Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten-free claim to be removed from General Mills Cheerios sold in Canada

kareng

Recommended Posts

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

 

"October 20, 2017 (Mississauga, ON) The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) has made an announcement that the words “gluten-free” will be removed from all Cheerios package sold in Canada by January 1, 2018.

The Canadian Celiac Association first objected to the claim in August 2016 and strongly recommended that people with celiac disease not consume the cereal, even though the box was labelled “gluten free”.

The announcement came in a letter addressed to a Canadian consumer who was one of many customer complaints to be filed against the products......."

 

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Ennis-TX Grand Master
Ennis-TX
Posted

US needs to do this, we also need to have the FDA crack down on foods that say gluten free but are not, or are produced in the same facility with possible contamination. -_- So tired of seeing "gluten free" read on the back. "Manufactured on/Packaged on equipment that handles wheat, etc."

Awol cast iron stomach Experienced
Awol cast iron stomach
Posted
21 hours ago, Ennis_TX said:

US needs to do this, we also need to have the FDA crack down on foods that say gluten free but are not, or are produced in the same facility with possible contamination. -_- So tired of seeing "gluten free" read on the back. "Manufactured on/Packaged on equipment that handles wheat, etc."

Agreed 

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

What new data are they basing this decision on?

Scarlettsdad Contributor
Scarlettsdad
Posted
11 minutes ago, admin said:

What new data are they basing this decision on?

I believe it was based on the number of customer complaints. 

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

Strange...oat intolerance is common among celiacs, and is well documented. It seems strange that they can't test boxes and find gluten, and that they would not base this decision on facts, rather than consumer complaints.

Ennis-TX Grand Master
Ennis-TX
Posted
1 minute ago, admin said:

Strange...oat intolerance is common among celiacs, and is well documented. It seems strange that they can't test boxes and find gluten, and that they would not base this decision on facts, rather than consumer complaints.

Actually GFWD did a article on cheerios and General mills testing methods its is more of a lot means and not testing the boxes, there are many cases where a lot will test in 5-10ppm range and pass then who is to day a random box does not contain a hot spot? The mechanically separated process is flawed at the core, there should be no gluten containing grains to even have to separate. I think the process need to be more dedicated to 100% gluten free, from planting, harvest, to store. There are 2 oat sources for this. Where the fields have never had gluten grains, the equipment is owned by the companies not rented and only used for the oats and not other gluten grains, and the transport trucks are also dedicated....sadly they are the only companies that follow such strict procedures. (Granbia and GFHarvest)

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted
Quote

who is to day a random box does not contain a hot spot?

It is not up to General Mills to test every single box to prove they are safe...has anyone found such a hot spot yet? Please post it here. 5-10 ppm is gluten-free, even by Canadian standards.

Quote

 The mechanically separated process is flawed at the core

Evidence please...making such a statement without any facts isn't helpful here. 

I am happy to discuss this, but please don't make claims you can't back up. GM is making a claim that their cereals are gluten-free and safe for celiacs, so far I've not seen any evidence otherwise, but am considering offering a reward for such evidence.

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

Oh, and how much do Granbia and GFHarvest cost, and how available are these cereals? 

Ennis-TX Grand Master
Ennis-TX
Posted
10 minutes ago, admin said:

Oh, and how much do Granbia and GFHarvest cost, and how available are these cereals? 

Granbia is wholesale only, GFHarvest you can order and they ship anywhere sales under Open Original Shared Link
 

 

13 minutes ago, admin said:

It is not up to General Mills to test every single box to prove they are safe...has anyone found such a hot spot yet?

Ok it is rare...1/5  boxes seems to be a maybe.....

Lab: Bia Diagnostics (www.biadiagnostics.com)

 

Sample                                   Assay/Extraction                               Results (ppm gluten)

Entire box homogenized first via a blender and then through a coffee grinder

Cheerios Yellow Box 1          R5/Cocktail*                                      7.3, < 5, 5.1

Cheerios Yellow Box 1          R5/GEB**                                           < 5, 9.6, < 5

.....................

Cheerios Yellow Box 2          R5/Cocktail                                        5.5, 7.0, 5.9 

Cheerios Yellow Box 2          R5/GEB                                              < 5, < 5, < 5

.....................

