Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Not Tolerating "low Gluten" Host

llama3

By llama3
in Coping with Celiac Disease

Recommended Posts

llama3 Apprentice
llama3
Posted

I am Catholic and have been receiving the approved low-gluten hosts and I'm pretty sure that I'm reacting to them. I'm pretty sure that it's not just CC, because I tried an unconsecrated one that had not been handled by anyone and I was in pain for hours after that. It could have been something else, I guess, although it was the same pains that I get when I eat gluten. I know scientists say they are supposed to be below levels that would cause a reaction, so I feel as if I'm being a hypochondriac.

Has anyone actually tried the low-gluten host and reacted?

(Please let's NOT make this a thread about Catholic teaching on Communion. Thank you.)

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

I don't do them because to me "low gluen" isn't NO GLUTEN. See about making arrangements to take the wine. It technically counts the same. Maybe they would let you drink first. I heard of someone that bought thier own chalice & they would hand them the chalice with the wine.

llama3 Apprentice
llama3
Posted
  • Author

I don't do them because to me "low gluen" isn't NO GLUTEN. See about making arrangements to take the wine.

I'm trying ... have met with resistance to the idea. I think they think I'm being needlessly difficult. As in, these hosts are supposed to be OK, they are OK for our other parishioner who is gluten intolerant, so why are they not OK for you?

I don't understand why scientists would say they are safe and below reactive levels if that is not true. Am I just ridiculously sensitive?

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

I'm trying ... have met with resistance to the idea. I think they think I'm being needlessly difficult. As in, these hosts are supposed to be OK, they are OK for our other parishioner who is gluten intolerant, so why are they not OK for you?

I don't understand why scientists would say they are safe and below reactive levels if that is not true. Am I just ridiculously sensitive?

I have thought about taking a tiny bit of the "gluten Lite" host, not the whole thing.

Jestgar Rising Star
Jestgar
Posted

I'm trying ... have met with resistance to the idea. I think they think I'm being needlessly difficult. As in, these hosts are supposed to be OK, they are OK for our other parishioner who is gluten intolerant, so why are they not OK for you?

I don't understand why scientists would say they are safe and below reactive levels if that is not true. Am I just ridiculously sensitive?

Safe more most doesn't mean safe for everyone. You will have to figure out something else. Perhaps just the wine, as Karen suggested.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

I don't understand why scientists would say they are safe and below reactive levels if that is not true. Am I just ridiculously sensitive?

That Fasano study where he concluded that 10 mg/day is "safe" is about the worst thing that has ever happened to the celiac community. In that study, people who hadn't healed by biopsy were excluded. In other words, they didn't enroll the people who might be more sensitive. In fairness, they couldn't enroll people with abnormal biopsies because the study had mild damage on biopsy as the endpoint, but the paper conclusions were written as though 10 mg/day is perfectly safe for all celiacs.

Wheat starch is particularly troublesome. In one study celiacs who weren't eating gluten-free wheat starch for various reasons were given bread made from wheat starch with <15 ppm gluten. By the end of 10 months, 15 of 17 people had elected to quit the study because they were sick. The controls in the study were a group of 14 celiacs who tolerate wheat starch and they remained perfectly fine. Nobody who was sick had antibodies come back; they just felt ill. The study authors blamed trace gluten but you can't rule out that some folks just don't tolerate anything from wheat grains.

You need to trust your body, even though it's a hard situation. Don't write off your reactions as being a hypochondriac and stick to your guns. The Catholic church needs to understand that low-gluten is not a solution for everyone with celiac disease. You need to sort out a way to handle the reaction, maybe a tiny sliver of the low-gluten wafer, maybe wine only?

llama3 Apprentice
llama3
Posted
  • Author

That Fasano study where he concluded that 10 mg/day is "safe" is about the worst thing that has ever happened to the celiac community. In that study, people who hadn't healed by biopsy were excluded. In other words, they didn't enroll the people who might be more sensitive. In fairness, they couldn't enroll people with abnormal biopsies because the study had mild damage on biopsy as the endpoint, but the paper conclusions were written as though 10 mg/day is perfectly safe for all celiacs.

Wheat starch is particularly troublesome. In one study celiacs who weren't eating gluten-free wheat starch for various reasons were given bread made from wheat starch with <15 ppm gluten. By the end of 10 months, 15 of 17 people had elected to quit the study because they were sick. The controls in the study were a group of 14 celiacs who tolerate wheat starch and they remained perfectly fine. Nobody who was sick had antibodies come back; they just felt ill. The study authors blamed trace gluten but you can't rule out that some folks just don't tolerate anything from wheat grains.

