Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Doctor Won't Confirm

bellac

Recommended Posts

bellac Newbie
bellac
Posted

Ok, my husband and I are in turmoil about what to do...

Here's a recap of our story. Our daughter's bloodwork and biopsy showed early stages/symptoms of celiac (she didn't have any symptoms - diarhea, etc). She's been on a gluten-free diet for 7 months. I just got back from the GI appt and he said based on these two things we are lead to diagnose celiac, however, he can not confirm it. He said we could put her back on a main-stream diet and see what happens (if symptoms arise she'll go in for another biopsy right awa, if no symptoms arrive then she'll go in for a biopsy in about a year). The idea of putting us all thru that again doesn't sound appealing, however, the idea of having an unconfirmed diagnosis and forcing my daughter to live her life as though she has celiac even though she may not doesn't sound too appealing either. We could do a genetic test and if it came back negative then she does not have it, however, if it comes back positive it's inconclusive....

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


adab8ca Enthusiast
adab8ca
Posted

Ok, my husband and I are in turmoil about what to do...

Here's a recap of our story. Our daughter's bloodwork and biopsy showed early stages/symptoms of celiac (she didn't have any symptoms - diarhea, etc). She's been on a gluten-free diet for 7 months. I just got back from the GI appt and he said based on these two things we are lead to diagnose celiac, however, he can not confirm it. He said we could put her back on a main-stream diet and see what happens (if symptoms arise she'll go in for another biopsy right awa, if no symptoms arrive then she'll go in for a biopsy in about a year). The idea of putting us all thru that again doesn't sound appealing, however, the idea of having an unconfirmed diagnosis and forcing my daughter to live her life as though she has celiac even though she may not doesn't sound too appealing either. We could do a genetic test and if it came back negative then she does not have it, however, if it comes back positive it's inconclusive....

Hello!

I am not sure I understand-if her blood work and biopsy indicated Celiac, she has it. There are many Celiacs called "silent" celiacs that have little to no symptoms and the celiac disease comes out while they are being tested for something else. I had no GI symptoms, none of my Dr's can believe I have Celiac disease but it is what it is...Even if there are little to no symptoms, damage is still being done to the intestines and it may not remain silent forever. If there was damage during the biopsy, then it isn't necessarily early stages.

can you post a few more details about what the blood work and biopsy results stated?

txplowgirl Enthusiast
txplowgirl
Posted

There's no such thing as being a little bit pregnant. Either you are are you aren't. If the blood tests are indicative then that means it is. Simple, period. She is having an auto immune reaction and she has some kind of intestinal damage and may have other possible auto immune disorders that may develop as well as can develop possible cancer later in life as well as short stature. Please keep her gluten free.

tarnalberry Community Regular
tarnalberry
Posted

Yeah - she's got an immune response to it, and she's got intestinal damage from it: that means she has it!

The doc is probably wishy washy because he's in the "oh, the diet is so hard, unless her life is unmanageable with symptoms, she won't stay on the diet, so lets not label her". Bubkis. You, and she, are smarter than that!

bellac Newbie
bellac
Posted
  • Author

Hello!

I am not sure I understand-if her blood work and biopsy indicated Celiac, she has it. There are many Celiacs called "silent" celiacs that have little to no symptoms and the celiac disease comes out while they are being tested for something else. I had no GI symptoms, none of my Dr's can believe I have Celiac disease but it is what it is...Even if there are little to no symptoms, damage is still being done to the intestines and it may not remain silent forever. If there was damage during the biopsy, then it isn't necessarily early stages.

can you post a few more details about what the blood work and biopsy results stated?

I don't have all her numbers, one number was a 12 when 4 is good/normal. After her endoscopy the doctor didn't expect celiac to be an issue because everything looked healthy but biopsy results stated "early stages/symptoms".

I think we are going to ask the dr to re-do her bloodwork. She's been on a gluten-free diet for 7 months and at least if we have the bloodwork re-ran her numbers should be down/normal and that can help me and my husband feel more confident that her diet is doing something.

Please, no one think we are in denial of celiac - we can deal with it. There's just so much grey area, even the doctor says it's a grey diagnosis....

seezee Explorer
seezee
Posted

Is it possible for you to send the biopsy and lab tests to another GI doctor who specializes in celiac. I found that some doctors aren't too knowledgeable. There are a number of celiac disease centers at hospitals around the country. It seems that you could possibly send the lab work there or maybe talk to someone else. I can't quite get the logic of making a child ill and damaging their digestive system for months.

