Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Super Sensitive People

Non-scientific discussions for those who react to lower levels of gluten than most.


546 topics in this forum

  1. KayM
    • 10 replies
    • 5.2k views
  2. Rcshumay
    psawyer
    • 1 reply
    • 3k views
  3. Jenniferxgfx
    dilettantesteph
    • 5 replies
    • 3.2k views

  4. Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  5. mrs.monicahall
    GFinDC
    • 7 replies
    • 2.6k views
  6. lovetapioca
    dilettantesteph
    • 57 replies
    • 27.1k views
  7. squirmingitch
    West Coast Canuck
    • 33 replies
    • 12.4k views
  8. carolynmay
    kareng
    • 6 replies
    • 9.3k views
  9. Justaglimmer
    IrishHeart
    • 11 replies
    • 3.9k views
  10. Brit6181
    Joe0123
    • 3 replies
    • 2.7k views

  11. Celiac.com Sponsor (A10):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A10):

  12. Kathyl067
    cyclinglady
    • 2 replies
    • 2.1k views
  13. Gabybelle
    RNGayle
    • 10 replies
    • 56.9k views
  14. luvs2eat
    • 5 replies
    • 3.1k views
  15. 1desperateladysaved
    dilettantesteph
    • 3 replies
    • 2.4k views
  16. T.H.
    lihaoqing
    • 11 replies
    • 5k views
  17. shayre
    oceangirl
    • 7 replies
    • 4k views
  18. minnasagi
    T.H.
    • 4 replies
    • 4.2k views
  19. felps89
    GF Lover
    • 2 replies
    • 2.9k views
  20. CNV2855
    kareng
    • 22 replies
    • 10.4k views
  21. answerseeker
    GFinDC
    • 15 replies
    • 4.9k views
  22. 1desperateladysaved
    • 0 replies
    • 1.8k views
  23. Tigercat17
    moosemalibu
    • 4 replies
    • 4.5k views
  24. BelleVie
    LauraTX
    • 34 replies
    • 9.1k views
  25. susan7fink
    • 4 replies
    • 3.4k views
  26. 1desperateladysaved
    w8in4dave
    • 16 replies
    • 6.9k views
  27. T.H.
    dilettantesteph
    • 9 replies
    • 3.1k views
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,159
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Greymo
    Newest Member
    Greymo
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.