Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Much Gluten, For How Long, Must You Eat Before Testing?


tom

Recommended Posts

tom Contributor

Moderator's note:

This discussion began in a topic started by a new member with several questions. It has been split out as a generic discussion of the question. There are differing views on this. What I perceive is that there is no one answer that fits everybody. Healing rates differ for many reasons, and the most significant factor is the amount of damage to heal from. - psawyer (mod).

...

Also it is critically important that you do NOT go gluten free until after the endoscopy. Biopsies look for damage, which can heal quickly on the gluten free diet.

Really? I don't think I've seen any studies on that. (Rapid healing)

Any link?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Here's what the Mayo Clinic says:

Usually several weeks after removal of gluten from the diet the small intestine begins to heal......

Open Original Shared Link

How many weeks is several? I don't know. Your several and mine may vary. Two weeks is not several to me, but three weeks could be.

I don't believe the poster was referring to total healing, just healing that may affect testing results.

tom Contributor

Can't read the pdf until later but does several weeks = "quickly" in this context?

mushroom Proficient

Can't read the pdf until later but does several weeks = "quickly" in this context?

Well, in the context of taking two years to heal completely for adults, I would say that is probably "quite" quickly.

MitziG Enthusiast

Tom, depending on the extent of the damage, a week or two could make the difference between a positive or negative result. For instance, if the OP has only mild villous blunting, a week or two could make the villi appear normal. After all, the intestinal lining renews itself every three days. Now, if the OP has total villous atrophy, likely a week or two would make no difference. But since they have no way of knowing the extent of the damage (if any) all precautions should be taken to avoid a false negative biopsy.

tom Contributor

... For instance, if the OP has only mild villous blunting, a week or two could make the villi appear normal.

...

Very interesting.

I'd love to read up more on that. Remember where you saw that?

Seems at odds w/ "several weeks to begin to heal" quote from Mayo.

Here's what the Mayo Clinic says:

Usually several weeks after removal of gluten from the diet the small intestine begins to heal......

Open Original Shared Link

...

bartfull Rising Star

Tom? Have you been glutened recently? I ask because irritability is one of MY glutening symptoms. Seems that lately you have been feeling the way I do when I get glutened.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Tom? Have you been glutened recently? I ask because irritability is one of MY glutening symptoms. Seems that lately you have been feeling the way I do when I get glutened.

I don't share the same impression bartfull. I, rather see it as Tom's attempt to bring proper and accurate information to this forum.

Information on a forum (any forum) has a tendency to stagnate. I suppose Tom feels passionate that the members here should be exposed to the most current research available.

You may not appreciate his approach or may challenge his facts, but as any member here, he has the right to post, free from personal criticism.

We have had many, many healthy debates here over these many years....which brought forth some wonderful information from some really great minds. I have always enjoyed them.

:)

tom Contributor

I'd actually really like to know more about research on the topic in the post.

As such, I was feeling Inquisitive rather than Irritated.

OT P.S. I think I'm soon buying a wider-necked guitar. Always like seeing your av.

tom Contributor

Ahhhhh sneaky Lisa snuck one in while I slowly typed. Was expecting mine to show up immed under Barty's. Looks disjointed now.

bartfull Rising Star

I guess it's not so much what you say, as how you say it that made me think you were irritated. I have often found myself offending people by being too blunt, when I never meant anything by it. A friend told me that if I preface what I say with, "In my opinion..." or "It seems to me..." that I could tell them what I think without seeming like I thought MY opinion was the only right one. I STILL have trouble with that sometimes, but I'm trying. (Except when I get glutened - then I don't care WHOSE feelings I hurt! :blink: )

I think you'll enjoy a wide neck. All of mine are standard width but that's because of my "delicate" :lol: female fingers. I am LOVING the baritone though, even though the longer fret spacing sure does make me stretch. :)

Lisa Mentor

Ahhhhh sneaky Lisa snuck one in while I slowly typed. Was expecting mine to show up immed under Barty's. Looks disjointed now.

:ph34r:

"a wider neck"...don't you have to have bigger hands or THUMBS? B)

mushroom Proficient

In general, Lisa, or Tom in particular???

Lisa Mentor

In general, Lisa, or Tom in particular???

:lol:

:lol:

:lol: ...either way. Hey, I just got back from Rome, remember! I've seen all I need to see for the time being, but, I'm easily amused. :P I have seen Tom's VERY large shoes... :blink:

EDIT (after Peter's post): Yes sir. :) Heading over to Psillie Land.

mommida Enthusiast

Very interesting.

I'd love to read up more on that. Remember where you saw that?

Seems at odds w/ "several weeks to begin to heal" quote from Mayo.

Tom,

The medical community statements on the amount of time to heal are just GUESSES. The truth is every individual is different.

