Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is A Biopsy Strictly Necessary?

AudreyT

Recommended Posts

AudreyT Newbie
AudreyT
Posted

Hello. My name is Audrey and I am new to the board. I recently suffered a 25 day bout of diarrhea...and my Doc suspects Celiac Disease.

I am scheduling the intital blood test(s). But I wanted to know if a biopsy is really necessary. I am nervous about the procedure, and also just having concerns about finding the time, etc. However, my health comes first, and I want to do the right thing here.

Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thank you.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


nikki-uk Enthusiast
nikki-uk
Posted

Getting the biopsy is a very personal thing.

There are many people on these boards that didn't - but they know through dietary response that when they eat gluten they feel ill.... and feel well off it.

There are however benefits to having the biopsy.

It can rule out any other 'nasties' the doc may be looking for.

Both my husband and son were diagnosed by biopsy.

It was our decision because it was irrefutable proof......I knew if there was an element of doubt it would make it harder to stick to being gluten-free for life.

Good Luck :)

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
Hello. My name is Audrey and I am new to the board. I recently suffered a 25 day bout of diarrhea...and my Doc suspects Celiac Disease.

I am scheduling the intital blood test(s). But I wanted to know if a biopsy is really necessary. I am nervous about the procedure, and also just having concerns about finding the time, etc. However, my health comes first, and I want to do the right thing here.

Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thank you.

Welcome Audrey:

Your blood test can confirm Celiac, but they are not 100% reliable. Make sure that your doctor runs the full Celiac Blood Screening test. If you do have a positive blood test, there is no need for further diagnostic testing for Celiac. The endoscopy exam and biopsy can also confirm Celiac Disease and look for the extent of villi damage in the small intestines. The endoscopy exam can also look for other issues. The biopsy can be hit or miss and also is not 100%. It is not a difficult exam and there is nothing to worry about regarding the procedure.

It is very important, that while you await your blood screening that you remain on gluten. DO NOT GO GLUTEN FREE. It may effect your results.

I hope this was helpful.

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

The endoscopy won't only be looking for Celiac. It will be looking to rule/in out other diagnoses, as well.

wannaBAmama Newbie
wannaBAmama
Posted

I had an endoscopy w/ biopsies last month despite negative blood work- I did blood tests one week after a 2 week gluten-free trial and was fearing a false negative. I responded so well to my gluten-free trial in November I really wanted to know if I had villi damage. The results just came back (see my other post re: endoscopy results) but the biopsies determined no villi damage but a high white blood cell count - doctor suspects small intestine bacterial overgrowth (which if left untreated, patients also can see a great response to going gluten free since the bacteria is feeding off of the gluten) - or if it's not bacteria, then very early celiac. I am now on antibiotics (xifaxan) to see if it is a bacteria issue and 3 days in I am feeling really good (I have been gluten-free since 12/22 but the antibiotics made me get more energy in the AM- which was surprising), so it's posible I am not gluten intolerant after all. I will remain off gluten and will also take some probiotics for a month or two before attempting to challenge any gluten but I honestly had not expected this possibility (I thought I was for sure genetically gluten sensitive and was ready to be off of gluten forever). Now I'm just taking things a day at a time. Assuming I will be able to ingest gluten again I'll probably remain gluten-free but not fear accidental glutenations (they suck- I was out of commision for a day and a half after accidentally having a corn tortilla that touched a flour tortilla).

So for me I am glad I did the biopsy. I have been trying to undersatnd my other health issues (infertility) and really wanted to get as much information as possible and the biopsy was part of my quest for answers.

I've had a lot of procedures as part of my infertility and the endoscopy was one of the simplest for me - the worst part was the preparation prior to it (I did a colonoscopy at the same time and was on the liquid diet for a day plus all the laxatives) - I barely remember the procedure itself and had no pain/effects afterwards.

Gina

AudreyT Newbie
AudreyT
Posted
  • Author

Thanks to each of you for your responses.

Is there a type of blood test I should be asking for specifically? Or is there only one that needs to be done?

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
Thanks to each of you for your responses.

Is there a type of blood test I should be asking for specifically? Or is there only one that needs to be done?

These are some or all of the tests your doctor may order:

IgG Antigliadin

IgA Antigliadin

tTG Antigliadin

IgG Tissue Translutaminase

IgA Tissue Transglutaminase

Total IgA

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


AudreyT Newbie
AudreyT
Posted
  • Author

Thank you so much. Now I can be sure that I am getting the right tests. Thanks again!

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

The tests that you want run are: Open Original Shared Link

Anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) both IgA and IgG

Anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) - IgA

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) - IgA

Total IgA level.

If you are IgA deficient, they will often run the tTG IgG.

JennyC Enthusiast
JennyC
Posted
These are some or all of the tests your doctor may order:

IgC Antigliadin

IgA Antigliadin

tTG Antigliadin

IgC Tissue Translutaminase

IgA Tissue Transglutaminase

Total IgA

You mean:

IgG Antigliadin

IgA Antigliadin

tTG Antigliadin

IgG Tissue Translutaminase

IgA Tissue Transglutaminase

Total IgA

:)

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
You mean:

IgG Antigliadin

IgA Antigliadin

tTG Antigliadin

IgG Tissue Translutaminase

IgA Tissue Transglutaminase

Total IgA

:)

Oooops, I'll go back and change it. Thank you ladies.

d4rp Newbie
d4rp
Posted
These are some or all of the tests your doctor may order:

IgG Antigliadin

IgA Antigliadin

tTG Antigliadin

IgG Tissue Translutaminase

IgA Tissue Transglutaminase

Total IgA

`

Hi,

Do you need to be still eating gluten to have these tests show a proper DX?

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
`

Hi,

Do you need to be still eating gluten to have these tests show a proper DX?

Yes, it's recommended to eat the equivalent of 3-4 slices of bread for at least two months.

grommet Newbie
grommet
Posted
I had an endoscopy w/ biopsies last month despite negative blood work- I did blood tests one week after a 2 week gluten-free trial and was fearing a false negative. I responded so well to my gluten-free trial in November I really wanted to know if I had villi damage. The results just came back (see my other post re: endoscopy results) but the biopsies determined no villi damage but a high white blood cell count - doctor suspects small intestine bacterial overgrowth (which if left untreated, patients also can see a great response to going gluten free since the bacteria is feeding off of the gluten) - or if it's not bacteria, then very early celiac.

You may want to have a look at this Open Original Shared Link.

It's a link to a write up on SIBO and a few messages from a UK based Coeliac forum.

Best Wishes in you endeavour to find out what is causing your problems.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. trents
      - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess...
    2. Roses8721
      - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    3. Roses8721
      - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    4. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    5. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,474
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Silk tha Shocker
    Newest Member
    Silk tha Shocker
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      By trents · Posted

      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      gluten-free Oatmeal

      By Roses8721 · Posted

      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      By Roses8721 · Posted

      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.