Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

American Airlines No-gluten-free Policy


MarathonGirl

Recommended Posts

MarathonGirl Newbie

I am travelling first class from the midwest to Hawaii on December 11, to run the Honolulu Marathon, on December 13. It is now July. I am travelling to Europe later this month, also on American Airlines. American Airlines provides gluten-free meals on overseas flights to Europe. (Thank goodness). When I travel to Hawaii I will be changing planes in LA. American Airlines has flights from LA to Europe, on which they provide gluten-free meals. However, according to Karen Paluch and Customer Service rep Jan at American Airlines in Dallas, American Airlines has made a "business decision" to NOT provide a gluten-free meal on the overseas flight to Hawaii, EVEN THOUGH THEY PROVIDE THOSE MEALS TO OTHER OVERSEAS FLIGHTS ORIGINATING FROM THAT SAME AIRPORT (LAX).

I said that I have a documented disability, and that I don't understand why American chooses not to accomodate it, particularly at an airport where the disability relief I need is being supplied to some overseas flights already. American said IT WAS A BUSINESS DECISION.

When Jan and Karen told me this, I suggested to them that business decisions that result in a lot of negative customer feedback are business decisions that can be changed.

There are 5 months until I fly from LAX to Honolulu. Doesn't it make sense to you, my fellow celiac, that an airlines that supplies some overseas flights originating at LAX with gluten-free meals would, with appropriate prior notice (5 months), also supply my overseas flight with a gluten-free meal for me? What does FIRST CLASS mean, after all? Evidently it does NOT mean first-class service!

Let's give American Airlines some negative feedback so they reconsider this BUSINESS DECISION!

Marathongirl.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MaryJones2 Enthusiast

They probably have different food service contracts for domestic and international flights and technically LAX to Hawaii is domestic. Regardless I'm a little surprised that they wouldn't offer gluten-free in first class on a flight of that duration. I've noticed that sometimes the airline websites allow you to order gluten-free meals but the telephone reps don't have it in their list or vice versa. Also, you could try to get the gate agent to order one when you check in. I'm always surprised at the things the first class purser can get on short notice so you could ask when you get on the plane. Good luck!

Mother of Jibril Enthusiast

If it was me, I don't know that I would trust a "gluten-free" meal from an airline... especially if I was going to something (like a marathon) where I needed to be at my peak physical performance.

I know it's a bummer flying in first class and being unable to enjoy the food... I had that experience back in March (long story). I agree that American could do a lot better job of trying to accomodate a legitimate need. But... I know I would feel better having my own safe, healthy, probably tastier, free-from-cross-contamination, gluten-free meal(s) in my carry-on luggage :P

ohsotired Enthusiast

I think I agree with MOJ - I'd be taking my own food and not trust their meals, especially if I was going somewhere to run a marathon, but if I was going on a trip of any kind. I just wouldn't want to risk being sick the whole time I was there.

elonwy Enthusiast

You'll find this is actually pretty common. Most airlines will only do special meals for international flight, I have yet to find a domestic flight that I have taken with a special meal option.

NJKen Rookie
You'll find this is actually pretty common. Most airlines will only do special meals for international flight, I have yet to find a domestic flight that I have taken with a special meal option.

Continental still offers special meals on coast-to-coast flights in the U.S. and certain other flights, including LAX to Hawaii. The original poster unfortunately chose the wrong airline.

lbd Rookie

I just came back from a vacation to London and Paris. I flew on United and requested gluten-free meals. The meals to Europe were OK and gluten-free. The dinner was chicken and rice and the snack was a crumbled rice cake and a container of applesauce, but at least it was gluten-free. On the way home, the dinner was the worst fish I have ever eaten (which I did not finish) and some veggies. The dinner was served with a packaged non-gluten-free roll! It was definitely a regular roll, identical to my daughter's non-gluten-free meal roll. The snack was two more crumbled rice cakes surrounding some dry chicken and wilted tomatoes. The dessert was a packaged non-gluten-free candy bar with wheat flour listed right in the ingredients. The meal was marked with my name and marked gluten-free Meal. So much for that. Do not trust the airline to get it right. If I hadn't been more observant, I would have been glutened. Next time, I will bring my own snack bars, etc to get me through. Luckily, I did have a pack of M&Ms in my purse!

