Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Blood Work, Negative Biopsy

*lee-lee*

Recommended Posts

*lee-lee* Enthusiast
*lee-lee*
Posted

please help me understand.

i can't tell if i "officially" have Celiac - i can't talk to my GI doctor until Monday

here's my timeline:

May 23 - blood work to test for Celiac

May 27 - started gluten-free test while waiting for blood work results

June 3 - blood work came back positive

June 4 - started gluten again and scheduled biopsy

June 24 - biopsy performed

July 1 - started gluten-free again

July 3 - doctors office (nurse) informed me the biopsy is negative but couldn't tell me anything else

i don't understand how the blood work can be positive but the biopsy negative. did i do the biopsy too soon after the 8 day gluten-free trial? maybe i skewed the results?

i felt better after the first gluten-free trial so i think that's my answer, regardless of the official diagnosis but i still would like to know. (i should also note my grandmother has Celiac so there is a family history.)

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted

Positive blood test and positive biopsy are diagnostic for Celiac. A negative results of these test cannot rule Celiac out. A biopsy can be hit and miss and is not considered a 100% diagnostic test, only if positive results.

Positive dietary response is also a diagnoses in itself. So, yes, with positive blood test, you do have Celiac. Welcome to the club.

PS: you might want to get a copy of the blood work that your doctors ordered and some people here can help to interpret the results.

Ridgewalker Contributor
Ridgewalker
Posted

It is perfectly possible to have a positive blood test and negative biopsy. A positive blood test means you do have Celiac Disease, no matter what the biopsy showed. It makes no sense for so many doctors to require a biopsy for diagnosis. Why? Because biopsy is unreliable.

Intestinal damage takes time to become visible. You may have Celiac for an unknown length of time before a biopsy would show up positive. Furthermore, Celiac damage is patchy, not constant. Taking a biopsy for this diagnosis is like playing Pin the Tail on the Donkey- you might hit a damaged spot, and you might not.

With a positive blood test, family history, and dietary response... That says Celiac.

Ursa Major Collaborator
Ursa Major
Posted

Could you tell us what your numbers were from your bloodwork?

Generally, the blood work is more reliable than the biopsies. Negative blood work results and negative biopsies can

ShayFL Enthusiast
ShayFL
Posted

I agree. Positive labs + positive dietary response = celiac

I would not believe the GI doc if he says you do not have celiac based soley on the biopsy. You could cause yourself years of suffering and set yourself up for cancers, auto-immune diseases associated with untreated celiac.

*lee-lee* Enthusiast
*lee-lee*
Posted
  • Author

ok, you guys are already making me feel better. i cried as soon as i hung up with the nurse today - she was absolutely no help and with the holiday weekend coming up, i couldn't bear the thought of waiting for more info until Monday.

i left a message requesting a copy of the blood work from the doctors office - hopefully they call me back today and can fax it right to me.

i'm off to the bookstore to find some good books on gluten-free living. i need all the help i can get...i miss my bread and pasta already!

Ridgewalker Contributor
Ridgewalker
Posted
i'm off to the bookstore to find some good books on gluten-free living. i need all the help i can get...i miss my bread and pasta already!

There are a lot of great books out there. And this forum is an excellent place to get info!

It'll take some trial and error to find breads that you like. But there's lots of choices these days... premade breads, mixes, recipes from scratch. And not all gluten-free pastas are created alike- there's brown rice pasta, white rice pasta, corn pasta, quinoa pasta, and even more. (My family's favorite is Tinkyada brand brown rice pasta.)

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


nikky Contributor
nikky
Posted

I had the same thing happen to me. I would agree that you do have coeliac, theres no false positives and together with a good dietry response, positive blood tests are a good basis for confirming diagnosis. My GI said that in a few years he will stop doing biopsy's (if its just for this) because even those with negatives end up being diagnosed with coeliac unless he suspects it in someone with negative bloods. If i were you i would continue being gluten free.

Good luck

*lee-lee* Enthusiast
*lee-lee*
Posted
  • Author

i'm still waiting for the doctors office to mail the blood work results so i can give you guys the specifics but in the meantime i talked to my GI doc yesterday so he could explain the negative biopsy result and he said the blood could have been a false positive...is that possible or does he not have a clue what he's talking about?

he's sending me for more blood work to test for the genetic markers. he claims if the genetic markers are there, than maybe the blood was correct and the biopsy was a false negative. he did say the biopsy was remarkably normal - as in, no signs of any damage. i think he knows i need a definite answer so that's why he suggested the genetic test.

meanwhile, i'm feeling a lot better on the diet so if nothing else i at least have that to be happy about.

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted

There are NO false positives with regards to blood tests for Celiac. There are, false negatives.

I have talked to several doctors and when they attended med school, there was only a brief reference to Celiac Disease and then, it was considered exceedingly rare. There have been some very rapid changes/research since then, and I believe few doctors are knowledgeable.