Cheerios Yellow Box 3          R5/Cocktail                                        5.2, 5.5, < 5

Cheerios Yellow Box 3          R5/GEB                                              < 5, 5.5, 12.1

......................

Representative sample homogenized to a fine powder

Cheerios Yellow Box 4          R5/Cocktail                                        6.1, < 5

Cheerios Yellow Box 4          R5/GEB                                              < 5, < 5

......................

Cheerios Yellow Box 5          R5/Cocktail                                        17.8, < 5

Cheerios Yellow Box 5          R5/GEB                                              24.5, 9.1

Cheerios Yellow Box 5         

(sample re-homogenized)   R5/Cocktail                                        < 5, < 5

.......................

Honey Nut Cheerios Box 1   R5/Cocktail                                        < 5, < 5

Honey Nut Cheerios Box 1   R5/GEB                                              < 5, < 5                                  

........................

Honey Nut Cheerios Box 2   R5/Cocktail                                        11.2, < 5

Honey Nut Cheerios Box 2   R5/GEB                                              < 5, 5.1

Honey Nut Cheerios Box 2

(sample re-homogenized)   R5/Cocktail                                        12.5, < 5

.......................

Multi-Grain Cheerios Box 1  R5/Cocktail                                        < 5, < 5

Multi-Grain Cheerios Box 2 R5/GEB                                               < 5, 5.2







Sorry to be the jumpy rabbit, but once bitten twice shy, I recall when they first came out with gluten-free cheerios....yeah it was worse back then and that pain and trickery will not be forgiven.

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

Yes, I've seen these and believe that these were taken during the time period that GM had an issue with a contaminated truck, and this caused them to issue a recall on batches made at a plant. If I am correct about this, that was years ago, and they have corrected that issue. What is the link for this? What time period were these tests done? 

I am fairly certain you are showing old data here, that is old news that was dealt with by GM...but please share if you know.

Ennis-TX Grand Master
Ennis-TX
Posted
2 minutes ago, admin said:

Yes, I've seen these and believe that these were taken during the time period that GM had an issue with a contaminated truck, and this caused them to issue a recall on batches made at a plant. If I am correct about this, that was years ago, and they have corrected that issue. What is the link for this? What time period were these tests done? 

I am fairly certain you are showing old data here, that is old news that was dealt with by GM...but please share if you know.

Nov 18, 2015 >.< yeah it was older, Checked some newer testing others have done and found the more recent ones under 5ppm.....so perhaps they got their act together. I still am that old dog recalling being hit and growling at them about it.

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted
  • Author

I posted this because ... I wanted us to have some info and see news reports about stuff related to Celiac/gluten free.  But I haven't seen any new tests on the Cheerios.  Has anyone?  

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted
9 hours ago, kareng said:

I posted this because ... I wanted us to have some info and see news reports about stuff related to Celiac/gluten free.  But I haven't seen any new tests on the Cheerios.  Has anyone?  

I don't have a lot of time this morning but I did locate organizations section on gluten free label regs in Canada. There may be more info on this in that section that may be helpful in knowing why they are making that change.

Open Original Shared Link

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted
  • Author

Open Original Shared Link

"As many of you have heard General Mills is removing the gluten-free claim from Cheerios sold in Canada. Gluten Free Watchdog reached out to General Mills to learn more about this decision and how it might impact Cheerios sold in the US. In particular, we asked about testing protocols and any changes to these protocols. These questions are motivated by our knowledge that an AOAC working group on gluten in oats was established because “Standards and methods are needed for gluten measurement specific to oats and oat products.” This project is supported by General Mills. Participating members “agreed that quantitative methods based on ELISA technology are needed for measurement of gluten in groats (after hulling); rolled oats; oat flour; extruded, cooked, finished product; and oat bran.”..."

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Yep, I saw this.  Thanks for posting Karen!  I allow “gluten-free” Cheerios in my house for my kid who does NOT have celiac disease.  But hubby and I do not eat them for a variety of reasons.  

When in doubt, do not eat it has been my motto ever since I questioned the safety of mayonnaise found in my roommate’s refrigerator some 30 years ago.  My Dad wisely counseled me when I called home to ask “Do you think this has spoiled?”  Dad replied, “Honey, is it worth a dollar to get really sick?”  I went without mayonnaise that day.  ?

