Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Positive

catfish

Recommended Posts

catfish Apprentice
catfish
Posted

Wheat products have never, ever been a trigger for my IBS symptoms. I recently was blood-tested for Celiac as a part of the IBS diagnosis routine, which apparently is just standard procedure. Now the blood test came back positive, but what exactly does this indicate? The Dr. says that the next step is a biopsy to test for Celiac, but my question is "why?"

Surely by now, after living with IBS symptoms for 20 years and carefully documenting which foods affect me, I would have noticed some sort of connection if this was the problem, wouldn't I have? And further, wouldn't it be easier, cheaper and more practical for me to just try eliminating wheat products for a couple of weeks and seeing if I notice some improvement or not? As opposed to a biopsy that is? I guess I'm just a bit amazed that suddenly they want to take a biopsy for something that I don't really show the symptoms for having in the first place and I don't really even understand what the test results mean. As near as I can tell, a negative blood test result is supposed to be a pretty good sign that you don't have Celiac, but a positive result really doesn't mean much other than that you "might" have it. Is this correct? Please help me understand all this, I'm bewildered and befuddled by this news. :(

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Tasha2004 Contributor
Tasha2004
Posted

Whic tests came in positive?

I know if you post them here, someone will jump in with an answer!

catfish Apprentice
catfish
Posted
  • Author

I think he said it was transglutaminase antibody , he didn't say what the levels were (not that it would have meant anything to me) but he said that they were "just a little high". I really don't have any idea what this is supposed to mean other than that he indicated previously that a positive test on this would mean a biopsy. :unsure:

tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

Well, he probably suggested a biopsy, because that's the "gold standard" for dx'ing celiac. (And count yourself lucky... running blood tests for celiac doesn't seem to be standard in most of the US!)

I haven't had a biopsy, I went off of blood tests alone. But the thing is, depening on your symptoms - and they vary as much as IBS symptoms can - keeping a food diary may NOT have told you anything depending on how you tested foods. For instance, if you tried to avoid wheat one week, and had sandwhiches on rye bread instead, you weren't avoiding gluten at all! Or if you avoided all bread to be on the safe side, but had chinese food that involved soy sauce, you weren't avoiding gluten at all! Not to mention it being hidden in modified food starch, barley malt, "natural flavorings", and so many other things.

Assuming that when you wrote "try eliminating wheat products", and assuming you had tried this in the past, you meant all gluten containing products, then it may depend on how long you eliminated all gluten containing products. Some of us get reactions fairly quickly (I get a bit dizzy and funny headed within half an hour, and my intestines "warble" within 24 hours), but some don't. Some celiacs, silent celiacs, don't get any symptoms whatsoever, but their intestines are still being damaged. So your food diary would help, but only if you include symptoms over a long enough duration after the consumption, you eliminated all potential gluten containing products (including those envelopes I am finally remembering not to lick! ;-) ), and you are not a silent celiac.

As for the tests, someone else correct me if I'm wrong, but most of the tests can't report a false positive. The body produces an antibody (and that's what the blood test looks for) only if it is negatively reacting to something. The sources I found note that the tTg test is 90% specific, and 95% sensitive - of course, this assumes that you've got enough damage in your intestines that the antibodies created inside your intestines can leak into the blood stream.

catfish Apprentice
catfish
Posted
  • Author

Thanks for that nice explanation. I spent some time doing research last night and what you said seems to correspond with what I've been reading as far as the test results. I wasn't aware that you could have prolonged symptoms and not immediate symptoms though. What I am thinking of doing is eliminating gluten from my diet right now and see if I can notice an improvement. My next Dr. visit isn't for a couple of weeks, so it is likely that I would see an improvement by then if it is gluten intolerance or even Celiac that's causing my problems, right? I think I'm going to just say "No" to the biopsy, as far as I can tell it really isn't very useful or even reliable, so why do it? If eliminating gluten is helpful, who cares what the biopsy would say? And if I have antibodies, than obviously my body doesn't like gluten or they wouldn't even be there, right? Does this sound like a logical plan, or should I just face the music and get the biopsy? Thanks so much for helping me make sense of this news. I now wish that someone would have thought to check for this 20 years ago, it might have saved me all that anguish through the years if this is indeed my problem!

