Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help The Us Govt Define "gluten Free"


VegasCeliacBuckeye

Recommended Posts

VegasCeliacBuckeye Collaborator

ACDA Launches Survey to Assist FDA on Gluten-Free Labeling

The FDA's proposal for labeling products 'gluten-free' was published on January 23, 2007. The FDA has requested feedback from consumers on several issues relating to the gluten-free diet, and how individuals make choices about gluten-free products.

Today, the American Celiac Disease Alliance (ACDA) is launching a survey focused on several questions posed by the FDA. The survey was developed by dietitians with expertise in the gluten-free diet and who are associated with the Dietitians in Gluten Intolerance Diseases (DIGID), a specialty subunit of the American Dietetic Association.

Please take a few moments to complete this very important survey. The results will be compiled and presented to the FDA by the ACDA.

To access the survey go to the ACDA website

www.americanceliac.org/news.htm

Your comments will help the FDA decide what type of gluten-free labeling will be allowed in the United States. The survey closes on March 15, 2007.

Thank you for being an advocate for celiacs.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Looking for answers Contributor

Thanks for the post . . . I just completed the survey and it took only five minutes!

jerseyangel Proficient

I did the survey, too :)

Nantzie Collaborator

Me too!

Ursa Major Collaborator

Me four.................ah, I mean, too. :P

mouse Enthusiast

Just did mine.

darlindeb25 Collaborator

Survey for Celiac Alliance

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't believe it. There is a survey about gluten-free labeling and even the people who do not have the gold standard diagnosis can participate. OK, gang, make our voice heard and fill out the survey. Open Original Shared Link

If you scroll down a bit, there is a link to sending comments directly to the FDA.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Thanks you both for that information. I just did mine. But, it does make you think a little.

I guess your answers can reflect in your experience/time into the diet and your trust of manufactures to list correctly.

I have to admit that when I was dx'd, I bought alot of gluten free foods. I also have to admit, that they are still here and I don't want to eat/fix/bake them. I have learned to deal without and eat well.

When fresh green beans get labled gluten free, now that's over the top. :(

Mtndog Collaborator

Thanks for posting this!

Guest cassidy

Thanks for posting this. I forwarded the link to my local celiac group so that they can get the word out.

I just wonder how many people react at a level of 20ppm. I know I'm very sensitive and every time I have gotten sick it has been from some tiny crumb because I'm very careful, but I don't know how much does make me sick. I would hate for them to say 20ppm is ok and that still be an amount that gets the very sensitive people sick - that would be worse than no labeling at all.

gfp Enthusiast
Thanks for posting this. I forwarded the link to my local celiac group so that they can get the word out.

I just wonder how many people react at a level of 20ppm. I know I'm very sensitive and every time I have gotten sick it has been from some tiny crumb because I'm very careful, but I don't know how much does make me sick. I would hate for them to say 20ppm is ok and that still be an amount that gets the very sensitive people sick - that would be worse than no labeling at all.

I agree and though this doesn't directly affect me like you guys I'd say the easiest way is pretty obvious....

Gluten Free should always mean gluten-free.... pure and simple and the limit should be if it can be detected by any method then its not gluten-free.

This gives them something to aim for....

Because of CC and mixed product lines and just plain accidents you can just have a catergory for "very low gluten". Because of the way different levels are tested and relative costs in testing then 20ppm is a sensible cut off.

I can warn about what happened in Europe using the 200ppm and perhaps this is useful but basically companies figured they had some "slack" to play with. Many of the gluten-free breads used wheat products (deglutified) etc. and the 200ppm which was sorta designed as a limit the companies could go up to ended up being a limit they aimed for because there was no certification they could aim for that meant 100%....

I know myself I can eat certain gluten-free breads with wheat starch at <20ppm but I can't eat a lot of it... or regularly. The problem seems to be that the effects of even tiny amounts of gluten are cumulative...

Its totally possible to make 100% gluten-free if you have an audit trail on the supplies and don't use additives. but unless the manufacturers are given something to aim for why would they bother??

VegasCeliacBuckeye Collaborator

Bump

Please take the time to do this survey! It affects us all (well, at least the US folks - but we could use the help from around the world!)

BB

Creative-Soul Newbie

Thanks for posting this! I just did mine...interesting questions...

I hope many, many people take the time to do this; it only takes a few minutes!

Guhlia Rising Star

I did it too. I agree with gfp... Gluten free should mean gluten free. I will likely not trust labels anymore if they keep in at the 20ppm level. That would be a real shame. I'll have to go back to eating only meats, fruits, and vegetables. Ugh...

kbtoyssni Contributor

The questions about oats have me freaked out. I would be really upset if they label oat-containing foods gluten-free.