The medical community made the most advancement in digestive knowledge from an accident. Dr. William Beaumont had a patient who was shot in the gut. The wound never fully healed and the man had a hole in his side made into a "window" to watch and learn digestion. Just saying it is a fascinating story, if you like to look up medical articles.

tom Contributor

Tom,

The medical community statements on the amount of time to heal are just GUESSES.

...

Hi mommida,

I suppose I have more belief in the scientific method than you do and in the resultant incremental advances in knowledge.

We know more today than we did 5 yrs ago & every year we'll know more than we do today.

So, I don't believe it's "just guesses", tho if you do I'd think your comment would be more appropriately aimed at the post attaching numbers to vaguely defined situations.

Tom, depending on the extent of the damage, a week or two could make the difference between a positive or negative result. For instance, if the OP has only mild villous blunting, a week or two could make the villi appear normal. After all, the intestinal lining renews itself every three days. Now, if the OP has total villous atrophy, likely a week or two would make no difference.

IrishHeart Veteran

P.S. I'm a little surprised there's no earlier reply. All the usual posters out having wkend fun maybe?

No, I am sure the "usual posters" are just afraid to post anymore about this topic, having been shouted down and argued with repeatedly.

Blevois,

"gluten light" is not helpful for symptom resolution.

You need to be strictly gluten free for symptoms to resolve, but

conversely, you need to be gluten heavy for about 3 months for the best diagnostic outcome on a biopsy (according to the leading celiac centers).

Someone will disagree with this, I am sure.

You have a POSITIVE celiac panel and that means you have celiac.

If your doc agrees, then welcome to the club.

GO gluten-free now.

You could stop eating gluten right now and start to get well.

HOWEVER, if you wish to have a biopsy, for a baseline reading of your villi, or because your doc requires it for a "real diagnosis", then, here is my best advice, and offered IMHO, based on the current celiac center research as we know it: if you are scheduled for a biopsy: EAT UP.

*** hopefully, I have given enough caveats and disclaimers and IMHOs and evidence for this post to be acceptable.

tom Contributor

No, I am sure the "usual posters" are just afraid to post anymore about this topic, having been shouted down and argued with repeatedly.

...

Oh please ....

I'm not the one bolding or using allcaps in these misguided disagreements.

If someone believes 3 months challenge is "needed to have any hope of a positive dx" (despite that being imo irrelevant in this thread, given an already-positive blood test) disregarding all the contrary evidence that it *is* possible to get DX'd on less than 3 months, there are many non-controversial ways to say so.

This thread isn't really about the same topic as those where someone is trying to launch testing after having been gluten-free.

...conversely, you need to be gluten heavy for about 3 months for the best diagnostic outcome on a biopsy (according to the leading celiac centers).

Someone will disagree with this, I am sure.

Someone, as in all but one leading celiac center, is how it's been presented here by others.

And the dispute is the word "need" again.

Last study I saw had no diagnostic difference w/ lower gluten. (The key info is that once over the threshold, how high doesn't matter.)

tom Contributor

THANK YOU IH for that MOST informative information & the link to the article!!!!!!!! This should clear up a lot of confusion on the subject.

The article's header is:

This article appeared in the Autumn 2005 edition of Celiac.coms Scott-Free Newsletter.

So, no, 7yo info shouldn't be expected to clear this up.

Did the best current celiac blood tests even exist in 2005?

We really need to use current info.

tom Contributor

I did chuckle a bit in finding that the article is from 2005.

I read this recently, for what it is worth.

"Another problem faced by gluten-free individuals who want a diagnosis is that it can take more than five years after returning to a regular gluten-containing diet before the characteristic damage of celiac disease can be seen on a biopsy (1).

Simply put, after beginning a gluten-free diet, only a positive biopsy is meaningful. A negative biopsy does not rule out celiac disease.

A variety of opinions have been offered regarding how much gluten, for how long, should result in a definitive biopsy. The reality is that no such recommendation is consistent with the medical literature (1-4).

Some people with celiac disease will experience a return of intestinal damage within a few weeks of consuming relatively small amounts of gluten. Such brief challenges are valuable for these individuals.

However, many people with celiac disease or dermatitis herpetiformis will require much larger doses of gluten, over much longer periods, to induce characteristic lesions on the intestinal wall. Unfortunately for these latter individuals, a negative biopsy after a brief gluten challenge can, and often is, misinterpreted as having ruled out celiac disease.

Blood tests can compound this problem. If, as seems likely, celiac patients who are slow to relapse are also the ones who develop milder intestinal lesions, they are the very celiac patients for whom blood tests are very unreliable (5).

