Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Doctor Follows Up Weeks Later?


dbuhl79

Recommended Posts

dbuhl79 Contributor

I'm sure many of you have followed my previous posts but I'll recap briefly. After a lot of digestive episodes, I was referred to a GI specialist (who specializes in Celiac Disease, IBS, Crohns). I was tested for Celiac Disease. After calling to receive my results, I was informed that they all came out negative. No exact numbers were given, nothing. And the assistant/nurse informed me that there was no follow up since they hadn't turned up positive.

I was disappointed to say the least that my GI doc had not bothered to have me come back, and review other avenues of diagnosis. Even if it was to generalize me and label me IBS I would of respected, but I didn't even get a follow up appt.

Now the doctors Phys. Asst has called and left a msg on my machine, asking how I am doing. If the Levsin they prescribed is working (which made me feel worse and I stopped taking it). Indicating they may want to see me again if I had issues still. This has been weeks since my appointment. Almost a month.

After getting these test results I've gone gluten-free and know that I feel normal when I am off gluten. When I occassionaly slip up and cheat (yep I'm just weak!!) I will feel the effects of it sometimes in 30 minutes or the next day or so.

I realize this is a personal choice, but I'm curious to get others opinion. Is itworth calling the doctors office back? Should I bother pursuing a follow up appointment? (And no I dont recommend self diagnosis) I'm just not sure its worth my time.

Thanks for any thoughts! :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Tasha2004 Contributor

I went through this yesterday with the rheumatologist. Test results normal, therefore nothing else to do and no reason for me to come back.

I say, get your test results out of them, and then tell them what you are doing and how you are feeling better.

I intend to do this with this guy, if I can get some kind of different help somewhere else.

There is probably no point setting your foot back in their door, because they essentially dismissed you anyway.

plantime Contributor

Why go back to them? They obviously don't think they can help you, or they would have tried. The gastro that did my endo gave me a positive diagnosis in Sept, and I have yet to hear from him about it. No follow-ups, nothing. Just "you have celiac, don't eat wheat, barley, rye, or oats." It wasn't even him that I heard it from, it was from the surgeon that removed my gall bladder! So, why give your moeny to a doc that doesn't want it?

tarnalberry Community Regular

If the doctor is otherwise good, then I wouldn't necessarily decide to leave just yet, though it's always an option. I would go back (or call) and let him know the progress, since they asked. They may well not have called sooner because getting data that covered less than a month on the med you took may not mean anything to them. Doctors don't always call to follow up on every single thing, so I'd be willing to cut him some slack, but also proceed with caution. It's a tough call between a doctor being proactive and a patient being proactive. In the end, though, if you need more follow through, and less reliance on the patient to call back if he/she wants to pursue things further, then it sounds like this isn't the style of doctor for you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,207
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    WAB19
    Newest Member
    WAB19
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.