Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Vitamin Supplementation - Tolerable Upper Limits


Russ H

Recommended Posts

Russ H Community Regular

Following discussion of B12 supplementation in another thread, this document by the European Scientific Committe on Food has comprehensive information regarding tolerable upper limits for various vitamins and minerals. It is a cornucopia of useful information.

European Food Safety Authority - TOLERABLE UPPER INTAKE LEVELS FOR VITAMINS AND MINERALS

Regarding B12 particularly:

Quote

The average dietary requirement for vitamin B12, as established by the Scientific Committee for Food (Nutrient and Energy Intakes for the European Community, Reports of the SCF, 31th Series, 1993) is 1.0 μg/day, with a population reference intake (PRI) for adults of 1.4 μg/day. This is approximately the amount needed to maintain an adequate vitamin B12 body pool (about 2.5 mg), and to compensate for daily losses (about 0.1% of the total body pool).

Quote

Ileal receptors are saturated with dosages between approximately 1.5 and 2.5 μg of vitamin B12 per meal. At intakes around 1 μg about 50% is absorbed, at dosages around 25 μg only 5% is absorbed. Very small amounts (ca 1%) can be absorbed by passive diffusion, in the absence of IF.

 

Quote

There are also no adverse effects known for vitamin B12 from foods, or from supplements in amounts far in excess of needs. Some studies suggested acne formation after high parenteral doses of hydroxocobalamin, but not with cyanocobalamin, or after a combination of vitamins A, B6 and B12 given orally.

Quote

In addition, adverse effects have not been reported in the treatment of patients with compromised B12 absorption who received dosages up 1000 μg/day orally for prolonged periods; however, there was no systematic assessment of adverse effects in these patients.

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

Thanks for sharing this!

I've been taking high levels for years, and have had high blood levels for years. I suspect that I still have issues processing it, even though my blood levels are high. The reason I suspect a possible processing issue is because whenever I lower my levels I do encounter more brain fog and memory issues, which go away when I add back the individual supplement. I also take a B-complex as well.

Wheatwacked Veteran

Great find @Russ314. 480 pages to read. The first thing I found is that the Referance body weight chart page 14  maxes out at 164 pounds (74.6 kg) for males over 18 and 145 pounds (66.1 kg) for females over age 60.

Russ H Community Regular
On 6/14/2022 at 10:11 PM, Wheatwacked said:

Great find @Russ314. 480 pages to read. The first thing I found is that the Referance body weight chart page 14  maxes out at 164 pounds (74.6 kg) for males over 18 and 145 pounds (66.1 kg) for females over age 60.

Yes, that it the average body weight in Europe. I suspect in the UK it is significantly higher.

It is a useful reference document - comprehensive and conservative.

 

On 6/14/2022 at 6:29 PM, Scott Adams said:

Thanks for sharing this!

I've been taking high levels for years, and have had high blood levels for years. I suspect that I still have issues processing it, even though my blood levels are high. The reason I suspect a possible processing issue is because whenever I lower my levels I do encounter more brain fog and memory issues, which go away when I add back the individual supplement. I also take a B-complex as well.

I plan to do that. I currently take a multivitamin. Apparently the one to be careful of is B6, which can cause neuropathy when given at high doses for long periods. The safe upper limit for B6 is 25 mg per day.

Posterboy Mentor

Russ,

I just wanted to add this reference work on Vitamin and Mineral interactions for you to read up on it is the most comprehensive I have read on the topic.....and to introduce the concept of Co-Factors.

https://deannaminich.com/vitamin-and-mineral-interactions-the-complex-relationship-of-essential-nutrients/

Co-Factors are like the Key to your house and the deadbolt etc.

You can unlock the door with one Vitamin but the Mineral or Vitamin Co-factor will still keep the door shut.

We see this with Vitamin D and Calcium or Magnesium and Thiamine for Example....

You can take the right Vitamin sometimes and still not get the benefit you expect or are looking for....

I had to learn this the hard way......but I was lucky to find Magnesium first.....because it  helps so many things!

This article illustrates  how being low in Magnesium will "Lock you out" of the benefits of taking Thiamine for example.....

Entitled "Thiamine refractory Wernickes encephalopathy reversed with magnesium therapy"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093844/

And why taking a B-Complex is often better than taking one B-Vitamin alone unless the B-Vitamin you are taking is the controlling factor......your B-Vitamin won't help you (the way you intended it too)....

I see this alot in/with Folate/Homocysteine's and/or MTHFR issue etc....

People take your B-6 (and I have as a P5P in the activated B6 form) etc......and still I had no benefit etc.

I didn't know it at the time but B2 aka Riboflavin is the controlling factor for elevated Homocysteine etc.

See this article about it....

https://chrismasterjohnphd.com/blog/2019/02/26/mthfr-just-riboflavin-deficiency/

Unless you take the Vitamin/Mineral with its appropriate Co-factor(s) you won't get the improvement you seek!

Or at least it was what helped me......I have taken the B6, B9 (Folic Acid) and B12 that you always hear about.....but until I took the controlling factor of B2 aka Riboflavin my issues didn't improve.

I hope this is helpful but it is not medical advice.

Posterboy,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,597
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sindi
    Newest Member
    Sindi
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
    • Scott Adams
      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...