Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

62 Years Young - Could I Have Celiac Disease?

Michaelyn

Recommended Posts

Michaelyn Newbie
Michaelyn
Posted

Hi, all,

I've learned alot on this website. I am 62 yrs young.... had pollen/cat allergies all my life, prickly skin (never thought much about it), am now on thyroid medication, generally have loose stools (again, didn't think much about it), sometimes restless leg syndrom..... But for the past year or so (after a very stressful time in my life), I would occasionally get hives which would come and go. Now have very itchy skin. No hives, just hot red spots that itch. Skin testing evealed sensitivity to soy, corn, and sesame, blood test said I am allergic to pork.... I still eat these foods and cannot find a definite link to my itchy skin. Was diagnosed with dermagraphia (sp??). I take an over the counter antihistamine which helps a lot. No gastric problems (only heart burn twice)... nothing on-going. My (non-blood related) nephew was diagnosed with Celiac disease at age 10, so I am not sure if I could be this age and have celiac disease. I have two blood relatives with celiac disease, however, and my mom and aunt were diabetics.... Need an opinion from someone.... is it worth being tested for this disease? Could my now, almost constant itchy skin be related to Celiac disease?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Hi, all,

I've learned alot on this website. I am 62 yrs young.... had pollen/cat allergies all my life, prickly skin (never thought much about it), am now on thyroid medication, generally have loose stools (again, didn't think much about it), sometimes restless leg syndrom..... But for the past year or so (after a very stressful time in my life), I would occasionally get hives which would come and go. Now have very itchy skin. No hives, just hot red spots that itch. Skin testing evealed sensitivity to soy, corn, and sesame, blood test said I am allergic to pork.... I still eat these foods and cannot find a definite link to my itchy skin. Was diagnosed with dermagraphia (sp??). I take an over the counter antihistamine which helps a lot. No gastric problems (only heart burn twice)... nothing on-going. My (non-blood related) nephew was diagnosed with Celiac disease at age 10, so I am not sure if I could be this age and have celiac disease. I have two blood relatives with celiac disease, however, and my mom and aunt were diabetics.... Need an opinion from someone.... is it worth being tested for this disease? Could my now, almost constant itchy skin be related to Celiac disease?

Yes it is worth getting tested. You skin issue could be DH, the skin form of celiac. A derm could biopsy the skin next to a lesion to test for it. If you have DH you have celiac even if you don't have GI issues. Don't go gluten free until all testing is done but try the diet no matter what the test results.

GFinDC Veteran
GFinDC
Posted

HI,

Celiac is not defined by any particular age. That used to be the thinking but not anymore. They used to think only children got celiac, and then outgrew it also. Anyone, any age can get celiac disease. Well, pretty much, it does help to have the genes for it. But there are people without the main genes who still have celiac. So, yes, you could have it. Blood relatives of a known celiac have a higher chance of it a also. The celiac panel is a series of blood antibody tests you could take. You need to keep eating gluten until all testing is done, or the results are no good.

eatmeat4good Enthusiast
eatmeat4good
Posted

But remember the tests are not 100% so even if you do not test positive, you could have Celiac or Gluten Sensitivity. So if you are trying for the testing, yeah stay on gluten, but if you test negative give it a 3 month gluten free trial to see what if any of your symptoms clear up. People come on here all the time at your age and find out that they have Celiac. 90% are undiagnosed, so it makes sense that one can find out at any age.

It's worth a try. I was amazed at all the things that cleared up on going gluten free, including allergies and I have the skin form of Celiac DH. It presented as hive-like welts and bites for a number of years before it blistered. I'm 49 and healthy for the first time in my life. Good luck...I hope you find it helps being gluten free. Some people forego testing so they can go gluten free and find out sooner if it is a problem for them. But it is well worth it whether you do testing or just go gluten free if gluten is contributing to your problems.

rosetapper23 Explorer
rosetapper23
Posted

My mother was diagnosed when she was 68! She had experienced a lifetime of allergy problems (which cleared up after going gluten free) and other medical issues, and now she is healthy and happy at the age of 76.

Funny--I also have dermatographia! I just assumed that it was yet another auto-immune disorder that befell me because of celiac. You may, in fact, have Dermatitis Herpetiformis, as well. I also have that, but I don't consider it as related to the dermatographia.

All the advice you've received so far is spot on--welcome to the celiac club!

MitziG Enthusiast
MitziG
Posted

Definitely get thorough testing asap. With celiacs in your family tree, your chances of having it are higher than normal.

Do NOT go gluten free until all tests, including endoscopy, are done. Going gluten-free now will cause a false negative test result.

After the tests, regardless of the results, try the diet for several months, strictly. You will likely find some relief.

Welcome to the boards. Take some time to look around!

psawyer Proficient
psawyer
Posted

When I asked my PCP to have me tested for celiac disease, I was 45. He told me that it was a rare childhood disease, but if I wanted the test he would order it. (I had been a patient for about 30 years, so I was not some crazy arriving with a theory.) Well, it turns out that 45 was not too old. We have members here who were diagnosed in their sixties. It is never to late to find the truth.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


cap6 Enthusiast
cap6
Posted

Hi ~ 62 is not too old. I was diagnosed two years ago at age 59. You should definitely get tested, especially if you have a diagnosed relative. I strongly believe that my mom passed away from undiagnosed/unteated Celiac. Don't take chances, get tested. And if your doctor is opposed - get someone else! Celiac knows no age limits.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.