Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gene Testing

lc1333

Recommended Posts

lc1333 Apprentice
lc1333
Posted

Hello all,

 

So in 2011 I was tested for antibodies for celiac.  Everything came out negative, but my doc did a biopsy anyway.  That came back way positive.  Then I went gluten free in Jan of 2012, and pretty much every symptom/bad thing/illness/problem I had completely went away!  My doc then diagnosed me with celiac.  Now, recently my sister did one of those gene coding things with my mom and my mom has the celiac gene, HLA DQ2.  So do y'all think it's logical that I have that gene too?  If so, why didn't I have antibodies?  My doc said (and no, I don't have too much faith in her), that if I didn't have antibodies there was no way possible to have the gene, but it looks like I probably do have the gene, but why then no antibodies.  She tested me twice for everything (I think).

 

Thanks,

Linda

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


GottaSki Mentor
GottaSki
Posted

Hello all,

So in 2011 I was tested for antibodies for celiac. Everything came out negative, but my doc did a biopsy anyway. That came back way positive. Then I went gluten free in Jan of 2012, and pretty much every symptom/bad thing/illness/problem I had completely went away! My doc then diagnosed me with celiac. Now, recently my sister did one of those gene coding things with my mom and my mom has the celiac gene, HLA DQ2. So do y'all think it's logical that I have that gene too? If so, why didn't I have antibodies? My doc said (and no, I don't have too much faith in her), that if I didn't have antibodies there was no way possible to have the gene, but it looks like I probably do have the gene, but why then no antibodies. She tested me twice for everything (I think).

Thanks,

Linda

Hi Linda!

The antibody tests are not perfect. Do you know which celiac antibody tests were run?

You likely inherited the celiac gene from your mother...but the positive biopsy with complete resolution of symptoms after removing gluten is celiac disease.

Edited to add: I would request written copies of your past testing and all future testing.

CajunChic Explorer
CajunChic
Posted

I'm DQ2 positive with negative blood work. My dr said it was seronegative celiac.

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

Having a gene for Celiac does not mean you have Celiac.  But, without the Celiac gene, you likely don't have Celiac.

 

"Genetics don’t diagnose celiac disease. They do, however, clarify whether an individual is “at-risk” for it. If this is the case, you should closely monitor your symptoms and submit to blood tests every 2-3 years or immediately upon the sight of symptoms. When the genetic predisposition for celiac disease was detected (on Chromosome 6) researchers noted that the genes were a necessary but not sufficient condition for the disease to develop. In fact, up to 1/3 of the U.S. population has the genes for celiac disease. Meaning, those who have the DQ2 or DQ8 gene can develop celiac disease at any time, but only about 5% of those people actually will."

 

Open Original Shared Link

CajunChic Explorer
CajunChic
Posted

Having a gene for Celiac does not mean you have Celiac.  But, without the Celiac gene, you likely don't have Celiac.

 

"Genetics don’t diagnose celiac disease. They do, however, clarify whether an individual is “at-risk” for it. If this is the case, you should closely monitor your symptoms and submit to blood tests every 2-3 years or immediately upon the sight of symptoms. When the genetic predisposition for celiac disease was detected (on Chromosome 6) researchers noted that the genes were a necessary but not sufficient condition for the disease to develop. In fact, up to 1/3 of the U.S. population has the genes for celiac disease. Meaning, those who have the DQ2 or DQ8 gene can develop celiac disease at any time, but only about 5% of those people actually will."

 

Open Original Shared Link

We're very aware of this. It was biopsy and resolution of symptoms on the diet that preempted the dx.

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

We're very aware of this. It was biopsy and resolution of symptoms on the diet that preempted the dx.

 

 

Sorry.  I didn't know the OP was aware of this.  I wasn't quite sure exactly what she was asking so I thought she might like a little info on the genetics of Celiac.  I don't think it hurt anything to put it here.  Maybe someone else reading won't know and would like the link?

CajunChic Explorer
CajunChic
Posted

Sorry.  I didn't know the OP was aware of this.  I wasn't quite sure exactly what she was asking so I thought she might like a little info on the genetics of Celiac.  I don't think it hurt anything to put it here.  Maybe someone else reading won't know and would like the link?

I also apologize, I thought the post was questioning the dx. Thanks for the extra info : )

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

This is for Linda - but anyone else may read it,too.   :D

 

 

"Is it possible to have a negative blood test, but a positive biopsy?

While rare, it is possible to have a negative blood test and still have celiac disease. tTG sensitivity is approximately 98%, which means that 2% of all celiacs may have a normal tTG level. Sometimes tTG antibodies are not produced enough to show up in the blood stream and can only be detected in the intestinal mucosa by special means.

IgA deficiency is a reason why you might have a negative blood test, but a positive biopsy."

 

Open Original Shared Link

GottaSki Mentor
GottaSki
Posted

This is for Linda - but anyone else may read it,too.   :D

 

 

"Is it possible to have a negative blood test, but a positive biopsy?

