Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing Question After Gf

barbiannc

Recommended Posts

barbiannc Newbie
barbiannc
Posted

Hi! New to this site. Here is my story in a nutshell. I am 57 years old and have had "stomach problems" since my teens. In college I was told I had ulcers because of it, but not confirmed by any testing. Over the years I can't remember a day when at some point my stomach didn't hurt, my lower abdomen had excruciating pain etc. I have had all sorts of workups and nothing was ever found. I also have autoimmune thyroid disease (Hashimotos) so I know I am more likely to have celiac disease. I took myself off ALL gluten about 5 months ago. Within days I felt 100% better. My question for you all is this: I am seeing two doctors at a very large hospital in Cleveland.....an endo and a family practice doctor. The endo ordered a celiac test even though I told her I had been gluten free for months. She said it didn't matter. Test came back negative. I asked the family doctor the same question and was told that even though I have been gluten free this long, the antibodies would still be in my body and I would therefore test positive. This goes against everything I've read. Am I crazy or are both of these doctors wrong???

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


NanaV Rookie
NanaV
Posted

Hi! New to this site. Here is my story in a nutshell. I am 57 years old and have had "stomach problems" since my teens. In college I was told I had ulcers because of it, but not confirmed by any testing. Over the years I can't remember a day when at some point my stomach didn't hurt, my lower abdomen had excruciating pain etc. I have had all sorts of workups and nothing was ever found. I also have autoimmune thyroid disease (Hashimotos) so I know I am more likely to have celiac disease. I took myself off ALL gluten about 5 months ago. Within days I felt 100% better. My question for you all is this: I am seeing two doctors at a very large hospital in Cleveland.....an endo and a family practice doctor. The endo ordered a celiac test even though I told her I had been gluten free for months. She said it didn't matter. Test came back negative. I asked the family doctor the same question and was told that even though I have been gluten free this long, the antibodies would still be in my body and I would therefore test positive. This goes against everything I've read. Am I crazy or are both of these doctors wrong???

I'm curious, too. I had an endo biopsy years ago, and the docs never told me that being gluten-free for a year would make any difference at all. Grrrr.

 

I think they're wrong. Uninformed. And it leaves us gluten-free but undiagnosed.

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Your doctors are wrong!  You must be eating gluten to get an accurate result.  Check out this link to the University of Chicago's Celiac Center regarding this issue:

 

Open Original Shared Link

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

The longer you are gluten-free, the higher the chances that any celiac test will yield a (false) negative result.  It IS possible to still have positive autoantibodies after 5 months gluten-free but I would say it's more likely that they will be negative. I personally still had a weak positive tTG IgA result after about 15 months gluten-free (it had fallen dramatically), but I know that my EMA IgA test became negative sometime before I was a year gluten-free.

 

After being gluten-free for 5 months you will need to complete a gluten challenge of about 2 slices of wheat bread per day for approximately 2 months before you will have accurate results.  :( It might be simpler to stay gluten-free.

 

And I agree, with a history of Hashi's, it's probably celiac disease.

 

Welcome to the board.  :)

WinterSong Community Regular
WinterSong
Posted

Flat out, your doctors are idiots. A friend of mine had a doctor who said the same thing, even after she had been gluten free for two years. Stupid doctors....

 

My blood tests were so positive they were off the charts, and it took me about a year and a half to get them down to normal, but even being gluten free for a few weeks can yield a false negative. 

 

Welcome to the board!

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

While it sometimes takes a few months for antibodies to go down, That is usually people with sky-high antibody numbers.  Not everyone is that bad off.

 

Open Original Shared Link

barbiannc Newbie
barbiannc
Posted
  • Author

Thanks, everyone! Exactly what I thought. It makes me absolutely crazy that so many doctors are so misinformed. It is such a HUGE problem and so prevalent that I should think they would know the basics of it. So now the question remains......do I go through with the gluten challenge for several months to be retested or just remain gluten-free?? I guess I would like to know for sure so that I don't have to be quite as diligent in my gluten avoidance. I still don't eat it, but I'm probably not as careful as I should be in regards to ingredients that are not obviously gluten. So another question....I am due soon to have a routine colonoscopy (it's been several years since my last one). Is it feasible to ask them to do a biopsy then and if so, would this be diagnostic or do I again need to be eating gluten for it to be positive? Thanks so much for everyone's help. This is all so overwhelming and confusing.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


NoGlutenCooties Contributor
NoGlutenCooties
Posted

Hi! New to this site. Here is my story in a nutshell. I am 57 years old and have had "stomach problems" since my teens. In college I was told I had ulcers because of it, but not confirmed by any testing. Over the years I can't remember a day when at some point my stomach didn't hurt, my lower abdomen had excruciating pain etc. I have had all sorts of workups and nothing was ever found. I also have autoimmune thyroid disease (Hashimotos) so I know I am more likely to have celiac disease. I took myself off ALL gluten about 5 months ago. Within days I felt 100% better. My question for you all is this: I am seeing two doctors at a very large hospital in Cleveland.....an endo and a family practice doctor. The endo ordered a celiac test even though I told her I had been gluten free for months. She said it didn't matter. Test came back negative. I asked the family doctor the same question and was told that even though I have been gluten free this long, the antibodies would still be in my body and I would therefore test positive. This goes against everything I've read. Am I crazy or are both of these doctors wrong???

 

Just wanted to add that another option for you would be to get the gene testing.  If you're negative for the Celiac gene, then you cannot have Celiac - you most likely have gluten sensitivity.  No need to do the gluten challenge.  That said, I agree with the others that 1) your doctor is an idiot and/or ignorant and 2) you'd have to do a gluten challenge to get a reliable Celiac test at this point.

NanaV Rookie
NanaV
Posted

I've read that one can be tested for celiac via a stool sample, EVEN if one has been gluten-free for a while. Can this really be true?

GF Lover Rising Star
GF Lover
Posted

Celiac Disease CANNOT be diagnosed by a stool sample.  I wish is was that easy. 

 

Colleen

frieze Community Regular
frieze
Posted

Just wanted to add that another option for you would be to get the gene testing.  If you're negative for the Celiac gene, then you cannot have Celiac - you most likely have gluten sensitivity.  No need to do the gluten challenge.  That said, I agree with the others that 1) your doctor is an idiot and/or ignorant and 2) you'd have to do a gluten challenge to get a reliable Celiac test at this point.

FYI, we have more than one biopsy proven celiac that does don't have those genes that post on this board.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin. In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began...
    2. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted...
    3. JoJo0611
      - JoJo0611 replied to JoJo0611's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      CT with contrast.

      Thank you.
    4. deanna1ynne
      - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased int...
    5. cristiana
      - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott. Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
      CT with contrast.

      By JoJo0611 · Posted

      Thank you. 
    • deanna1ynne
      Inconclusive results

      By deanna1ynne · Posted

      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

      By cristiana · Posted

      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.