Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Kids' Test Results


Ang724

Recommended Posts

Ang724 Newbie

I was diagnosed with Celiac about 3 weeks ago and was told to have my children tested. Two of my kids have symptoms, two do not. Their pediatrician tested their IgA level (she said this one was the most used to test). We did not test my 7 month old. The range was less than 20 for normal. My oldest was 11, and the other two were 3. I know they were less than 20, but doesn't it show something since their results weren't 0? Does it mean their bodies are producing some antibodies? I'm confused by this because the ped said they were fine. We would just retest at their yearly PE's. (I hope my question makes sense :-) ).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Little Northern Bakehouse
Little Northern Bakehouse



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Lakefront Brewery


shadowicewolf Proficient

1-19 is normal for someone (if i've got the scale right), 20-30 is considered a low positive, and anything above 31 a high positive.

It is normal for a body to produce a low amount of antibodies to my understanding.

Ang724 Newbie
  On 12/23/2012 at 4:27 AM, shadowicewolf said:

1-19 is normal for someone (if i've got the scale right), 20-30 is considered a low positive, and anything above 31 a high positive.

It is normal for a body to produce a low amount of antibodies to my understanding.

Ok, I'm glad to know it's normal to produce some antibodies. Thanks :-)

shadowicewolf Proficient
  On 12/23/2012 at 4:42 AM, Ang724 said:

Ok, I'm glad to know it's normal to produce some antibodies. Thanks :-)

Indeed. The body produces, to my understanding, a certain amount of antibodies and whatnot (believe it or not, this also includes cancer cells in their 'dorment' form or so i've heard). It is when you start producing more than normal (or less for that matter) that it becomes concerning :)

guest134 Apprentice

Here is a little understanding of antibody tests.

To begin with, an antibody test is NOT a simple number of antibodies in the blood. It is not as simple as reading little dots and counting them like one antibody, two antibody, three antibody. The number you are seeing is a dilution titre to a reactivity staining pattern, the gliadin peptides are diluted by a machine (ELISA). The number references how many dilutions it took for the reaction to completely fade, through certain laboratory methods a "positive reaction" is chosen at a certain number. What this means is that your children's reactions were negative, requiring a less than positive dilution titre to vanish the pattern, the number under negative is irrelevant and does not mean you have some antibodies in your blood. That being said, having some antibodies is normal as well.

This is why a slightly over positive blood test means nothing, it requires a certain positive reaction to indicate that there is an autoimmune response strong enough to warrant concern over damage to the affecting organs. This is the cause of why many A.I patients will have false positive autoantibody tests in other areas, the cross reactivity will cause a false positive staining reactivity pattern.

You will notice that Antinuclear can have a positive staining pattern but under 40 dilutions is negative, just like the endomysial which can be reported as a positive reaction yet titred at 5 and under is negative. This is because those levels do not correlate with damage and risks or further indicate potential for a progressive autoimmune attack.

Skysmom03 Newbie

Tests can vary too. We had my son tested for same reason. He had NO visible symptoms... Which really just men's none that were obvious to us ( because we live with him and we just thought he was doing 'normal' stuff. The ped tested him and his reading was 25. A month and a half later, the ped GI tested him at it was up to 67. Biopsy revealed about 3 years worth of damage to intestines. After 1 week of diet, we could see a Difference in personality. He even gained some weight ( he was already a healthy weight though) and gained 3 cm ( apparently a big deal at his age) in less than three months.

nvsmom Community Regular

The tests are negative but you might want to retest them every few years if they continue to eat gluten. Celiac can manifest at any time, especially after a trauma or serious illness (like mono) so you'll probably want to keep an eye out for symptoms.

My boys all tested negative but my youngest visited the bathroom 5-8 times a day and my oldest had stomach and head aches, and has a tougher time controlling his emotions, so we decided make our family gluten-free. My youngest now only has bm's 1-3 times a day and my oldest says he feels quite a bit better. If your kids have any symptoms, you might want to consider going gluten-free anyways. Wheat has been so genetically modified that it hardly resmble the stuff our great grandparents ate... it's not a natural food anymore and I doubt it's that good for anyone.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Authentic Foods
Little Northern Bakehouse



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Food for Life


frieze Community Regular

what were the total IgA for ea child, without that the testing is meaningless.

kerid Newbie
  On 12/23/2012 at 7:09 AM, toworryornottoworry said:

Here is a little understanding of antibody tests.

