Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Blood Work, Negative Biopsy


*lee-lee*

Recommended Posts

*lee-lee* Enthusiast

please help me understand.

i can't tell if i "officially" have Celiac - i can't talk to my GI doctor until Monday

here's my timeline:

May 23 - blood work to test for Celiac

May 27 - started gluten-free test while waiting for blood work results

June 3 - blood work came back positive

June 4 - started gluten again and scheduled biopsy

June 24 - biopsy performed

July 1 - started gluten-free again

July 3 - doctors office (nurse) informed me the biopsy is negative but couldn't tell me anything else

i don't understand how the blood work can be positive but the biopsy negative. did i do the biopsy too soon after the 8 day gluten-free trial? maybe i skewed the results?

i felt better after the first gluten-free trial so i think that's my answer, regardless of the official diagnosis but i still would like to know. (i should also note my grandmother has Celiac so there is a family history.)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Positive blood test and positive biopsy are diagnostic for Celiac. A negative results of these test cannot rule Celiac out. A biopsy can be hit and miss and is not considered a 100% diagnostic test, only if positive results.

Positive dietary response is also a diagnoses in itself. So, yes, with positive blood test, you do have Celiac. Welcome to the club.

PS: you might want to get a copy of the blood work that your doctors ordered and some people here can help to interpret the results.

Ridgewalker Contributor

It is perfectly possible to have a positive blood test and negative biopsy. A positive blood test means you do have Celiac Disease, no matter what the biopsy showed. It makes no sense for so many doctors to require a biopsy for diagnosis. Why? Because biopsy is unreliable.

Intestinal damage takes time to become visible. You may have Celiac for an unknown length of time before a biopsy would show up positive. Furthermore, Celiac damage is patchy, not constant. Taking a biopsy for this diagnosis is like playing Pin the Tail on the Donkey- you might hit a damaged spot, and you might not.

With a positive blood test, family history, and dietary response... That says Celiac.

Ursa Major Collaborator

Could you tell us what your numbers were from your bloodwork?

Generally, the blood work is more reliable than the biopsies. Negative blood work results and negative biopsies can

ShayFL Enthusiast

I agree. Positive labs + positive dietary response = celiac

I would not believe the GI doc if he says you do not have celiac based soley on the biopsy. You could cause yourself years of suffering and set yourself up for cancers, auto-immune diseases associated with untreated celiac.

*lee-lee* Enthusiast

ok, you guys are already making me feel better. i cried as soon as i hung up with the nurse today - she was absolutely no help and with the holiday weekend coming up, i couldn't bear the thought of waiting for more info until Monday.

i left a message requesting a copy of the blood work from the doctors office - hopefully they call me back today and can fax it right to me.

i'm off to the bookstore to find some good books on gluten-free living. i need all the help i can get...i miss my bread and pasta already!

Ridgewalker Contributor
i'm off to the bookstore to find some good books on gluten-free living. i need all the help i can get...i miss my bread and pasta already!

There are a lot of great books out there. And this forum is an excellent place to get info!

It'll take some trial and error to find breads that you like. But there's lots of choices these days... premade breads, mixes, recipes from scratch. And not all gluten-free pastas are created alike- there's brown rice pasta, white rice pasta, corn pasta, quinoa pasta, and even more. (My family's favorite is Tinkyada brand brown rice pasta.)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nikky Contributor

I had the same thing happen to me. I would agree that you do have coeliac, theres no false positives and together with a good dietry response, positive blood tests are a good basis for confirming diagnosis. My GI said that in a few years he will stop doing biopsy's (if its just for this) because even those with negatives end up being diagnosed with coeliac unless he suspects it in someone with negative bloods. If i were you i would continue being gluten free.

Good luck

*lee-lee* Enthusiast

i'm still waiting for the doctors office to mail the blood work results so i can give you guys the specifics but in the meantime i talked to my GI doc yesterday so he could explain the negative biopsy result and he said the blood could have been a false positive...is that possible or does he not have a clue what he's talking about?

he's sending me for more blood work to test for the genetic markers. he claims if the genetic markers are there, than maybe the blood was correct and the biopsy was a false negative. he did say the biopsy was remarkably normal - as in, no signs of any damage. i think he knows i need a definite answer so that's why he suggested the genetic test.

meanwhile, i'm feeling a lot better on the diet so if nothing else i at least have that to be happy about.

Lisa Mentor

There are NO false positives with regards to blood tests for Celiac. There are, false negatives.

I have talked to several doctors and when they attended med school, there was only a brief reference to Celiac Disease and then, it was considered exceedingly rare. There have been some very rapid changes/research since then, and I believe few doctors are knowledgeable.

