Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

She's Still Saying I Need A Colonoscopy!


TrillumHunter

Recommended Posts

TrillumHunter Enthusiast

Okay, so second follow up with APN I originally convinced to test me for celiac disease. She is still saying I might need a colonoscopy despite me correcting her and giving her literature about it. I said today, "NO, I would need an endoscopy. They would need to biopsy the small intestine. Her answer--"Oh but an endoscopy only looks at the duodenum!" Well, duh!? Isn't that where many of us have damage! I've had pernicious anemia for 13 years!! I've been severely iron def for six! Anyone here think I might have some damage in my duodenum? GRRRR! She is just absolutely clueless--really! I am not having either test anyway as I am showing great improvement going gluten-free.

Thanks for listening! :rolleyes:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kbtoyssni Contributor

Add her to the list of doctors that don't have a clue! Luckily you've done your research so you don't trust your health to her and her limited knowledge of celiac.

Michi8 Contributor

I'm surprised she's not suggesting both an colonoscopy and a gastroscopy (endo), because there is value in checking the colon too...especially if she's trying to rule out any other potential health issues related to the GI tract. But to not suggest gastroscopy at all makes no sense!

If you're having good sucess with the diet, then you're right that there is no reason to do either procedure.

Michelle

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Okay, so second follow up with APN I originally convinced to test me for celiac disease. She is still saying I might need a colonoscopy despite me correcting her and giving her literature about it. I said today, "NO, I would need an endoscopy. They would need to biopsy the small intestine. Her answer--"Oh but an endoscopy only looks at the duodenum!" Well, duh!? Isn't that where many of us have damage! I've had pernicious anemia for 13 years!! I've been severely iron def for six! Anyone here think I might have some damage in my duodenum? GRRRR! She is just absolutely clueless--really! I am not having either test anyway as I am showing great improvement going gluten-free.

Thanks for listening! :rolleyes:

Short and sweet, you need another doctor as this one is clueless (I thought of many other words to use but they are not very nice). Glad to hear you are having good results from the diet that is the most important thing. I do hope you are taking some sublingual B12 on a daily basis that is going to be really important for your healing.

bakingbarb Enthusiast

I have to ask, why is the endoscopy important?

Michi8 Contributor
I have to ask, why is the endoscopy important?

It provides a visual check of how the small intestine looks, and biopsies can be taken to check for villous atrophy. A positive biopsy is considered the "gold standard" for diagnosing celiac disease. However a positive blood test should be enough for diagnosis, as should dietary response.

Michelle

Guest j_mommy

I did the colonoscopy and endo at teh same time!!! Much easier!!!! WE have a history of pulps in my family so they wanted to do both and get a good look at it all!!!!

An endo is the gold standard for DX!!! But all you need is a positive blood test...I wanted to know for sure so I had the endo!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Phyllis28 Apprentice

I wanted to make sure I did not get a clueless GI when I needed a routine screening colonscopy at 50. I contacted the local Celiac Support Group. They provided me with serveral names. I also, looked on the sites of the two university teaching hospitals within driving distance. The sites had a page for each doctor with their education, backround and interests.

I chose one of the GI's recommended by the local Celiac Support Group. He is on staff at the local University teaching hospital. He was very knoweglable about Celiac.

  • 2 weeks later...
miles2go Contributor
Okay, so second follow up with APN I originally convinced to test me for celiac disease. She is still saying I might need a colonoscopy despite me correcting her and giving her literature about it. I said today, "NO, I would need an endoscopy. They would need to biopsy the small intestine. Her answer--"Oh but an endoscopy only looks at the duodenum!" Well, duh!? Isn't that where many of us have damage! I've had pernicious anemia for 13 years!! I've been severely iron def for six! Anyone here think I might have some damage in my duodenum? GRRRR! She is just absolutely clueless--really! I am not having either test anyway as I am showing great improvement going gluten-free.

