Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing and biopsy


KathleenH

Recommended Posts

KathleenH Enthusiast

Hello everyone! I am new to this so bare with me if I mess something up I've never posted on a forum. So on Friday I will be getting a biopsy done to confirm celiac disease. I'm wondering if I had a positive blood test what are the chances that the biopsy will come back positive showing blunted villi. I know its hard to say if you aren't a doctor but I'm curious. I guess I'm just looking for reassurance that I'll get a positive result. I know that sounds weird, like "wait you want celiac disease?" but I'm only 21 and I've been sick for so long and been to countless doctors and no one knows whats wrong with me. I finally think this can be the "thing" and maybe I can start to feel like a human instead of a zombie. Thanks for the input in advance! 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Daura Damm
Authentic Foods



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Lakefront Brewery


cyclinglady Grand Master

Welcome!  No one can say for sure that a positive celiac blood test is going to confirm celiac disease.  Some folks skip the endoscopy for various reasons (health, financial, long wait times in some countries, etc.), but help to confirm with a trial Gluten free diet.  The endoscopy remains the "gold standard" by most celiac experts.  

Note that your test may be negative if you stopped eating gluten.  You must be eating it daily two to four weeks prior to the endoscopy.  If you stopped, you might need to postpone the procedure. Ask your GI to take four or more intestinal tissue samples.   Damage from celiac disease can be spotty.  

Good luck!  Keep us posted.  We are here to help.  ?

 

 

 

KathleenH Enthusiast
1 minute ago, cyclinglady said:

Welcome!  No one can say for sure that a positive celiac blood test is going to confirm celiac disease.  Some folks skip the endoscopy for various reasons (health, financial, long wait times in some countries, etc.), but help to confirm with a trial Gluten free diet.  The endoscopy remains the "gold standard" by most celiac experts.  

Note that your test may be negative if you stopped eating gluten.  You must be eating it daily two to four weeks prior to the endoscopy.  If you stopped, you might need to postpone the procedure. Ask your GI to take four or more intestinal tissue samples.   Damage from celiac disease can be spotty.  

Good luck!  Keep us posted.  We are here to help.  ?

 

 

 

Thanks for the reply. Yes I have been eating it everyday since they said it was a possibility but I hope its enough because I do prefer to eat fresh stuff. Like for example today I ate mainly gluten free stuff (as I normally do) but I had pasta to make sure I got something with gluten. Also do you know how long it takes for the biopsy to come back? Can they tell anything from the naked eye while doing the endoscopy? 

Jmg Mentor

Welcome Kathleen :)

32 minutes ago, KathleenH said:

Also do you know how long it takes for the biopsy to come back? Can they tell anything from the naked eye while doing the endoscopy? 

You will probably get some instant feedback on what they've seen with the naked eye, I got a sheet with the initial observations of the person that did the endoscopy, but the analysis of the villi happened later in the lab via the biopsies taken. So you'll have to wait till you speak to your GI before you get the full picture.

1 hour ago, KathleenH said:

. I know that sounds weird, like "wait you want celiac disease?"

No it doesn't feel weird at all! You're lucky you've found one of the few places where almost everyone will know exactly what you mean. I found myself very conflicted when my biopsy failed to find evidence of celiac because by then I'd established exactly what gluten did to me. So, even if the results are negative, bear in mind that you may be like me and others, and give the gluten free diet a try regardless.

Best of luck. You've found a great site here, hope it's as useful to you as it's been for me. :)

 

KathleenH Enthusiast
1 minute ago, Jmg said:

Welcome Kathleen :)

You will probably get some instant feedback on what they've seen with the naked eye, I got a sheet with the initial observations of the person that did the endoscopy, but the analysis of the villi happened later in the lab via the biopsies taken. So you'll have to wait till you speak to your GI before you get the full picture.

No it doesn't feel weird at all! You're lucky you've found one of the few places where almost everyone will know exactly what you mean. I found myself very conflicted when my biopsy failed to find evidence of celiac because by then I'd established exactly what gluten did to me. So, even if the results are negative, bear in mind that you may be like me and others, and give the gluten free diet a try regardless.

