Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Am As Confused As The Doctors? Am I celiac disease?


mcoop911

Recommended Posts

mcoop911 Newbie

I was told in late October of 2006 that I have Celiac Disease. This was by a colo-rectal specialist saying this based on my 3 year history of symptoms and 2 hospitalizations (and low vitamin D). It was recommended at that point to go gluten-free which I did. Two weeks later his nurse called to say my blood work was "positive" and that at some point I should get a confirming EGD w/ biopsy - he doesn't do those type biopsies; he is strictly lower GI. I got a referral to a local gastroenterologist who reviewed all my accompanying labs and performed the EGD w/ biopsy the first week of December. My biopsy was "normal" but my response to the gluten-free diet has been nothing short of miraculous.

In follow up appointments to all the above physicians, one says I'm celiac disease and the other says not celiac disease. Other than my opinion that I should never go back to WBRO or any gluten containing product what should be my next step (especially for my 3 kids, one of which is symptomatic)?

Additionally, I found out the "positive lab work" was really a suppressed IgA. Should this blood work be repeated? It was sent to Mayo Clinic.

Thanks out there for any advice.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



outOfThisWorld Newbie

Sorry I don't have any advice at this time as I am trying to work out if I have gluten/thyroid issues. However, I am interested to hear what symptoms you were suffering from that were miraculously improved by going gluten-free?

mamaw Community Regular

There are alot of people who dx themselves no matter what the medical outcome my be. In other words if you feel so much better on the diet , stay on the diet. It will not hurt you. Some people want that doctor confirmation & seal of approval. But I think if your body feels better who cares what the doctor says, you know how you feel....Also you could do the DNA testing to see if you carry the genes....

If you had the endo & colonoscopy done while you were off of gluten that will alter your results...and not everyone has intestional damage... Mine was caught before I caused damage which is a good thing.

In the end the choice is yours to decide ..Doctors in the US need to catch up in regards to celiac.

best of luck

mamaw

Nancym Enthusiast

You're falling into a gray area lots of us do. Many doctors will diagnos celiac on the basis of blood work alone or positive response to the diet. Were you gluten-free before your biopsy? If so, how long? That could skew your results too.

Anyway, many of us realize that the testing is obviously inadequate and are choosing to follow the diet anyway, despite our tests results, based upon positive experiences with the diet.

You don't need your doctor's permission to make dietary changes.

happygirl Collaborator

There are many on this board who have unclear diagnoses because of poor medical advice/treatment by doctors, as well as many who have positive bloodwork/no biopsy, etc etc. Every iteration possible----you can find on this board.

I had some positive bloodwork, but my biopsy was taken while gluten free and was negative. Many doctors have told me I "don't" have it and that I need to know if I have it or not. I know that gluten is a problem for me....even my idiot GI who performed the biopsy on me after telling me to start the diet saw the change in my health and agreed that gluten was a serious problem for me. I think that my family, friends, co-workers, etc would describe going gluten free as miraculous for me as well!!!! It gave me my life back. I have not been willing to do a "gluten challenge" for months to see if I have villous damage-for me it is not worth it. If you have more testing done, you will need to be back on gluten for awhile for the results to be as accurate as possible.

Either way-if you do better on a gluten free diet, you may have Celiac, or you may have non-Celiac gluten intolerance/sensitivity that will not show up on a biopsy, etc. There are many NCs on here....the treatment is the same. We don't really differentiate on here---we are here to support those on a gluten free diet.

Good luck!

Laura

mcoop911 Newbie
There are many on this board who have unclear diagnoses because of poor medical advice/treatment by doctors, as well as many who have positive bloodwork/no biopsy, etc etc. Every iteration possible----you can find on this board.

I had some positive bloodwork, but my biopsy was taken while gluten free and was negative. Many doctors have told me I "don't" have it and that I need to know if I have it or not. I know that gluten is a problem for me....even my idiot GI who performed the biopsy on me after telling me to start the diet saw the change in my health and agreed that gluten was a serious problem for me. I think that my family, friends, co-workers, etc would describe going gluten free as miraculous for me as well!!!! It gave me my life back. I have not been willing to do a "gluten challenge" for months to see if I have villous damage-for me it is not worth it. If you have more testing done, you will need to be back on gluten for awhile for the results to be as accurate as possible.

Either way-if you do better on a gluten free diet, you may have Celiac, or you may have non-Celiac gluten intolerance/sensitivity that will not show up on a biopsy, etc. There are many NCs on here....the treatment is the same. We don't really differentiate on here---we are here to support those on a gluten free diet.

Good luck!

Laura

Thanks for your advice about Dr. Peter Green's book. I bought it last month and passed it along to another Celiac friend. I was gluten-free for about 4-6 weeks before the biopsy. Is that short length of time sufficient to produce a false negative? My GI guy thought that I would still show villious damage due to the fact I was symptomatic for over 3 years. (He is an idiot as well, didn't do a colonsocopy- said I'd have to be gluten-free for that biopsy?).

Thanks.

mcoop911 Newbie
Sorry I don't have any advice at this time as I am trying to work out if I have gluten/thyroid issues. However, I am interested to hear what symptoms you were suffering from that were miraculously improved by going gluten-free?

You asked about symptoms? For over threee years (including two hospitalizations of one week each) I had truly disabling diarrhea and horrible fatigue. I gave up a very solid career of over 18 years due to this illness.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

You can be full force eating 100% gluten and your biopsy can still be negative. celiac disease is a patchy disease....so if they don't sample enough places, they could easily miss where the damage is. So even under ideal circumstances (eating gluten, and multiple biopsies in multiple locations), the biopsies might miss the damage. Add going gluten free, plus---did he take multiple biopsies in multiple locations?---and that can decrease even further the accuracy of the biopsy. The biopsy can rule Celiac IN but unless the "whole" 22 ft of small intestine is biopsied ;), it really can't rule it out.

Like mentioned above, I was gluten-free for 5 weeks, and he only took one biopsy. So for me and most knowledgable Celiac doctors, it is hard to say that it was a conclusive test by ANY means. So yes, going gluten free can definitely impact it. Some people heal quicker than others.

That all being said.....if you have non-Celiac gluten intolerance, you won't have villous atrophy....but will still react to gluten.

Happy that you enjoyed the book---it really is a great reference for what they know about Celiac. Non Celiac gluten intolerance still is overlooked, but hey, the treatment is the same---so I'll be happy for what I can get :).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.