Thanks for listening! :rolleyes:

Hi TrillumHunter,

I don't know your age or insurance status and like everyone else here, have been through the slew of doctors who don't know very much at all about celiac, but I've had a few who did. Celiacs are at a higher risk for lymphoma in the intestinal tract and for that reason alone, I wish you'd reconsider. Certainly an endoscopy is in order and I had both at the same time. My doc didn't have a clue, but I'm a comp-care insuree, so I can tell them what I want and they have to comply, much as they might not like to. Additionally, I've been to the doctors so much this year that it was a freebie for me, okay not really, but you know what I mean. ;) When my doctor ordered my colonoscopy, I asked for the endoscopy at the same time and gave her my reasoning for it, as I'm wondering if I have refractory sprue. She got this pinched look when I started explaining things, was going to send me to a general surgeon and then said that she'd refer me to a specialist instead. When I got the call for my appointment, I was told that no endoscopy had been ordered and after we got over that hurdle, things didn't get much better. My GI knows nothing about my diet, I woke up during the procedure in excrutiating pain for only about 20 seconds, until they gave me more anaesthesia and sure, it's no day at the beach. But, I now know what's going on in my insides - more when I get the biopsy test results, was a (very) little sore for a couple of days afterwards, know that some of my doctors are uneducated, but hey, I try to be and that's all that matters. My mom certainly has it right, you are your primary health-care provider and everyone else is secondary. For all the uneducated medical professionals out there, I find myself reminding myself that they are after all, just people too. We are the ones who know what's going on with us and it's our responsibility to maintain our health. So after all that soap-boxy stuff, if you don't think you need "the procedure", don't have it, but it sure is nice knowing. And the bit about "returning the air" is enough for a week's worth of comic relief, if nothing else. :)

Bestest,

Margaret

gfpaperdoll Rookie

Trillium Hunter, good for you!!! With that anemia I would not be having a scope done period.

I also suggest you start taking the sublingual B12 right away.

Happy to hear you are improving on the gluten-free diet !!!

I had pernicious anemia which they thought was leukemia, not...

miles2go Contributor

Why wouldn't you have a scope done?

  • 3 months later...
scotty Explorer

alright i will show my ignorance here too...why would you not want a colonoscopy? and what is the difference btween a endoscope and an gastroscope? i had an endoscopy and results were "fine" but celiac was never discussed in fact i was not aware of it yet, i'm wondering though should i have a gasrtoscopy now after 8 months, should i have a colonoscopy as well, will these tell me anything? i though they could get farther in the intestines from the other end....and was the better test for celiac---i was right about to call the GI spec. to set up my colonoscopy too...cuz i got to figure out if i am really fighting the gluten or what here

Michi8 Contributor
alright i will show my ignorance here too...why would you not want a colonoscopy? and what is the difference btween a endoscope and an gastroscope? i had an endoscopy and results were "fine" but celiac was never discussed in fact i was not aware of it yet, i'm wondering though should i have a gasrtoscopy now after 8 months, should i have a colonoscopy as well, will these tell me anything? i though they could get farther in the intestines from the other end....and was the better test for celiac---i was right about to call the GI spec. to set up my colonoscopy too...cuz i got to figure out if i am really fighting the gluten or what here

I believe endoscopy and gastroscopy are virtually the same thing. They are both examining the upper portion of the intestinal tract (duodenum), which is where villous atrophy would be seen. During gastroscopy, the dr will be looking for health issues of the esophagus and stomach as well. Colonoscopy will look at the colon, and can be useful in detecting other potential health issues such as chron's, colitis, tumors, redundant colon, etc. Neither procedure gets too far into the intestines.

Michelle

scotty Explorer
I believe endoscopy and gastroscopy are virtually the same thing. They are both examining the upper portion of the intestinal tract (duodenum), which is where villous atrophy would be seen. During gastroscopy, the dr will be looking for health issues of the esophagus and stomach as well. Colonoscopy will look at the colon, and can be useful in detecting other potential health issues such as chron's, colitis, tumors, redundant colon, etc. Neither procedure gets too far into the intestines.

