Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Too Old To Have Problems With Gluten


poopedout

Recommended Posts

poopedout Apprentice

My doctor told me this problem does not show up for the first time at my age and it occurs in much younger people. I am not sure if he meant celiac disease or gluten intolerance. I am 69 years old. I am wondering if any of you developed this problem at my age or if you were all much younger than I am when you started having problems.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jerseyangel Proficient

My doctor told me this problem does not show up for the first time at my age and it occurs in much younger people. I am not sure if he meant celiac disease or gluten intolerance. I am 69 years old. I am wondering if any of you developed this problem at my age or if you were all much younger than I am when you started having problems.

With all due respect, your doctor is mistaken. I was 49 when diagnosed--after being misdiagnosed for many years. The disease can be triggered at any time in one's life.

sa1937 Community Regular

My doctor told me this problem does not show up for the first time at my age and it occurs in much younger people. I am not sure if he meant celiac disease or gluten intolerance. I am 69 years old. I am wondering if any of you developed this problem at my age or if you were all much younger than I am when you started having problems.

Your doctor is just plain WRONG! I am older than you, had a positive celiac blood panel in Dec., consult with GI doc in late Feb. and was diagnosed with a positive biopsy on April 9. On my initial appt., I asked my GI doc if he didn't think I was a little old to have celiac to which he told me, "No".

It's sad that doctors are so ill-informed about this disease and don't think of testing for it. I believe my daughter also has celiac and quite some time ago, she asked her endocrinologist about it and he told her celiac is very rare. Thankfully he's a top-notch endocrinologist who has her thyroid totally under control for the first time. He's an older doctor so that probably explains why he thinks celiac is "rare".

skigirlchar Newbie

with all due respect (thank you jerseyangel for the appropriate words i just used) your doctor is an idiot.

there many of us have family links to gluten allergies or insensitivity that have never been diagnosed, but when you lay out the symptoms they are EXACTLY the same.

my grandmother, nor great grandmother, ever had a gluten insensitivity diagnosis. instead one had her gall bladder removed, both were told to not eat eggs, were told to cut salt from their diets, and were told to take iron pills.

i was even diagnosed w/ menieres at 25 - something TYPICALLY diagnosed in people in their 40's (though it has been removed since my dr's realized i had the gluten issues.)

heck, my mom is in her 60's and was only recently diagnosed w/ both asthma and a few allergies.

if you take a look at my symptoms and those each had in my family on my mom's side alarm bells start going off.

and as i take a closer and closer look, i really think my dad my have it.

you obviously don't agree w/ your dr since you are asking us...... i would say you probably are also asking us in a round about way if you should get a 2nd opinion..... and i have to say YES, find another dr.

nora-n Rookie

The finnish celiac researchers have studied celiac in old or elderly people, and actually the incidence of cleiac INCREASES with age.

Over 3% of them are celiacs.

So your doctor was educated some decades ago and did not re-educate himself.

He should be finding 3% celiacs amongst his 70-yrs olds if he just would bother to test them, as many are unsymptomatic.

poopedout Apprentice

The finnish celiac researchers have studied celiac in old or elderly people, and actually the incidence of cleiac INCREASES with age.

Over 3% of them are celiacs.

So your doctor was educated some decades ago and did not re-educate himself.

He should be finding 3% celiacs amongst his 70-yrs olds if he just would bother to test them, as many are unsymptomatic.

I thought he was probably wrong, but I wanted to see what people here had to say.

I cannot change doctors. This is Canada, after all.

psawyer Proficient

I cannot change doctors. This is Canada, after all.

You don't say where in Canada you are, but here in Ontario it is difficult but not impossible to change. I have done it three times in the last eight years.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



poopedout Apprentice

You don't say where in Canada you are, but here in Ontario it is difficult but not impossible to change. I have done it three times in the last eight years.

I am in Ontario in an area where no one is taking new patients. They especially will not accept anyone who already has a doctor.

weluvgators Explorer

You may want to start educating your doctor!

My latest reading is Fast Facts: Celiac Disease by Geoffrey Holmes, Carlo Catassi, Alesio Fasano, Second edition.