I also looked for recent testing and found nothing.  So perhaps the “power of media” is what prompted this decision.  ??????

 

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

Celiac.com just checked with the CDF and they still recommend them to all celiacs, as they are gluten-free and contain less than 20 ppm measurable gluten (most tests we've seen come in at under 10 ppm). We contacted GM and there are different reasons why they decided to no longer label them gluten-free in Canada, which we'll detail shortly in an article.

Hint: It has nothing to do with their safety for celiacs, and everything to do with Canada's crazy labeling regulations, which keep changing--and adding to confusion among celiacs and manufacturers. Health Canada still says GF cereals are gluten-free and safe for celiacs according to their regulations on GF products:

Open Original Shared Link

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Looking forward to the article clearing this up!  

 

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

Here is our first article on this topic:

https://www.celiac.com/articles/24930/1/General-Mills-to-Remove-Gluten-Free-Label-for-Cheerios-in-Canada/Page1.html

Ennis-TX Grand Master
Ennis-TX
Posted

Interesting, seems the Nima community has been testing cheerios constantly. They have some interesting results for for the past few months.

"The results? Eighty-eight percent of test results for the pea-sized sample of Cheerios were gluten-free, and for 13 percent, Nima detected gluten. All gluten found results were from Honey Nut Cheerios. As a reminder, Nima can occasionally detect below 20ppm, so the results could still have technically been “gluten-free” by FDA standards."

Open Original Shared Link

I

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Well, the article posted by celiac.com seemed to just repeat all the press releases.   Hopefully, the next article can shed more light in the subject.  

Open Original Shared Link

I do think that General Mills (GM) opted out due to conflicting testing requirements.  It looks like they are part of a group (manufacturers, scientists, etc.) that reviews or creates testing standards (just one of many things this group does).    The “oat” team was created in January and was to submit their proposal in September.  Maybe GM’s decision to re-label had to do with this proposal.  

Open Original Shared Link

 

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted
On 10/25/2017 at 3:30 PM, admin said:

Celiac.com just checked with the CDF and they still recommend them to all celiacs, as they are gluten-free and contain less than 20 ppm measurable gluten (most tests we've seen come in at under 10 ppm). We contacted GM and there are different reasons why they decided to no longer label them gluten-free in Canada, which we'll detail shortly in an article.

Hint: It has nothing to do with their safety for celiacs, and everything to do with Canada's crazy labeling regulations, which keep changing--and adding to confusion among celiacs and manufacturers. Health Canada still says gluten-free cereals are gluten-free and safe for celiacs according to their regulations on gluten-free products:

Open Original Shared Link

Am I not getting it?  According to the link, Health Canada is just saying that any food, even cereal, is considered safe for the majority of celiacs if under 20 ppm.   What does this have to do with Cherrios?  

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted
4 hours ago, cyclinglady said:

Well, the article posted by celiac.com seemed to just repeat all the press releases.   Hopefully, the next article can shed more light in the subject.  

Open Original Shared Link

I do think that General Mills (GM) opted out due to conflicting testing requirements.  It looks like they are part of a group (manufacturers, scientists, etc.) that reviews or creates testing standards (just one of many things this group does).    The “oat” team was created in January and was to submit their proposal in September.  Maybe GM’s decision to re-label had to do with this proposal.  

Open Original Shared Link

 

You either didn't read our 1st article, or the press releases you refer to...not sure which, as it is an original article and we did interview GM about this. Here is our 2nd article:

https://www.celiac.com/articles/24929/1/Canadian-Celiac-Association-Press-Release-Draws-Pushback-from-General-Mills/Page1.html

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,035
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    bostonbell
    Newest Member
    bostonbell
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Beverage
      Is this celiac?

      By Beverage · Posted

      Exactly which blood tests were done? There are a few different ones and some docs don't do them all. Also, your results and reference ranges for each?
    • Jmartes71
      Fighting for a name

      By Jmartes71 · Posted

      Thankyou so much for your words.Its a hard battle when a supposed well known hospital whose celiac " specialist " has down played me because my colon looks fine and put it in my medical and so pcp doesn't take seriously. In their eyes we all carry that gene.Im having alot of bad days trying to be positive because of it.
    • Scott Adams
      Celiac getting dentures

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Dedicated gluten-free Restaurants in East Bay (near San Francisco):

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      Fighting for a name

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.