Michelle

ok. thanks. so........if i was to try and determine if conclusively i had Celiac, going up the rear is a waste of time energy pain and money....? my docs are trying to convince me i have IBS and want to do one now, but imagine they wont find anything, which seems pointless to me. why would they want to look if they are convinced they wont find anything. i told my doc a diet is working. he is not a believer in diets, but he isalso not a beliver that i have anything other than IBS. is it worng to try and get a doc to bring up Celiac, cuz in 5 years i have never got them to. should i go into my new doc when i find one that is, like i know what i am talking about. i guess it is a trust thing. i need someone that will work with me. i wish i could find one to say "i wont stop til i figure out how to make you feel 100%!!"

aprilh Apprentice

I believe she would be doing the colonoscopy to check for internal bleeding since you are so iron deficient. My coworker is having that done due to a small iron deficiency.

Unfortunately, Iron deficiency can be due to so many other issues.

If it were me (and I am a big scaredy cat) I would follow the diet and see if my iron levels improved. If not, then maybe do the colonoscopy and endoscopy.

The problem is that many people can be gluten sensitive not necessarily celiac but still have the same result by going gluten free - by feeling better.

I was gluten intolerant from a whole different reason. I opted not to have the testing done because I responsed so well to the dietary changes.

IBS is just a term that covers up an "underlying issue". When a dr diagnoses someone with IBS I get so pissed! My question is whY! What is causing IBS. They just want to leave it at that. There are many reaons someone develops IBS symptoms and they can be dealt with and your gut healed.

Just my 2 cents!

mushroom Proficient

IBS is just a term that covers up an "underlying issue". When a dr diagnoses someone with IBS I get so pissed! My question is whY! What is causing IBS. They just want to leave it at that. There are many reaons someone develops IBS symptoms and they can be dealt with and your gut healed.

Just my 2 cents!

ccrrgn Newbie
Okay, so second follow up with APN I originally convinced to test me for celiac disease. She is still saying I might need a colonoscopy despite me correcting her and giving her literature about it. I said today, "NO, I would need an endoscopy. They would need to biopsy the small intestine. Her answer--"Oh but an endoscopy only looks at the duodenum!" Well, duh!? Isn't that where many of us have damage! I've had pernicious anemia for 13 years!! I've been severely iron def for six! Anyone here think I might have some damage in my duodenum? GRRRR! She is just absolutely clueless--really! I am not having either test anyway as I am showing great improvement going gluten-free.

Thanks for listening! :rolleyes:

Hi From an other Trillium

I would advise you that what you have done is your best test results.I to was annoyed when my Dr. would not do the tests for me, now I would have to go back to gluten to get an endoscopy that would tell the tale. I am not willing to compromize my health that way, and if I get proof will it effect my chances of getting travel ins. in the future.

Thank you

disneyfan Apprentice
Okay, so second follow up with APN I originally convinced to test me for celiac disease. She is still saying I might need a colonoscopy despite me correcting her and giving her literature about it. I said today, "NO, I would need an endoscopy. They would need to biopsy the small intestine. Her answer--"Oh but an endoscopy only looks at the duodenum!" Well, duh!? Isn't that where many of us have damage! I've had pernicious anemia for 13 years!! I've been severely iron def for six! Anyone here think I might have some damage in my duodenum? GRRRR! She is just absolutely clueless--really! I am not having either test anyway as I am showing great improvement going gluten-free.

Thanks for listening! :rolleyes:

I totally agree with the last post on this topic. If your iron levels are that low, the doctor may be looking for any sign of internal bleeding, not only from your monthly cycle. On the other hand, if you iron levels are that low right now, I'm not sure I would want anyone poking around inside where it could cause additional bleeding!

I have had low iron levels for years. I take Feosol which is sold over the counter. I had been taking 3 tablets a day for several years. Finally, after going gluten free, my hemoglobin levels are stable and normal. I did have heavy cycles and that has seemed to calm down as well. I would suggest if you are taking the iron tablets, try taking one with a glass of orange juice. The vit C will help your body absorb the iron. I also do not take iron on an empty stomach. I will usually take it with a meal.