mstroud Rookie
mstroud
Posted

I agree that it sounds like she has positive test results and I don't understand why the doctor would hesitate to diagnose her. My son was 7 when he was diagnosed and his results were on the 'mild' side as well. He had definite symptoms (abdominal pain, dark circles, pain in his legs / joints) and they told us that his biopsy results showed early signs of celiac disease and his blood results were 'low positive.' They diagnosed him, but did say that his results were probably on the low side because we caught it early. He did have the genetic test and it came back positive as well.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

I am a little confused by this whole thread too. As I understand it, the celiac panel was not run because she was having any symptoms, but for some other reason??? That is why the results were a surprise to everyone? However, both results were positive, but because she was a silent celiac the doctor will not make a diagnosis. The reason the biopsy samples are taken is because the flattened villi often only show up under microscopic examination; i.e, they are not visible to the naked eye during the scope. But the microscopic exam showed early stage celiac, confirming the blood work. I am at a loss as to why anyone is doubting this diagnosis.

scarlett77 Apprentice
scarlett77
Posted

OK, my take on the situation is this: she tested positive for BOTH blood and scope. How can the doctor not diagnose based of those results? If it acts like a horse and looks like a horse it is a horse. My suggestion is to take the results of the positive labs and endoscopy to another GI and see if s/he can give an official diagnosis.

There is NO WAY in HECK that I would subject my child to an entire YEAR of gluten just for a diagnosis. That is ridiculous. I myself may be looking at making a decision to do a gluten challenge with my youngest and I'm still on the fence about it(leaning towards NOT though). I understand that you don't want to have her miss out if she isn't Celiac, but you have had 2 tests that are positive.

lovegrov Collaborator
lovegrov
Posted

Positive on both. She has it. Be glad you caught it before she got REALLY sick. I had to get to the point where I was hospitalized for 11 days and missed 10 weeks of work.

BTW, if your doctor truly said that he wanted her to go back to gluten and if symptoms arise he's do another biopsy RIGHT away, then he's showing his ignorance about celiac. Most experts agree you need to be eating gluten for many weeks, months, actually, before you could have an accurate biopsy.

richard

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,163
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Estee
    Newest Member
    Estee
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • DAR girl
      Celiac and allergic to common subs and adds in prepared foods

      By DAR girl · Posted

      Looking for help sourcing gluten-free products that do not contain potato or corn derived ingredients. I have other autoimmune conditions (Psoriatic Arthritis and Sjogrens) so I’m looking for prepared foods as I have fatigue and cannot devote a lot of time to baking my own treats. 
    • Scott Adams
      Disregarded

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I am so sorry you're going through this. It's completely understandable to feel frustrated, stressed, and disregarded after such a long and difficult health journey. It's exhausting to constantly advocate for yourself, especially when you're dealing with so many symptoms and positive diagnoses like SIBO, while still feeling unwell. The fact that you have been diligently following the diet without relief is a clear sign that something else is going on, and your doctors should be investigating other causes or complications, not dismissing your very real suffering. 
    • Oldturdle
      Paying for my own Celiac screening at WalkInLab so a positive result doesn’t become part of my medical history

      By Oldturdle · Posted

      It is just so sad that health care in the United States has come to this.  Health insurance should be available to everyone, not just the healthy or the rich.  My heart goes out to you.  I would not hesitate to have the test and pay for it myself.  My big concern would be how you could keep the results truly private.  I am sure that ultimately, you could not.  A.I. is getting more and more pervasive, and all data is available somewhere.  I don't know if you could give a fake name, or pay for your test with cash.  I certainly would not disclose any positive results on a private insurance application.  As I understand it, for an official diagnosis, an MD needs to review your labs and make the call.  If you end up in the ER, or some other situation, just request a gluten free diet, and say it is because you feel better when you don't eat gluten.      Hang in there, though.  Medicare is not that far away for you, and it will remove a lot of stress from your health care concerns.  You will even be able to "come out of the closet" about being Celiac!
    • plumbago
      Paying for my own Celiac screening at WalkInLab so a positive result doesn’t become part of my medical history

      By plumbago · Posted

      Yes, I've posted a few times about two companies: Request a Test and Ulta Labs. Also, pretty much we can all request any test we want (with the possible exception of the N protein Covid test and I'm sure a couple of others) with Lab Corp (or Pixel by Lab Corp) and Quest. I much prefer Lab Corp for their professionalism, ease of service and having it together administratively, at least in DC. And just so you know, Request a Test uses Lab Corp and Quest anyway, while Ulta Labs uses only Quest. Ulta Labs is cheaper than Request a Test, but I am tired of dealing with Quest, so I don't use them so much.
    • Scott Adams
      Does Dailymed.nlm.nih.gov site have filters for gluten?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      PS - I think you meant this site, but I don't believe it has been updated in years: http://glutenfreedrugs.com/ so it is best to use: You can search this site for prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/   
×
×
  • Create New...