Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Caramel Color/maltodextrin...gluten-free?


kay's mommom

Recommended Posts

kay's mommom Newbie

Im new on here and I need some help. I just recieved a list of gluten containing foods to avoid in the mail and it says caramel color, malt, and dextrin are some ingredients to avoid. Is maltodextrin also bad for celiac? Also, I have eaten foods saying gluten-free and have checked the ingredients to make sure but some say caramel color. Does anyone know if caramel color contains gluten?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

If you are in North America, neither caramel color nor maltodextrin is a cause for concern. They are made from corn.

Malt must be avoided since it is almost always made from barley which is a source of gluten.

Outside North America, it is possible that caramel color or maltodextrin could be made from wheat. Both of these are highly processed, and so even if the source is from wheat, there is generally no detectable gluten in the ingredient. Since they are a very small component of the finished food, I don't worry about them. However, if you want to take a zero-tolerance position, you may want to investigate the origin of these ingredients if the food containing them is produced in Europe. To me, no detectable gluten in an ingredient comprising a very small fraction of the finished product is just not a cause for worry.

Others may have different views; these are mine.

kenlove Rising Star

I think it also depends on the level of sensitivity. Also we don't really know where some company might get the caramel coloring they use in ginger ale or something. It has always given me problems when I forget to read a label or someone has changed how they make something. In Hawaii we have this idiotic law saying that as long as a producer adds 51% value to a product it can be called Made in Hawaii. So people bring things in really cheap made in china or Malaysia mark up the price and call it local. It's not and often contains items that celiacs need to stay away from.

I'm extremely sensitive to any amount of gluten which for the past two years my body does not let me forget.

Ken

If you are in North America, neither caramel color nor maltodextrin is a cause for concern. They are made from corn.

Malt must be avoided since it is almost always made from barley which is a source of gluten.

Outside North America, it is possible that caramel color or maltodextrin could be made from wheat. Both of these are highly processed, and so even if the source is from wheat, there is generally no detectable gluten in the ingredient. Since they are a very small component of the finished food, I don't worry about them. However, if you want to take a zero-tolerance position, you may want to investigate the origin of these ingredients if the food containing them is produced in Europe. To me, no detectable gluten in an ingredient comprising a very small fraction of the finished product is just not a cause for worry.

Others may have different views; these are mine.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Carmel coloring is made by heating a starch, and that starch can be a gluten grain starch. Most times it is corn but not always. You do need to check with those. Be aware though that if it tests below a certain level the company can say it is gluten free so it is best to ask where the carmel color comes from rather than just asking if the product is gluten-free. Carmel coloring is the prime gluten source in most sodas that are not gluten-free.

Dextrin can be derived from wheat but with the new labeling laws they should tell you. Glucose can also be gluten derived but again the label should note that.

Maltodextrin in the US is always corn unless it says otherwise.

Sweetfudge Community Regular
If you are in North America, neither caramel color nor maltodextrin is a cause for concern. They are made from corn.

Malt must be avoided since it is almost always made from barley which is a source of gluten.

Outside North America, it is possible that caramel color or maltodextrin could be made from wheat. Both of these are highly processed, and so even if the source is from wheat, there is generally no detectable gluten in the ingredient. Since they are a very small component of the finished food, I don't worry about them. However, if you want to take a zero-tolerance position, you may want to investigate the origin of these ingredients if the food containing them is produced in Europe. To me, no detectable gluten in an ingredient comprising a very small fraction of the finished product is just not a cause for worry.

Others may have different views; these are mine.

Carmel coloring is made by heating a starch, and that starch can be a gluten grain starch. Most times it is corn but not always. You do need to check with those. Be aware though that if it tests below a certain level the company can say it is gluten free so it is best to ask where the carmel color comes from rather than just asking if the product is gluten-free. Carmel coloring is the prime gluten source in most sodas that are not gluten-free.

Dextrin can be derived from wheat but with the new labeling laws they should tell you. Glucose can also be gluten derived but again the label should note that.

Maltodextrin in the US is always corn unless it says otherwise.

I ALWAYS check on caramel coloring before eating it!!

hathor Contributor

I just read this morning a post on another board by a dietician who did some research. Maltodextrin from wheat need not be disclosed in the US if it is a food not covered by the FDA labeling law, that is, food that is regulated instead by the USDA.

Still I don't know if this is a big problem. (Not that I eat anything regulated by the USDA, I don't :lol: ) I don't know how common the wheat maltodextrin is in USDA products or whether it contains enough gluten to be a concern (Europe doesn't think so).

I would be more concerned about it as a potential hidden source of MSG myself.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
I just read this morning a post on another board by a dietician who did some research. Maltodextrin from wheat need not be disclosed in the US if it is a food not covered by the FDA labeling law, that is, food that is regulated instead by the USDA.