Laurie


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



laurelfla Enthusiast

But you guys are missing the point! American made a "business decision" to discriminate! Yes, the gluten-free meals on flights are unfortunately notoriously unreliable, but refusing to provide one in the first place, when it's requested so far in advance and obviously not impossible to obtain?? I think that is ridiculous! :angry:

Mother of Jibril Enthusiast

Schools have to accomodate celiacs because kids have to go to school. Private businesses, on the other hand, are allowed to discriminate in certain ways. Nobody is FORCED to fly. If American was losing a lot of business because they don't serve gluten-free meals it would probably convince them to change, but really... I still wouldn't trust them with a gluten-free meal if I was travelling to something important. My son has an allergy to peanuts and there is NO WAY I would let him eat a pre-packaged meal on an airplane. That's the last place to you want to have anaphylaxis :( If people with severe allergies can't get airlines to stop serving peanuts, then I don't see what hope there is for celiacs to change airline policies.

In an ideal world, it would be great if all businesses would accomodate legitimate medical needs and do so in a way that was truly effective... I'm not holding my breath.

Gemini Experienced
But you guys are missing the point! American made a "business decision" to discriminate! Yes, the gluten-free meals on flights are unfortunately notoriously unreliable, but refusing to provide one in the first place, when it's requested so far in advance and obviously not impossible to obtain?? I think that is ridiculous! :angry:

I cringed when you referred to Celiac as a disability as I do not and never will consider myself disabled. Airlines are not required to accommodate anyone with a medical issue with regards to food. They aren't even required to feed you at all. Diabetics, generally, do not get special meals either. I think the airlines that have them on long haul flights are awfully nice for doing so but I've had some pretty crappy gluten-free meals in first class myself.

If Americans want to fly ultra cheap, and they apparently do, you cannot expect airlines to keep the level of service we received 10-20 years ago. I noticed myself, on a first class flight from London in April of this year, how much they were cutting back on services. It was still nice to fly first class BUT it isn't the same first class it was even 10 years ago because the price was so much cheaper. It's all relative.

I usually try to find a safe restaurant at the airport to eat in during a lay-over or bringing my own food/snacks on board. I will say that Virgin Atlantic does a stellar job of accommodating Celiacs but their gluten-free meal this time was yucky. First time I didn't like it but that's the way it goes. I "survived" on red wine and cashews for the flight which wasn't too bad either! ;) They may supply gluten-free meals to Europe over Hawaii because Europe is loaded with Celiacs and the demand may be MUCH higher on those flights than to Hawaii. Many Europeans fly back and forth to the US on business so they always try to accommodate the business world in a big way. It's all about money these days!

Good luck with your marathon!

munchkinette Collaborator

I have had success with some gluten-free meals on flights, but I always take a back up plan. I've done ok on a number of airlines, including Air Canada, but I did have an issue with an Air Canada flight recently. They accidentally gave me a (wrapped) regular roll with my gluten-free meal. Obviously I didn't eat it. They later gave me a sandwich, which I suspected was actually for the vegetarian special meal. I didn't eat that either. I wrote them an email and they gave me a free VIP lounge pass, although that didn't seem like much compensation. I should have had more food with me. The only reason I didn't is because I ran out of Euros.

  • 2 weeks later...
kathropologist Newbie

I had both an amazing experience and a terrible experience on American Airlines in first class! I was already aware of their policy so, I planned ahead and brought food on both flights. On my way to my honeymoon (my mood might have had something to do with it), one of the flight attendants was gluten-intolerant and was super nice about everything! She told me that the nuts were okay to eat and made me a salad. I was made to feel like a normal person - wow, imagine that! On the way back to Dallas, however, I had a completely different experience. The flight attendants brought me to tears! I asked if the chicken had gravy on it and they told me they didn't know. I explained that I had an allergy and they started laughing! "Allergic to wheat? That's weird," one of the ladies laughed with another customer! This is first class! Then they went off that it wasn't their business to know what was in the food and they couldn't be held accountable for what I ate. Real nice.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Judy Wysocki
    Newest Member
    Judy Wysocki
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.