kvogt Rookie
kvogt
Posted

Blood tests for celiac disease tend to give a lot a false negatives. That's FALSE NEGATIVES. That is, they miss often. People have negative blood tests and still have celiac disease. The reason is that most of the antibodies are voided in stool. You have to have signficant villi damage before it will get in the blood. I opted out of the biopsy. Ask your doctor, if you did have a positivie biopsy, the next step is "improvement on a gluten-free diet". Then some doctors want you to take another biopsy to check for improvement - then a gluten challenge, followed by yet another biopsy to see if the gluten challenge caused villi damage.

Tasha2004 Contributor
Tasha2004
Posted

From my perspective (and I have only a postive IgA), if you have a postive Ttg then that is a pretty accurate sign of Celiac. I think the IgG and IgA are less predictive.

I would say go for the diet and see how it goes!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Kim Explorer
Kim
Posted

I'd strongly recommend getting the biopsy and knowing for sure whether you have celiac disease. Once you are off of gluten for a while, the only way you'll be able to tell is if you do a "gluten challenge" which generally is not a good idea. Of course, I'd recommend you discuss the pros/cons of a biopsy with a knowledgable Gastroenterologist. Good luck. Kim.

Guest jhmom
Guest jhmom
Posted

Hi catfish:

I say if you have positive blood results then there is no need for the biopsy because there is no guarantee the results would be 100% accurate. You CAN have a negative biopsy and still have it gluten sensitivity / Celiac!!!! It takes time for this disease to show up in blood-work or to damage your villi.

I hope you find some answers soon and begin to feel better! :D

catfish Apprentice
catfish
Posted
  • Author

Well it's only been 4 full days since I started a gluten-free diet, and I am already noticing incredible improvement! If I'd known something like this would make me feel so much better I would have done it long ago! I don't think I could ever think about eating wheat again if it means feeling as rotten as I have been, I really forgot what it was like to feel "normal". Oh the wasted years!

The only discomfort I have had from my intestines this week has been from the increase in vegetables and fruit replacing the gluten-based snacks I used to eat- I find that it takes a lot more fruit and vegies to fill me up than it ever did snack crackers for instance, and I have had a bit of bloating from that but the spasms and other symptoms have literally vanished! Gone! Adios! I am still in amazement! :blink:

Guest jhmom
Guest jhmom
Posted

Hi Catfish:

I am glad you are feeling better and can tell a difference being gluten free! I too forgot what it felt like to be "normal"! It

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,293
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Jschwind351
    Newest Member
    Jschwind351
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      is my celiac disease gone?

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      I should point out that iodine is known to exasperate dermatitis herpetiformis blistering. It can take several months or even years of a strict gluten-free diet for the IgA-TG3 deposits to clear from the skin. After the skin completely heals, iodine may no longer trigger symptoms. "The circulating antibodies disappear and skin symptoms resolve as a result of gluten-free diet but the cutaneous anti-TG3 IgA deposits may persist for several years. " Missing Insight Into T and B Cell Responses in Dermatitis Herpetiformis
    • Wheatwacked
      is my celiac disease gone?