Claims to have ruled out celiac disease based on brief challenges with small quantities of gluten is a mistake that could lead to serious, even deadly, consequences."

https://www.celiac.com/articles/979/1/Challenging-the-Gluten-Challenge---By-Dr-Ron-Hoggan-EdD/Page1.html

Besides it being from 2005, I don't see how much this relates to the OP's situation of already having a positive on the bloods.

And to think *I* keep hearing accusations of going OT. (Which I disagreed w/, for the record)

A lot has changed since 2005. Imho just about everyone who wrote technical articles on celiac in 2005 would write them differently in 2012.

squirmingitch Veteran

The article's header is:

This article appeared in the Autumn 2005 edition of Celiac.coms Scott-Free Newsletter.

So, no, 7yo info shouldn't be expected to clear this up.

Did the best current celiac blood tests even exist in 2005?

We really need to use current info.

Oh but Tom, it clears it up very nicely for me. It states in essence that we are all individuals & we all have varying degrees of damage or not at any given time & that depending on our individual circumstances we may or may not show villi damage over a wide range of time.

I fail to see what your statement "Did the best current celiac blood tests even exist in 2005?" has to do with the article as the article is speaking of biopsies.

squirmingitch Veteran

I did chuckle a bit in finding that the article is from 2005.

Besides it being from 2005, I don't see how much this relates to the OP's situation of already having a positive on the bloods.

And to think *I* keep hearing accusations of going OT. (Which I disagreed w/, for the record)

A lot has changed since 2005. Imho just about everyone who wrote technical articles on celiac in 2005 would write them differently in 2012.

It relates to the OP's question:

"Does anyone know if 4 weeks of eating gluten light would lead to a false negative on biopsy?"

Read that last word ------ BIOPSY.

tom Contributor

Oh but Tom, it clears it up very nicely for me. It states in essence that we are all individuals & we all have varying degrees of damage or not at any given time & that depending on our individual circumstances we may or may not show villi damage over a wide range of time.

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm leaning towards thinking that you & everyone else already thought that before reading this 2005 article, even those that read it way back then.

I fail to see what your statement "Did the best current celiac blood tests even exist in 2005?" has to do with the article as the article is speaking of biopsies.

The article is "Challenging the Gluten Challenge" & is in no way limited to biopsies! Are we reading the same link? He discusses - no, disussED - blood tests, antibodies, their specificity (reminder here that best current blood tests didn't exist then) & something called a 'rectal challenge'. :unsure:

tom Contributor

It relates to the OP's question:

"Does anyone know if 4 weeks of eating gluten light would lead to a false negative on biopsy?"

Read that last word ------ BIOPSY.

I have no idea why so many are so adamantly going off on these tangents.

Several of us answered the orig Q. (The "Does anyone know" answer is "no, no one can be sure".)

The OP, Blevois, was already diagnosed by blood.

The topic of the thread is not about getting a dx by biopsy.

tom Contributor

See, there is the question and it specifically asks using the explicit word, "biopsy."

Ok then, before I go out, what would YOU hypothetically want your own Dr to say w/ "very high" positive bloods and the hypothetical negative biopsy?