The other thought is, are you taking an iron tablet that is gluten free? Nature Made makes an iron tablet that is gluten free. I think that your doctor is correct in having you take supplements right now because if you iron levels are that low, you could have additional problems.

I did not have the endoscope because the GI I saw told me it was in my head and go home and eat whatever I wanted. I tried it for about 3 days and could not take it anymore. I will never go back to him or the food!

Hope this helps!

disneyfan Apprentice
I totally agree with the last post on this topic. If your iron levels are that low, the doctor may be looking for any sign of internal bleeding, not only from your monthly cycle. On the other hand, if you iron levels are that low right now, I'm not sure I would want anyone poking around inside where it could cause additional bleeding!

I have had low iron levels for years. I take Feosol which is sold over the counter. I had been taking 3 tablets a day for several years. Finally, after going gluten free, my hemoglobin levels are stable and normal. I did have heavy cycles and that has seemed to calm down as well. I would suggest if you are taking the iron tablets, try taking one with a glass of orange juice. The vit C will help your body absorb the iron. I also do not take iron on an empty stomach. I will usually take it with a meal.

The other thought is, are you taking an iron tablet that is gluten free? Nature Made makes an iron tablet that is gluten free. I think that your doctor is correct in having you take supplements right now because if you iron levels are that low, you could have additional problems.

I did not have the endoscope because the GI I saw told me it was in my head and go home and eat whatever I wanted. I tried it for about 3 days and could not take it anymore. I will never go back to him or the food!

Hope this helps!

P.S. I was referring to the posting by aprilh...

gfcookie Newbie
Okay, so second follow up with APN I originally convinced to test me for celiac disease. She is still saying I might need a colonoscopy despite me correcting her and giving her literature about it. I said today, "NO, I would need an endoscopy. They would need to biopsy the small intestine. Her answer--"Oh but an endoscopy only looks at the duodenum!" Well, duh!? Isn't that where many of us have damage! I've had pernicious anemia for 13 years!! I've been severely iron def for six! Anyone here think I might have some damage in my duodenum? GRRRR! She is just absolutely clueless--really! I am not having either test anyway as I am showing great improvement going gluten-free.

Thanks for listening! :rolleyes:

doesn't sound like she's clueless to me. if you are having celiac like problems, any good doctor will do both an endo and colonoscopy bc celiac has symptoms in common with other IBD. I think the problem is, sometimes doctors tell us what we don't like to hear, even if it is the truth.

TrillumHunter Enthusiast
doesn't sound like she's clueless to me. if you are having celiac like problems, any good doctor will do both an endo and colonoscopy bc celiac has symptoms in common with other IBD. I think the problem is, sometimes doctors tell us what we don't like to hear, even if it is the truth.

Maybe it wasn't clear in my post. She never recommended an endoscopy, only a colonoscopy. She never recommended the celiac panel either. I did. This was a six month follow up after positive blood work. I've been gluten free for almost a year now---and it resolved every medical issue I had. Strange as it may sound, I'm thrilled to have celiac because it means I WASN'T crazy all those years.

Yeah, she's clueless and happy to remain so.

Gemini Experienced
Maybe it wasn't clear in my post. She never recommended an endoscopy, only a colonoscopy. She never recommended the celiac panel either. I did. This was a six month follow up after positive blood work. I've been gluten free for almost a year now---and it resolved every medical issue I had. Strange as it may sound, I'm thrilled to have celiac because it means I WASN'T crazy all those years.

Yeah, she's clueless and happy to remain so.

I would have to agree with you. If you have had excellent results with the diet and are having no problems, any invasive procedure would be not necessary. I certainly would not have them done unless I were having a problem that made it medically necessary. They are the test du jour today though, and doctors push them.

nikky Contributor

its suprising and sad how many doctors are practically completely clueless,

i was lucky enough to get a good GP and GI both of whom know what they are doing, i had a false negative biopsy but my consultant decided to ignore that and go with the blood results

keep going with the diet and dont worry about the doctor

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,898
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MLucia
    Newest Member
    MLucia
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.