Mtndog Collaborator
The questions about oats have me freaked out. I would be really upset if they label oat-containing foods gluten-free.

I know- me too! I know the protein is different but I don't think it's been definitively proven that oats DON'T do damage. Does anyone know otherwise? If oats were not cross-contaminated would they be safe? I woouldn't eat them, but I'm curious.

gfp Enthusiast
I know- me too! I know the protein is different but I don't think it's been definitively proven that oats DON'T do damage. Does anyone know otherwise? If oats were not cross-contaminated would they be safe? I woouldn't eat them, but I'm curious.

I'm pretty certain there is as much evidence in both directions....

Since this is a health issue then IMHO they should be labelled....

However I don't think they should be labelled "gluten" since this is technically incorrect and once you actually take a step away from "gluten free" meaning exactly that you are inviting all sorts of exceptions.

When you look at the whole way its been done in Europe the justification is that we are too stupid to understand .. its the same with additives and "E" numbers. I find that very concept disturbing. If it disturbs someone to have a list of additives making up 90% of the label then perhaps they should think of reducing the additives, not the numer of numbers/letters it takes up on the jar.

If you ever read shampoo etc. its entirely the opposite... instead of writing water they write "aqua" and then a whole load of invented words like "enriched with <insert catchy phrase here>" ...

kbtoyssni Contributor
I know- me too! I know the protein is different but I don't think it's been definitively proven that oats DON'T do damage. Does anyone know otherwise? If oats were not cross-contaminated would they be safe? I woouldn't eat them, but I'm curious.

From what I've read the protien in oats is starting to be different enough from the wheat gluten protien that some celiacs react and some don't (and I mean an actual autoimmune reaction, not just symptoms of glutening because some celiacs are asymptomatic even when damage is being done). I have no idea if I react, but I choose not to eat oats. Not worth it. And I didn't like oatmeal much anyhow so no biggie.

This reminds me of England. Some things are labeled gluten-free but contain wheat starch. I know in those cases wheat starch is tested to be below a certain number of ppm, but if it's got a few ppm and I eat several, that's might put me over the limit. Again, not worth it.

kbtoyssni Contributor

Oh, and I answered the "if we determine oats are gluten-free how do you want them labeled?" with OTHER: "I will not eat oats even if you do think they're gluten-free."

gfp Enthusiast
From what I've read the protien in oats is starting to be different enough from the wheat gluten protien that some celiacs react and some don't (and I mean an actual autoimmune reaction, not just symptoms of glutening because some celiacs are asymptomatic even when damage is being done). I have no idea if I react, but I choose not to eat oats. Not worth it. And I didn't like oatmeal much anyhow so no biggie.

This reminds me of England. Some things are labeled gluten-free but contain wheat starch. I know in those cases wheat starch is tested to be below a certain number of ppm, but if it's got a few ppm and I eat several, that's might put me over the limit. Again, not worth it.

Exactly my experience. If I have the under 20ppm bread I can perhaps get away with a couple of slices ..at least as far as GI

symptoms but who can say what damage its causing. but I know from experience if I eat it all then I'll be ill.

I have no idea if I react, but I choose not to eat oats. Not worth it. And I didn't like oatmeal much anyhow so no biggie.

Well, I have to say, I'd quiite like some oat flapjacks and real oatcakes ... BUT even so I still agree, its just not worth it.

I think the only test I would be happy with would be screening me direct for antibodies.... and quite simply if they elevated at all then NO.

sunshinen Apprentice

I doubt anyone will ever start labeling fresh produce or eggs (in their shells) as gluten-free, but the other month, I realized some frozen veggies I bought had wheat in them. WHY???? :huh: There was nothing on the front to tell me to expect anything other than fresh, frozen veggies. It was not until I saw that they were not on the "gluten-free" list that I even thought to make sure if they were okay. So I'm all for a gluten-free label being allowed on anything that is actually gluten-free. Even "pure" rice flour. That way I know it hasn't been processed on a line that processes wheat flour.

I think the statement "all rice flour is gluten free" is a terrible idea to put into people's heads--especially newbies. There is just too much room for the introduction of gluten into things that many people would expect to be gluten-free (whether by contamination or "hidden gluten" ingredients). So I say allow companies to label away! (as long as that label actually means something.) :D

Mango04 Enthusiast
I doubt anyone will ever start labeling fresh produce or eggs (in their shells) as gluten-free,

I've actually seen that label on eggs in other countries. :lol: It's pretty funny.