Didn't most of the 1st few replies comment that the OP's blood results should be enough to dx celiac? Along that path, the endoscopy is post-diagnostic. Confirms if pos, but ignored if neg isn't a dx flowchart.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,188
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Leeila
    Newest Member
    Leeila
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Ginger38
      So I recently had allergy testing for IGE antibodies in response to foods. My test results came back positive to corn, white potatoes, egg whites. Tomatoes, almonds and peanuts to name a few.  I have had obvious reactions to a few of these - particularly tomatoes and corn- both GI issues. I don’t really understand all this allergy versus celiac stuff. If the food allergies are mild do I have to avoid these foods entirely? I don’t know what I will eat if I can’t  have corn based gluten free products 
    • Kris2093u4
      Geography makes a difference.  I'm in the West and Trader Joe's gluten-free bread tastes great and is a better price than most gluten-free breads sold elsewhere in my area.  
    • JForman
      We have four children (7-14 yo), and our 7 year old was diagnosed with NCGS (though all Celiac labs were positive, her scope at 4 years old was negative so docs in the US won't call it celiac). We have started her on a Gluten Free diet after 3 years of major digestive issues and ruling out just about everything under the sun. Our home and kitchen and myself are all gluten-free. But I have not asked my husband/her dad or her other siblings to go completely gluten-free with us. They are at home, but not out of the home. This has led to situations when we are eating out where she has to consistently see others eating things she can't have and she has begun to say "Well, I can't have <fill in the blank>...stupid gluten."  How have you supported your gluten-free kiddos in the mental health space of this journey, especially young ones like her. I know it's hard for me as an adult sometimes to miss out, so I can't imagine being 7 and dealing with it! Any tips or ideas to help with this? 
    • Jane878
      By the time I was 5 I had my first auto0immune disorder, Migraine headaches, with auras to blind me, and vomiting, sensitivity to light and sound. I was 5 years old, and my stepfather would have pizza night, milling his own flour, making thick cheesy gluten pizza, that I would eat and the next day, I would have serious migraines, and my mother & stepfather did nothing about my medical problems. When I was 17 in my first year at college, I was diagnosed with my 2nd known auto-immune disorder, Meniere's disease. I was a elite athlete, a swimmer, and soccer player. And once again my parents didn't think anything of understanding why I had a disorder only older people get. Now after my mother passed from Alzheimer's disease she also suffered with living with gluten. She had a rash for 30 years that nobody could diagnose. She was itchy for 45 years total. My brother had a encapsulated virus explodes in his spleen and when this happened his entire intestines were covered with adhesions, scar tissue and he almost lost his life. He has 5 daughters, and when I finally was diagnosed after being pregnant and my body went into a cytokine storm, I lost my chance to have children, I ended up having Hashimoto's disease, Degenerative Disc disease, and my body started to shut down during my first trimester. I am 6ft tall and got down to 119lbs. My husband and I went to a special immunologist in Terrace, California. They took 17 vials of blood as we flew there for a day and returned home that evening. In 3 weeks, we had the answer, I have Celiac disease. Once this was known, only my father and husband made efforts to change their way of feeding me. At the family cabin, my stepfather & mother were more worried that I would ruin Thanksgiving Dinner. It wasn't until one of my cousins was diagnosed with Celiac disease. They finally looked into getting Gluten Free flour and taking measures to limit "gluten" in meals. He did nothing but ask for me to pay for my own food and wi-fi when I came to the cabin to stay after our house burned down. When he informed my mother, they proceeding to get into a physical fight and she ended up with a black eye. The is just more trauma for me. Sam had no interest in telling the truth about what he wanted. He lied to my mother that he had asked my husband if I could pay for "food" when he asked Geoffrey if I had money to pay for my wi-fi. My mother hates when he spends so much time on the computer so he lied and said I could pay for my own food. I will remind you I weighed 119lbs at this time. (At 6ft) that is a very sick looking person. Neither parent was worried about my weight, they just fought about how cheap my stepfather was. As my mother was diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease in 2014. He had her sign over the will to a trust and added his children. He had no testimonial capacity at the time, so she signed without proper papers. Making this Trust null and void. When I gave my brother my childhood home, my mother stated I would be getting an equal part of inheritance to the house on Race. It currently worth 2.0 million $. I got nothing, and my stepfather has since disowned me b/c of my claim and he knows that my mother would never have left it uneven between my biological brother and myself. She sat me and my husband down, as we lived at the Race Street house and treated and took care of it as our own. My brother took over b/c he was going through a horrific divorce and needed a home so he could get a better custody deal with his soon to be ex-wife who was a Assist DA for Denver. She used the girls against him, and he & I were the primary caregivers. We, Judd and I spent the most time with them pre the divorce. Once Judd moved into the house, he threw all of my mother, grandmother and my family heirlooms out to the Goodwill. Nobody told my mother about this as she was going through cancer treatment and had Alzheimer's disease in her mother and her sister. My stepfather and biological brother took advantage of this matter, as I called a "family council" that my brother just never could make it to at the last moment. All of the furnishing, kitchen ware, everything was in the house my brother just moved into. He had had 2 weddings, I chose to elope b/c my stepfather ruined my brother's first wedding by talking about his relationship with my brother in front of my dad and his entire family, insulting him and having my grandfather leave the ceremony. It was a disaster. My stepfather just plays dumb and blames my father for the slight. I was the only child not to have a wedding. So, my mother and stepfather never had to pay for a thing. My mother had had an agreement with my father he'd pay for college and all medical issues with their kids, myself and Judd. So truly my mother never had to pay for anything big for me in her entire life. I am looking for anyone that has had a similar story, where they grew up in a household that had a baker that regularly milled flour and ate gluten. What happened to you? DId you suffer from different auto-immune diseases b/c of living with a baker using "gluten" Please let me know. I have been looking into legal ways to get my stepfather to give me what my mother had promised, and he erased. Thank you for listening to my story. Jane Donnelly  
    • trents
      Possibly gluten withdrawal. Lot's of info on the internet about it. Somewhat controversial but apparently gluten plugs into the same neuro sensors as opiates do and some people get a similar type withdrawal as they do when quitting opiates. Another issue is that gluten-free facsimile flours are not fortified with vitamins and minerals as is wheat flour (in the U.S. at least) so when the switch is made to gluten-free facsimile foods, especially if a lot of processed gluten-free foods are being used as substitutes, vitamin and mineral deficiencies can result. There is also the possibility that she has picked up a virus or some but that is totally unrelated to going gluten-free.
×
×
  • Create New...