To begin with, an antibody test is NOT a simple number of antibodies in the blood. It is not as simple as reading little dots and counting them like one antibody, two antibody, three antibody. The number you are seeing is a dilution titre to a reactivity staining pattern, the gliadin peptides are diluted by a machine (ELISA). The number references how many dilutions it took for the reaction to completely fade, through certain laboratory methods a "positive reaction" is chosen at a certain number. What this means is that your children's reactions were negative, requiring a less than positive dilution titre to vanish the pattern, the number under negative is irrelevant and does not mean you have some antibodies in your blood. That being said, having some antibodies is normal as well.

This is why a slightly over positive blood test means nothing, it requires a certain positive reaction to indicate that there is an autoimmune response strong enough to warrant concern over damage to the affecting organs. This is the cause of why many A.I patients will have false positive autoantibody tests in other areas, the cross reactivity will cause a false positive staining reactivity pattern.

You will notice that Antinuclear can have a positive staining pattern but under 40 dilutions is negative, just like the endomysial which can be reported as a positive reaction yet titred at 5 and under is negative. This is because those levels do not correlate with damage and risks or further indicate potential for a progressive autoimmune attack.

it is interesting what you wrote, thank you for explaining. however, i don't understand how you can write "those levels do not correlate with damage". just curious,,, how do you know that? how do you know that antibodies at a smaller amount aren't causing harm? (and i'm not questioning you. im genuinely wondering how you know that, so i can take this info to the pedi gi specialist!) thanks!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,575
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ArcRose
    Newest Member
    ArcRose
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    Daura Damm


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Daura Damm



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rejoicephd
      Thank you very much @trents! This is super helpful. The only time I wasn’t sick after my diagnosis was when I was ordering and eating certified gluten-free meals from a company. I did that for a few months right after being diagnosed and then I started to try to figure it out how to cool and eat gluten-free meals myself. I think I’m probably getting low levels of gluten exposure and maybe that’s what’s making me ill. Possibly other things also not helping the situation (like dairy). Anyway this gives me something to focus on to see if it helps. So thanks for that!
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com, @Rejoicephd! 1. "Gluten Free" does not equate to "contains no gluten". According to FDA advertising regulations, it means it cannot contain more than 20ppm of gluten. This is a good standard for most in the celiac community but not good enough for those on the sensitive end of the spectrum. If you find the "Certified Gluten Free" symbol on a package that is even better, indicating that there is no more than 10ppm of gluten.  2. When you are choosing "gluten free" items from a restaurant, realize that it only means gluten is not an intentional ingredient. It does not rule out CC (Cross Contamination) caused by those cooking and preparing the food back in...
    • Rejoicephd
      Hi everyone! I was diagnosed with celiac a year ago (they confirmed it on endoscopy following a positive TTG antibody and positive genetic test). I thought the gluten free diet thing wasn’t going to be that hard of an adjustment, but man was I wrong. I’m a year in and still having issues in terms of accidentally glutening myself and getting super sick (I’m starting to think I need to just bring my own food everywhere I go). And also even when I am eating foods that say they are gluten free, I’m still dealing with an upset stomach often. My GI doc said I should avoid dairy as well, and the internal medicine doc said my gut microbiome might be messed up from all of this. I’m just...
    • trents
      If your total IGA is low then the values for the other IGA tests cannot be trusted. They will be depressed. Celiacs who have the DQ2 gene typically are on the more sensitive side as opposed to those who only have the DQ8. But keep in mind that having either or both of those genes does not equate to having celiac disease as 40% of the general population have one or the other and only about 1% of the general population develops active celiac disease. Genetic typing can be used for ruling it out, however. Because of the low total IGA, symptoms and the possession of the DQ2 gene, my suggestion would be for you to go seriously gluten free for a few months and see if your symptoms...
    • Cat M
      Ah ok, I just saw didn’t even post the DGP IgA at all. 😫 I started with itching and hives Jan 2024, been taking a ton of meds and on Xolair and even that is not providing total relief. The other primary symptoms: intermittent but worsening abdominal pain, diarrhea and bloating. This summer I am just exhausted. I uploaded my 23andMe data to genetic lifehacks and discovered quite a few variations, including DQ2, MTHFR, VDR and I have always had very low ferritin, vitamin D and B12. I still think that mast cell disease makes the most sense, but latest labs show I am barely in range for thiamine, zinc and vitamin A, so the GI stuff feels more important to figure out than the hives right now...
×
×
  • Create New...