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      I get my supplements f from Pipingrock.com close to 10 years now. Good quality, prices, ship  worldwide.  My 25(OH)D is at 93 ng/ml after 10 years taking. In 2019 it had still only gotten to 47 ng/ml.  Celiac Disease causes low D from malabsorption. High Potency Vitamin D3, 10,000 IU, 250 Quick Release Softgels 4.8 out of 5 stars, average rating value. Read 1662 Reviews. Sale price$10.70 Regular price$21.39 Basil Carcinoma.  Basil cell carcinoma is the result of failure of the immune system to recognize fauty DNA in cells. It is iodine that causes apoptosis, killing old and defective cells.  Not enough vitamin D to control the immune system and not enough iodine to do the job.  I had a sebaceous cyst, my seventh facial cyst, in 2014.  It started looking like a blackhead, but grew (Third eye blind).  All my 7 previous cysts had drained and healed normally.  When I drained this, there was a hairball the size of a BB and it would not heal.  This was one of many reasons I started Gluten Free.  I chose to not have it surgically removed, because I realized I had nutrient deficiencies that were causing slow healing.  By 2015 I realized it was Iodine deficiency and started eating seaweed, which helped my muscle tone, but not the healing.  The warnings on iodine from the gov't were so scary, I was afraid to use them.  Turns out it is all based on one study on rats in 1948. "The Wolff-Chaikoff Effect:   Crying Wolf?"   Last year I started taking 600 mcg a day and it is reversing my glaucoma and fixing muscle tone, hair nails and skin all returning to healthy,  Brain fog, which had improved dramatically on Gluten Free diet, my thinking got even clearer with the iodine. Finally the cyst my bellwether since 2014, began to heal.  So I had it biopsied  in July 2025, came back basal cell carcinoma.  With the Iodine (Piping Rock Liquid Iodine 12 drops a day 😃 = 600 mcg) is healing normally and I have a follow up in December.  By then it will have healed.  It is scabbing over like a normal wound.  In 1970 the US stopped using Iodine as a dough modifier.  The daily intake of Iodine dropped in the US 50% between 1970 and 1984.  Also, prescriptions for thyroxine have doubled.  150 mcg the RDA is not enough for anything more than preventing goiter.  Growing up in the sixties just 2 slices of bread had 200 micrograms of iodine, add a glass of milk and iodized salt and you're at 300 mcg a day.  The safe upper tolerable limit in the US is 1000 mcg.  In Japan it is 3000 mcg and the average Japanese, traditional diet, averages above 1000 mcg.  Remember when in the 80's our schools were loosing competitions to Japanese schools?  Iodine.  And Japan has 50% less breast cancer.  Nicer hair nails and skin.  It the US our kids are getting dumber, more flabby.  Fertility is dependant on enough iodine, also. 600 mcg.
    • numike
      is my celiac disease gone?

      By numike · Posted

      69yo M I have had skin cancer basal  I use a higher quality Vit D https://www.amazon.com/Biotech-D3-5-5000iu-Capsules-Count/dp/B00NGMJRTE
    • Wheatwacked
      is my celiac disease gone?

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      Your high lactulose test, indicating out of control Small Itenstinal Bacterial O,vergrowth is one symptom.  You likely have low vitamin D, another symptom.  Unless you get lots of sun.   Celiac Disease is a disease of malabsorption, often leading to subclinical vitamin deficiencies.  A lot of people have these symptoms just before an acute phase of Celiac Disease.  Each of the symptoms can have multiple causes that are not celiac disease,  but when you start having multiple symptoms,  and each symptom is treated as a separate disease,  you have to think, maybe these are all one cause. celiac disease. There is a misconception that Celiac Disease is  a gastrointestinal disease and symptoms are only gastro related.  Wrong.  It is an autoimmune disease and has many symptoms that usually are disregarded.  I made that mistake until 63 y.o.  It can cause a dermatitis herpetiformis rash,  white spots on the brain.  It caused my alcoholism, arthritis, congested sineses, protein spots on my contacts lenses, swollen prostate, symptoms that are "part of aging". You may be tolerating gluten, the damage will happen. Of curiosity though, your age, sex, are you outside a lot without sunscreen?  
    • trents
      is my celiac disease gone?

      By trents · Posted

      It would be interesting to see if you were tested again for blood antibodies after abandoning the gluten free diet for several weeks to a few months what the results would be. Don't misunderstand me. I'm not necessarily suggesting you do this but it is an option to think about. I guess I'm saying there is a question in my mind as to whether you actually ever had celiac disease. As I said above, the blood antibody testing can yield false positives. And it is also true that celiac-like symptoms can be produced by other medical conditions.
×
×
  • Create New...