USDA, would that mean meats?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



hathor Contributor

Meat, poultry and egg products. Technically, something could have just a little meat in it and that would be USDA jurisdiction, not FDA. How the jurisdiction is divided up in practice is rather confusing. Researching yesterday, I found a public hearing for a rulemaking where the agencies were trying to rationalize things. From what I could tell, no action has been taken. Anyway, this is an explanation:

Open Original Shared Link

I found another explanation that 2 to 3 percent meat is enough for USDA jurisdiction. But I think for some items they have deferred to the FDA. It looks like the USDA decides what it wants jurisdiction for; what it doesn't want the FDA gets. I couldn't find a good and simple explanation at all. But finally I stopped because, heck, I'm a vegan so I'm not going to be eating USDA food anyway. Anyone else can research this for themselves if interested ...

It really makes no sense. Meat pizzas are regulated by the USDA. Cheese pizza by the FDA.

I also found that the USDA has said that they are going to issue allergen labelling rules like the FDA has. If I'm reading this correctly, the timetable calls for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to go out in March of 2008: Open Original Shared Link

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Meat, poultry and egg products. Technically, something could have just a little meat in it and that would be USDA jurisdiction, not FDA. How the jurisdiction is divided up in practice is rather confusing. Researching yesterday, I found a public hearing for a rulemaking where the agencies were trying to rationalize things. From what I could tell, no action has been taken. Anyway, this is an explanation:

Open Original Shared Link

I found another explanation that 2 to 3 percent meat is enough for USDA jurisdiction. But I think for some items they have deferred to the FDA. It looks like the USDA decides what it wants jurisdiction for; what it doesn't want the FDA gets. I couldn't find a good and simple explanation at all. But finally I stopped because, heck, I'm a vegan so I'm not going to be eating USDA food anyway. Anyone else can research this for themselves if interested ...

It really makes no sense. Meat pizzas are regulated by the USDA. Cheese pizza by the FDA.

I also found that the USDA has said that they are going to issue allergen labelling rules like the FDA has. If I'm reading this correctly, the timetable calls for the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to go out in March of 2008: Open Original Shared Link

Thanks, they do make things sooooo very confusing don't they. I appretiate the links.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,819
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Charlette Jillie-Martinez
    Newest Member
    Charlette Jillie-Martinez
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • xxnonamexx
      Is there a digestive enzyme that helps build a healthier gut? I see people taking them but not sure what really works
    • trents
      So the tTG-IGA at 28 is positive for celiac disease. There are some other medical conditions that can cause elevated tTG-IGA but this is unlikely. There are some people for whom the dairy protein casein can cause this but by far the most likely cause is celiac disease. Especially when your small bowel lining is "scalloped". Your Serum IGA 01 (aka, "total IGA") at 245 mg/dl is within normal range, indicating you are not IGA deficient. But I also think it would be wise to take your doctor's advice about the sucraid diet and avoiding dairy . . . at least until you experience healing and your gut has had a chance to heal, which can take around two years. After that, you can experiment with adding dairy back in and monitor symptoms. By the way, if you want the protein afforded by dairy but need to avoid casein, you can do so with whey protein powder. Whey is the other major protein in dairy.
    • jenniber
      hi, i want to say thank you to you and @trents   . after 2 phone calls to my GI, her office called me back to tell me that a blood test was “unnecessary” and that we should “follow the gold standard” and since my biopsy did not indicate celiac, to follow the no dairy and sucraid diet. i luckily have expendable income and made an appt for the labcorp blood test that day. i just got my results back and it indicates celiac disease i think 😭   im honestly happy bc now i KNOW and i can go gluten free. and i am SO MAD at this doctor for dismissing me for a simple blood test that wouldn’t have cost her anything !!!!!!!!!!! im sorry, im so emotional right now, i have been sick my whole life and never knew why, i feel so much better already   my results from labcorp:   Celiac Ab tTG TIgA w/Rflx Test Current Result and Flag Previous Result and Date Units Reference Interval t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA 01 28 High U/mL 0-3 Negative 0 - 3 Weak Positive 4 - 10 Positive >10 Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) has been identified as the endomysial antigen. Studies have demonstrated that endomysial IgA antibodies have over 99% specificity for gluten sensitive enteropathy. Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 01 245 mg/dL 87-352
    • JoJo0611
      Thank you this really helped. 
    • Samanthaeileen1
      Okay that is really good to know. So with that being positive and the other being high it makes sense she diagnosed her even without the endoscopy. So glad we caught it early. She had so many symptoms though that to me it was clear something was wrong.   yeah I think we had better test us and the other kids as well. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.