Best of luck. You've found a great site here, hope it's as useful to you as it's been for me. :)

 

Yes, I plan on going gluten free regardless of what the biopsy said because my doctor said there could be a chance I'm gluten intolerant. I was feeling anxious about what my lab results said because they didn't fully explain them to me so I actually called them today and they said my Ig-A was very high. But as I was hanging up the phone and confirming my endoscopy with the nurse I could of sworn she said their is no biopsy. Like what? I thought that was the entire point. To look at the villi? 

cyclinglady Grand Master

It takes 7 to 10 days (depending on where you live).  My GI told me that everything looked great when he looked (no stomach ulcers, etc), but my biopsies revealed moderate to severe damage.  So, you need to wait for the pathologist's report.  I know, waiting is hard!  And speaking of reports, it is a good idea to maintain all your medical records.  Good habit to get into.  When I walk into a new doctor's office, I have proof of my celiac disease diagnosis and all my other ailments!  ?

Today  is the day to eat your most favorite gluten food!  I only miss good sourdough bread.  Luckily, I have been able to recreate gluten-free versions of everything else that I like.  

KathleenH Enthusiast

Hahah yes. I took all my spring break as time to eat/try all the food I wont be able to have. It was worth the pain I think =b.. but I'm perfectly happy to get rid of it and get healthy. =] 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Food for Life
Food for Life



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Little Northern Bakehouse


cyclinglady Grand Master

Call back and confirm.  I would even ask the GI on Friday to show the lab order.  Intestinal damage is not always seen visually.  Your GI should be following leading celiac research center's guidelines like this one: 

Open Original Shared Link

(I often refer to the University of Chicago's website because it is the most well written and easy to nagivate.). 

Be your own health advocate.  Doctors can and do make mistakes!  

cyclinglady Grand Master

I had seven weeks after my positive blood test to consume gluten.  (I waited due to work contraints).  I ate gluten like a fiend.  Bought everything and sample a few and gave away the rest.  It was a fond farewell.  Even ate a loaf of sourdough bread a day.  I kid you not!  Anemia was my only symptom.  By the end of seven weeks, I had all the classic gut issues.  I knew even before my biopsy that gluten was not for me.  ?

KathleenH Enthusiast
2 minutes ago, cyclinglady said:

Call back and confirm.  I would even ask the GI on Friday to show the lab order.  Intestinal damage is not always seen visually.  Your GI should be following leading celiac research center's guidelines like this one: 

Open Original Shared Link

(I often refer to the University of Chicago's website because it is the most well written and easy to nagivate.). 

Be your own health advocate.  Doctors can and do make mistakes!  

They unfortunately closed so I will have to call back tomorrow. What if they say they aren't doing a biopsy, what do I do? My mom is traveling from far away to come with me so I cant really reschedule.  

cyclinglady Grand Master

Do not worry.  Didn't you say you talked to a nurse?  She might not even know the procedure for obtaining biopsies for celiac disease.  She might just be thinking endoscopy.  She might even be new to the practice.  Who knows?  Print off the U of Chicago's info and call or email tomorrow with your questions.  If you do not get an answer, then talk to the GI when you see him on Friday. But you need the biopsies.  Villi damage is too small to see!  There are some other signs....but biopsies are key.  

GFinDC Veteran

Hi Kathleen,

There is a standard called the Marsh Scale that is used to rate the various levels of damage to the gut.  While the lighter damage levels might not show up to the naked eye, the worst damage levels are obviously visible.  The worst levels result in what they call "scalloping" referring to the appearance of the gut lining.

Isn't this great, you are learning new stuff already! :)

Welcome to the forum Kathleen! :)

KathleenH Enthusiast

Thanks everyone for the advice and info! I've never really considered joining a support group before but its pretty cool to get intouch with people who understand what you're experiencing. For years everyone would just tell me I was a  hypochondriac but after I learned that I might have this disease and researching it these are all the symptoms I've been having! I finally don't feel crazy anymore! 

cyclinglady Grand Master

You are not crazy!  There is something wrong.  Keep advocating for your health.  I am glad your Mom will be with you.  