While rare, it is possible to have a negative blood test and still have celiac disease. tTG sensitivity is approximately 98%, which means that 2% of all celiacs may have a normal tTG level. Sometimes tTG antibodies are not produced enough to show up in the blood stream and can only be detected in the intestinal mucosa by special means.

IgA deficiency is a reason why you might have a negative blood test, but a positive biopsy."

 

Open Original Shared Link

I read too :)

This is why I suggested getting written copies of your prior tests. Not many doctors....especially primaries....run a complete celiac antibody panel with total serum IgA .... Thus making an imperfect system much less accurate.

RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted

 Now, recently my sister did one of those gene coding things with my mom and my mom has the celiac gene, HLA DQ2.  So do y'all think it's logical that I have that gene too?

 

Thanks,

Linda

Do you know if your mother had one or two copies of HLA DQ2? if she had two copies, you have to have at least one copy (and one is enough for Celiac).

lc1333 Apprentice
lc1333
Posted
  • Author

Thank you all for the responses.  I don't know if my mother has one copy or two.  I also had a very positive biopsy and complete resolution of symptoms which is why my doc diagnosed celiac.  Oh, and that was a couple of years ago.  I just found out about the gene thing the other day.  The other thing that concerns me is that I have four children who also tested negative blood work wise.  They have not been biopsied, but my daughter had a ton of symptoms that resolved after she went gluten free.  In fact, she feels so much better that she said she will never do a gluten challenge for a biopsy, so she will never be officially diagnosed.  Unfortunately, one of my boys has some symptoms, but they aren't intestinal (like a lot of mine were), so he won't go gluten free even if it he were told to.  I'm kinda considering getting my kids gene tested, but I really don't know if it's necessary...

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

I have seen other numbers, like 20% are Ttg negative when there is total villous atrophy and 40% are negative on Ttg  when there is patchy celiac (the most common form nowadays)

 

The antibodies are made locally in the intestine, and just a little spills over into the blood, and the amount can vary a lot. Additionally, there is a rather high cutoff because they want to avoid sending people to biopsies that do not have enough villi damage to get a diagnosis....

 

(The latter with the 40% I ran across in some articles about the then new DGP test, which is designed to find celiac when there is patchy celiac, and early celiac)

 

Nora

lc1333 Apprentice
lc1333
Posted
  • Author

So, I'm gonna request my test results from my doc, I'm really curious now...

 

Thank you all for your input, it's been really helpful!!!!   :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,197
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Liburna
    Newest Member
    Liburna
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • xxnonamexx
      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

      By xxnonamexx · Posted

      Please read: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-steps-improve-gluten-ingredient-disclosure-foods?fbclid=IwY2xjawPeXhJleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFzaDc3NWRaYzlJOFJ4R0Fic3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHrwuSsw8Be7VNGOrKKWFVbrjmf59SGht05nIALwnjQ0DoGkDDK1doRBDzeeX_aem_GZcRcbhisMTyFUp3YMUU9Q
    • cristiana
      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

      By cristiana · Posted

      Hi @Atl222 As @trents points out, there could be many reasons for this biopsy result.  I am interested to know, is your gastroenterologist concerned?  Also, are your blood tests showing steady improvement over the years? I remember when I had my last biopsy, several years after diagnosis, mine came back with with raised lymphocytes but no villous damage, too! In my own case, my consultant wasn't remotely concerned - in fact, he said I might still get this result even if all I ever did was eat nothing but rice and water.   My coeliac blood tests were still steadily improving, albeit slowly, which was reassuring.
    • trents
      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease or gluten/oats exposure. See attachment. But you might try eliminating oats to start with and possibly dairy for a few months and then seek another endoscopy/biopsy to see if there was a reduction in lymphocyte counts. 
    • Scott Adams
      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especially since Eden has a long-standing reputation for transparency. While the lack of gluten labeling can understandably give pause, manufacturer confirmation like this is often what people rely on for traditionally fermented products. As always, trusting your body after trying it is reasonable, but based on the information you gathered, your conclusion makes sense.
    • Scott Adams
      nothing has changed

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can take 12–24 months (sometimes longer) for antibodies and the intestinal lining to fully heal, particularly in teens and young adults. Eating gluten again to “test” things isn’t recommended and won’t give you clear answers—it’s far more likely to cause harm than clarity. Weight not changing is also very common in celiac and doesn’t rule anything out. Please know that your frustration and sadness matter; this adjustment is hard, and feeling stuck can really affect mental health. You deserve support, and if you can, reaching out to a GI dietitian or mental health professional familiar with chronic illness could really help you through this phase. This study indicates that a majority of celiacs don't recover until 5 years after diagnosis and starting a gluten-free diet: Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet However, it's also possible that what the study really shows is the difficulty in maintaining a 100% gluten-free diet. I suspect that if you looked closely at the diets of those who did not recover within 2 years might be that their diets were not 100% gluten-free. Perhaps they ate out more often, or didn't understand all of the hidden ingredients where gluten can hide. Either way, it shows how difficult recovery from celiac disease can be for most people. According to this study: This article explores other causes of flattened villi:    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.