Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Too Old To Have Problems With Gluten


poopedout

Recommended Posts

poopedout Apprentice

My doctor told me this problem does not show up for the first time at my age and it occurs in much younger people. I am not sure if he meant celiac disease or gluten intolerance. I am 69 years old. I am wondering if any of you developed this problem at my age or if you were all much younger than I am when you started having problems.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jerseyangel Proficient

My doctor told me this problem does not show up for the first time at my age and it occurs in much younger people. I am not sure if he meant celiac disease or gluten intolerance. I am 69 years old. I am wondering if any of you developed this problem at my age or if you were all much younger than I am when you started having problems.

With all due respect, your doctor is mistaken. I was 49 when diagnosed--after being misdiagnosed for many years. The disease can be triggered at any time in one's life.

sa1937 Community Regular

My doctor told me this problem does not show up for the first time at my age and it occurs in much younger people. I am not sure if he meant celiac disease or gluten intolerance. I am 69 years old. I am wondering if any of you developed this problem at my age or if you were all much younger than I am when you started having problems.

Your doctor is just plain WRONG! I am older than you, had a positive celiac blood panel in Dec., consult with GI doc in late Feb. and was diagnosed with a positive biopsy on April 9. On my initial appt., I asked my GI doc if he didn't think I was a little old to have celiac to which he told me, "No".

It's sad that doctors are so ill-informed about this disease and don't think of testing for it. I believe my daughter also has celiac and quite some time ago, she asked her endocrinologist about it and he told her celiac is very rare. Thankfully he's a top-notch endocrinologist who has her thyroid totally under control for the first time. He's an older doctor so that probably explains why he thinks celiac is "rare".

skigirlchar Newbie

with all due respect (thank you jerseyangel for the appropriate words i just used) your doctor is an idiot.

there many of us have family links to gluten allergies or insensitivity that have never been diagnosed, but when you lay out the symptoms they are EXACTLY the same.

my grandmother, nor great grandmother, ever had a gluten insensitivity diagnosis. instead one had her gall bladder removed, both were told to not eat eggs, were told to cut salt from their diets, and were told to take iron pills.

i was even diagnosed w/ menieres at 25 - something TYPICALLY diagnosed in people in their 40's (though it has been removed since my dr's realized i had the gluten issues.)

heck, my mom is in her 60's and was only recently diagnosed w/ both asthma and a few allergies.

if you take a look at my symptoms and those each had in my family on my mom's side alarm bells start going off.

and as i take a closer and closer look, i really think my dad my have it.

you obviously don't agree w/ your dr since you are asking us...... i would say you probably are also asking us in a round about way if you should get a 2nd opinion..... and i have to say YES, find another dr.

nora-n Rookie

The finnish celiac researchers have studied celiac in old or elderly people, and actually the incidence of cleiac INCREASES with age.

Over 3% of them are celiacs.

So your doctor was educated some decades ago and did not re-educate himself.

He should be finding 3% celiacs amongst his 70-yrs olds if he just would bother to test them, as many are unsymptomatic.

poopedout Apprentice

The finnish celiac researchers have studied celiac in old or elderly people, and actually the incidence of cleiac INCREASES with age.

Over 3% of them are celiacs.

So your doctor was educated some decades ago and did not re-educate himself.

He should be finding 3% celiacs amongst his 70-yrs olds if he just would bother to test them, as many are unsymptomatic.

I thought he was probably wrong, but I wanted to see what people here had to say.

I cannot change doctors. This is Canada, after all.

psawyer Proficient

I cannot change doctors. This is Canada, after all.

You don't say where in Canada you are, but here in Ontario it is difficult but not impossible to change. I have done it three times in the last eight years.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



poopedout Apprentice

You don't say where in Canada you are, but here in Ontario it is difficult but not impossible to change. I have done it three times in the last eight years.

I am in Ontario in an area where no one is taking new patients. They especially will not accept anyone who already has a doctor.

weluvgators Explorer

You may want to start educating your doctor!

My latest reading is Fast Facts: Celiac Disease by Geoffrey Holmes, Carlo Catassi, Alesio Fasano, Second edition.

I bought the book specifically to give it to my doctors. In the Clinical manifestations section it has the following information on page 48,

Celiac disease is being increasingly diagnosed in later life and, today, about 25% of cases are diagnosed in patients over 60 years of age and 10% in those aged over 70 years. Contrary to common belief, 95% of the patients manage a GFD well and enjoy a much improved quality of life.

