Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

First GI visit 2 years post blood test diagnosis


Tuesday

Recommended Posts

Tuesday Rookie

I was diagnosed 2 years ago with an antibody level over 3,000, had many symptoms, and couldn't tolerate dairy.  I started to feel better almost right after starting the gluten free diet and could tolerate dairy again 3 months out.  My blood test was 2 at 10 months post diagnosis.  I am completely confident in my diagnosis.

My primary care doctor did not refer me to a GI doctor at the time of diagnosis.  My primary care doctor now wants me to have a consult with a GI doctor as he thinks he should have sent me there at the time of diagnosis for a biopsy.

Does anyone have experience with not seeing a GI doctor until 2 years post diagnosis?  Is there any reason to get a scope 2 years out when I have done well on a gluten free diet?  I plan to have an office visit with the GI and see if there is any reason for a biopsy besides diagnosis confirmation.  Any other ideas of what I should ask the GI doc?

I'd appreciate any advice or other's experience.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
1 hour ago, Tuesday said:

I was diagnosed 2 years ago with an antibody level over 3,000, had many symptoms, and couldn't tolerate dairy.  I started to feel better almost right after starting the gluten free diet and could tolerate dairy again 3 months out.  My blood test was 2 at 10 months post diagnosis.  I am completely confident in my diagnosis.

My primary care doctor did not refer me to a GI doctor at the time of diagnosis.  My primary care doctor now wants me to have a consult with a GI doctor as he thinks he should have sent me there at the time of diagnosis for a biopsy.

Does anyone have experience with not seeing a GI doctor until 2 years post diagnosis?  Is there any reason to get a scope 2 years out when I have done well on a gluten free diet?  I plan to have an office visit with the GI and see if there is any reason for a biopsy besides diagnosis confirmation.  Any other ideas of what I should ask the GI doc?

I'd appreciate any advice or other's experience.

As long as your symptoms have resolved and your blood tests have come down, I do not see the need to get a repeat scope.  If you are experiencing symptoms now or in the future, it might be nice to rule out other issues that may develop.  I would not consider a two to four week challenge for a firm diagnosis, but that is just me.  You should talk to the GI about the benefits.  

I am formally diagnosed, but my hubby went gluten-free based on the advice of his GP and my allergist.  He never had any testing.  Well, the diet worked.  He has maintained it for 17 years now (who else would stick to to a gluten-free diet for that long unless they were sure gluten makes them sick).  While it is nice to have a formal diagnosis, he does not want to make himself sick just to reinforce what he already knows.  My diagnosis does however, makes it easy for our kid to get tested and may be helpful if I end up in jail or in a nursing home.  We shall see.  

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,747
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kambrie
    Newest Member
    Kambrie
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Healthforme, No prescription needed for thiamine hydrochloride, Benfotiamine, and TTFD (Tetrahydrofurfuryl Disulfide).  They are available over the counter.   Thiamine Mononitrate is not recommended because the body doesn't absorb or utilize it well.  
    • knitty kitty
      @Zuma888,  I'm so happy you're feeling better!   Thanks for letting us know of your improvement!
    • RMJ
      HLA-DQ2 is NOT a continuum 2.01 to 2.99, but I don’t understand HLA genetics well enough to explain it further.  It is not just one gene that is either this or that.
    • trents
      Okay, I'm taking a guess here. We are used to hearing in layman terms that having either the HLA-DQ2 or the HLA-DQ8 gene, either heterozygous or homozygous, presents the possibility of developing active celiac disease. So, I'm guessing that the HLA-DQ2 gene is actually a range of variants (2.01-2.99) with HLA-DQ 2.5 being in the centerpiece of the range. I'm also guessing that "permissive" is equivalent to "possessing the possibility" to develop active celiac disease and does not address the issue of hetero vs. homozygus per se. But the fact that 2.01,2.01 is a couplet may indicated homozygousity? All wild guesses.
    • Kirita
      I received the results that my child has the genes for celiac disease (she is still undergoing testing and it has been complicated). Can someone explain if this is homozygous HLA DQ 2.5 or not? The interpretation just says permissive for celiac disease. Thank you! DQ Alpha 1  05:01, 5 DQ Beta 1 02:01, 02:01 DQ serologic equivalent 2,2     
×
×
  • Create New...