricklypear - great link. Thank you!

Lisa - does this mean the doctor ordered the wrong blood tests?

For the two of you and any others - if you were in my shoes, what would you do next? See a different doctor? Go gluten-free without an actual diagnosis?

I guess I'm not sure where to go from here. The doctor says he would like to put me on a medication for spastic intestines (i.e., a medication for IBS). I guess I'm just not sold on that. I don't want to take a medication that simply deals with the symptoms rather without eradicating the cause of the issue.

Lisa Mentor

I guess I'm just not sold on that. I don't want to take a medication that simply deals with the symptoms rather without eradicating the cause of the issue.

I'm with you there!!!! And yes, he ordered one test, that was not specific to Celiac. If you are not yet, gluten free, he can run the tests again using the full panel.

If not, you can opt to go fully gluten free and see if you symptoms subside. It does take time though, depending on the level of damage. And further testing cannot be accurate with gluten no longer in your system.

Many people here are self diagnosed and they feel quite comfortable with it. Some want a dx from a medical doctor. I guess you have to decide that yourself.

Hope that helps.

There are varied criterias for diagnosis.

Celiac Panel - Positive

Endoscopy Exam w/ biopsy - positive

Genetic pre-disposition - positve

Positive Dietary Results - positive

DH biopsy - positive

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Pricklypear - great link. Thank you!

Lisa - does this mean the doctor ordered the wrong blood tests?

For the two of you and any others - if you were in my shoes, what would you do next? See a different doctor? Go gluten-free without an actual diagnosis?

I guess I'm not sure where to go from here. The doctor says he would like to put me on a medication for spastic intestines (i.e., a medication for IBS). I guess I'm just not sold on that. I don't want to take a medication that simply deals with the symptoms rather without eradicating the cause of the issue.

I think id do research and think about what I want to do. Talk to the doctor about getting a full celiac panel of bloo d work (if the panel wasn't done). Then, ask what his dx would be if a gluten-free diet relieves symptoms -will he dx Celiac?

I'd probably try gluten-free before taking meds...what if it is Celiac? If gluten-free doesn't help what's the docs plan to treat you? Just call it ibs and shove pills down? I can't imagine that will be very successfull.

Takala Enthusiast

For the two of you and any others - if you were in my shoes, what would you do next? See a different doctor? Go gluten-free without an actual diagnosis?

I guess I'm not sure where to go from here. The doctor says he would like to put me on a medication for spastic intestines (i.e., a medication for IBS).

Oh, this doc is a real rocket scientist, ain't he ? :blink:

" ....and slight prominence of intrapithelial lymphocytosis."

Gee, I wonder what could possibly be causing that.

I would ask the doctor to run a FULL CELIAC PANEL, not just the one weeny test.

If he refuses to do that, and still wants to put you on the medication, be sure you get the full test results in writing for what he did so far, the single blood test and the biopsy results. (be charming if you have to) I see you have these already at least in email form, that's good, but on their figurehead is better.

Then you take that, and go to a regular doctor and have him or her run the full celiac blood panel. that Lisa listed above. It doesn't have to be a gastro doc, a regular doctor can do this.

When you go to the blood draw, be sure to double check against your list that they are actually running the full panel, and not just one weeny test.

After full testing has been done, <_< you will either have still have negative blood tests, positive biopsy, and symptoms, or be 3 for 3 with a positive blood test, biopsy, symptoms. Perhaps then, a normal doctor will consider you more likely to be celiac, but even so, THEN you can start playing around with elimination diets. You have made the full - faith effort to sort this out thru medical testing that other doctors will respect.

There is no use going off of gluten yet by yourself, to see if a diet trial produces relief of symptoms, if you're still ingesting it and can possibly get another positive test result out of it.

A lot of times here, I see people who go off gluten anyway, and then a few months in because they aren't perfect yet, they begin to doubt themselves and they mention this to a doctor who then retests and announces that they don't have celiac because the tests were negative - but they have not been eating gluten long enough again to produce damage and antibodies to it. But if they resume eating gluten, they are still sick, and they know they are still sick. But they have no "reason," and that upsets them. People who are also not officially diagnosed can also face social pressure from family, co- workers, friends, and in-laws that need to be dealt with to respect the gluten free diet. (People like me, who are very methodical, have a strong response to diet, have cooperative spouses and are very, ah, "stubborn" are not bothered as much as others, but you can't pick your in- laws. :P )

nora-n Rookie

if you scroll down a little bit here on this link, there is an explanation about increased IEL

PossiblyCeliac? Newbie

Thanks so much everyone for your insight on this... The information and links you're providing are excellent.

I've been following this forum (quietly) for a few months - wondering if it could be celiac causing my issues. I read about the frustration so many of your are feeling and certainly empathized. Now, though I'm feeling the frustration first hand.

People think I'm nuts for spending time on this website - as if I'm fishing for a celiac diagnosis. I've stopped talking about it with certain people because that's not the impression I want to give. I just want to find out why eating makes me sick. And I'm frustrated by the elusiveness of celiac and its symptoms... or more so the elusiveness of diagnosis.

Anyway, preaching to the choir. I'm sure you all feel the same way.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      Yes, you are right. Indeed, I’ve been feeling anemic since the beginning of this week, and today I felt horrible during a lecture at the university, I was trembling a lot and felt all my body incredibly heavy, so I had to come back home. I’ll do a blood test tomorrow, but I’m just worried about the possibility of it coming back negative. I’ve been eating two cookies in the morning as my only source of gluten over the past two weeks—could that affect the final result?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.