You need to trust your body, even though it's a hard situation. Don't write off your reactions as being a hypochondriac and stick to your guns. The Catholic church needs to understand that low-gluten is not a solution for everyone with celiac disease. You need to sort out a way to handle the reaction, maybe a tiny sliver of the low-gluten wafer, maybe wine only?

Thank you - this is really helpful.

In fairness to the Church, I read a statement, either from the Vatican or US bishops, outlining different options for Communion, which gave the options you mentioned and did not treat low gluten hosts as a solution for everyone. However, not all Catholics in charge of arrangements for communion read those documents ... even the woman at my church who is responsible for ordering the low gluten hosts was not aware that the hosts were made of wheat starch and still had a low level of gluten, until I explained that to her.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Takala Enthusiast
Takala
Posted

"Scientists" are not all claiming that these things (the low gluten hosts) are "safe." Somebody somewhere has made a decision that assumes this level of parts per million of gluten should not cause a reaction in the majority of gluten-free consumers. Big difference. The ultra -sensitives, as Skylark has pointed out, were tossed out of the study.

Roda Rising Star
Roda
Posted

This subject came up with a friend of mine. My husband was brought up catholic and I thought it would be a good thing to introduce my boys to some catholic services. I am not catholic and my boys have never been. My friend said that there are low gluten hosts and if the boys were ever to take communion that there wasn't enough gluten in them to hurt them. I guess I'm just a rebel because I told her they would not be safe at all for them. I guess this decision is easy for me since my boys and I were not brought up catholic. I can completely sympathize with everyone's struggle with a solution that feels right to them. I hope you figure something out that works for you.

Metoo Enthusiast
Metoo
Posted

I don't think I am very sensitive. The low gluten host has not bothered me, but I just started taking communion again because I was afraid.

I did have a 'regular' host on Ash Wednesday and I was super nervous about that. I went to a different church and they don't offer them.

I am still having slight skin problems anyways though nothing bad like before, just dryness cracking, but I haven't seen any new blisters though.

  • 2 weeks later...
Victoria6102 Contributor
Victoria6102
Posted

Jesus wouldn't make you eat something if it destroyed your body! I don't eat the cracker when we have the Lords supper, and everyone knows its because I have celiac not because I'm rebelling against the Lord! Do what's safe for you. God gave you celiac, He isn't going to punish you for not eating the wafer! :) good luck hope you feel better!

Strawberry-Jam Enthusiast
Strawberry-Jam
Posted

I recently decided not to take communion anymore because the bishop told my priest he couldn't concecrate the chalice without putting a little bit of the host in it because of "tradition". I'm Eastern Orthodox and we don't usually consecrate multiple chalices. Celiac disease is largely unheard of in the E.O. community at large so they don't know how to deal with it, I think. Altho, the Orthodox in Ireland and England really need to get their act together.

Maybe a different bishop would hear me out and allow a separate, gluten-free, chalice to be consecrated for my sake. I don't know. My priest disagrees but must be obedient to the bishop. I'm kind of miffed, but not surprised. If the bishop believes that communion MUST be that way, then it must mean I'm not to take communion at this juncture.

Just pray about it. Communion is a beautiful miracle but at the same time, unless you live your faith by loving others, what's the point?

I don't know. Don't want to hijack your thread so.

  • 1 year later...
jrohr Newbie
jrohr
Posted

I am Catholic and have been receiving the approved low-gluten hosts and I'm pretty sure that I'm reacting to them. I'm pretty sure that it's not just CC, because I tried an unconsecrated one that had not been handled by anyone and I was in pain for hours after that. It could have been something else, I guess, although it was the same pains that I get when I eat gluten. I know scientists say they are supposed to be below levels that would cause a reaction, so I feel as if I'm being a hypochondriac.

Has anyone actually tried the low-gluten host and reacted?

(Please let's NOT make this a thread about Catholic teaching on Communion. Thank you.)

Hi. I'm Catholic too. I know this thread is a bit old now but I wanted to reply anyway. I have been afraid the low gluten host will make me sick and haven't tried it. In retrospect this may sound dumb, but when I went gluten free I though I'd just take wine, no problem. Wow, did I get sick. It actually took a bit for it to occur to me that there was cross contamination with the wine! So now I just sit while my kids and everyone else participates. I feel awkward and kind of lost. I also have to say I kind of wonder that people that don't know me wonder why that one person is not participating as everyone else.  My faith, church, communion have been an important part of my life and I feel it's just been pulled away. I spoke with the priest. We have one other in the parish that uses the low gluten hosts without problem. But I just can't. It's wheat! I wonder what people with wheat allergies do?