Welcome to the Club! ;)

*lee-lee* Enthusiast

ok, all you people who can interpret blood work! what do you see?? :blink:

Antigliadin Abs, IgA = 1

Antigliadin Abs, IgG = 2

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA = 19 (Flagged: HIGH)

(there's a note below this one that says "tTG has been identified as the endomysial antigen. Studies have deomonstrated that endomysial IgA antibodies have over 99% specificity for gluten sensitive enteropathy.")

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG = 30 (Flagged: HIGH)

Endomysial Antibody IgA = Positive Abnormal

Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum = 199

is there anything about these results that could be questionable?

As i've said, the biopsy came back negative according to my GI doc (he even commented that it looked remarkably normal.) Now he wants me to test for genetic markers. that's fine by me...i don't have an issue with the test itself, except my insurance company tends to jerk me around and i get stuck with outrageous co-pays that i would like to avoid. i am responding well on the diet but would just like to have a firm diagnosis. and i don't have kids yet but am planning on it in the next few years so i'm concerned about passing the gene onto them. what are everyones thoughts on the genetic test? (it's through Prometheus - they're the only ones who perform this specific test i guess?)

jldanforth Newbie

I am a new group member and have been reading this thread with a lot of interest. I have not officially been diagnosed as having Celiac disease, at least my MD has not told me I have it. Based on my history of IBS and significant problems with bloating he did order blood work.

Here are my results: Antigliadin Antibody, IgG - 31 (high); Antigliadin Antibody, IgA - 14 (within normal limits) and Tissue transglutaminase Antibody, IgA - 4 (within normal limits). His comment was that since all tests weren't positive he wasn't sure. He suggested I 'decrease the amount of wheat' I eat. This was late last summer. I am still trying to consistently (greater than 4-5 days) go gluten-free. I find going diary-free has definitely helped the IBS.

I would like to ask the members, based on their knowledge, if they think my blood test was indicative of Celiac.

I am working on the dietary attempt to verify that going gluten-free helps.

JL

IBS times many years

Hypothyroidism

kristionii Rookie

Hi,

I'm new to the board, but in the same position. I had a transglutamine blood test done in May, which came out positive. I just had my biopsy (endoscopy) done yesterday, and my doctor remarked that everything looked very good from what he saw, and he was surprised by that. Of course I don't get the actual results for another week, but it sounded like he was saying he was expecting the results to be negative. I spent the last 8 weeks eating tons of "bad" food that I may never get to eat again (and gaining 10lbs in the process!) and emotionally accepting my new way of life ... only now to feel like I'm going to get a negative biopsy result. I'm so confused. I'm actually hoping for a positive biopsy result so I can accept it and move on with my life.

So it's not possible for a positive blood test to be wrong?

Thanks,

K

happygirl Collaborator

See this article for why the biopsy is NOT as accurate as doctors hope they are. Take this and discuss this with your doctor.

Open Original Shared Link

"Ninety-two percent had visible damage detected by capsule endoscopy while upper endoscopy only detected visible damage in 55% of the patients."

(Capsule endoscopy is not what you had.)

Study done by Mayo Clinic and Dr. Murray, who is a leading Celiac specialist/researcher.

*lee-lee* Enthusiast

kristionii - are you my long lost sister?? :P

i, too, just want to know so i can get on with my bread-less life. problem is, i can't just accept that i feel better on the diet. there's just something that nags at me that makes me want a definite diagnosis but i'm quickly learning it's just not that simple. best of luck to you...i hope your biopsy comes back positive! LOL

betty6333 Newbie

i have good news and bad news....

it is possible for you to not have celiacs(good news) BUT ----(BAD NEWS) YOU HAVE CELIACS

Let me explain

it is possible to get pos. blood work and not have celiacs, unfortunately if this were the case you would have much bigger problems that you would definately know about...... if you had type 1 autoimmune insulin dependent diabetes or autoimmune hepatitis, you very well could have had pos blood work and not have celiacs..... but you don't have those, because it is highly unlikely you would miss severe janudice or a coma.....

since you don't have either condition, the only other possible explanation is celiacs.

so, i am sorry they made you do an unnecessary biopsy that gave you false results....

you need to : either ----do a gluten challenge and get yourself really really sick, or, you can accept that you have celiacs and go gluten free ( and be very glad you do not have type1 diabetes or a fatal form of hepatitis!!!)

:

kristionii Rookie

I'll definately discuss that article with my doctor if the result is (eek! negative).. thank you!

