Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Did I Do Wrong?


Juliebove

Recommended Posts

Juliebove Rising Star

I made this recipe, adding another bell pepper (but it was a small one). I also added about 2 oz. of extra water. No other changes.

Open Original Shared Link

Due to the way my day was playing out, I opted to cook it for 3 hours on high. This just worked out well for me time-wise. I don't usually cook on high if I am not at home and I opted to use my older crockpot thinking that perhaps the new one got hotter. My fear was that it would overcook and be dry.

Instead, as I stirred it, I could feel uncooked rice under my spoon. So I tasted it and indeed the rice was hard. The onions and peppers were not cooked either. And the mix was not soupy, but only a little liquid remained.

Since it's late and we really need to eat dinner, I transferred it all to my large Rachel Ray oval pasta pot, added quite a bit more water, brought it to a boil and have it cooking on low. I am hoping it will get done in about 20 minutes as rice would when cooked on the stove.

I have looked up similar recipes and see that they say to cook for 10 hours on low or 6 hours on high. Could it be that I just didn't cook it for long enough? Should I have added more liquid?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lorka150 Collaborator

What kind of rice did you end up using? Some, like jasmine rice, take 15 to 20 minutes, whereas brown rices take about 50. Could it be that?

Juliebove Rising Star
What kind of rice did you end up using? Some, like jasmine rice, take 15 to 20 minutes, whereas brown rices take about 50. Could it be that?

Texmati. Should take 20 minutes on the stove. I wound up having to cook it for about another half an hour and we didn't like the end result. I think it was the Worchestershire sauce. It smelled oddly fishy and tasted too sweet. Was very soupy too. I had to serve it in mugs.

ang1e0251 Contributor

I have never cooked rice in a crockpot. I learned to eat rice in Colombia. They eat long grain white rice cooked simply for neary every meal. I was taught that on the stove this had to be boiled hard for a time, then the heat lowered until done. Now I admit I was never very good at getting the temp and timing right. Usually just asked my husband to make it.

A couple of years ago he came back from his siser's with an inexpensive rice cooker. Miracle!! I can cook rice perfectly every time!! Best appliance we ever bought! It doesn't take long to cook. If you started it as soon as you walked in the door, it would be ready for dinner while you did every thing else.

We usually cook a big batch to last for several days then just reheat for lunches and meals. DH will often make a batch in the morning and it's done when we go to leave. Just unplug and leave. The nice thing is the cooker turns itself off when the rice is cooked you don't have to check it or anything. Love it!!

Jestgar Rising Star

If your crockpot was really full, it would take longer. The recipe doesn't say what size crockpot. If the person had a 6Qt (for example) and it was only half full, her recipe would have cooked more quickly.

SevenWishes Newbie

Rice can take a looooong time in a crock pot, as the temperature tends to be much lower than when you are using a pot with a flame going underneath it. Even if the stuff in a crock pot is bubbling, the bottom of the pot is quite cooler than the bottom of a saucepan that has that lovely blue flame blasting away at it.

Also, maybe I'm just bitter and cynical, but I've never in my life been particularly satisfied with anything I've ever eaten that has come out of a slow cooker. It seems like it's always "off" just a little bit in some aspect...some ingredient is always just a little overdone or underdone, or it burns on the bottom even though the setting was on medium or low, or it's mushy, or....

I know for many using a slow cooker is nearly a necessity, but I've just never seen any dish come out of one that seems as good as one prepared on a stove top or other ways. If anyone wants to prove me wrong and bring me dinners that will change my mind, though...! :lol:

ang1e0251 Contributor

I have to agree with you. To me crockpot cooking has a certain "flavor" to it I just usually don't like. I do like to use it to make broths or to keep food warm in for a carry-in but for cooking a meal I'd rather have the taste of the stove or oven.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



626Belle Newbie
2 pounds lean ground chuck

2 medium onions, chopped

2 green peppers, chopped

2 cans (14 1/2 ounces) tomatoes

1 can (8 ounces) tomato sauce

1 cup water

2 1/2 teaspoons chili powder

2 1/2 teaspoons salt

2 teaspoons Worcestershire sauce

1 cup rice, (not Minute Rice)

Hmm...seems a little dry, even with whatever juice may come with the tomato products. 1 cup of water and 1 cup of non-instant rice? I do believe only instant rice can be cooked properly with equal amounts of rice and water. Check the bag/box for the rice you used and make sure the liquid ratio is correct. If the finished dish had soaked up almost all of the liquid but there was still uncooked rice, it seems like that could have been caused by an insufficient amount of liquid. I hope it comes out better next time :)

rinne Apprentice
Hmm...seems a little dry, even with whatever juice may come with the tomato products. 1 cup of water and 1 cup of non-instant rice? I do believe only instant rice can be cooked properly with equal amounts of rice and water. Check the bag/box for the rice you used and make sure the liquid ratio is correct. If the finished dish had soaked up almost all of the liquid but there was still uncooked rice, it seems like that could have been caused by an insufficient amount of liquid. I hope it comes out better next time :)

That would be my thinking also although I am sure the temperature of the Crockpot makes a difference. I have a Rival Crockpot and I turn it on high until it starts to boil and then to low for a long simmer and at simmer it bubbles away.

angieInCA Apprentice

The water to rice ratio was right but it sounds like one of two things happened, 1) you just didn't cook it in the crock pot long enough or 2) your crock pot is not getting hot enough. On high your food should have been at a slow boil. Check the type of rice you had. Long grain white rice just takes 15 min on simmer to cook but all others take longer.

Juliebove Rising Star

I've never had trouble cooking rice on the stove, and although I know it is fairly quick to cook it that way, when daughter comes in from two back to back dance classes, she wants to eat right away. Which is why I was trying the crock pot meals.

The crock pot was really full. I believe I used a 3 qt. I think I might try my 6 qt. tonight for the chicken and rice dish.

Thanks!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

    2. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    4. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    5. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,142
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mark Conway
    Newest Member
    Mark Conway
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      no argument. Never take the pills sold for Nuclear events, except in a nuclear event when instructed to by authorities.  Some of these go up to 130 milligrams per pill. 5000 times the strength of the dietary supplement.  130 times the safe upper limit.  130 mg = 130,000 mcg. Dietary supplements like Lugol's Solution and Liquid Iodine are 50 micrograms per drop.  It takes 20 drops to reach the safe upper limit. In the US the Safe upper limit is 1100 mcg.  In Europe 600 mcg and in Japan 3000 mcg ( 3 mg).
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.