I think your doctor may need to update his understanding of celiac!

Skylark Collaborator

Bring him this article. It is a particularly powerful study because they followed people for a few years and a few people who were not celiac developed the disease.

Open Original Shared Link

It will look nicer if you use the PDF link at the top right-hand side of the page and print from that.

Generic Apprentice

My great-grandma was diagnosed at the ripe old age of 83. So no it is deffinetly wrong. Also

My mom was diagnosed via the gluten challenge at the age of 62.

poopedout Apprentice

Bring him this article. It is a particularly powerful study because they followed people for a few years and a few people who were not celiac developed the disease.

Open Original Shared Link

It will look nicer if you use the PDF link at the top right-hand side of the page and print from that.

Thanks for the article. It was very informative. It looks like celiac disease will not kill me. It might even make me healthier since my diet is much healthier now that I cannot eat foods containing gluten.

poopedout Apprentice

You may want to start educating your doctor!

My latest reading is Fast Facts: Celiac Disease by Geoffrey Holmes, Carlo Catassi, Alesio Fasano, Second edition.

I bought the book specifically to give it to my doctors. In the Clinical manifestations section it has the following information on page 48,

I think your doctor may need to update his understanding of celiac!

Thanks for the book recommendation. I will try to find it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,021
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    maltawildcat
    Newest Member
    maltawildcat
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • NanCel
    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
    • knitty kitty
      Please do more research before you settle on nicotine. Dr. Paul New house is a psychiatrist.  His latest study involves the effect of nicotine patches on Late Life Depression which has reached no long term conclusions about the benefits.   Effects of open-label transdermal nicotine antidepressant augmentation on affective symptoms and executive function in late-life depression https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39009312/   I'm approaching the subject from the Microbiologist's point of view which shows nicotine blocks Thiamine B1 uptake and usage:   Chronic Nicotine Exposure In Vivo and In Vitro Inhibits Vitamin B1 (Thiamin) Uptake by Pancreatic Acinar Cells https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26633299/   While supplementation with thiamine in the form Benfotiamine can protect from damage done by  nicotine: Benfotiamine attenuates nicotine and uric acid-induced vascular endothelial dysfunction in the rat https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18951979/   I suggest you study the beneficial effects of Thiamine (Benfotiamine and TTFD) on the body and mental health done by Dr. Derrick Lonsdale and Dr. Chandler Marrs.  Dr. Lonsdale had studied thiamine over fifty years.   Hiding in Plain Sight: Modern Thiamine Deficiency https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8533683/ I suggest you read their book Thiamine Deficiency Disease, Dysautonomia, and High Calorie Malnutrition.     Celiac Disease is a disease of malabsorption causing malnutrition.  Thiamine and benfotiamine: Focus on their therapeutic potential https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10682628/
    • sleuth
      Thanks for your response.  Everything you mentioned he is and has been doing.  Tobacco is not the same as nicotine.  Nicotine, in the form of a patch, does not cause gastrointestinal irritation.  Smoking does. He is not smoking.  Please do your research before stating false information. Dr. Paul Newhouse has been doing research on nicotine the last 40 years at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.  
    • Jmartes71
      Im so frustrated and still getting the run around trying to reprove my celiac disease which my past primary ignored for 25 years.I understand that theres a ray of medical that doctors are limited too but not listening and telling the patient ( me) that im not as sensitive as I think and NOT celiac!Correction Mr white coat its not what I think but for cause and affect and past test that are not sticking in my medical records.I get sick violently with foods consumed, not eating the foods will show Im fabulous. After many blood draws and going through doctors I have the HLA- DQ2 positive which I read in a study that Iran conducted that the severity in celiac is in that gene.Im glutenfree and dealing with related issues which core issue of celiac isn't addressed. My skin, right eye, left leg diagestive issues affected. I have high blood pressure because im in pain.Im waisting my time on trying to reprove that Im celiac which is not a disease I want, but unfortunately have.It  has taken over my life personally and professionally. How do I stop getting medically gaslight and get the help needed to bounce back if I ever do bounce back to normal? I thought I was in good care with " celiac specialist " but in her eyes Im good.Im NOT.Sibo positive, IBS, Chronic Fatigue just to name a few and its all related to what I like to call a ghost disease ( celiac) since doctors don't seem to take it seriously. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.