Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Doctor Follows Up Weeks Later?


dbuhl79

Recommended Posts

dbuhl79 Contributor

I'm sure many of you have followed my previous posts but I'll recap briefly. After a lot of digestive episodes, I was referred to a GI specialist (who specializes in Celiac Disease, IBS, Crohns). I was tested for Celiac Disease. After calling to receive my results, I was informed that they all came out negative. No exact numbers were given, nothing. And the assistant/nurse informed me that there was no follow up since they hadn't turned up positive.

I was disappointed to say the least that my GI doc had not bothered to have me come back, and review other avenues of diagnosis. Even if it was to generalize me and label me IBS I would of respected, but I didn't even get a follow up appt.

Now the doctors Phys. Asst has called and left a msg on my machine, asking how I am doing. If the Levsin they prescribed is working (which made me feel worse and I stopped taking it). Indicating they may want to see me again if I had issues still. This has been weeks since my appointment. Almost a month.

After getting these test results I've gone gluten-free and know that I feel normal when I am off gluten. When I occassionaly slip up and cheat (yep I'm just weak!!) I will feel the effects of it sometimes in 30 minutes or the next day or so.

I realize this is a personal choice, but I'm curious to get others opinion. Is itworth calling the doctors office back? Should I bother pursuing a follow up appointment? (And no I dont recommend self diagnosis) I'm just not sure its worth my time.

Thanks for any thoughts! :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Tasha2004 Contributor

I went through this yesterday with the rheumatologist. Test results normal, therefore nothing else to do and no reason for me to come back.

I say, get your test results out of them, and then tell them what you are doing and how you are feeling better.

I intend to do this with this guy, if I can get some kind of different help somewhere else.

There is probably no point setting your foot back in their door, because they essentially dismissed you anyway.

plantime Contributor

Why go back to them? They obviously don't think they can help you, or they would have tried. The gastro that did my endo gave me a positive diagnosis in Sept, and I have yet to hear from him about it. No follow-ups, nothing. Just "you have celiac, don't eat wheat, barley, rye, or oats." It wasn't even him that I heard it from, it was from the surgeon that removed my gall bladder! So, why give your moeny to a doc that doesn't want it?

tarnalberry Community Regular

If the doctor is otherwise good, then I wouldn't necessarily decide to leave just yet, though it's always an option. I would go back (or call) and let him know the progress, since they asked. They may well not have called sooner because getting data that covered less than a month on the med you took may not mean anything to them. Doctors don't always call to follow up on every single thing, so I'd be willing to cut him some slack, but also proceed with caution. It's a tough call between a doctor being proactive and a patient being proactive. In the end, though, if you need more follow through, and less reliance on the patient to call back if he/she wants to pursue things further, then it sounds like this isn't the style of doctor for you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,597
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Caroline Alexandria
    Newest Member
    Caroline Alexandria
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
      Thank you for sharing your experience, Florence. It’s important to clarify, though, that proteins like zein in corn, panicin in millet, and kafirin in sorghum are not considered gluten and have not been shown to trigger the same autoimmune intestinal damage seen in celiac disease. Some people with celiac disease do report symptoms with certain gluten-free grains, oats, or other foods, but that reflects individual intolerance or sensitivity—not a proven “gluten-mimic” effect that damages the small intestine. Certified gluten-free oats are considered safe for most people with celiac disease, though a small subset may react to avenin. If specific foods consistently cause symptoms for you, it makes sense to avoid them personally, but it’s helpful for readers to know that these foods are still medically classified as gluten-free and generally safe for the broader celiac community.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s true that awareness of celiac disease can vary among physicians, particularly outside of gastroenterology, and many patients end up educating their own providers. Reaching out to someone you trusted for 25 years makes sense if you felt heard and supported. That said, celiac disease management often benefits from a team approach, including a knowledgeable primary care provider and, when needed, a gastroenterologist or dietitian familiar with gluten-related disorders. Advocating for yourself is not unreasonable—it’s part of managing a chronic condition. If your current provider relationship isn’t working, it’s appropriate to seek care where you feel respected and properly supported.
    • Scott Adams
      I understand why that feels concerning. Some Schär products use specially processed wheat starch that has had the gluten removed to meet strict gluten-free standards (under 20 ppm in the U.S. and EU), which is why they can legally and safely be labeled “gluten free” for people with celiac disease. However, wheat must still be listed in the ingredients and allergen statement because it is derived from wheat, even though the gluten protein has been removed. For individuals with a true wheat allergy, these products are not appropriate—but for those with celiac disease, properly tested gluten-free wheat starch is considered safe under current medical guidelines. That said, it’s completely reasonable to prefer products made without wheat starch if that gives you greater confidence, and clearer front-of-package communication could certainly help reduce confusion for shoppers.
    • elisejunker44
      I have enjoyed Schar's gluten free products for years. However, some items Do contain Wheat and are not clearly labeled on the front. Indeed the package states 'gluten free' on the front, and it is not until you read the ingredient label that one see's wheat as the first ingredient. Some celiacs may be willing to take a chance on this 'gluten free wheat', but not me. I strongly feel that the labeling for these wheat containing products should be clearly labeled on the front, with prehaps a different color and not using the 'no gluten symbol on the front. The products are not inexpensive, and also dangerous for my health!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.