Keenwa Newbie

I read something today that said that 0-2ppm is not even testable - That the lowest amount that's testable is 3ppm. So I suggested that 3ppm be the allowable limit. I'm not concerned about eating one thing that is 20ppm - I'm concerned about the cumulative effects of eating SEVERAL things each day that might have 20ppm.

zansu Rookie

yeah, like that "how much do you think 20ppm is: 1 TSpn, etc" I said other: "depends on the serving size!" 20ppm in a vitamin is a different animal than 20ppm in an entree....

but I'm with y'all: if I eat 3 or 4 things that are low gluten, how sick am I going to get? I learned about cumulative glutening with a medicine. Took me 2 weeks to start having symptoms.

gfp Enthusiast
I read something today that said that 0-2ppm is not even testable - That the lowest amount that's testable is 3ppm. So I suggested that 3ppm be the allowable limit. I'm not concerned about eating one thing that is 20ppm - I'm concerned about the cumulative effects of eating SEVERAL things each day that might have 20ppm.

Its completely testable, it just costs more....

Indeed its possible to test down to 1 millionth part of this in ppb, the testing is just way more expensive and takes much longer.

When people quote lower testing limits they are regarding a specific test... commonly for gluten these are ELISA tests which have then benefit of being cheap and quick but the disadvantage of not providing quantitive analysis at low concentrations...

Secondly all testing has two method based limits (method being the term used for the recipe followed in testing) the first is the MDL or minimum detecting level and the second being MRL or minimum reporting limit.

MDL means a substance was detected but the test was not able to give an accurate quantitive test within those limits...

MRL is a legal definition, it is defined by legislation according to what is being tested for...

It is possible to test for gluten or its consituents in parts per billion, but to accurately determine 100ppb from 200ppb is much harder/more expensive.

The major reason tests are expensive however is how popular a test is.... for instrumentation based analysis like GC-MS you also have expense in sample prep and consumables, to analyse for different substances quantitively means changing the column to one which is specific to that class of compounds... thus $500 minimum for a single sample ... just for the column but then the machine needs to be completely recalibrated which means standards, sample prep and machine time... hence switching to quantitive gluten as a one off is going to cost in the thousands .... BUT if the machine is already set-up and calibrated for gluten it costs machine time, tech time and sample prep time... as part of an ongoing analysis your talking change from $20.... vs $2-3 for ELISA tests.

What I m saying is the regulations to a large extend determine the cost of the tests. No food company is forced to test to ppb so the tests are not set-up and waiting... thus if a speciality gluten-free company wants to test its prohibitively expensive. Meanwhile for the big food companies like the Phillip Morris group, Danone and Nestle it is far from being in their interests to have these tests...

If the tests were available and cheap then legislation might make them use them! If they did that then they would have to start putting trace of gluten on a lof of stuff they get away with right now.

Kraft make a bid deal about "never intentionally hiding gluten", but they then go to great lengths NOT to find out... some how I don't think they care if it has gluten in it or not, merely that they have to label it as such. Remember this is the same company funded research to cast doubt on cigaretes causing cancer for 50 years....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      My only proof

    2. - Wheatwacked replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      8

      Related issues

    3. - NanceK replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      My only proof

    4. - Wheatwacked replied to Scatterbrain's topic in Sports and Fitness
      4

      Feel like I’m starting over

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Kirita's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      3