I bought the book specifically to give it to my doctors. In the Clinical manifestations section it has the following information on page 48,

Celiac disease is being increasingly diagnosed in later life and, today, about 25% of cases are diagnosed in patients over 60 years of age and 10% in those aged over 70 years. Contrary to common belief, 95% of the patients manage a GFD well and enjoy a much improved quality of life.

I think your doctor may need to update his understanding of celiac!

Skylark Collaborator

Bring him this article. It is a particularly powerful study because they followed people for a few years and a few people who were not celiac developed the disease.

Open Original Shared Link

It will look nicer if you use the PDF link at the top right-hand side of the page and print from that.

Generic Apprentice

My great-grandma was diagnosed at the ripe old age of 83. So no it is deffinetly wrong. Also

My mom was diagnosed via the gluten challenge at the age of 62.

poopedout Apprentice

Bring him this article. It is a particularly powerful study because they followed people for a few years and a few people who were not celiac developed the disease.

Open Original Shared Link

It will look nicer if you use the PDF link at the top right-hand side of the page and print from that.

Thanks for the article. It was very informative. It looks like celiac disease will not kill me. It might even make me healthier since my diet is much healthier now that I cannot eat foods containing gluten.

poopedout Apprentice

You may want to start educating your doctor!

My latest reading is Fast Facts: Celiac Disease by Geoffrey Holmes, Carlo Catassi, Alesio Fasano, Second edition.

I bought the book specifically to give it to my doctors. In the Clinical manifestations section it has the following information on page 48,

I think your doctor may need to update his understanding of celiac!

Thanks for the book recommendation. I will try to find it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,612
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Rotary
    Newest Member
    Rotary
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • itsdunerie
      Dang......did it again and yeah I should admit I am 63 with clumsy phone thumbs. I started feeling better quickly and a doctor a year later said I had to eat  poison (gluten) every day for a month so he could formally diagnose me and NO FREAKING WAY. I couldn't then and can't imagine putting my body through that crap (no pun intended) on purpose ever again.  Why ingest poison for a month to have some doctor say Hey, All you Have To Do Is Never Eat poison Again.. 
    • itsdunerie
      Poop head, sorry, but I accidentally posted and can't figure out how to continue my post. My long winded post was going to tell you that after I figu
    • itsdunerie
      15 years ago my best friend 'diagnosed' me as Celiac. Her little nephew had been formally diagnosed and her observations of me dealing with brain fog, stomach problems and other stuff had her convincing me to try going gluten free. Oh my heavens, within 3 days, no lie, I felt human again. Took me about a y
    • Scott Adams
      It seems like you have two choices--do a proper gluten challenge and get re-tested, or just go gluten-free because you already know that it is gluten that is causing your symptoms. In order to screen someone for celiac disease they need to be eating gluten daily, a lot of it--they usually recommend at least 2 slices of wheat bread daily for 6-8 weeks before a blood screening, and at least 2 weeks before an endoscopy (a colonoscopy is no used to diagnose celiac disease). Normally the blood panel is your first step, and if you have ANY positive results there for celiac disease the next step would be to take biopsies of your villi via an endoscopy given by a gastroenterologist.  More info on the blood tests and the gluten challenge beforehand is below: The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:   Not to discourage you from a formal diagnosis, but once you are diagnosed it may lead to higher life and medical insurance rates (things will be changing quickly in the USA with the ACA starting in 2026), as well as the need to disclose it on job applications. While I do think it's best to know for sure--especially because all of your first degree relatives should also get screened for it--I also want to disclose some negative possibilities around a formal diagnosis that you may want to also consider.  
    • Wheatwacked
      Yes.  Now, if you hit your finger with a hammer once, wouldn't you do your best not to do it again?  You have identified a direct connection between gluten and pain.  Gluten is your hammer.  Now you have to decide if you need a medical diagnosis.  Some countries have aid benefits tgat you can get if you have the diagnosis, but you must continue eating a gluten-normal diet while pursuing the diagnosis. Otherwise the only reason to continue eating gluten is social. There are over 200 symptoms that could be a result of celiac disease.. Celiac Disease and Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity  both cause multiple vitamin and mineral deficiency.  Dealing with that should help your recovery, even while eating gluten.  Phosphatidyl Choline supplements can help your gut if digesting fats is a problem,  Consider that any medications you take could be causing some of the symptoms, aside from gluten.        
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.