KathleenH Enthusiast

Hey guys so I had the endoscopy today. When my doctor was going into it he made it sound like all of a sudden he didnt think I had celiacs. He said my antigen levels were elevated but not super high.  When I woke up he told me that he didnt see anything that indicated celiacs with the naked eye. So he took like 5-6  biopsies  and he will see how those look. He said if it comes back negative they are going to do a DNA test to see how predisposed my DNA is. Why would he all of a sudden think I dont have it? I feel so sad today. I just want to feel better. :'( did any of you have a normal looking intestine but your biopsy was positive?

cyclinglady Grand Master

Me.  Only one positive on the celiac panel and visually, my GI said everything looked great.  My biopsies revealed moderate to severe patches of intestinal damage.  You just have to wait for the pathologist's report.  The wait is hard!  ?

KathleenH Enthusiast
29 minutes ago, cyclinglady said:

Me.  Only one positive on the celiac panel and visually, my GI said everything looked great.  My biopsies revealed moderate to severe patches of intestinal damage.  You just have to wait for the pathologist's report.  The wait is hard!  ?

Yes it is! 10-12 days they said. I hope Thats what mine is like. I really dont want to be left again with no answers as to why Im so sick. 

Washingtonmama Contributor
7 hours ago, cyclinglady said:

Me.  Only one positive on the celiac panel and visually, my GI said everything looked great.  My biopsies revealed moderate to severe patches of intestinal damage.  You just have to wait for the pathologist's report.  The wait is hard!  ?

My daughter just had hers done. They said everything looked normal during the procedure, but her biopsies showed otherwise. 

ironictruth Proficient

I do not have a diagnosis. But I do know that I had an EUS in late July to rule out duct issues and an endoscopy in late August and both doctors said visually everything was fine. In fact, one of them (was referred to him for the procedure only) sternly said, "there is nothing wrong with your duodenum!" But never asked me a single question about symptoms nor did he introduce himself. 

Nausea was one of the main symptoms at the time. 

The pathology report read "marked focal duodenitis", which is basically inflammation without villi blunting. My GI commented on the language the pathologist used. 

So yup. They can miss a lot visually during the scope. 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Food for Life



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,963
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Pat Martin
    Newest Member
    Pat Martin
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    Holidaily Brewing Co.