      Recovery from gluten challenge


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,291
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    DottieLyn
    Newest Member
    DottieLyn
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @NanceK, I do have Hypersensitivity Type Four reaction to Sulfa drugs, a sulfa allergy.  Benfotiamine and other forms of Thiamine do not bother me at all.  There's sulfur in all kinds of Thiamine, yet our bodies must have it as an essential nutrient to make life sustaining enzymes.  The sulfur in thiamine is in a ring which does not trigger sulfa allergy like sulfites in a chain found in pharmaceuticals.  Doctors are not given sufficient education in nutrition (nor chemistry in this case).  I studied Nutrition before earning a degree in Microbiology.  I wanted to know what vitamins were doing inside the body.   Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.   Not feeling well after starting Benfotiamine is normal.  It's called the "thiamine paradox" and is equivalent to an engine backfiring if it's not been cranked up for a while.  Mine went away in about three days.  I took a B Complex, magnesium and added molybdenum for a few weeks. It's important to add a B Complex with all eight essential B vitamins. Supplementing just one B vitamin can cause lows in some of the others and result in feeling worse, too.  Celiac Disease causes malabsorption of all the B vitamins, not just thiamine.  You need all eight.  Thiamine forms including Benfotiamine interact with each of the other B vitamins in some way.  It's important to add a magnesium glycinate or chelate supplement as well.  Forms of Thiamine including Benfotiamine need magnesium to make those life sustaining enzymes.  (Don't use magnesium oxide.  It's not absorbed well.  It pulls water into the intestines and is used to relieve constipation.)   Molybdenum is a trace mineral that helps the body utilize forms of Thiamine.   Molybdenum supplements are available over the counter.  It's not unusual to be low in molybdenum if low in thiamine.   I do hope you will add the necessary supplements and try Benfotiamine again. Science-y Explanation of Thiamine Paradox: https://hormonesmatter.com/paradoxical-reactions-with-ttfd-the-glutathione-connection/#google_vignette
    • Wheatwacked
      Your goal is not to be a good puppet, there is no gain in that. You might want to restart the ones that helped.  It sounds more like you are suffering from malnutrition.  Gluten free foods are not fortified with things like Thiamine (B1), vitamin D, Iodine, B1,2,3,5,6 and 12 as non-gluten free products are required to be. There is a Catch-22 here.  Malnutrition can cause SIBO, and SIBO can worsen malnutrition. Another possibility is side effects from any medication that are taking.  I was on Metformin 3 months before it turned me into a zombi.  I had crippling side effects from most of the BP meds tried on me, and Losartan has many of the side effects on me from my pre gluten free days. Because you have been gluten free, you can test and talk until you are blue in the face but all of your tests will be negative.  Without gluten, you will not create the antigen against gluten, no antigens to gluten, so no small intestine damage from the antigens.  You will need to do a gluten challange to test positive if you need an official diagnosis, and even then, no guaranty: 10 g of gluten per day for 6 weeks! Then a full panel of Celiac tests and biopsy. At a minimum consider vitamin D, Liquid Iodine (unless you have dermatitis herpetiformis and iodine exasperates the rash), and Liquid Geritol. Push for vitamin D testing and a consult with a nutritionist experienced with Celiack Disease.  Most blood tests don't indicate nutritional deficiencies.  Your thyroid tests can be perfect, yet not indicate iodine deficiency for example.  Thiamine   test fine, but not pick up on beriberi.  Vegans are often B12 deficient because meat, fish, poultry, eggs, and dairy are the primary souces of B12. Here is what I take daily.  10,000 IU vitamin D3 750 mg g a b a [   ] 200 mg CoQ10 [   ] 100 mg DHEA [   ] 250 mg thiamine B1 [   ] 100 mg of B2 [   ] 500 mg B5 pantothenic acid [   ] 100 mg B6 [   ] 1000 micrograms B12 n [   ] 500 mg vitamin c [   ] 500 mg taurine [   ] 200 mg selenium   
    • NanceK
      Hi…Just a note that if you have an allergy to sulfa it’s best not to take Benfotiamine. I bought a bottle and tried one without looking into it first and didn’t feel well.  I checked with my pharmacist and he said not to take it with a known sulfa allergy. I was really bummed because I thought it would help my energy level, but I was thankful I was given this info before taking more of it. 
    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @Scatterbrain, Are you getting enough vitamins and minerals.  Gluten free food is not fortified so you may be starting to run low on B vitamins and vitamin D.   By the way you should get your mom checked for celiac disease.  You got it from your mom or dad.  Some studies show that following a gluten-free diet can stabilize or improve symptoms of dementia.  I know that for the 63 years I was eating gluten I got dumber and dumber until I started GFD and vitamin replenishment and it began to reverse.  Thiamine can get used up in a week or two.  Symptoms can come and go with daily diet.  Symptoms of beriberi due to Thiamine deficiency.   Difficulty walking. Loss of feeling (sensation) in hands and feet. Loss of muscle function or paralysis of the lower legs. Mental confusion. Pain. Speech difficulties. Strange eye movements (nystagmus) Tingling. Any change in medications? Last March I had corotid artery surgery (90 % blockage), and I started taking Losartan for blood pressure, added to the Clonidine I was taking already.  I was not recovering well and many of my pre gluten free symptoms were back  I was getting worse.  At first I thought it was caused a reaction to the anesthesia from the surgery, but that should have improved after two weeks.  Doctor thought I was just being a wimp. After three months I talked to my doctor about a break from the Losartan to see if it was causing it. It had not made any difference in my bp.  Except for clonindine, all of the previous bp meds tried had not worked to lower bp and had crippling side effects. One, I could not stand up straight; one wobbly knees, another spayed feet.  Inguinal hernia from the Lisinopril cough.  Had I contiued on those, I was destined for a wheelchair or walker. She said the symptoms were not from Losartan so I continued taking it.  Two weeks later I did not have the strength in hips and thighs to get up from sitting on the floor (Help, I can't get up😨).  I stopped AMA (not recommended).  Without the Losartan, a) bp did not change, after the 72 hour withdrawal from Losartanon, on clonidine only and b) symptoms started going away.  Improvement started in 72 hours.  After six weeks they were gone and I am getting better.  
    • Scott Adams
      Hopefully the food she eats away from home, especially at school, is 100% gluten-free. If you haven't checked in with the school directly about this, it might be worth a planned visit with their staff to make sure her food is safe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.