Welcome to the Club! ;)

*lee-lee* Enthusiast
*lee-lee*
Posted
  • Author

ok, all you people who can interpret blood work! what do you see?? :blink:

Antigliadin Abs, IgA = 1

Antigliadin Abs, IgG = 2

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA = 19 (Flagged: HIGH)

(there's a note below this one that says "tTG has been identified as the endomysial antigen. Studies have deomonstrated that endomysial IgA antibodies have over 99% specificity for gluten sensitive enteropathy.")

t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG = 30 (Flagged: HIGH)

Endomysial Antibody IgA = Positive Abnormal

Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum = 199

is there anything about these results that could be questionable?

As i've said, the biopsy came back negative according to my GI doc (he even commented that it looked remarkably normal.) Now he wants me to test for genetic markers. that's fine by me...i don't have an issue with the test itself, except my insurance company tends to jerk me around and i get stuck with outrageous co-pays that i would like to avoid. i am responding well on the diet but would just like to have a firm diagnosis. and i don't have kids yet but am planning on it in the next few years so i'm concerned about passing the gene onto them. what are everyones thoughts on the genetic test? (it's through Prometheus - they're the only ones who perform this specific test i guess?)

jldanforth Newbie
jldanforth
Posted

I am a new group member and have been reading this thread with a lot of interest. I have not officially been diagnosed as having Celiac disease, at least my MD has not told me I have it. Based on my history of IBS and significant problems with bloating he did order blood work.

Here are my results: Antigliadin Antibody, IgG - 31 (high); Antigliadin Antibody, IgA - 14 (within normal limits) and Tissue transglutaminase Antibody, IgA - 4 (within normal limits). His comment was that since all tests weren't positive he wasn't sure. He suggested I 'decrease the amount of wheat' I eat. This was late last summer. I am still trying to consistently (greater than 4-5 days) go gluten-free. I find going diary-free has definitely helped the IBS.

I would like to ask the members, based on their knowledge, if they think my blood test was indicative of Celiac.

I am working on the dietary attempt to verify that going gluten-free helps.

JL

IBS times many years

Hypothyroidism

kristionii Rookie
kristionii
Posted

Hi,

I'm new to the board, but in the same position. I had a transglutamine blood test done in May, which came out positive. I just had my biopsy (endoscopy) done yesterday, and my doctor remarked that everything looked very good from what he saw, and he was surprised by that. Of course I don't get the actual results for another week, but it sounded like he was saying he was expecting the results to be negative. I spent the last 8 weeks eating tons of "bad" food that I may never get to eat again (and gaining 10lbs in the process!) and emotionally accepting my new way of life ... only now to feel like I'm going to get a negative biopsy result. I'm so confused. I'm actually hoping for a positive biopsy result so I can accept it and move on with my life.

So it's not possible for a positive blood test to be wrong?

Thanks,

K

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

See this article for why the biopsy is NOT as accurate as doctors hope they are. Take this and discuss this with your doctor.

Open Original Shared Link

"Ninety-two percent had visible damage detected by capsule endoscopy while upper endoscopy only detected visible damage in 55% of the patients."

(Capsule endoscopy is not what you had.)

Study done by Mayo Clinic and Dr. Murray, who is a leading Celiac specialist/researcher.

*lee-lee* Enthusiast
*lee-lee*
Posted
  • Author

kristionii - are you my long lost sister?? :P

i, too, just want to know so i can get on with my bread-less life. problem is, i can't just accept that i feel better on the diet. there's just something that nags at me that makes me want a definite diagnosis but i'm quickly learning it's just not that simple. best of luck to you...i hope your biopsy comes back positive! LOL

betty6333 Newbie
betty6333
Posted

i have good news and bad news....

it is possible for you to not have celiacs(good news) BUT ----(BAD NEWS) YOU HAVE CELIACS

Let me explain

it is possible to get pos. blood work and not have celiacs, unfortunately if this were the case you would have much bigger problems that you would definately know about...... if you had type 1 autoimmune insulin dependent diabetes or autoimmune hepatitis, you very well could have had pos blood work and not have celiacs..... but you don't have those, because it is highly unlikely you would miss severe janudice or a coma.....

since you don't have either condition, the only other possible explanation is celiacs.

so, i am sorry they made you do an unnecessary biopsy that gave you false results....

you need to : either ----do a gluten challenge and get yourself really really sick, or, you can accept that you have celiacs and go gluten free ( and be very glad you do not have type1 diabetes or a fatal form of hepatitis!!!)

:

kristionii Rookie
kristionii
Posted

I'll definately discuss that article with my doctor if the result is (eek! negative).. thank you!

I'm definately one of those "planner" people - once I have my mind set, I want answers immediately so I can plan out my actions to move forward! Ahh if anything, waiting for this test result will teach me that I can't plan life! :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Mmoc
      - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results.
    2. Aretaeus Cappadocia
      - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to...
    3. trents
      - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies...
    4. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted...
    5. Wheatwacked
      - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

      Have you had your 25(OH)D vitamin D blood level checked? Vitamin D deficiency occurs in 40 - 60% of western societies. It is even more common in Celiac Disease because of malabsorption syndrome. Appropriate intake of vitamin D or skin production from sun, increases the absorbtion rate of Calcium.and phosphorus, two minerals crucial to...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

      By Mmoc · Posted

      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      Gluten free nuts

      By Aretaeus Cappadocia · Posted

      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

      By trents · Posted

      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.