 

I know God doesn't mind, but now church just feels incomplete. Another thought that I have regarding the low gluten host is that if I did try it and I didn't feel sick, the gluten may still be doing damage and I wouldn't even know.  Or maybe I'd start to get a little worse over time, just gradual enough that I would not recognize the change. Though, when I get CC to this point, I sure notice! 

 

Anyway, I don't take communion wine or host anymore. But I still go to church.

mbrookes Community Regular
mbrookes
Posted

I am Episcopalian, but have the same problems a Catholics. Actually, my church orders a gluten free host for me. I can't take the wine, but receive a blessing when the wine is passed. No problem. Maybe you could talk (non-confrontationally) about having a gluten free host ordered, or offer to provide it yourself. As long as it is consecrated, it can be any bread.

Bear with me Rookie
Bear with me
Posted

The Episcopal (Anglican) Church will accept a gluten-free host as valid. The Roman Catholic Church does not, requiring there to be wheat present.

notme Experienced
notme
Posted

i go to a methodist church and i just bring a little bread in a snack baggie - i take it out when i go up, pastor blesses it, an i drink the 'wine' (grape juice) because it is presented in tiny individual glasses.  lolz - i have thought of bringing my own wine, but then everybody would want some......... (just kidding)..........  ;)

Celtic Queen Explorer
Celtic Queen
Posted

I'm in a Methodist church and talked to my pastor about all of this.  I had bought gluten free host and he was trying to serve it while holding it next to the bread <shudder>  I explained cross contamination and put myself in charge of the gluten free host.  We have a separate little plate that is used for nothing but that.  And we do the juice in the individual cups.  Since I'm the most sensitive of all the ones in the congregation (2 Celiacs and 2 NCGIs), it makes the most sense.  It gives me peace of mind about communion because if I get glutened, I only have myself to blame :D

 

Of course this doesn't help if you're Catholic, since they require wheat in the host.  Personally, I agree with the person earlier who said they didn't think Jesus would want us making ourselves sick to take Communion.

notme Experienced
notme
Posted

cq - i don't let him touch it!   :o   i just palm it until he offers me the 'regular' plate, then i open my hand and he says 'the body of Christ' - that's official enough for me and he is ok with it.  the whole congregation knows i do this and nobody has fussed at all. and, right, i'm of the opinion that Jesus (the healer) wouldn't want someone to get sick from a sacrament. 

irish daveyboy Community Regular
irish daveyboy
Posted

I am Catholic and have been receiving the approved low-gluten hosts and I'm pretty sure that I'm reacting to them. I'm pretty sure that it's not just CC, because I tried an unconsecrated one that had not been handled by anyone and I was in pain for hours after that. It could have been something else, I guess, although it was the same pains that I get when I eat gluten. I know scientists say they are supposed to be below levels that would cause a reaction, so I feel as if I'm being a hypochondriac.

Has anyone actually tried the low-gluten host and reacted?

(Please let's NOT make this a thread about Catholic teaching on Communion. Thank you.)

 

The problem with the Approved low gluten Catholic host is it contains Codex Wheat Starch < 20PPM.

People that react to it may have an additional Wheat allergy.

 

I'm a Celiac with such a wheat allergy and a recovering alcoholic, so partaking of the wine is a no no for me.

The priest just gives me a blessing at communion.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,549
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Blough
    Newest Member
    Blough
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Taken Seriously

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Your post demonstrates the profound frustration and isolation that so many in the Celiac community feel, and I want to thank you for channeling that experience into advocacy. The medical gaslighting you endured for decades is an unacceptable and, sadly, a common story, and the fact that you now have to "school" your own GI specialist speaks volumes about the critical lack of consistent and updated education. Your idea to make Celiac Disease a reportable condition to public health authorities is a compelling and strategic one. This single action would force the system to formally acknowledge the prevalence and seriousness of the disease, creating a concrete dataset that could drive better research funding, shape medical school curricula, and validate the patient experience in a way that individual stories alone often cannot. It is an uphill battle, but contacting representatives, as you have done with Adam Gray, is exactly how change begins. By framing it as a public health necessity—a matter of patient safety and protection from misdiagnosis and neglect—you are building a powerful case. Your voice and your perseverance, forged through thirty years of struggle, are exactly what this community needs to ensure that no one else has to fight so hard just to be believed and properly cared for.
    • Scott Adams
      Looking for a gluten-free roomie in Denver CO