I'm definately one of those "planner" people - once I have my mind set, I want answers immediately so I can plan out my actions to move forward! Ahh if anything, waiting for this test result will teach me that I can't plan life! :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - YoshiLuckyJackpotWinner888 replied to YoshiLuckyJackpotWinner888's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      Water filters are a potential problem for Celiac Disease

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Known1's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Reverse Osmosis (RO) Water

    3. - Scott Adams replied to JoJo0611's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      3

      Yeast extract

    4. - Scott Adams replied to dsfraley's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      14

      9 y/o Son Diagnosed with Celiac Disease; Persistent Symptoms: Does this Sound Familiar?

    5. - Scott Adams replied to YoshiLuckyJackpotWinner888's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      Water filters are a potential problem for Celiac Disease

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,570
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Chanty
    Newest Member
    Chanty
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • YoshiLuckyJackpotWinner888
      What non organic or nonorganic molecules from a plastic bottle of water can trigger a reaction that I have only experienced during an auto immune experience? There really should not be any organic molecules in  such a bottle. I seen a thread where it was mentioned that his refrigerator water filter tested positive for gluten when he had it checked. If I went to physician to get checked for other possible triggers from a water bottle, I don’t think that will go anywhere. Again, distilled water containers cause no reactions. I’m not an industry expert, but something is there.  I don’t think that this is a case of microplastics causing this. Too bad we can’t call upon some third party investigation.  
    • Scott Adams
      It’s understandable to want to be cautious, especially after experiencing symptoms. However, there is currently no scientific evidence that reverse osmosis or standard activated carbon water filters expose people to gluten in amounts that would trigger celiac disease. Gluten is a protein, and if any starch-based binder were used in filter manufacturing, it would not pass through RO membranes or remain in finished bottled water at clinically meaningful levels. Plain water — filtered, RO, or bottled — does not contain gluten unless it is intentionally added (which would require labeling). Steam-distilled water is certainly safe, but it is not considered medically necessary for people with celiac disease. If reactions are occurring, it may be helpful to explore other potential explanations with a healthcare provider rather than assuming filter-related gluten exposure.
    • Scott Adams
      It’s understandable to look for bigger explanations when you’re dealing with complex symptoms, but the current scientific consensus does not support the idea that celiac disease evolved as a defense against Candida. Celiac disease is a well-characterized autoimmune condition triggered specifically by gluten in genetically susceptible individuals (HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8). While some laboratory studies have shown that certain Candida proteins (like Hwp1) share limited sequence similarities with gluten or tissue transglutaminase (tTG), that does not mean Candida causes celiac disease or commonly produces false-positive tTG tests in clinical practice. Anti-tTG IgA remains a highly specific and validated marker for celiac when used appropriately (especially alongside total IgA testing and, when indicated, biopsy). IgG antibodies to Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA) are more commonly associated with Crohn’s disease and are not considered diagnostic for celiac. There is ongoing research into microbiome interactions and immune cross-reactivity, but at this time there is no evidence that yeast exposure from foods triggers celiac autoimmunity in people without gluten exposure. If symptoms persist despite a strict gluten-free diet, it’s best to work with a gastroenterologist to rule out other conditions such as IBD, SIBO, non-celiac food intolerances, or refractory celiac disease rather than assuming a fungal-driven mechanism.
    • Scott Adams
      It sounds like you’ve put a lot of effort into tracking patterns, and that kind of awareness can be helpful. With celiac disease specifically, though, the only confirmed immune trigger is gluten. Reactions to dairy are common after diagnosis because intestinal damage can temporarily reduce lactase, leading to lactose intolerance — but that’s different from casein sensitivity. IgG food panels, including yeast, are generally considered markers of exposure rather than proof of clinical intolerance. Aged cheeses like Irish cheddar are typically gluten-free, though they do contain casein and natural cultures. If symptoms are strong and repeatable, it may be worth working with a gastroenterologist or allergist to sort out true allergies, intolerances, or other GI conditions rather than assuming multiple cross-reactive immune triggers.
    • Scott Adams
      I completely understand wanting to track down every possible source of exposure after a celiac diagnosis, especially when symptoms are distinct and repeatable. That said, there’s currently no credible evidence that bottled water — including filtered water products like Gatorade water — contains gluten from filter materials. Activated carbon filters are typically bound with food-grade binders, and if any starch were used in manufacturing, it would not remain in the finished water at measurable or biologically active levels. Plain water itself does not contain protein, and gluten is a protein. Major beverage companies also have strict allergen control programs, and gluten would need to be declared if intentionally added. If symptoms are occurring consistently after certain products, it may be worth discussing with a physician to explore other potential triggers, but at this time distilled water is not considered medically necessary for people with celiac disease.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.