Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Did I Do Wrong?


Juliebove

Recommended Posts

Juliebove Rising Star

I made this recipe, adding another bell pepper (but it was a small one). I also added about 2 oz. of extra water. No other changes.

Open Original Shared Link

Due to the way my day was playing out, I opted to cook it for 3 hours on high. This just worked out well for me time-wise. I don't usually cook on high if I am not at home and I opted to use my older crockpot thinking that perhaps the new one got hotter. My fear was that it would overcook and be dry.

Instead, as I stirred it, I could feel uncooked rice under my spoon. So I tasted it and indeed the rice was hard. The onions and peppers were not cooked either. And the mix was not soupy, but only a little liquid remained.

Since it's late and we really need to eat dinner, I transferred it all to my large Rachel Ray oval pasta pot, added quite a bit more water, brought it to a boil and have it cooking on low. I am hoping it will get done in about 20 minutes as rice would when cooked on the stove.

I have looked up similar recipes and see that they say to cook for 10 hours on low or 6 hours on high. Could it be that I just didn't cook it for long enough? Should I have added more liquid?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lorka150 Collaborator

What kind of rice did you end up using? Some, like jasmine rice, take 15 to 20 minutes, whereas brown rices take about 50. Could it be that?

Juliebove Rising Star
What kind of rice did you end up using? Some, like jasmine rice, take 15 to 20 minutes, whereas brown rices take about 50. Could it be that?

Texmati. Should take 20 minutes on the stove. I wound up having to cook it for about another half an hour and we didn't like the end result. I think it was the Worchestershire sauce. It smelled oddly fishy and tasted too sweet. Was very soupy too. I had to serve it in mugs.

ang1e0251 Contributor

I have never cooked rice in a crockpot. I learned to eat rice in Colombia. They eat long grain white rice cooked simply for neary every meal. I was taught that on the stove this had to be boiled hard for a time, then the heat lowered until done. Now I admit I was never very good at getting the temp and timing right. Usually just asked my husband to make it.

A couple of years ago he came back from his siser's with an inexpensive rice cooker. Miracle!! I can cook rice perfectly every time!! Best appliance we ever bought! It doesn't take long to cook. If you started it as soon as you walked in the door, it would be ready for dinner while you did every thing else.

We usually cook a big batch to last for several days then just reheat for lunches and meals. DH will often make a batch in the morning and it's done when we go to leave. Just unplug and leave. The nice thing is the cooker turns itself off when the rice is cooked you don't have to check it or anything. Love it!!

Jestgar Rising Star

If your crockpot was really full, it would take longer. The recipe doesn't say what size crockpot. If the person had a 6Qt (for example) and it was only half full, her recipe would have cooked more quickly.

SevenWishes Newbie

Rice can take a looooong time in a crock pot, as the temperature tends to be much lower than when you are using a pot with a flame going underneath it. Even if the stuff in a crock pot is bubbling, the bottom of the pot is quite cooler than the bottom of a saucepan that has that lovely blue flame blasting away at it.

Also, maybe I'm just bitter and cynical, but I've never in my life been particularly satisfied with anything I've ever eaten that has come out of a slow cooker. It seems like it's always "off" just a little bit in some aspect...some ingredient is always just a little overdone or underdone, or it burns on the bottom even though the setting was on medium or low, or it's mushy, or....

I know for many using a slow cooker is nearly a necessity, but I've just never seen any dish come out of one that seems as good as one prepared on a stove top or other ways. If anyone wants to prove me wrong and bring me dinners that will change my mind, though...! :lol:

ang1e0251 Contributor

I have to agree with you. To me crockpot cooking has a certain "flavor" to it I just usually don't like. I do like to use it to make broths or to keep food warm in for a carry-in but for cooking a meal I'd rather have the taste of the stove or oven.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



626Belle Newbie
2 pounds lean ground chuck

2 medium onions, chopped

2 green peppers, chopped

2 cans (14 1/2 ounces) tomatoes

1 can (8 ounces) tomato sauce

1 cup water

2 1/2 teaspoons chili powder

2 1/2 teaspoons salt

2 teaspoons Worcestershire sauce

1 cup rice, (not Minute Rice)

Hmm...seems a little dry, even with whatever juice may come with the tomato products. 1 cup of water and 1 cup of non-instant rice? I do believe only instant rice can be cooked properly with equal amounts of rice and water. Check the bag/box for the rice you used and make sure the liquid ratio is correct. If the finished dish had soaked up almost all of the liquid but there was still uncooked rice, it seems like that could have been caused by an insufficient amount of liquid. I hope it comes out better next time :)

rinne Apprentice
Hmm...seems a little dry, even with whatever juice may come with the tomato products. 1 cup of water and 1 cup of non-instant rice? I do believe only instant rice can be cooked properly with equal amounts of rice and water. Check the bag/box for the rice you used and make sure the liquid ratio is correct. If the finished dish had soaked up almost all of the liquid but there was still uncooked rice, it seems like that could have been caused by an insufficient amount of liquid. I hope it comes out better next time :)

That would be my thinking also although I am sure the temperature of the Crockpot makes a difference. I have a Rival Crockpot and I turn it on high until it starts to boil and then to low for a long simmer and at simmer it bubbles away.

angieInCA Apprentice

The water to rice ratio was right but it sounds like one of two things happened, 1) you just didn't cook it in the crock pot long enough or 2) your crock pot is not getting hot enough. On high your food should have been at a slow boil. Check the type of rice you had. Long grain white rice just takes 15 min on simmer to cook but all others take longer.

Juliebove Rising Star

I've never had trouble cooking rice on the stove, and although I know it is fairly quick to cook it that way, when daughter comes in from two back to back dance classes, she wants to eat right away. Which is why I was trying the crock pot meals.

The crock pot was really full. I believe I used a 3 qt. I think I might try my 6 qt. tonight for the chicken and rice dish.

Thanks!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    3. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.