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I had no idea there is a "Louisville" in Colorado!😉 I thought it was a typo because I always think of the Kentucky city--but good luck!
    • Scott Adams
      Allergy medication: cetirizine by the HealthA2Z is it gluten free?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Navigating medication safety with Celiac disease can be incredibly stressful, especially when dealing with asthma and severe allergies on top of it. While I don't have personal experience with the HealthA2Z brand of cetirizine, your caution is absolutely warranted. The inactive ingredients in pills, known as excipients, are often where gluten can be hidden, and since the FDA does not require gluten-free labeling for prescription or over-the-counter drugs, the manufacturer's word is essential. The fact that you cannot get a clear answer from Allegiant Health is a significant red flag; a company that is confident its product is gluten-free will typically have a customer service protocol to answer that exact question. In situations like this, the safest course of action is to consider this product "guilty until proven innocent" and avoid it. A better alternative would be to ask your pharmacist or doctor to help you identify a major national brand of cetirizine (like Zyrtec) whose manufacturer has a verified, publicly stated gluten-free policy for that specific medication. It's not worth the risk to your health when reliable, verifiable options are almost certainly available to you. You can search this site for USA prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/   
    • Scott Adams
      Protein or fat?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      What you're describing is indeed familiar to many in the Celiac community, especially in the early stages of healing. When the intestinal villi are damaged from Celiac disease, they struggle to properly digest and absorb fats, a condition known as bile acid malabsorption. This can cause exactly the kind of cramping and spasms you're seeing, as undigested fats can irritate the sensitive gut lining. It is highly plausible that her reactions to dairy and eggs are linked to their higher fat content rather than the proteins, especially since she tolerates lean chicken breast. The great news is that for many, this does improve with time. As her gut continues to heal on a strict gluten-free diet, her ability to produce the necessary enzymes and bile to break down fats should gradually return, allowing her to slowly tolerate a wider variety of foods. It's a slow process of healing, but your careful approach of focusing on low-fat, nutrient-dense foods like seeds and avocado is providing her system the best possible environment to recover. Many people with celiac disease, especially those who are in the 0-2 year range of their recovery, have additional food intolerance issues which could be temporary. To figure this out you may need to keep a food diary and do an elimination diet over a few months. Some common food intolerance issues are dairy/casein, eggs, corn, oats, and soy. The good news is that after your gut heals (for most people who are 100% gluten-free this will take several months to two years) you may be able to slowly add some these items back into your diet after the damaged villi heal. This article may be helpful: Thank you for sharing your story—it's a valuable insight for other parents navigating similar challenges.
    • Beverage
      Diagnosed celiac for 1-2 months ago and everything makes me bloated.

      By Beverage · Posted

      I had a very rough month after diagnosis. No exaggeration, lost so much inflammatory weight, I looked like a bag of bones, underneath i had been literally starving to death. I did start feeling noticeably better after a month of very strict control of my kitchen and home. What are you eating for breakfast and lunch? I ignored my doc and ate oats, yes they were gluten free, but some brands are at the higher end of gluten free. Lots of celics can eat Bob's Red Mill gluten-free oats, but not me. I can now eat them, but they have to be grown and processed according to the "purity protocol" methods. I mail order them, Montana Gluten-Free brand. A food and symptoms and activities log can be helpful in tracking down issues. You might be totally aware, but I have to mention about the risk of airborne gluten. As the doc that diagnosed me warned . . Remember eyes, ears, nose, and mouth all lead to your stomach and intestines.  Are you getting any cross contamination? Airborne gluten? Any pets eating gluten (they eat it, lick themselves, you pet them...)? Any house remodeling? We live in an older home, always fixing something. I've gotten glutened from the dust from cutting into plaster walls, possibly also plywood (glues). The suggestions by many here on vitamin supplements also really helped me. I had some lingering allergies and asthma, which are now 99% gone. I was taking Albuterol inhaler every hour just to breathe, but thiamine in form of benfotiamine kicked that down to 1-2 times a day within a few days of starting it. Also, since cutting out inflammatory seed oils (canola, sunflower, grapeseed, etc) and cooking with real olive oil, avocado oil, ghee, and coconut oil, I have noticed even greater improvement overall and haven't used the inhaler in months! It takes time to weed out everything in your life that contains gluten, and it takes awhile to heal and rebuild your health. At first it's mentally exhausting, overwhelming, even obsessive, but it gets better and second nature.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.