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Food for Life



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @CeliacNew, If you are Vegan to help you feel better, reconsider returning to omnivore.  Actually, since you are already on a very restrictive diet, transitioning to gluten free might be easier for you.  Read the ingredient labels, Particularly vitamin D and Choline require supplements for vegan diet because our primary source is sun, eggs and beef.  B12 also.
    • Wheatwacked
      Once you've completed testing and still don't have improvement, start a trial gluten free diet.  Looking for imprvement that may indicate Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, which is 10 times more prevalent than Celiac Disease. Deficiencies in vitamins B6, B12, D, and C can manifest as skin rashes.  Virtual guaranty you are deficient in vitamin D.
    • cameo674
      So those rs numbers tell researchers where the dbSNP is located in a Genome so that other reasearchers or an AI system can look in that specific spot for that Snip of information.  You can look those rs # s by pasting the numbers after rs into the lookup on this page https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/ right under the Blue header bar at the top of the webpage.  Since you are not a researcher, I do not know how this will help you though.
    • cameo674
      So I posted here once before, and everyone advocated that I get into a GI doc.  I finally got into my functional health appointment on 6/16 to get my blood results evaluated and get the Gastro referral. I was told that I would be fortunate to see a gastro doctor by December, because of the number of people waiting to get in, but they did believe that I needed to see a GI doc among others.  Well, the stars aligned. I got home. I looked at MyChart and it showed an appointment available for later that same day. I never clicked so fast on an appointment time. The gastro doc ran some additional blood work based off the December values that had confirmed my daughter's suspicion that I have undiagnosed stomach issues.  Gastro has also scheduled me to get an upper endoscopy as well as a colonoscopy since it has been 8 years since my last one. She said it would rule out other concerns if I did not show Celiac per the biopsies.  Those biopsies will not occur until August 29th and like everyone here stated, Gastro wants me to keep gluten in my diet exactly as everyone suggested. To be honest, I was barely eating any gluten since I figured I would have plenty of time to do so before testing.  Doc is also looking for the cause of the low level heartburn that I have had for 30 years.  I have mentioned the heartburn to PCPs in the past and they always said take a tums or other OTC drug.  The upper endoscopy is for ruling out eosinphilic esophagitis, h. pylori, and to biopsy the duodenal bulb and second portion to confirm or exclude celiac. The colonoscopy will have random biopsies to rule out microscopic colitis. I didn't really catch her reasoning for the bloodwork.  Doc looked at the December numbers and said they were definitely concerning for Celiac.  She also said, “Hmm that’s odd; usually it’s the reverse”, but I did not catch which result made her say that. She seems very through.  She also asked why I had never bothered to see a GI before.  To be honest, I told her I just assumed that the heartburn and loose stool were a part of aging.  I have been gassy since I was born and thought constantly passing gas was normal?  Everyone I know with Celiac have horrible symptoms that cannot be attributed to other things.  They are in a lot of stomach pain.  I do not go through that.  I attribute my issues to the lactose intolerance that comes with aging, but have slowly been eliminating foods from my diet due to the heartburn or due my assumption that they did not agree with a medication that I was prescribed. I have already eliminated milk products especially high fat ones like ice cream; fats like peanut butter; acids like citrus and tomatoes; chocolate in all forms; and breads more because it is so hard to get in 100 grams of protein if I eat any foods that are not a protein.  I would not have even done the testing if my daughter had not brought up the fact that she thought I might have an undiagnosed condition since she has issues with bloating and another sibling has periodic undiagnosed stomach pain that GI docs throw pills at instead of helping.  Who knew that Bristol scale 5 and 6 were not considered normal especially multiple times a day? I watched my MIL go through basically the same bowel changes starting at 50 so to be honest, I really did think it was normal before this week's appointment.   December 2024's blood tests ran through Quest Labs were:  Deamidated Gliadin (IgA) 53.8 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Deamidated Gliadin (IgG) >250.0 U/mL Above Range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgA) 44.0 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgG) <1.0 In range <15.0; Immunoglobulin A (IgA) 274 mg/dL In range 47-310 mg/dL 6/16/25 bloodwork:  Until today, I did not really know what all the four tubes of blood were for and since I did not understand the results, I got into the clinical notes to see what was ordered, but it did not exactly explain why for everything. Immunoglobulins IGG, IGA, IGM all came back in range:  IGG 1,010 mg/dL In range 600-1,714; IgA 261 mg/dL In range 66-433 mg/dL; IGM 189 mg/dL In range 45-281.  How do these numbers help with diagnosis? Google says she checked these to see if I have an ongoing infection? I do have Hashimoto's and she did say once you have one autoimmune disease others seem to follow. Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies? Comprehensive Metabolic Panel: Everything was in the middle of the normal range.  Google says this just says I am metabolically healthy. Tissue Transglutaminase ABS test results – Done by the Mayo Clinic’s Labs –  T-Transglutaminase IGA AB --Value: 3.1 U/mL – Normal Value is <4.0 (negative) U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase, IgG -- Value: 15.3 U/mL High -- Normal Value is <6.0 (Negative) U/mL – Interpretation Positive (>9.0) – These are the only labs the GI did that have been labeled Abnormal.  I am confused at how/why these came back different than the December labs? Because these numbers seem to be the opposite of what the were in December and I know I have eaten less gluten.  They were definitely measured differently and had different ranges. This must be why she said they are usually opposite? Molecular Stool Parasite Panel said I was Negative for Giardia Lamblia by PCR; Entamoeba Histolytica by PCR and Cryptosporidium Parvum/Hominis by PCR.  So at least I do not need to do a parasite cleanse like everyone on TikTok seems to be doing. So I guess, I am just really asking why the Tissue Transglutaminase numbers are different.  Was it because they were truly different tests? Is it because I have not consumed the crazy amount of gluten one is suppose to eat prior to testing? To be honest, I thought that was only for the biopsy testing. I generally only eat twice a day, and the thought of eating the equivalent of 6 slices of bread is daunting. Even in my youth, I probably only consumed the equivalent of maybe 3 slices a day. Like I said before, now I usually focus on trying to eat 60 gram of protein.  I am suppose to consume 100 grams, but have failed to succeed. I will focus on eating gluten starting in July now that I know my procedure date.
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents and wiping down the spot you eat your lunch, and eating the food your brought from home should be safe for even sensitive celiacs. Gluten can jump on your food, so it would likely better better for you to continue eating where you prefer.
×
×
  • Create New...